The scent world of cats: where to place a urine scent mark to increase signal persistence?
In: Animal BiologySearch for other papers by Maja Mohorović in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Miha Krofel in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Scent-marking is a predominant form of communication among felids, with urine spraying having a key role. Detectability and longevity of scent marks are recognized as crucial for efficiency of scent-marking, but there is limited research that has tested scent persistence with respect to various environmental factors. We used an experimental framework to measure human-perceived strength of felid urine smell and determine the effects of substrate, tilt and aspect of marked surfaces on persistence of the simulated scent marks. We used area under the curve (AUC), calculated for the scent strength of each scent-marked surface over time, as a proxy for urine scent preservation. Thereafter, we used ANOVA, followed by analysis of differences of interest between the marking sites, to assess the effect of environmental factors on human-perceived scent mark persistence. Odour persisted significantly better on rough surfaces, surfaces covered with moss and on surfaces with overhanging tilts, while there was no significant difference between the northerly- and southerly-oriented surfaces. The results are generally in accordance with the use and selection of marking sites previously reported for wild felids throughout the world, confirming that in their marking behaviour felids strive to prolong the persistence of scent marks. This knowledge will help researchers in interpretation of data on scent-marking and to evaluate the adaptive significance of this behaviour.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ahlborn, G.G. & Jackson, R.M. (1988) Marking in free-ranging snow leopards in west Nepal: a preliminary assessment. In: H. Freeman (Ed.) Proceedings of the 5th International Snow Leopard Symposium, pp. 25-49. International Snow Leopard Trust and Wildlife Institute of India, Seattle, Washington.
-
Alberts, A.C. (1992) Constraints on the design of chemical communication systems in terrestrial vertebrates. Am. Nat., 139, S62-S89. DOI:10.1086/285305.
-
Allen, M.L., Wittmer, H., Houghtaling, P., Smith, J., Elbroch, L.M. & Wilmers, C.C. (2015) The role of scent marking in mate selection by female pumas (Puma concolor). PLoS One, 10, e0139087. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139087.
-
Allen, M.L., Wittmer, H.U., Setiawan, E., Jaffe, S. & Marshall, A.J. (2016a) Scent marking in Sunda clouded leopards (Neofelis diardi): novel observations close a key gap in understanding felid communication behaviours. Sci. Rep., 6, 35433. DOI:10.1038/srep35433.
-
Allen, M.L., Yovovich, V. & Wilmers, C.C. (2016b) Evaluating the responses of a territorial solitary carnivore to potential mates and competitors. Sci. Rep., 6, 27257. DOI:10.1038/srep27257.
-
Allen, M.L., Hočevar, L., de Groot, M. & Krofel, M. (2017) Where to leave a message? The selection and adaptive significance of scent-marking sites for Eurasian lynx. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 71, 136. DOI:10.1007/s00265-017-2366-5.
-
ARSO (2019) Archive of meteorological data. Agencija Republike Slovenije za okolje. http://www.meteo.si/met/sl/archive/ (last accessed 29 Nov. 2019).
-
Asa, C.S. (1993) Relative contributions of urine and anal-sac secretions in scent marks of large felids. Am. Zool., 33, 167-172. DOI:10.1093/icb/33.2.167.
-
Bailey, T.N. (1974) Social organization in a bobcat population. J. Wildlife Manage., 38, 435-446. DOI:10.2307/3800874.
-
Barja, I. (2003) Patrones de señalización con heces en el lobo ibérico. Etología, 11, 1-7.
-
Barja, I. (2009) Decision making in plant selection during the faecal-marking behaviour of wild wolves. Anim. Behav., 77, 489-493. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.11.004.
-
Black-Décima, P. (2000) Home range, social structure, and scent marking behavior in brown brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira) in a large enclosure. Mastozool. Neotrop., 7, 5-14.
-
Bothma, J. du P. & le Richet, E.A.N. (1995) Evidence of the use of rubbing, scent-marking and scratching-posts by Kalahari leopards. J. Arid Environ., 29, 511-517. DOI:10.1016/S0140-1963(95)80023-9.
-
Burger, B.V., Viviers, M.Z., Bekker, J.P.I., le Roux, M., Fish, N., Fourie, W.B. & Weibchen, G. (2008) Chemical characterization of territorial marking fluid of male Bengal tiger, Panthera tigris. J. Chem. Ecol., 34, 659. DOI:10.1007/s10886-008-9462-y.
-
Caragiulo, A., Pickles, R.S.A., Smith, J.A., Smith, O., Goodrich, J. & Amato, G. (2015) Tiger (Panthera tigris) scent DNA: a valuable conservation tool for individual identification and population monitoring. Conserv. Genet. Resour., 7, 681-683. DOI:10.1007/s12686-015-0476-9.
