Co-occurrence patterns in independently evolved groups of Mediterranean insectivorous vertebrates (lizards and shrews)

in Amphibia-Reptilia
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Soricid mammals and lizards are small-sized, insectivorous vertebrates that are widespread and abundant in Mediterranean habitats. Because of their broad sympatry and their diet similarity, these taxa have been suspected to compete for food. Therefore, co-occurrence patterns between these taxa were studied at 72 sites in southern Italy by means of trapping methods. The assemblages were quite distinct depending on the site bioclimate: for the Lacertidae, Podarcis siculus dominated in the thermo-Mediterranean sites and P. muralis in the temperate sites, whereas, for the soricids, Suncus etruscus and two species of Crocidura were dominant in thermo-Mediterranean sites and three Sorex species in the temperate sites. The mean number of captured soricids was statistically higher in the temperate sites, and was positively related to the first component of a Principal Component Analysis summarizing three collinear study site variables (elevation, mean annual temperature, annual rainfall), the reverse being true for lizards. Co-occurrence analysis revealed that a non-segregated structure was present in the dataset, whereas a randomization algorithm showed that the assemblage of small mammals and lizards was non-randomly structured, with the frequency distribution of shrews being non-independent by site from that of lizards. However, when we divided the sites by their bioclimatic regime (thermo-Mediterranean versus temperate), the non-randomness of the community structure disappeared, thus demonstrating that interspecific competition was not the main force driving these assemblages of species. The number of shrews captured in each sampling site was however significantly negatively related to the number of lizards, this pattern being linked to the bioclimate of the various sampling sites. Overall, our data indicated that the assemblage of shrews and lizards was likely regulated essentially by local climate and not by synecological (interspecific competition) dynamics.

Co-occurrence patterns in independently evolved groups of Mediterranean insectivorous vertebrates (lizards and shrews)

in Amphibia-Reptilia



  • AitchisonC.W. (1987): Review of winter trophic relations of soricine shrews. Mammal Review 17: 1-24.

  • AmoriG.ContoliL.NappiA. Eds (2008): Fauna d’Italia Vol. XLIV. Mammalia II. Erinaceomorpha Soricomorpha Lagomorpha Rodentia. Edizioni Calderini de Il Sole 24 ORE Editoria Specializzata S.r.l. Bologna.

  • BlombergS.ShineR. (1996): Reptiles. In: Ecological Census Techniques. A Handbook p.  218-226. SutherlandW.J. Ed. Cambridge University PressCambridge.

  • BrandmayrP.CagninM.MingozziT.ScalercioS.PizzolottoR. (1997): Misura efficace della biodiversità animale in ambienti mediterranei e sue applicazioni. SITE Atti 18: 581-586.

  • BrönmarkC.RundleS.D.ErlandssonA. (1991): Interactions between freshwater snails and tadpoles: competition and facilitation. Oecologia 87: 8-18.

  • BrownJ.H.DavidsonD.W. (1977): Competition between seed-eating rodents and ants in desert ecosystems. Science 196: 880-882.

  • CagninM.PizzolottoR.BarbieriA.TripepiS.RossiF.RipoloD.AloiseP.BrandmayrP. (1991): Zoocenosi (Coleotteri Carabidi, Rettili, micromammiferi terricoli) in ambienti forestali e prativi della Catena Costiera di Calabria. SITE Atti 12: 455-459.

  • CagninM.AloiseG.GarofaloG.MilazzoC.CristaldiM. (1996): Les communautés de petit Mammifères terrestres des trois “fiumare” de la Calabre (Italie du sud). Vie et Milieu 46: 319-326.

  • CagninM.MorenoS.AloiseG.GarofaloG.VillafuerteR.GaonaP.CristaldiM. (1998): A comparative study of Spanish and Italian terrestrial small mammal coenoses of different biotopes in Mediterranean regions. Journal of Biogeography 25: 1105-1113.

  • CamE.NicholsJ.D.HinesJ.E.SauerJ.R. (2000): Inferences about nested subsets structure when not all species are detected. Oikos 91: 428-434.

  • CanovaL.FasolaM. (1993): Food habits and trophic relationships of small mammals in six habitats of the northern Po plain (Italy). Mammalia 57: 189-200.

