Shark scavenging and predation on sea turtles in northeastern Brazil

in Amphibia-Reptilia
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Large sharks have the potential to help structure ecosystem dynamics through top-down impacts on their prey, including sea turtles. Studies of interactions between large sharks and sea turtles, however, are practically nonexistent along the Brazilian coast. Between September 2002 and May 2011 we examined 655 sea turtles – including green turtles Chelonia mydas (n = 607), olive ridleys Lepidochelys olivacea (n = 10), hawksbills Eretmochelys imbricata (n = 33), and loggerheads Caretta caretta (n = 5) – that stranded on Paraíba coast, northeastern Brazil. A total of 63 green turtles (10.4%), two olive ridleys (20.0%) and one hawksbill (3.0%) had shark-inflicted bites. Most bites could not be definitively attributed to scavenging or attacks on living turtles, but the presence of healed shark bites and freshly bleeding bites suggests that some attacks occurred pre-mortem. Bite characteristics suggest that tiger sharks Galeocerdo cuvier were responsible for most bites that could be identified to a particular species. Within green turtles, the only species with sufficient sample size, the probability of carcasses having been bitten increased with carapace length but did not vary across seasons and years. However, there was spatial variation in the probability of a carcass having been bitten by sharks. Our estimates of the minimum proportion of turtles attacked while alive (∼4%) and bitten overall are similar to other areas where shark-turtle interactions have been studied. Turtles likely are an important food for tiger sharks in northeastern Brazil, but further studies are needed to determine the relative frequencies of scavenging and predation.

Shark scavenging and predation on sea turtles in northeastern Brazil

in Amphibia-Reptilia



AlmeidaA.P.SantosA.J.B.ThoméJ.C.A.BeliniC.BaptistotteC.MarcovaldiM.A.SantosA.S.S.LopezM. (2011): Avaliação do estado de conservação da tartaruga marinha Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus, 1758) no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira 1: 12-19.

BalazsG.H. (2006): The Sea Turtle Stranding Research Network in the Hawaiian Islands Marine Turtle Research Program NOAA Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC).

BjorndalK.A.JacksonJ.B.C. (2003): Roles of sea turtles in marine ecosystems: reconstructing the past. In: The Biology of Sea Turtles p.  259-273. LutzP.L.MusickJ.A.WynekenJ. Eds CRC PressBoca Raton.

BornatowskiH.RobertM.C.CostaL. (2007): Data on the food of juveniles Tiger Shark, Galeocerdo cuvier (Péron and Lesueur) (Elasmobranchii, Carcharhinidae), from southern Brazil. Pan-Am. J. Aquat. Sci. 2: 10-13.

BornatowskiH.WedekinL.L.HeithausM.R.MarcondesM.C.C.Rossi-SantosM.R. (2012): Shark scavenging and predation on cetaceans at Abrolhos Bank, eastern Brazil. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK. DOI:10.1017/S0025315412001154.

ChaloupkaM.WorkT.M.BalazsG.H.MurakawaS.K.K.MorrisR. (2008): Cause-specific temporal and spatial trends in green sea turtle strandings in the Hawaiian Archipelago. Mar. Biol. 154: 887-898.

ChanV. (2004): Spatial and temporal trends in sea turtle strandings in North Carolina 1980-2003. Master thesis Environmental Management (Coastal) Nicholas School of the Environment Duke University.

FerrettiF.WormB.BrittenG.L.HeithausM.R.LotzeH.K. (2010): Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean. Ecol. Lett. 13: 1055-1071.

GaspariniJ.L.SazimaI. (1995): Natural history notes: Eretmochelys imbricata (Hawksbill). Predation. Herp. Revi. 26(1): 34.

HeithausM.R. (2001): Shark attacks on bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in Shark Bay, Western Australia: attack rate, bite scar frequencies, and attack seasonality. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 17: 526-539.

HeithausM.R.FridA.DillL.M. (2002): Species and sex-class differences in shark-inflicted injury frequencies, escape ability, and habitat use of green and loggerhead turtles. Mar. Biol. 140: 229-236.

HeithausM.R.FridA.WirsingA.J.BejderL.DillL.M. (2005): Biology of sea turtles under risk from tiger sharks at a foraging ground. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 288: 285-294.

HeithausM.R.FridA.WirsingA.J.DillL.M.FourqueranJ.W.BurkholderD.ThomsonJ.BejderL. (2007): State-dependent risk-taking by green sea turtles mediates top-down effects of tiger shark intimidation in a marine ecosystem. J. Anim. Ecol. 76: 837-844.

HeithausM.R.WirsingA.J.ThomsonJ.A.BurkholderD.A. (2008): A review of lethal and non-lethal effects of predators on adult marine turtles. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 356: 43-51.

