Barriers for conservation: mitigating the impact on amphibians and reptiles by water cisterns in arid environments

in Amphibia-Reptilia
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Anthropogenic infrastructures are one of the major threats to biodiversity. In the north-western Sahara shepherds are increasingly building water cisterns of reinforced concrete for watering livestock. These infrastructures attract desert fauna and act as indiscriminate death traps for the amphibians and reptiles (herps) in the surrounding habitats. Here we propose an on-site, cost-effective management measure. We selected two groups of 36 cisterns, managed a group by covering the lateral openings with wire mesh (managed cistern), leaving the other group unmanaged (control cistern). Managed cisterns trapped fewer species, fewer individuals (one third), and individuals of smaller body size and of less conservation concern than did control cisterns. In a multivariate approach by Generalized Mixed Models, the best models explaining the number of species and individuals of herps trapped within cisterns included as the predictor only the management condition, with a trend for higher values in control cisterns.

Barriers for conservation: mitigating the impact on amphibians and reptiles by water cisterns in arid environments

in Amphibia-Reptilia

References

ArescoM.J. (2005): Mitigation measures to reduce high way mortality of turtles and other herpetofauna at a north Florida lake. J. Wild. Manag. 69: 549-560.

AzizF.FarissiM.KhalifaJ.OuazzaniN.MandiL. (2014): Les réservoirs de stockage d’eau traditionnel: caractéristiques, popularité et problèmes. IJISR 11: 83-95.

BartonK. (2016): MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.15.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn (accessed 15.06.2016).

BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015): Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67: 1-48.

BenayasJ.M.R.De La MontanaE.BelliureJ.EekhoutX.R. (2006): Identifying areas of high herpetofauna diversity that are threatened by planned infrastructure projects in Spain. J. Environ. Manag. 79: 279-289.

Benítez-LópezA.AlkemadeR.VerweijP.A. (2010): The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: a meta-analysis. Biol. Conserv. 143: 1307-1316.

BritoJ.C.GodinhoR.Martínez-FreiríaF.PleguezuelosJ.M. (2014): Unravelling biodiversity, evolution and threats to conservation in the Sahara-Sahel. Biol. Rev. 89: 215-231.

BurkettD.W.ThompsonB.C. (1994): Wildlife association with human-altered water sources in semiarid vegetation communities. Conserv. Biol. 8: 682-690.

BurnhamK.P.AndersonD.R. (2002): Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer-VerlagNew York.

DaviesJ.PoulsenL.Schulte-HerbrüggenB.MackinnonK.CrawhallN.HenwoodW.D.DudleyN.SmithJ.GudkaM. (2012): Conserving Dryland Biodiversity. IUCNNairobi.

García-CardeneteL.PleguezuelosJ.M.BritoJ.C.Jimenez-CazallaF.Perez-GarciaM.T.SantosX. (2014): Water cisterns as death traps for amphibians and reptiles in arid environments. Environ. Conserv. 41: 341-349.

GriloC.BissonetteJ.A.CramerP.C. (2010): Mitigation measures to reduce impacts on biodiversity. In: Highways: Construction Management and Maintenance p.  63-114. JonesS.R. Ed. Nova ScienceHahppauge.

ManningG.J. (2007): Uta stansburiana (side-blotched lizard). Mortality. Herpetol. Rev. 38: 465.

McIntyreN.E.DrakeJ.C.Griffis-KyleK.L. (2016): A connectivity and wildlife management conflict in isolated desert waters. J. Wildl. Manag. 80: 655-666.

NorthrupJ.M.WittemyerG. (2013): Characterising the impacts of emerging energy development on wildlife, with an eye towards mitigation. Ecol. Lett. 16: 112-125.

PedlerR.D. (2010): The impacts of abandoned mining shafts: fauna entrapment in opal prospecting shafts at Coober Pedy, South Australia. Ecol. Manage. Restor. 11: 36-42.

PleguezuelosJ.M.BritoJ.C.FahdS.FericheM.MateoJ.A.Moreno-RuedaG.RequesR.SantosX. (2010): Setting conservation priorities for the Moroccan herpetofauna: the utility of regional red lists. Oryx 44: 501-508.

R Core Team (2016): R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna, Austria. Available at https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 15.06.2016).

ThortonP.K.JonesP.G.OwiyoT.KruskaR.L. (2008): Climate change and poverty in Africa: mapping hotspots of vulnerability. AfJARE 2: 24-44.

Van der ReeR.GagnonJ.W.SmithD.J. (2015): Fencing: a valuable tool for reducing wildlife-vehicle collisions and funnelling fauna to crossing structures. In: Handbook of Road Ecology p.  159-171. Van der ReeR.SmithD.J.GriloC. Eds Wiley-BlackwellHokobe.

WilsonJ.S.TophamS. (2009): The negative effects of barrier fencing on the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) and non-target species: is there room for improvement? Contempor. Herpetol. 2009: 1-4.

YerliS.CanbolatA.F.BrownL.J.MacdonaldD.W. (1997): Mesh grids protect loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta nests from red fox Vulpes vulpes predation. Biol. Conserv. 82: 109-111.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    (A) Location of the study area in north-western Africa. (B) Distribution of managed water cisterns (red symbols) and control water cisterns (green symbols) in the three zones of the study area (circles, zone 1; triangles, zone 2; squares, zone 3). (C) Typical cistern in a typical environment of the study area. (D) Wire mesh fitted over a water-inlet opening creating a barrier effect against amphibians and reptiles.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 60 60 19
Full Text Views 155 155 65
PDF Downloads 11 11 1
EPUB Downloads 7 7 0