Optimal egg size in a suboptimal environment: reproductive ecology of female Sonora mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) in central Arizona, USA

in Amphibia-Reptilia
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

We studied the reproductive ecology of female Sonora mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) at Montezuma Well, a chemically-challenging natural wetland in central Arizona, USA. Females matured between 115.5 and 125 mm carapace length (CL) and 36-54% produced eggs each year. Eggs were detected in X-radiographs from 23 April-28 September (2007-2008) and the highest proportion (56%) of adult females with eggs occurred in June and July. Clutch frequency was rarely more than once per year. Clutch size was weakly correlated with body size, ranged from 1-8 (mean = 4.96) and did not differ significantly between years. X-ray egg width ranged from 17.8-21.7 mm (mean 19.4 mm) and varied more among clutches than within. Mean X-ray egg width of a clutch did not vary significantly with CL of females, although X-ray pelvic aperture width increased with CL. We observed no evidence of a morphological constraint on egg width. In addition, greater variation in clutch size, relative to egg width, suggests that egg size is optimized in this hydrologically stable but chemically-challenging habitat. We suggest that the diversity of architectures exhibited by the turtle pelvis, and their associated lack of correspondence to taxonomic or behavioral groupings, explains some of the variation observed in egg size of turtles.

Optimal egg size in a suboptimal environment: reproductive ecology of female Sonora mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) in central Arizona, USA

in Amphibia-Reptilia

Sections

References

AngielczykK.D.FeldmanC.R.MillerG.R. (2010): Adaptive evolution of plastron shape in emydine turtles. Evolution 65 ( 2): 377- 394.

BlinnD.W. (2008): The extreme environment, trophic structure, and ecosystem dynamics of a large, fishless desert spring – Montezuma Well, Arizona. In: Aridland Springs in North America – Ecology and Conservation . StevensL.E.MeretskyV.J. Eds University of Arizona PressTucson.

BlinnD.W.OberlinG.E. (1995): Analyses of the Biota in the Aquatic Habitats of Montezuma Castle National Monument. Montezuma Castle National Monument Integrated Inventory and Monitoring Studies . U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service, Colorado Plateau Research StationFlagstaff, AZ.

BowdenR.M.HarmsH.K.PaitzR.T.JanzenF.J. (2004): Does optimal egg size vary with demographic stage because of a physiological constraint? Funct. Ecol. 18 ( 4): 522- 529.

BrambleD.M. (1974): Emydid shell kinesis: Biomechanics and evolution. Copeia 1974: 707- 727.

BrambleD.M.HutchisonJ.H.LeglerJ.M. (1984): Kinosternid shell kinesis: Structure, function and evolution. Copeia 1984: 456- 475.

BrockelmanW.Y. (1975): Competition and fitness of offspring, and optimal clutch size. Am. Nat. 109 ( 970): 677- 699.

BuhlmannK.A.LynchT.K.GibbonsJ.W.GreeneJ.L. (1995): Prolonged egg retention in the turtle Deirochelys reticularia in South Carolina. Herpetologica 51 ( 4): 457- 462.

ClarkP.J.EwertM.A.NelsonC.E. (2001): Physical apertures as constraints on egg size and shape in the common musk turtle, Sternotherus odoratus. Funct. Ecol. 15 ( 1): 70- 77.

ColeG.A.BarryW.T. (1973): Montezuma Well, Arizona as a habitat. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science 8 ( 1): 7- 13.

CongdonJ.D. (1989): Proximate and evolutionary constraints on energy relations of reptiles. Physiol. Zool. 62 ( 2): 356- 373.

CongdonJ.D.GibbonsJ.W. (1987): Morphological constraint on egg size: A challenge to optimal egg size theory? P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84 ( 12): 4145- 4147.

CongdonJ.D.DunhamA.E.TinkleD.W. (1982): Energy budgets and life histories of reptiles. In: Biology of the Reptilia p.  233- 271. GansC. Ed. Academic PressNew York.

CongdonJ.D.NagleR.D.KinneyO.M.Van Loben SelsR.C. (2001): Hypotheses of aging in a long-lived vertebrate, Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii). Exp. Gerontol. 36 ( 4-6): 813- 827.

CongdonJ.D.NagleR.D.KinneyO.M.Van Loben SelsR.C.QuinterT.TinkleD.W. (2003): Testing hypotheses of aging in long-lived painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Exp. Gerontol. 38 ( 7): 765- 772.