LalA.ArthurR.MarbaN.LillA.AlcoverroT. (2010): Implications of conserving an ecosystem modifier: increasing green turtle densities substantially alters seagrass meadow structure and dynamics. Biol. Conserv. 143: 2730-2738.

LongD.J.JonesR.E. (1996): White shark predation and scavenging on cetaceans in the eastern north Pacific Ocean. In: Great White Sharks: The Biology of Carcharodon carcharias p.  293-307. KlimleyA.P.AinleyD.G. Eds Academic PressNew York, NY.

LoweC.G.WetherbeeB.M.CrowG.L.TesterA.L. (1996): Ontogenetic dietary shifts and feeding behavior of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, in Hawaiian waters. Env. Biol. Fish. 47: 203-211.

LowryD.CastroA.L.F.MaraK.WhitenackL.B.DeliusB.BurgessG.H.MottaP. (2009): Determining shark size from forensic analysis of bite damage. Mar. Biol. 156: 2483-2492.

MarcovaldiM.A.MarcovaldiG.G. (1999): Marine turtles of Brazil: the history and structure of Projeto TAMAR-IBAMA. Biol. Conserv. 91: 35-41.

MarcovaldiM.A.LopezG.G.SoaresL.S.BeliniC.SantosA.S.LopezM. (2011): Avaliação do estado de conservação da tartaruga marinha Eretmochelys imbricata (Linnaeus, 1766) no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira. Ano I 1: 20-27. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade.

MascarenhasR.GonçalvesR.ZeppeliniD. (2005): Stranded sea turtles on the coast of Paraiba – Brazil. Mar. Turtle Newsletter 107: 13-14.

NakaokaM. (2005): Plant-animal interactions in seagrass beds: ongoing and future challenges for understanding population and community dynamics. Popul. Ecol. 47: 167-177.

ProiettiM.C.Lara-RuizP.ReisserJ.W.PintoL.S.DellagostinO.A.MarinsL.F. (2009): Green turtles (Chelonia mydas) foraging at Arvoredo Island in Southern Brazil: Genetic characterization and mixed stock analysis through mtDNA control region haplotypes. Genet. Mol. Biol. 32: 613-618.

SalesG.GiffoniB.B.BarataP.C.R. (2008): Incidental catch of sea turtles by the Brazilian pelagic longline fishery. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 88(4): 853-864.

SantosA.S.SoaresL.S.MarcovaldiM.A.MonteiroD.S.GiffoniB.AlmeidaA.P. (2011): Avaliação do estado de conservação da tartaruga marinha Caretta caretta Linnaeus, 1758 no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira 1: 3-11.

ShaverD.J. (1998): Sea turtle strandings along the Texas coast 1980-94. United States Department of Commerce NOAA Tec. Rep. NMFS. 143: 57-72.

ShibuyaA.RosaR.S.GadigO.B.F. (2005): Stomach contents of Galeocerdo cuvier and Carcharhinus plumbeus (Elasmobranchii: Carcharhinidae) caught of Paraíba State, Brazil. Arq. Ciênc. Mar. 38: 105-107.

SilvaA.C.C.D.CastilhosJ.C.LopezG.G.BarataP.C.R. (2007): Nesting biology and conservation of the olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) in Brazil, 1991/1992 to 2002/2003. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 87: 1047-1056.

SimpfendorferC.A.GoodreidA.B.McAuleyR.B. (2001): Size, sex and geographic variation in the diet of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, from Western Australian waters. Env. Biol. Fish. 61: 37-46.

WitzellW.N. (1987): Selective predation on large cheloniid sea turtles by tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier). Japan. J. Herp. 12: 22-29.

WitzellW.N. (2007): Kemp’s Ridley (Lepidochelys kempi) shell damage. Mar. Turtle Newsletter 115: 16-17.

WynekenJ. (2001): The anatomy of sea turtles. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. US Department of Commerce NOAA Tec. Mem. NMFS-SEFSC-470.


  • View in gallery

    The study was conducted in two municipalities (João Pessoa and Cabedelo) of northeastern Brazil, south-western Atlantic. We subdivided the study area into three regions (north, central and south).

  • View in gallery

    Live-stranded green turtle (90 cm curved carapace length) with amputated right foreflipper, in northeastern Brazil. This figure is published in colour in the online version.

  • View in gallery

    A crescent-shaped wound in the foreflipper of a green turtle caused by a tiger shark, in northeastern Brazil. This figure is published in colour in the online version.

  • View in gallery

    Size-related variation in predicted probabilities of a stranded green turtle having a shark bite based on logistic regression. CCL, curved carapace length.

  • View in gallery

    Regional variation in predicted probabilities of a stranded green turtle having a shark bite based on logistic regression.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 9 9 6
Full Text Views 10 10 10
PDF Downloads 3 3 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0