Death and the King’s Horseman, published in 1975, is undoubtedly Wole Soyinka’s most acclaimed play. When awarding the playwright the Nobel Prize in Literature in October 1986, the Committee specifically cited it as a “drama of existence”. Many literary critics have written about the play from multifarious perspectives. However, the dramatic text is still open to multidimensional interpretations that can further illuminate the rich texture of this canonical work. My study contextualises this dramatic masterpiece as yielding to a form of critical inquiry that makes it cohere with definitions of various literary traditions. It can be interrogated as Yoruba/Nigerian national literature, African literature, postcolonial literature, and world literature. It is, therefore, in this effort to use many approaches to see the play as a holistic text that I have chosen to interrogate it as “one text, many literary traditions”.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abdul-Aziz, A.-A.A. (9.3.2016). “Tradition and Leadership Roles in Soyinka’s Death and the King’s Horseman”, Praxis Magazine. www.praxismagonline.com/death-and-the-kings-horseman, accessed 20.3.2020.
Achebe, C. 1984. Things Fall Apart (reprint). London: Heinemann.
Achebe, C. 1991. “The Madman”, in Girls at War and Other Stories. New York: Anchor Books.
Akwang, E. 2012. “Modernism as a Failed Utopia: A postcolonial critique of Wole Soyinka’s Death and the King’s Horseman and Ngugi Wa Thiong’o and Ngugi wa Mirii’s I will Marry When I Want”, The Dawn Journal, 1(2):53–71. www.academia.edu/2193652/MODERNISM_AS_A_FAILED_UTOPIA_A_POSTCOLONIAL_CRITIQUE_OF_WOLE_SOYINKAS_DEATH_AND_THE_KINGS_HORSEMAN_AND_NGUGI_WA_THIONGO_, accessed 24.3.2020.
Barnaby, A. 2014. “‘The Purest Mode of Looking’: (Post) colonial trauma in Wole Soyinka’s Death and the king’s horseman”, Research in African Literatures, 45(1):125–149. www.academia.edu/34285259/_The_Purest_Mode_of_Looking_Post_Colonial_Trauma_in_Wole_Soyinka_s_Death_and_the_King_s_Horseman, accessed 2.4.2020.
Billy, C.A. n.d. “Death and the King’s Horseman (Critical Review)”, Encyclopedia.com. www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/death-and-kings-horseman, accessed 19.7.2020.
Damrosch, D. 2008. How to Read World Literature. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Diehl, S.V.23.3.2017. “Book Review: Death and the King’s Horseman by Wole Soyinka”, The Word After. https://thewordafter.wordpress.com/2017/03/23/book-review-death-and-the-kings-horseman, accessed on 10.4.2020.
Doherty, B. 2014. “The Center Cannot Hold: The development of world literature anthologies”, Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics, 4: 100–124.
George, O. 1999. “Cultural Criticism in Wole Soyinka’s Death and the King’s Horseman”, Representations, 67: 67–91.
Gikandi, S. 2008. “African Literature and the Colonial Factor”, in Irele, A.ed., The Cambridge History of African and Caribbean Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ifatimehin, O.O. 2017. “Contrapuntal Significations in Wole Soyinka’s Death and the King’s Horseman”, ejotmas: Ekpoma Journal of Theatre and Media Arts, 6 (1–2):10–31.
Irele, A. 1988. “The Significance of Wole Soyinka”, in Ogunbiyi, Y.ed., Perspectives on Nigerian Literature: 1700 to the Present Volume 1. Lagos: Guardian Books.
Irele, A. 2008. “The Achievements of Wole Soyinka”, Philosophia Africana, 11(1):5–9.
Juvan, M. 2013. “Worlding Literatures Between Dialogue and Hegemony”, CLCweb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 15(5).
Losambe, L. 2007. “Death, Power and Cultural Translation in Wole Soyinka’s Death and the King’s Horseman”, Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 42(1):21–30.
Mbiti, J. 1985. African Religions and Philosophy. London: Heinemann.
Mekunda, D. 2019. “Mytho-Ritual Dramaturgy: Death as rite of passage in Wole Soyinka’s Death and the king’s horseman” Journal of Literature and Arts Studies, 9(8):818–829. www.davidpublisher.org/Public/uploads/Contribute/5d71b44d92a31.pdf, accessed 12.7.2020.
Moretti, F. 2000. “Conjectures on World Literature”, New Left Review, 1: 54–68.
Moyo, M. 2014. “The Autobiographical Nature of the Allegory in Wole Soyinka’s Death and the King’s Horseman”, in European Scientific Journal, 10(32):194–206.
Nnolim, C. 2010. Issues in African Literature. Lagos: Malthouse.
Nobel Prize 1986. www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1986/summary, accessed 10.4.2020.
Ojaide, T. 2015. “Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart in World Literature”, in Indigeneity, Globalization and African Literature: Personally speaking. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Quayson, A. 2015. “Wole Soyinka’s Death and the King’s Horseman in Comparative Frameworks”, Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Inquiry, 2(2): 287–296. www.academia.edu/27709785/Explication_de_Texte_Wole_Soyinkas_Death_and_the_Kings_Horseman_in_Comparative, accessed 11.4.2020.
Soyinka, W. 1982. Death and the King’s Horseman (reprint). London: Methuen.
Taymuree, G.17.12.2017. “The Play and Its Double Heritage of English and African Theatre Traditions”, Medium. https://medium.com/soyinkas-death-and-the-king-s-horseman-double/the-play-and-its-double-heritage-of-english-and-african-theater-traditions-9679ab91b7bc, accessed 18.7.2020.
Topper, R. 2019. “The Sacrificial Foundation of Modernity in Wole Soyinka’s Death and the King’s Horseman”, Research in African Literatures, 50(1):53–79.
Uzoatu, U.M. 27.11.2016. “Sacred Suicide: Re-reading Soyinka’s Death and the king’s horseman forty years after”, The Guardian, Nigeria. https://guardian.ng/art/sacred-suicide-re-reading-soyinkas-death-and-the-kings-horseman-forty-years-after, accessed 15.3.2020.
Wright, D. 1992. “Ritual and Revolution: Soyinka’s dramatic theory”, Ariel: A Review of International English Literature, 23(1):39–58.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 576 | 250 | 28 |
Full Text Views | 9 | 4 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 17 | 9 | 1 |
Death and the King’s Horseman, published in 1975, is undoubtedly Wole Soyinka’s most acclaimed play. When awarding the playwright the Nobel Prize in Literature in October 1986, the Committee specifically cited it as a “drama of existence”. Many literary critics have written about the play from multifarious perspectives. However, the dramatic text is still open to multidimensional interpretations that can further illuminate the rich texture of this canonical work. My study contextualises this dramatic masterpiece as yielding to a form of critical inquiry that makes it cohere with definitions of various literary traditions. It can be interrogated as Yoruba/Nigerian national literature, African literature, postcolonial literature, and world literature. It is, therefore, in this effort to use many approaches to see the play as a holistic text that I have chosen to interrogate it as “one text, many literary traditions”.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 576 | 250 | 28 |
Full Text Views | 9 | 4 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 17 | 9 | 1 |