The King’s House or the Tyrant’s Palace? Rethinking Persia in Herodotus’s History
In: Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political ThoughtSearch for other papers by Matthew K. Reising in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article contributes to the scholarly movement beyond rigid classifications of East and West by arguing that the Persia of Herodotus’s History, commonly understood to be a tyrannical regime, possessed both external and internal freedom. It was once common to argue that, for Herodotus, internal freedom was the exclusive purview of the Greeks. Recent scholarship has shown that Herodotus laced the History with several incriminating parallels between Greek and Barbarian political practices, thereby casting doubt on the claim that Herodotus uncritically supported Greek supremacy. This article reverses that method and argues, contrary to previous scholarship, that Herodotus offers several indications in the History that he knew Persia was a politically free regime. By examining the three prominent theories on the ancient definition of tyranny and showing their inapplicability to Persian government, I offer an even-handed defense of Persia that neither excuses real cruelty nor condemns without justification.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 235 | 235 | 35 |
| Full Text Views | 35 | 35 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 191 | 191 | 0 |
The King’s House or the Tyrant’s Palace? Rethinking Persia in Herodotus’s History
In: Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political ThoughtSearch for other papers by Matthew K. Reising in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article contributes to the scholarly movement beyond rigid classifications of East and West by arguing that the Persia of Herodotus’s History, commonly understood to be a tyrannical regime, possessed both external and internal freedom. It was once common to argue that, for Herodotus, internal freedom was the exclusive purview of the Greeks. Recent scholarship has shown that Herodotus laced the History with several incriminating parallels between Greek and Barbarian political practices, thereby casting doubt on the claim that Herodotus uncritically supported Greek supremacy. This article reverses that method and argues, contrary to previous scholarship, that Herodotus offers several indications in the History that he knew Persia was a politically free regime. By examining the three prominent theories on the ancient definition of tyranny and showing their inapplicability to Persian government, I offer an even-handed defense of Persia that neither excuses real cruelty nor condemns without justification.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 235 | 235 | 35 |
| Full Text Views | 35 | 35 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 191 | 191 | 0 |