  • CapizziD.LuiselliL. (1996): Feeding relationships and competitive interactions between phylogenetically unrelated predators (owls and snakes). Acta Oecologica 17: 265-284.

  • CapulaM.AloiseG. (2011): Extreme feeding behaviours in the Italian wall lizard, Podarcis siculus. Acta Herpetologica 6: 11-14.

  • CapulaM.LuiselliL.RugieroL. (1993): Comparative ecology in sympatric Podarcis muralis and P. sicula (Reptilia: Lacertidae) from the historical centre of Rome: What about competition and niche segregation in an urban habitat? Bollettino di Zoologia 60: 287-291.

  • ChessonP.KuangJ.J. (2008): The interaction between predation and competition. Nature 456: 235-238.

  • ChurchfieldS.RychlikL. (2006): Diets and coexistence in Neomys and Sorex shrews in Białowieża forest, eastern Poland. Journal of Zoology London 269: 381-390.

  • ChurchfieldS. (1990): The Natural History of Shrews. Christopher Helm, A & C BlackLondon.

  • ChurchfieldS.NesterenkoV.A.ShvartsE.A. (1999): Food niche overlap and ecological separation amongst six species of coexisting forest srews (Insectivora: Soricidae) in the Russian Far East. Journal of Zoology London 248: 349-359.

  • ConnellJ.H. (1983): On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. American Naturalist 122: 661-696.

  • ConnorE.F.SimberloffD. (1979): The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology 60: 1132-1140.

  • ContoliL. (1988): La nicchia trofica di allocco (Strix aluco) e barbagianni (Tyto alba) in Italia: acquisizioni e problemi. Naturalista Siciliano s. 4 (suppl.): 129-143.

  • CortiC.CapulaM.LuiselliL.RazzettiE.SindacoR. Eds (2010): Fauna d’Italia Vol. XLV. Reptilia Edizioni Calderini de Il Sole 24 ORE Editoria Specializzata S.r.l. Bologna.

  • DenoëlM.SchabetsbergerR. (2003): Resource partitioning in two heterochronic populations of Greek Alpine newts, Triturus alpestris veluchiensis. Acta Oecologica 24: 55-64.

  • DiamondJ.M. (1975): Assembly of species communities. In: Ecology and Evolution of Communities p.  342-444. CodyM.L.DiamondJ.M. Eds Harvard University PressCambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

  • FriendG.R.SmithG.T.MitchellD.S.DickmanC.R. (1989): Influence of pitfall and drift fence design on capture rates on small vertebrates in semi-arid habitats of Western Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 16: 1-10.

  • FriggensM.H.BrownJ.H. (2005): Niche partitioning in the cestode communities of two elasmobranches. Oikos 108: 76-84.

  • GoldbergD.E.BurtonA.M. (1996): Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. American Naturalist 139: 771-801.

  • GotelliN.J. (2000): Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81: 2606-2621.

  • GotelliN.J.EntsmingerG.L. (2011): EcoSim: null modelling software for ecology v.7.0. Acquired Intelligence Inc. and Kesey-Bear Jericho

  • GotelliN.J.GravesG.C. (2006): Null Models in Ecology. Smithsonian Institution PressWashington, D.C.

  • HanskiI. (1987): Colonization of ephemeral habitats. In: Colonization Succession and Stability p.  155-185. GrayA.J.CrawleyM.J.EdwardsP.J. Eds BlackwellLondon.

  • KabischK.EngelmannK.E. (1969): Zur Nahrung von Lacerta muralis (Laurenti) in Ostbulgarien. Zool. Abh. 30: 89-92.

  • KrijgerC.L.PetersY.C.SevensterJ.C. (2001): Competitive ability of neotropical Drosophila predicted from larval development times. Oikos 92: 325-332.

  • LawlorL.L. (1980): Structure and stability in natural and randomly constructed competitive communities. American Naturalist 116: 394-408.

  • LehstenV.HarmandP. (2006): Null models for species cooccurrence patterns: assessing bias and minimum iteration number for the sequential swap. Ecography 29: 786-792.

  • LuiselliL. (2006a): Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in snakes: the search for general geographical and guild patterns. Oikos 114: 193-211.

  • LuiselliL. (2006b): Food niche overlap between sympatric potential competitors increases with habitat alteration at different trophic levels in rain-forest reptiles (omnivorous tortoises and carnivorous vipers). Journal of Tropical Ecology 22: 695-704.