-
Clapham, M., Nevin, O.T., Ramsey, A.D. & Rosell, F. (2012) A hypothetico-deductive approach to assessing the social function of chemical signalling in a non-territorial solitary carnivore. PLoS One, 7, e35404. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0035404.
-
Conover, R.C. (2007) Predator-Prey Dynamics: the Role of Olfaction. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
-
Eaton, R.L. (1970) Group interactions, spacing and territoriality in cheetahs. Z. Tierpsychol., 27, 481-491. DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1970.tb01882.x.
-
Feldman, H.N. (1994) Methods of scent marking in the domestic cat. Can. J. Zool., 72, 1093-1099. DOI:10.1139/z94-147.
-
Gese, E.M. & Ruff, R.L. (1997) Scent-marking by coyotes, Canis latrans: the influence of social and ecological factors. Anim. Behav., 54, 1155-1166. DOI:10.1006/anbe.1997.0561.
-
Gorman, M.L. & Trowbridge, B.J. (1989) The role of odor in the social lives of carnivores. In: J.L. Gittleman (Ed.) Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution, pp. 57-88. Springer US, Boston, MA, USA. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4757-4716-4_3.
-
Gosling, L.M. & Roberts, S.C. (2001) Scent-marking by male mammals: cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates. In: P.J.B. Slater, J.S. Rosenblatt, C.T. Snowdon & T.J. Roper (Eds) Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol. 30, pp. 169-217. Academic Press, London. DOI:10.1016/S0065-3454(01)80007-3.
-
Haswell, P.M., Jones, K.A., Kusak, J. & Hayward, M.W. (2018) Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators. Oecologia, 187, 573-583. DOI:10.1007/s00442-018-4133-3.
-
Hirano, Z.M.B., Correa, I.C. & de Oliveira, D.A.G. (2008) Contexts of rubbing behavior in Alouatta guariba clamitans: a scent-marking role? Am. J. Primatol., 70, 575-583. DOI:10.1002/ajp.20531.
-
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F. & Westfall, P. (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom. J., 50, 346-363. DOI:10.1002/bimj.200810425.
-
Jackson, R.M. (1996) Home Range, Movements and Habitat Use of Snow Leopard (Uncia Uncia) in Nepal. PhD dissertation. University of London (External Programme), London, UK.
-
Kimura, R. (2000) Relationship of the type of social organization to scent-marking and mutual-grooming behaviour in Grevy’s (Equus grevyi) and Grant’s Zebras (Equus burchelli bohmi). J. Equine Sci., 11, 91-98.
-
Kitchener, A.C. (2000) Are cats really solitary? Lutra, 43, 1-10.
-
Krofel, M., Hočevar, L. & Allen, M.L. (2017) Does human infrastructure shape scent marking in a solitary felid? Mamm. Biol., 87, 36-39. DOI:10.1016/j.mambio.2017.05.003.
-
Kurien, B.T., Everds, N.E. & Scofield, R.H. (2004) Experimental animal urine collection: a review. Lab. Anim., 38, 333-361. DOI:10.1258/0023677041958945.
-
Mattisson, J., Segerström, P., Persson, J., Aronsson, M., Rauset, G.R., Samelius, G. & Andrén, H. (2013) Lethal male-male interactions in Eurasian lynx. Mamm. Biol., 78, 304-308. DOI:10.1016/j.mambio.2012.11.006.
-
McGann, J.P. (2017) Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth. Science, 356, eaam7263. DOI:10.1126/science.aam7263.
-
Mellen, J.D. (1993) A comparative analysis of scent-marking, social and reproductive behavior in 20 species of small cats (Felis). Am. Zool., 33, 151-166. DOI:10.1093/icb/33.2.151.
-
Mertl-millhollen, A.S. (2006) Scent marking as resource defense by female Lemur catta. Am. J. Primatol., 68, 605-621. DOI:10.1002/ajp.20255.
-
Nie, Y., Swaisgood, R.R., Zhang, Z., Hu, Y., Ma, Y. & Wei, F. (2012) Giant panda scent-marking strategies in the wild: role of season, sex and marking surface. Anim. Behav., 84, 39-44. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.026.
-
Owen, S.M., Boissard, C. & Hewitt, C.N. (2001) Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from 40 Mediterranean plant species: VOC speciation and extrapolation to habitat scale. Atmos. Environ., 35, 5393-5409. DOI:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00302-8.
-
Piñeiro, A. & Barja, I. (2012) The plant physical features selected by wildcats as signal posts: an economic approach to fecal marking. Naturwissenschaften, 99, 801-809. DOI:10.1007/s00114-012-0962-9.
-
R Core Team (2019) R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://cran.r-project.org.
-
Remonti, L., Balestrieri, A., Smiroldo, G. & Prigioni, C. (2011) Scent marking of key food sources in the Eurasian otter. Ann. Zool. Fennici, 48, 287-294. DOI:10.5735/086.048.0503.