ErnstC.H.LovichJ.E. (2009): Turtles of the United States and Canada . 2nd Edition. Johns Hopkins University PressBaltimore.

FoustR.D.Jr.MohapatraP.Compton-O’BrienA.M.ReifelJ. (2004): Groundwater arsenic in the Verde Valley in central Arizona, USA. Appl. Geochem. 19 ( 2): 251- 255.

GibbonsJ.W.GreeneJ.L. (1979): X-ray photography: A technique to determine reproductive patterns of freshwater turtles. Herpetologica 35 ( 1): 86- 89.

HallD.H.SteidlR.J. (2007): Movements, activity, and spacing of Sonoran mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) in interrupted mountain streams. Copeia 2007: 403- 412.

HarmsH.K.PaitzR.T.BowdenR.M.JanzenF.J. (2005): Age and season impact resource allocation to eggs and nesting behavior in painted turtles. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 78 ( 6): 996- 1004.

HensleyF.R.JonesT.R.MaxwellM.S.AdamsL.J.NedellaN.S. (2010): Demography, terrestrial behavior, and growth of Sonora mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense) in an extreme habitat. Herpetol. Monogr. 24: 174- 193.

HintonT.G.FleddermanP.LovichJ.E.CongdonJ.GibbonsJ.W. (1997): Radiographic determination of fecundity: Is the technique safe for developing turtle embryos? Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 2 ( 3): 409- 414.

HofmeyrM.D.HenenB.T.LoehrV.J.T. (2005): Overcoming environmental and morphological constraints: Egg size and pelvic kinesis in the smallest tortoises, Homopus signatus. Can. J. Zoolog. 83 ( 10): 1343- 1352.

HulseA.C. (1982): Reproduction and population structure in the turtle, Kinosternon sonoriense. Southwest. Nat. 27 ( 4): 447- 456.

IversonJ.B. (1998): Molecules, morphology, and mud turtle phylogenetics (family Kinosternidae). Chelonian. Conserv. Biol. 3 ( 1): 113- 117.

IversonJ.B.SmithG.R. (1993): Reproductive ecology of the painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) in the Nebraska Sandhills and across its range. Copeia 1993: 1- 21.

IversonJ.B.BarthelmessE.L.SmithG.R.deRiveraC.E. (1991): Growth and reproduction in the mud turtle Kinosternon hirtipes in Chihuahua, México. J. Herpetol. 25 ( 1): 64- 72.

IversonJ.B.BalgooyenC.P.ByrdK.K.LyddanK.K. (1993): Latitudinal variation in egg and clutch size in turtles. Can. J. Zoolog. 71 ( 12): 2448- 2461.

KingR.B. (2000): Analyzing the relationship between clutch size and female body size in reptiles. J. Herpetol. 34 ( 1): 148- 150.

KonieczkiA.D.LeakeS.A. (1997): Hydrogeology and water chemistry of Montezuma Well in Montezuma Castle National Monument and surrounding area, Arizona. In: U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 97-4156 p. 49.

LongD.R.RoseF.L. (1989): Pelvic girdle size relationships in three turtle species. J. Herpetol. 23 ( 3): 315- 318.

LovichJ.E.BeamanK. (2008): Distribution of native turtles in the arid southwestern United States with comments on Kinosternon sonoriense: A species presumed to be lost from California’s herpetofauna. In: The 2008 Desert Symposium and Field Guide and Proceedings p. 127- 134. ReynoldsR.E. Ed. California State University, Desert Studies Consortium and LSA Associates, Inc.

Macip-RíosR.Arias CisnerosM.L.Aguilar-MiguelX.S.Casas-AndreuG. (2009): Population ecology and reproduction of the Méxican mud turtle (Kinosternon integrum) in Tonatico, Estado de México. West. N. Am. Naturalist 69 ( 4): 501- 510.

NaimiM.ZnariM.LovichJ.E.FeddadiY.Ait BaamraneM.A. (2012): Clutch and egg allometry of the turtle Mauremys leprosa (Chelonia: Geoemydidae) from a polluted peri-urban river in west-central Morocco. Herpetological Journal 22: 43- 49.

O’BrienC.BlinnD.W. (1999): The endemic spring snail Pyrgulopsis montezumensis in a high CO2 environment: Importance of extreme chemical habitats as refugia. Freshwater Biol. 42 ( 2): 225- 234.

PaitzR.T.HarmsH.K.BowdenR.M.JanzenF.J. (2007): Experience pays: offspring survival increases with female age. Biol. Lett. 3: 44- 46.

