Philosophy and Law: An Interpretation of Plato’s Minos

In: Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought
View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Political Science, Ouachita Baptist University, 410 Ouachita Street, Box 3752, Arkadelphia, ar 71998-0001,
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


Plato’s Minos presents a twofold argument. In part it is a facile defense of law directed at a typical Athenian citizen. On another level it is a sophisticated teaching that ponders the question what is law for the would-be philosopher or student of Socrates. These arguments are made in three parts. First, it becomes clear that Socrates’ interlocutor has been influenced or corrupted by the teachings of sophists. Second, Socrates attempts to reform the interlocutor’s opinion of law by suggesting there is a science of law. Finally, Socrates argues that present day Greek laws are derived from the oldest Greek laws, which were revealed and taught by Zeus himself. With this twofold argument Socrates counters his interlocutor’s sophists’ influenced opinion of law and reveals to the careful reader the complexity of the question: what is law?

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 418 67 5
Full Text Views 254 5 0
PDF Views & Downloads 51 17 0