Factors Underlying Return Migration Decisions among Nigerian Victims of 2019 Xenophobic Violence in South Africa
In: African DiasporaUniversity of Ibadan Diaspora and Transnational Studies Unit, Institute of African Studies Nigeria Ibadan
Search for other papers by Oludayo Tade in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Studies on xenophobic violence have mainly focused on their causes and effects, but have yet to probe how victimisation experiences of xenophobia trigger migration intentions and actual practices. In a balance of tales, I examine how families contributed to staying put/return decisions by Nigerian migrants in South Africa following the September 2019 xenophobic violence. The study asks: to what extent do family facilitate and/or contribute to the decision to return? And how do return strategies unveil the centrality of family in taking migration decisions? Data emerged through online interviews with Nigerian immigrants in South Africa who stayed put, and six family members in Nigeria were reached through snowball sampling. This was supplemented with secondary interviews conducted with Nigerian returnees in three National newspapers (The Punch, Vanguard, Nigerian Tribune and The Nation newspapers). Findings show the centrality of family in both migration intentions, staying-put, and the actual practices of Nigerian victims of xenophobia in South Africa.
Résumé
Les études sur les violences xénophobes se sont majoritairement concentrées sur les causes et les effets de celles-ci. Pourtant, il reste à décrire comment les expériences de victimisation xénophobe peuvent être à l’ origine des intentions voire des prises de décision de rentrer au pays. A travers des récits, j’ ai étudié la manière dont des familles ont contribué à la décision de migrants nigérians en Afrique du sud de rester/rentrer suite aux violences xénophobes de septembre 2019. Cet article pose la question suivante : dans quelle mesure la famille joue-t-elle un rôle dans la prise de décision du retour ? Et comment les stratégies de retour mettent au jour la place centrale de celle-ci dans les décisions migratoires ? Les données provenant d’ entretiens en ligne avec des migrants nigérians en Afrique du sud qui sont restés sur place et six membres de leurs famille au Nigéria. Des entretiens secondaires avec des migrants nigérians rentrés chez eux dans quatre journaux nationaux (The Punch, Vanguard, Nigerian Tribune et The Nation) ont complété ce tableau. Les recherches ont établi la centralité de la famille dans les intentions migratoires, – rester –, et les actions réelles posées par les victimes nigérianes de xénophobie en Afrique du sud.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Adebayo, Oluwatoyin, K. 2019. ‘‘I Don’t Want to Have a Separated Home’: Reckoning Family and Return Migration Among Married Nigerians in China.’ Migration Studies, 8 (2): 250–270.
-
Adida, Claire, L. 2014. Immigrants Exclusion and Insecurity in Africa: Co-ethnic Strangers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Afeez, Hanafi. 2019 Xenophobia: Our South African Classmates Bully, Tell us to Leave their Country – Nigerian Pupils. Available at https://punchng.com/our-safrican-classmates-bully-tell-us-to-leave-their-country-nigerian-pupils/. Accessed 7 August 2021.
-
Akiwowo, Akinsola, A. 1983. Ajobi and Ajogbe: Variations on the Theme of Sociation. Ife: University of Ife Press.
-
Baldassar, Lorreta., Majella Kilkey, Laura Merla and Raelane Wilding. 2018. ‘Transnational Families in the Era of Global Mobility.’ In Handbook of Migration and Globalisation, edited by A. Triandafyllidou. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Pp. 431–443.
-
Cassarino, Jean-Pierre. 2008. ‘The Conditions of Modern Return Migrant – Editorial Introduction.’ International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 10 (2): 95–105.
-
Cassarino, Jean-Pierre. 2004. ‘Theorising Return Migration: The Conceptual Approach to Return Migrants Revisited.’ International Journal of Multicultural Societies, 6 (2): 253–279.
-
Claassen, Christopher. 2014. ‘Who Participates in Communal Violence? Survey Evidence from South Africa.’ Research and Politics.
-
Carling, Jorgen. 2004. ‘Emigration, Return and Development in Cape Verde: The Impact of Closing Borders,’ Population, Space and Place, 10 (2): 113–132.
-
Claassen, Christopher. 2017. ‘Explaining South African Xenophobia.’ Afro Barometer, Working Paper 173.
-
Crush., Jonathan. 2001. ‘The Dark Side of Democracy: Migration, Xenophobia and Human Rights in South Africa.’ International Migration, 38 (6): 103–133.
-
Crush, Jonathan; Godfrey Tawodzera, Chikanda Abel, Suraja Ramachandran and Daniel Tevera. 2017. Migrants in Countries in Crisis: South Africa Case Study: The Double Crisis – Mass Migration from Zimbabwe and Xenophobic Violence in South Africa. Vienna: International Centre for Migration Policy Development.
-
De Hass, Hein. 2005. ‘International Migration, Remittances and Development: Myths and Facts.’ Third World Quarterly, 26 (8): 1269–1284.
