It is intended in this study to present initial reliability and validity data for the Russian adaptation of the Multidimensional Inventory of Religious/Spiritual Well-being (MI-RSWB-R), as being related to personality factors and psychopathology. Therefore, the first version of the MI-RSWB-R was applied to a sample of 192 (147 females) non-clinical subjects, together with the NEO Five Factor Inventory and the Symptom-Check-List (SCL-90-R). The original six-factor structure of the scale could be replicated for the MI-RSWB-R, which also provides satisfying psychometric properties. In accordance with previous research the RSWB total score was linked to more favorable personality traits such as Extraversion (r = .45), Openness to Experience (r = .39), and Agreeableness (r = .38), which was paralleled by substantial negative correlations with increased psychopathology. Our findings support the reliability and structural validity of the MI-RSWB-R as a standardized instrument for addressing the spiritual dimension in Russian populations. Further research in clinical surroundings is now recommended.
BergerD.FinkA.PerezG. M.LewisA. & UnterrainerH.-F. (2016). The validation of a Spanish version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Religious/Spiritual Well-Being in Mexican college students. The Spanish Journal of PsychologyE31-11.
HillP. C.PargamentK. I.HoodR. W.McCulloughM. E.SwyersJ. P.LarsonD. B. & ZinnbauerB. J. (2000). Conceptualizing religion and spirituality: Points of commonality, points of departure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour30(1) 51-77.
LedbetterM. F.SmithL. A.Vosler-HunterW. L. & FischerJ. D. (1991). An evaluation of the research and clinical usefulness of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale. Journal of Psychology and Theology19(1) 49-55.
MalinovicA.FinkA.LewisA. & UnterrainerH.-F. (2016). Dimensions of religious/spiritual well-being in relation to personality and stress coping: Initial results from Bosnian young adults. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health18(1) 43-54.
MartinT. A.CostaP. T.Jr.OryolV. E.RukavishnikovA. A. & SeninI. G. (2002). Applications of the Russian NEO-PI-R. In R. R.McCrae & J.Alik (Eds.) The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 261-277). New York: Springer.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.MartinT. A.OryolV. E.RukavishnikovA. A.SeninI. G.HřebíčkováM.UrbánekT. (2004). Consensual validation of personality traits across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality38(2) 179-201.
UnterrainerH.-F.LadenhaufK. H.MoazediM.Wallner-LiebmannS. & FinkA. (2010). Dimensions of religious/spiritual well-being and their relation to personality and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences49(3) 192-197.
UnterrainerH.-F.LadenhaufK. H.Wallner-LiebmannS. J. & FinkA. (2011). Different types of religious/spiritual well-being in relation to personality and subjective well-being. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion21(2) 115-126.
UnterrainerH.-F.NelsonO.CollicuttJ. & FinkA. (2012). The English version of the Multidimensional Inventory for Religious/Spiritual Well-being (MI-RSWB-E): First results from British college students. Religions3(3) 588-599.
UnterrainerH.-F.RuttingerJ.LewisA. J.AnglimJ.FinkA. & KapfhammerH.-P. (2016). Vulnerable dark triad personality facets are associated with religious fundamentalist tendencies. Psychopathology49(1) 47-52.
WorthingtonE. L.Jr.WitvlietC. V. O.PietriniP. & MillerA. J. (2007). Forgiveness, health, and well-being: A review of evidence for emotional versus decisional forgiveness, dispositional forgivingness, and reduced unforgiveness. Journal of Behavioral Medicine30(4) 291-302.
ZinnbauerB. J.PargamentK. I.ColeB.RyeM. S.ButterE. M.BelavichT. G.HippK. M.ScottA. B.KadarJ. L. (1997). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion36(4) 549-564.