A paucity of scholarship on emotions in South Asia through a queer lens prevails, as the field is relatively new, and thus, majorly normative. Discussions around emotions, particularly guilt, remain heteronormative. The act of queering emotion not only challenges the dominant gendered affective discourse, but also proposes an alternative framework to understand and elucidate emotions pertinent to queer lives in South Asia. The study analysed ethnographic accounts of 32 gay men from the Eastern Indian state of Odisha. The objectives of this study are threefold. One, it examines the validity of the hypothesis that guilt among gay men is not just an internal orientation, but can be induced by people’s complicitous actions. Two, it uncovers how guilt based on “reciprocity” is roused among gay men in a social system (Lebra, 1971). Society urges gay men to repay their parents, siblings, and caretakers by fulfilling their heteronormative expectations. Three, it foregrounds how gay men respond when apprised of their indebtedness to individuals. The study examines emotions in South Asia through a queer lens by investigating the complex manner in which the queer subjects negotiate with their affectual spaces, viz. social institutions of family and other alternative kinship structures.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ahmed, S. (2006) Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Ahmed, Sara (2013) The cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.
Aufhauser, M.C. (1975) “Guilt and Guilt Feeling: Power and the Limits of Power.” Ethics 85(4): 288–297.
Barrett, M. and M. McIntosh (2015) The anti-social family. London: Verso Trade.
Borneman, J. (1996) “Until death do us part: Marriage/death in anthropological discourse.” American Ethnologist 23(2): 215–235.
Boyce, Paul (2013) “The object of attention: Same-sex sexualities in small town India and the contemporary sexual subject,” in S. Srivastava (ed.) Sexuality studies. New Delhi: Oxford University Press India.
Boyce, P. and R.K. Dasgupta (2017) “Utopia or elsewhere: Queer modernities in small town West Bengal,” in Kuldova and Varghese (ed.) Urban Utopias. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, Pp. 209–225.
Boyce, P. and A. Khanna (2011) “Rights and representations: Querying the male-to-male sexual subject in India.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 13(1): 89–100.
Browne, K. (2005) “Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8(1): 47–60.
Bybee, J. and Z.N. Quiles (1998) “Guilt and mental health,” in Jane Bybee (ed.) Guilt and Children. Academic Press: New York, Pp. 269–291.
Bybee, J.A., E.L. Sullivan, E. Zielonka and E. Moes (2009) “Are gay men in worse mental health than heterosexual men? The role of age, shame and guilt, and coming-out.” Journal of Adult Development 16(3): 144–154.
Chatterjee, E., S. Krishnan and E.M. Robb (2017) “Feeling Modern: The History of Emotions in Urban South Asia.” Journal of Royal Asiatic Society, 27(4): 539–557.
Collier, J.F. and S.J. Yanagisako (1987) Gender and kinship: Essays toward a unified analysis. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Dasgupta, R.K. (2017) Digital queer cultures in India: Politics, intimacies and belonging. New Delhi: Routledge India.
Dasgupta, R.K. and D. Dasgupta (2016) “Intimate Subjects and Virtual Spaces: Rethinking Sexuality as a category for intimate ethnographies.” Sexualities, 21(5–6): 932–950
De Villiers, N. (2012) Opacity and the closet: Queer tactics in Foucault, Barthes, and Warhol. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ferguson, T.J., H. Stegge, E.R. Miller and M.E. Olsen (1999) “Guilt, shame, and symptoms in children.” Developmental Psychology 35(2): 347.
Goldman, E. (1911) Marriage and love. Mother Earth Publishing Association.
Haggarty, R. and J. Bybee (2004) “Predispositional and chronic guilt in clinical depression.” Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, D.C. April, 2004.
Hequembourg, A.L. and R.L. Dearing (2013) “Exploring shame, guilt, and risky substance use among sexual minority men and women.” Journal of Homosexuality 60(4): 615–638.
Horton, B.A. (2017) “What’s so ‘queer’ about coming out? Silent queers and theorizing kinship agonistically in Mumbai.” Sexualities, 21(7): 1059–1074.
Johnson, U. (1997) “Coping strategies among long-term injured competitive athletes. A study of 81 men and women in team and individual sports.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 7(6): 367–372.
Kakar, S. (1990) Intimate relations: Exploring Indian sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Katyal, A. (2013) “Laundebaazi: Habits and Politics in North India.” Interventions 15(4): 474–493.
Kaur, R. and R. Palriwala (eds.) (2014) Marrying in South Asia: Shifting concepts, changing practices in a globalising world. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan, Pp. 271–292.
Khan, R. (2015) “The Social Production of Space and Emotions in South Asia.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 58(5): 611–633.
Kollontaĭ, A. (1920) Communism and the Family. New York: Contemporary Publishing Association.
Lebra, T.S. (1971) “The social mechanism of guilt and shame: The Japanese case.” Anthropological Quarterly, 44(4): 241–255.
