Save

Boni Gone Bad: Cicero’s Critique of Epicureanism in De Finibus 1 and 2

In: Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought
Author:
Michelle T. Clarke Associate Professor, Department of Government, Dartmouth College Dartmouth, NH USA

Search for other papers by Michelle T. Clarke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5427-2413
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This paper argues that Cicero’s critique of Epicureanism in De finibus is motivated by a concern about its degrading effect on the moral sensibility of Rome’s best men. In place of earlier objections to Epicureanism, which centered on its inability to explain or recommend the virtuous conduct of Roman maiores, De finibus focuses on its inability to do so properly and, more prospectively, to assist boni in the work of maintaining the dignity and respectability of Roman civic life. Responding to optimates like Cassius who claimed that Epicureanism was compatible with Roman politics because it treats virtue as being necessary for pleasure, Cicero holds that instrumentalizing virtue in this way is actually a grave corruption of it. Not only do Epicureans debase politics by reducing it to considerations of utility alone: they also introduce deeper forms of civic confusion by distorting and abusing the very idea of honorableness.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 186 181 33
Full Text Views 210 185 9
PDF Views & Downloads 275 239 23