Save

Political Audiences and the Abolition of Capital Punishment in the Asia Pacific

In: Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law
Author:
Samantha Bradley School of Politics and International Relations, Australian National University, samanthafrancesbradley@gmail.com

Search for other papers by Samantha Bradley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

This article investigates why some states in the Asia Pacific have retained capital punishment, while others have abolished it, either de facto or de jure. In contrast to existing theories, it is theorised that governments conduct cost-benefit calculations considering both domestic support and international pressure for abolition, then formulate their death penalty policy based on the lowest cost scenario. This theory is tested by applying controlled comparison and process tracing analysis to three cases: Cambodia, South Korea, and Indonesia. These case studies demonstrate that pressures from domestic and international political audiences are determinative in states’ decision-making processes regarding capital punishment.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1194 116 5
Full Text Views 116 5 0
PDF Views & Downloads 134 14 0