-
De Hass, Hein. 2011. The Determinants of International Migration. Conceptualising Policy, Origin and Destination Effects. DEMIG Project Paper 2.
-
Duda-Mikulin, Eva, A. 2017. ‘“Should I Stay or Should I Go?” Exploring Polish Women’s Returns Home.’ International Migration, 56 (4): 140–153.
-
Essa, Azad and Khadjia Patel. 2015. South Africa and Nigeria Spar Over Xenophobic Violence. Mail & Guardian online, 28 April 2015. Available at http://mg.co.za/article/2015-04-28-south-africa-and-Nigeria-spar-over-xenophobic-violence. Accessed 12 August 2021.
-
Elijah, Yendaw. 2013. ‘A Study of the Underlying Determinants of Return Migration of International Return Migrants to the Berekum Municipality, Ghana,’ International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 5/8: 297.
-
Flahaux, Maurie-Laurence and Hein De Haas. 2016. ‘African Migration: Trends, Patterns, Drivers.’ Comparative Migration Studies 4: 1–25.
-
Flahaux, Maurie-Laurence. 2014. The Influence of Migration Policies in Europe on Return Migration to Senegal. Working Paper Series 93, Oxford: International Migration Institute.
-
Flahaux, Maurie-Laurence. 2017. ‘The Role of Migration Policy Changes in Europe for Return Migration to Senegal,’ International Migration Review, 51/4: 868–892.
-
Friedman, Debra and Michael Hechter. 1988. ‘The Contribution of Rational Choice Theory to Macrosociological Research.’ Sociological Theory, 6: 201–218.
-
Godin, Marie and Giorgia Dona. 2016. ‘“Refugee Voices”: New Social Media and the Politics of Representation: Young Congolese in the Diaspora and Beyond.’ Refugee, 32 (1): 60–71.
-
Hall, James. 2015. ‘Anti-Foreigner Violence Exposes Festering Conflict in South Africa.’ Africa Conflict Monitor, 71–77.
-
Harris, Adam S, Michael G. Findley, Daniel L. Nielson and Kennard L. Noyes. 2018. ‘The Economic Roots of Anti-Immigrant Prejudice in the Global South: Evidence from South Africa.’ Political Research Quarterly, 71 (1): 228–241.
-
Hechter, Michael and Satoshi Kanazawa. 1997. ‘Sociological Rational Choice Theory.’ Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 191–214.
-
Landau, Lauren B. 2011. ‘Loving the Alien? Citizenship, Law and the Future in South Africa’s Demonic Society.’ African Affairs, 109 (435): 213–230.
-
Landau, Lauren B. 2012. ‘Introducing the Demons.’ In Excorsing the Demons Within: Xenophobia, Violence and Statecraft in Contemporary South Africa, edited by Lauren. B. Landau. Johannesburg: Wits University Press. Pp. 1–25.
-
Levin, Irene and Jan Trost. 1992. ‘Understanding the Concept of Family.’ Family Relations, 41 (3): 348–351.
-
Matsinhe, David M. 2011. ‘Africa’s Fear of Itself: The Ideology of Makwerekwere in South Africa.’ Third World Quarterly, 32 (2): 295–313.
-
Neocosmos, Michael. 2010. From Foreign Natives to Native Foreigners: Explaining Xenophobia in Post-Apartheid South Africa Citizenship and Nationalism, Identity and Politics. Dakar: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA).
-
Nyar, Annsilla. 2010. What Happened? A Narrative of the May 2008 Xenophobic Violence. In South African Civil and Xenophobia, edited by D. Everatt. Johannesburg: Strategy & Tactics. Pp. 7.
-
Oyewumi, Oyeronke. 2000. ‘Family Bonds/Conceptual Binds: African Notes on Feminist Epistemologies.’ Signs, 25 (4): 1093–1098.
-
Phillips, Everard M. 2011. ‘Pain, Suffering, and Humiliation: The Systematization of Violence in Kidnapping for Ransom.’ Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 20: 845–869.
-
Piper, Laurence and Andrew Charman. 2012. ‘Xenophobia, Criminality and Violent Entrepreneurship: Violence Against Somali Shopkeepers in Delft South, Cape Town, South Africa.’ South African Review of Sociology, 43 (3): 81–105.
-
Saturday Punch Newspaper (2019). ‘Xenophobia: S’Africa may Place 10-Year Travel Ban on Evacuated Nigerians.’ 14 September 2019. Available at https://punchng.com/xenophobia-safrica-may-place-10-year-travel-ban-on-evacuated-nigerians/. Accessed 16 October 2019.
-
Saturday Vanguard. 2019. ‘Xenophobic Rage: Why we Don’t Want to Return Home.’ 14 September 2019. Available at https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/09/xenophobic-rage-why-we-dont-want-to-return-home/. Accessed 16 October 2019.