  • LuiselliL. (2008): Do lizards communities partition the trophic niche? A worldwide meta-analysis using null models. Oikos 117: 321-330.

  • MacKenzieD.I.BaileyL.L.NicholsJ.D. (2004): Investigating species co-occurrence patterns when species are detected imperfectly. Journal of Animal Ecology 73: 546-555.

  • MokanyA.ShineR. (2003): Competition between tadpoles and mosquito larvae. Oecologia 135: 615-620.

  • MortonS.R.GillamM.W.JonesK.R.FlemingM.R. (1988): Relative efficiency of different pit-trap systems for sampling reptiles in spinifex grasslands. Australian Wildlife Research 15: 571-577.

  • NicolasV.BarriereP.ColynM. (2003): Impact of removal pitfall trapping on the community of shrews (Mammalia: Soricidae) in two African tropical forest sites. Mammalia 67: 133-138.

  • PankakoskiE. (1979): The cone trap – a useful tool for index trapping of small mammals. Annales Zoologici Fennici 16: 144-150.

  • Pérez-MelladoV.CortiC. (1993): Dietary adaptations and herbivory in lacertid lizards of the genus Podarcis from western Mediterranean islands (Reptilia: Sauria). Bonner Zoologische Beitraege 44: 193-220.

  • PiankaE.R. (1986): Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards. Analyses of the Ecological Niche and Community Structure. Princeton University PressPrinceton, New Jersey.

  • PucekZ. (1969): Trap response and estimation of numbers of shrews in removal catches. Acta Theriologica 14: 403-426.

  • RayJ.C.SunquistM.E. (2001): Trophic relations in a community of African rainforest carnivores. Oecologia 127: 395-408.

  • RychlikL.RamalhinhoG.PollyP.D. (2006): Response to environmental factors and competition: skull, mandible and tooth shapes in Polish water shrews (Neomys, Soricidae, Mammalia). Journal for Zoological and Systematic and Evolutionary Research 44: 339-351.

  • SandersN.J.GotelliN.J.HellerN.E.GordonD.M. (2003): Community disassembly by an invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100: 2474-2477.

  • SchoenerT.W. (1974): The compression hypothesis and temporal resource partitioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 71: 4169-4172.

  • SchoenerT.W. (1982): The controversy over interspecific competition. American Scientist 70: 586-595.

  • ShorrocksB. (1990): Coexistence in a patchy environment. In: Living in a Patchy Environment p.  91-106. ShorrocksB.SwinglandI.S. Eds Oxford Univ. PressOxford.

  • StoneL.RobertsA. (1990): The checkerboard score and species distributions. Oecologia 85: 74-79.

  • ToschiA. (1959): Insectivora. In: Mammalia. Generalità Insectivora Chiroptera. Fauna d’Italia. Vol. IV. ToschiA.LanzaB. Eds Calderini ed.Bologna.

  • UlrichW. (2004): Species co-occurrences and neutral models: reassessing J.M. Diamond’s assembly rules. Oikos 107: 603-609.

  • UlrichW.GotelliN.J. (2007): Disentangling community patterns of nestedness and species co-occurrence. Oikos 116: 2053-2061.

  • Van DammeR. (1999): Evolution of herbivory in lacertid lizards: effects of insularity and body size. Journal of Herpetology 33: 663-674.

  • VignoliL.LuiselliL. (2012): Dietary relationships among coexisting anuran amphibians: a worldwide quantitative review. Oecologia 169: 499-509.

  • VittL.J.PiankaE.R. (2005): Deep history impacts present-day ecology and biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102: 7877-7881.

  • WiensJ.A. (1977): On competition and variable environments. American Scientist 65: 590-597.


  • View in gallery

    Relationship between, respectively, number of captured animals (A = lizards, B = shrews) and PCA1 of the principal component analysis on elevation, mean annual temperature and annual rainfall. For the statistical details, see the text.

  • View in gallery

    Relationships between (log + 1) of the number of soricids and (log + 1) of the number of lizards captured in each sampling site. For the statistical details, see the text.

  • View in gallery

    Scatter plot of a PCA of elevation, mean annual temperature, and annual rainfall data from the 72 study stations. For the statistical details, see the text.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 57 47 1
Full Text Views 143 143 0
PDF Downloads 6 6 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0