Lebra, T. (2010) “Shame and guilt in Japan.” in Robert A. LeVine (ed.) Psychological Anthropology: A reader on self in culture. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 102–111.
Luxemburg, R. (1971) The mass strike, the political party and the trade unions. New York: Harper & Row, Pp. 83–84.
Iyer, P. (2015) Matrimonial Advertisement. Mumbai: The Midday.
Merchant, H. (1999) Yaraana: Gay Writing from India. Gurgaon: Penguin Books.
Merchant, H. (2009) Forbidden Sex, Forbidden Texts: New India’s Gay Poets. New Delhi: Routledge India.
Meyer, I.H. (2003) “Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence.” Psychological Bulletin 129(5): 674.
Mitra, R. and R. Gajjala (2008) “Queer blogging in Indian digital diasporas: A dialogic encounter.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 32(4): 400–423.
Mullatti, L. (1995) “Families in India: Beliefs and realities.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 26(1): 11–25.
Muraleedharan, T. (2002) “Queer bonds: male friendships in contemporary Malayalam cinema,” in Ruth Vanita (ed.) Queering India: Same-Sex Love and Eroticism in Indian Culture and Society. New York: Routledge, Pp. 181–192.
Pernau, M. (2015) “Mapping Emotions, Constructing Feelings.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 58(5): 634–667.
Piers, G. and M.B. Singer (1953) Shame and guilt: A psychoanalytic and a cultural study. Vol. 86. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Rahim, M.A. (1983) “A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict.” Academy of Management Journal 26(2): 368–376.
Ramberg, L. (2014) Given to the Goddess: South Indian Devadasis and the Sexuality of Religion. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Rao, R. (2017) Criminal Love? 1st edition. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Ratti, R. (1993) “Beta,” in R. Ratti (ed.) Lotus of Another Color: An Unfolding of the South Asian Gay and Lesbian Experience. New York: Alyson Books.
Reddy, G. (2005) With Respect to Sex. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sarangi, C. (2015) Samalingi Samparka. Bhubaneswar: The Prameya.
Singh, B. (2011) “Agonistic intimacy and moral aspiration in popular Hinduism: A study in the political theology of the neighbor.” American Ethnologist 38(3): 430–450.
Spiro, M.E. (1961) “Social systems, personality, and functional analysis.” in B. Kalpan (Ed.) Studying Personality Cross-culturally. Evanston, Illinois: Row, Peterson. 93–127
Tellis, A. (ed.) (2014) “Multiple ironies: Notes on same-sex marriage for South Asians at home and abroad,” in Ravinder Kaur and Rajni Palriwala (eds.) Marrying in South Asia: Shifting Concepts, Changing Practices in a Globalising World. New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan.
Vanita, R. (2002) “Dosti and Tamanna: Male-male love, difference, and normativity in Hindi cinema.” in Diane P. Mines and Sarah Lamb (eds.) Everyday Life in South Asia. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 146–158.
Vanita, R. (2005) Love’s Rite. Delhi: Palgrave Macmillan.
Weston, K. (1997) Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York, Columbia University Press.
Yanagisako, S.J. (1979) “Family and household: the analysis of domestic groups.” Annual Review of Anthropology 8(1): 161–205.
Zhu, J. (2018) “ ‘Unqueer’ kinship? Critical reflections on ‘marriage fraud’ in mainland China.” Sexualities 21(7): 1075–1091.
Zimmer, M. (2010) “ ‘But the data is already public’: On the ethics of research in Facebook.” Ethics and Information Technology 12(4): 313–325.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1402 | 226 | 20 |
Full Text Views | 202 | 18 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 305 | 39 | 3 |
A paucity of scholarship on emotions in South Asia through a queer lens prevails, as the field is relatively new, and thus, majorly normative. Discussions around emotions, particularly guilt, remain heteronormative. The act of queering emotion not only challenges the dominant gendered affective discourse, but also proposes an alternative framework to understand and elucidate emotions pertinent to queer lives in South Asia. The study analysed ethnographic accounts of 32 gay men from the Eastern Indian state of Odisha. The objectives of this study are threefold. One, it examines the validity of the hypothesis that guilt among gay men is not just an internal orientation, but can be induced by people’s complicitous actions. Two, it uncovers how guilt based on “reciprocity” is roused among gay men in a social system (Lebra, 1971). Society urges gay men to repay their parents, siblings, and caretakers by fulfilling their heteronormative expectations. Three, it foregrounds how gay men respond when apprised of their indebtedness to individuals. The study examines emotions in South Asia through a queer lens by investigating the complex manner in which the queer subjects negotiate with their affectual spaces, viz. social institutions of family and other alternative kinship structures.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1402 | 226 | 20 |
Full Text Views | 202 | 18 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 305 | 39 | 3 |