-
Schoumaker, Bruno, Maurie-Laurence Flahaux, Djamila Schans, Cris Beauchemin, Valentina Mazzucato and Pape Sakho. 2015. ‘Changing Patterns of African Migration: A Comparative Analysis.’ MAFE Working Paper 18.
-
Sinatti, Giulia. 2011. ‘‘Mobile Transmigrants’ or ‘Unsettled Returnees’? Myth of Return and Permanent Resettlement among Senegalese Migrants’, Population, Space and Place, 17 (2): 153–166.
-
Tade, Oludayo, Usman A Ojedokun and Adeyinka A. Aderinto. 2019. ‘‘I Went through Hell’: Strategies for Kidnapping and Victims’ Experiences in Nigeria.’ Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 29 (10): 1244–1256.
-
Tade, Oludayo and Olusoji E. Aiyebo. 2014. ‘Commodifying the Fabric of Solidarity: Aso-ebi and Dynamics of Social Relations in Ibadan.’ South African Review of Sociology, 45 (1): 66–82.
-
Tade, Oludayo and Nonyerem Onwuanaegbule. 2020. ‘“They Cut my Son’s Head, Legs and Hands Before Me”: Pre- and Post-Terror Experiences Among Returnee Victims of Boko Haram in Orlu, Imo State.’ Canadian Journal of African Studies, 54 (2): 329–337.
-
Tunde, Ajaja. 2019. ‘Deaths: Nigerians as Endangered People at Home and Abroad.’ 14 September 2019. Available at https://punchng.com/deaths-nigerians-as-endangered-people-at-home-and-abroad/. Accessed 7 August 2021.
-
Kevin, Osage O. 2019. Xenophobic attacks: Returnees relive ordeal, demand revenge against south Africa. 14 September 2019. Available at https://thenationonlineng.net/xenophobic-attacks-returnees-relive-ordeal-demand-revenge-against-south-africa/. Accessed 16 October 2021.
-
Xenowatch. 2019. Monitoring Xenophobia violence in South Africa: January–September 2019. Available at http://www.migration.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Factsheet-1-Xenohopbic-violence-incidents-in-SA_-Jan-Sept-2019.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2019.
-
Zaiceva, Anzelika and Klaus F. Zimmermann. 2012. ‘Returning Home at Times of Trouble? Return Migration of EU Enlargement Migrants during the Crisis.’ IZA Discussion Paper No. 7111. Bonn: IZA.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2009 | 291 | 27 |
| Full Text Views | 22 | 3 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 40 | 6 | 2 |
Factors Underlying Return Migration Decisions among Nigerian Victims of 2019 Xenophobic Violence in South Africa
In: African DiasporaUniversity of Ibadan Diaspora and Transnational Studies Unit, Institute of African Studies Nigeria Ibadan
Search for other papers by Oludayo Tade in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Studies on xenophobic violence have mainly focused on their causes and effects, but have yet to probe how victimisation experiences of xenophobia trigger migration intentions and actual practices. In a balance of tales, I examine how families contributed to staying put/return decisions by Nigerian migrants in South Africa following the September 2019 xenophobic violence. The study asks: to what extent do family facilitate and/or contribute to the decision to return? And how do return strategies unveil the centrality of family in taking migration decisions? Data emerged through online interviews with Nigerian immigrants in South Africa who stayed put, and six family members in Nigeria were reached through snowball sampling. This was supplemented with secondary interviews conducted with Nigerian returnees in three National newspapers (The Punch, Vanguard, Nigerian Tribune and The Nation newspapers). Findings show the centrality of family in both migration intentions, staying-put, and the actual practices of Nigerian victims of xenophobia in South Africa.
Résumé
Les études sur les violences xénophobes se sont majoritairement concentrées sur les causes et les effets de celles-ci. Pourtant, il reste à décrire comment les expériences de victimisation xénophobe peuvent être à l’ origine des intentions voire des prises de décision de rentrer au pays. A travers des récits, j’ ai étudié la manière dont des familles ont contribué à la décision de migrants nigérians en Afrique du sud de rester/rentrer suite aux violences xénophobes de septembre 2019. Cet article pose la question suivante : dans quelle mesure la famille joue-t-elle un rôle dans la prise de décision du retour ? Et comment les stratégies de retour mettent au jour la place centrale de celle-ci dans les décisions migratoires ? Les données provenant d’ entretiens en ligne avec des migrants nigérians en Afrique du sud qui sont restés sur place et six membres de leurs famille au Nigéria. Des entretiens secondaires avec des migrants nigérians rentrés chez eux dans quatre journaux nationaux (The Punch, Vanguard, Nigerian Tribune et The Nation) ont complété ce tableau. Les recherches ont établi la centralité de la famille dans les intentions migratoires, – rester –, et les actions réelles posées par les victimes nigérianes de xénophobie en Afrique du sud.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2009 | 291 | 27 |
| Full Text Views | 22 | 3 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 40 | 6 | 2 |