-
Roper, T.J., Conradt, L., Butler, J., Christian, S.E., Ostler, J. & Schmid, T.K. (1993) Territorial marking with faeces in badgers (Meles meles): a comparison of boundary and hinterland latrine use. Behaviour, 127, 289-307. DOI:10.1163/156853993X00074.
-
Rosenthal, G.G. & Ryan, M.J. (2000) Visual and acoustic communication in non-human animals: a comparison. J. Biosci., 25, 285-290. DOI:10.1007/BF02703937.
-
Rostain, R.R., Ben-David, M., Groves, P. & Randall, J.A. (2004) Why do river otters scent-mark? An experimental test of several hypotheses. Anim. Behav., 68, 703-711. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.027.
-
Ruiz-Olmo, J., Such-Sanz, A. & Piñol, C. (2013) Substrate selection for urine spraying in captive wildcats. J. Zool., 290, 143-150. DOI:10.1111/jzo.12025.
-
Sharma, S., Dutta, T. & Bhatnagar, Y.V. (2006) Marking site selection by free ranging snow leopard (Uncia uncia). In: J.A. McNeely, T.M. McCarthy, A. Smith, L. Olsvig-Whittaker & E.D. Wikramanayake (Eds) Conservation Biology in Asia, pp. 197-213. Society for Conservation Biology Asia Section and Resources Himalaya, Kathmandu, Nepal.
-
Smith, J.L.D., McDougal, C. & Miquelle, D. (1989) Scent marking in free-ranging tigers, Panthera tigris. Anim. Behav., 37, 1-10. DOI:10.1016/0003-3472(89)90001-8.
-
Soler, L., Lucherini, M., Manfredi, C., Ciuccio, M. & Casanave, E.B. (2009) Characteristics of defecation sites in the Geoffroy’s cat Leopardus geoffroyi. Mastozool. Neotrop., 16, 485-489.
-
Sunquist, M. & Sunquist, F. (2002) Wild Cats of the World. 1st Edition. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
-
Tai, M.M. (1994) A mathematical model for the determination of total area under glucose tolerance and other metabolic curves. Diabetes Care, 17, 152-154. DOI:10.2337/diacare.17.2.152.
-
Vogt, K., Zimmermann, F., Kölliker, M. & Breitenmoser, U. (2014) Scent-marking behaviour and social dynamics in a wild population of Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx. Behav. Process., 106, 98-106. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.04.017.
-
Vogt, K., Boos, S., Breitenmoser, U. & Kölliker, M. (2016a) Chemical composition of Eurasian lynx urine conveys information on reproductive state, individual identity, and urine age. Chemoecology, 26, 205-217. DOI:10.1007/s00049-016-0220-2.
-
Vogt, K., Hofer, E., Ryser, A., Kölliker, M. & Breitenmoser, U. (2016b) Is there a trade-off between scent marking and hunting behaviour in a stalking predator, the Eurasian lynx, Lynx lynx? Anim. Behav., 117, 59-68. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.004.
-
Walker, J.C. & Jennings, R.A. (1991) Comparison of odor perception in humans and animals. In: D.G. Laing, R.L. Doty & W. Breipohl (Eds) The Human Sense of Smell, pp. 261-280. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-76223-9_13.
-
Wickham, H. (2016) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.
-
Zala, S.M., Potts, W.K. & Penn, D.J. (2004) Scent-marking displays provide honest signals of health and infection. Behav. Ecol., 15, 338-344. DOI:10.1093/beheco/arh022.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1294 | 325 | 32 |
| Full Text Views | 58 | 8 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 85 | 17 | 0 |
The scent world of cats: where to place a urine scent mark to increase signal persistence?
In: Animal BiologySearch for other papers by Maja Mohorović in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Miha Krofel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Scent-marking is a predominant form of communication among felids, with urine spraying having a key role. Detectability and longevity of scent marks are recognized as crucial for efficiency of scent-marking, but there is limited research that has tested scent persistence with respect to various environmental factors. We used an experimental framework to measure human-perceived strength of felid urine smell and determine the effects of substrate, tilt and aspect of marked surfaces on persistence of the simulated scent marks. We used area under the curve (AUC), calculated for the scent strength of each scent-marked surface over time, as a proxy for urine scent preservation. Thereafter, we used ANOVA, followed by analysis of differences of interest between the marking sites, to assess the effect of environmental factors on human-perceived scent mark persistence. Odour persisted significantly better on rough surfaces, surfaces covered with moss and on surfaces with overhanging tilts, while there was no significant difference between the northerly- and southerly-oriented surfaces. The results are generally in accordance with the use and selection of marking sites previously reported for wild felids throughout the world, confirming that in their marking behaviour felids strive to prolong the persistence of scent marks. This knowledge will help researchers in interpretation of data on scent-marking and to evaluate the adaptive significance of this behaviour.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1294 | 325 | 32 |
| Full Text Views | 58 | 8 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 85 | 17 | 0 |