PetersonC.C.StoneP.A. (2000): Physiological capacity for estivation of the Sonoran mud turtle, Kinosternon sonoriense. Copeia 2000: 684- 700.

RichmondN.D. (1964): The mechanical function of the testudinate plastron. Am. Midl. Nat. 72 ( 1): 50- 56.

RollinsonN.BrooksR.J. (2008a): Optimal offspring provisioning when egg size is “constrained”: A case study with the painted turtle Chrysemys picta. Oikos . 117 ( 1): 144- 151.

RollinsonN.BrooksR.J. (2008b): Sources and significance of among-individual reproductive variation in a northern population of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Copeia 2008: 533- 541.

RoosenburgW.M.DunhamA.E. (1997): Allocation of reproductive output: Egg- and clutch-size variation in the diamondback terrapin. Copeia 1997: 290- 297.

RoseF.L.JuddF.W. (1991): Egg size versus carapace-plastron aperture size in Gopherus berlandieri. J. Herpetol. 25 ( 2): 248- 250.

RosenP.C. (1987): Variation in female reproduction among populations of Sonoran mud turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense). Unpubl. Thesis Arizona State University Tempe.

RoweJ.W. (1994a): Egg size and shape variation within and among Nebraskan painted turtle (Chrysemys picta bellii) populations: Relationships to clutch and maternal body size. Copeia 1994: 1034- 1040.

RoweJ.W. (1994b): Reproductive variation and the egg size-clutch size trade-off within and among populations of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta bellii). Oecologia . 99 ( 1): 35- 44.

RuckesH. (1929): Studies in chelonian osteology Part I: Truss and arch analogies in chelonian pelves. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 31: 31- 80pls. IV-VII .

RunckC.BlinnD.W. (1994): Role of Belostoma bakeri (Heteroptera) in the trophic ecology of a fishless desert spring. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39 ( 8): 1800- 1812.

RyanK.M.LindemanP.V. (2007): Reproductive allometry in the common map turtle, Graptemys geographica. Am. Midl. Nat. 158 ( 1): 49- 59.

SmithC.C.FretwellS.D. (1974): The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am. Nat. 108 ( 962): 499- 506.

TriversR.L. (1972): Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871-1971 p.  136- 179. CampbellB. Ed. AldineChicago.

Van Loben SelsR.C.CongdonJ.D.AustinJ.T. (1997): Life history and ecology of the Sonoran mud turtle (Kinosternon sonoriense) in southeastern Arizona: A preliminary report. Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 2 ( 3): 338- 344.

ZangerlR. (1969): The turtle shell. In: Biology of the Reptilia Vol. 1. Morphology A p.  311- 339. GansC.D’bellairsA.ParsonsT.S. Eds Academic PressNew York.

ZugG.R. (1971): Buoyancy, locomotion, morphology of the pelvic girdle and hindlimb, and systematics of cryptodiran turtles. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology University of Michigan 142: 1- 98.

ZugG.R. (1972): Walk pattern analysis of cryptodiran turtle gaits. Anim. Behav. 20 ( 3): 439- 443.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Responses of egg width to pelvic aperture width (shown by solid line scenarios) in various turtle species. Line labels refer to the line immediately above. The dashed line shows the expected relationship between carapace length and pelvic aperture width. The unconstrained/not optimized response suggests a constraint due to something other than pelvic aperture width since egg size increases with body size but the largest egg is still smaller than the smallest pelvic aperture (refer to text for details).

  • View in gallery

    The relationship between clutch size and carapace length in Kinosternon sonoriense from Montezuma Well, Arizona, USA. The data include one female that produced a clutch of eggs in both years of the study. Including all log10 transformed data results in a regression equation where log10 clutch size = −6.269 + 3.243(log10 CL). Removing the two outliers (females that produced a single egg clutch) results in the relationship log10 clutch size = −6.042 + 3.161(log10 CL).

  • View in gallery

    Relationship between carapace length and both mean X-ray egg width (MXREW) (solid circles) and X-ray pelvic aperture width (XRPAW) (open circles) in Kinosternon sonoriense from Montezuma Well, Arizona, USA. Linear smoothing functions are shown with accompanying 95% confidence intervals. XRPAW = 12.632 + 0.085(CL). MXREW = 19.631 − 0.001(CL).

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 17 17 12
Full Text Views 11 11 10
PDF Downloads 4 4 4
EPUB Downloads 1 1 1