Origene e i suoi sostenitori nei Concili: un ammonimento per la Dogmengeschichte

In: Annuarium Historiae Conciliorum
Giulio Maspero Dipartimento di Teologia Dogmatica, Pontificia Università della Santa Croce Roma Italia

Search for other papers by Giulio Maspero in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


In order to approach the Origenist crises through the category of “minority”, some remarks are needed. It is necessary to avoid any anachronistic projection of modern understanding on the past. But, at the same time, the epistemological challenge could be useful to go beyond historicism in contemporary Dogmengeschichte. The condemnation of Origenism in the mark of the 2nd Council of Constantinople, in fact, presents a deep difference with respect to the Three Chapters issue. The main question at stake was not merely the Emperor’s ecclesiastical politics in view of the unity of the Empire and of the Church. Having recourse to Christian Gnilka’s categories, it can be shown that the 6th century condemnations were the krisis of a chrêsis, that is a judgement on the use of Origen in (Evagrian) monasticism of that time.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 386 34 5
Full Text Views 15 4 0
PDF Views & Downloads 21 3 0