Rethinking Autism, Theism, and Atheism

Bodiless Agents and Imaginary Realities

in Archive for the Psychology of Religion
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



This anthropologically informed study explores descriptions of communication with invisible, superhuman agents in high functioning young adults on the autism spectrum. Based on material from interviews, two hypotheses are formulated. First, autistic individuals may experience communication with bodiless agents (e.g., gods, angels, and spirits) as less complex than interaction with peers, since it is unrestricted by multisensory input, such as body language, facial expressions, and intonation. Second, descriptions of how participants absorb into “imaginary realities” suggest that such mental states are desirable due to qualities that facilitate social cognition: While the empirical world comes through as fragmented and incoherent, imaginary worlds offer predictability, emotional coherence, and benevolent minds. These results do not conform to popular expectations that autistic minds are less adapted to experience supernatural agents, and it is instead argued that imaginative, autistic individuals may embrace religious and fictive agents in search for socially and emotionally comprehensible interaction.

Rethinking Autism, Theism, and Atheism

Bodiless Agents and Imaginary Realities

in Archive for the Psychology of Religion



American Psychiatric Associatiion. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: Author.

AttwoodT. (2006). The complete guide to Asperger’s syndrome. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

BanerjeeK. & BloomP. (2014). Why did this happen to me? Religious believers’ and non-believers’ teleological reasoning about life events. Cognition133(1) 277-303.

Baron-CohenS. (1985). Social cognition and pretend play in autism. London: University of London.

Baron‐CohenS.GolanO. & AshwinE. (2009). Can emotion recognition be taught to children with autism spectrum conditions? Proceedings of the Royal Society (Series B)3643567-3574.

BarrettJ. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences4(1) 29-34.

BarrettJ. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

BarrettJ. (2012). Born believers: The science of children’s religious beliefs. New York: Free Press.

BeringJ. (2002). The existential theory of mind. Review of General Psychology6(1) 3-24.

BeringJ. M. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences29453-498.

BeringJ. (2010). Atheism is only skin deep: Geertz and Markússon rely mistakenly on sociodemographic data as meaningful indicators of underlying cognition. Religion40(3) 166-168.

Bird G. & Cook R. (2013). Mixed emotions: The contribution of alexithymia to emotional symptoms of autism. Translational Psychiatry3(7) e285.

BölteS. (2014). The power of words: Is qualitative research as important as quantitative research in the study of autism? Autism18(2) 67-68.

BoucherJ. (2011). Redefining the concept of autism as a unitary disorder: Multiple causal deficits of a single kind? In D. A. Fein (Ed.) The neuropsychology of autism (pp. 469-483). New York: Oxford University Press.

BoydJ. H. (2008). Have we found the holy grail? Theory of mind as a unifying construct. Journal of Religion and Health47(3) 366-385.

BoyerP. (1994). The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.

BoyerP. (1997). Distinctions between magic, reality, religion and fiction. Child Development68(6) 1012-1014.

BrockJ.BrownC. B.Boucher J. & Rippon G. (2002). The temporal binding deficit hypothesis of autism. Development and Psychopathology14(2) 209-224.

BurénA. A. (2015). Living simultaneity: On religion among semi-secular Swedes. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.

Caldwell-HarrisC.Murphy C.VelazquezT. & McNamaraP. (2012). Religious belief systems of persons with high functioning autism. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society3362-3366.

ColemanT. J.III. (2016). The social brain in human and religious evolution: Elucidating the role of theory of mind in (non)religious belief. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.

CraigJ. & Baron-CohenS. (1999). Creativity and imagination in autism and Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders29(4) 319-326.

CraneL.GoddardL. & PringL. (2009). Sensory processing in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism13(3) 215-228.

CrespiB.LeachE.DinsdaleN.MokkonenM. & HurdP. (2016). Imagination in human social cognition, autism, and psychotic-affective conditions. Cognition150181-199.

DavidsonJ. & OrsiniM. (2013). The shifting horizons of autism online. In J. Davidson & M. Orsini (Eds.) Worlds of autism: Across the spectrum of neurological difference (pp. 285-303). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology1085.

DewrangP. (2011). Asperger’s syndrome: Social functioning in relation to behavioural and cognitive traits from infancy to young adulthood. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

EpleyN.ConverseB. A.DelboscA.MonteleoneG. A. & CacioppoJ. T. (2009). Believers’ estimates of God’s beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people’s beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106(51) 21533-21538.

Foss-FeigJ. H.KwakyeL. D.CascioC. J.BurnetteC.P.KadivarH.StoneW. L. & WallaceM. T. (2010). An extended multisensory temporal binding window in autism spectrum disorders. Experimental Brain Research203(2) 381-389.

FrithU. & FrithC. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences358(1431) 459-473.

GeertzA. W. & MarkússonG. I. (2010). Religion is natural, atheism is not: On why everybody is both right and wrong. Religion40(3) 152-165.

GervaisW. M. (2013). Perceiving minds and gods: How mind perception enables, constrains, and is triggered by belief in gods. Perspectives on Psychological Science8(4) 380-394.

GouldJ. (2016April 8). Autism among girls and women [Lecture at Stockholm University]. Retrieved from

GrandinT. & JohnsonC. (2005). Animals in translation. New York: Scribner.

HackingI. (2010). Autism fiction: A mirror of an Internet decade? University of Toronto Quarterly79(2) 632-655.

HappéF. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development66(3) 843-855.

HeywoodB. T. & BeringJ. M. (2014). “Meant to be”: How religious beliefs and cultural religiosity affect the implicit bias to think teleologically. Religion Brain & Behaviour4(3) 183-201.

JackA. I.FriedmanJ. P.BoyatzisR. E. & TaylorS. N. (2016). Why do you believe in God? Relationships between religious belief, analytic thinking, mentalizing and moral concern. PloS one11(3) e0149989.

JewellE. J. & AbateF. R. (2001). New Oxford American dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

KelemenD. & RossetE. (2009). The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition111138-143.

LindemanM. & LipsanenJ. (2016). Diverse cognitive profiles of religious believers and nonbelievers. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion26(3) 1-8.

Looking. (2016March 10). Re: Anyone with autism have a good imagination? [Blog comment]. Retrieved from

Lorraine. (2016December 8). Re: Autism and imagination?? [Blog comment]. Retrieved from–autism-imagination-all.html.

MaijD. L. R.van HarreveldF.GervaisW.SchragY.MohrC. & van ElkM. (2017). Mentalizing skills do not differentiate believers from non-believers but credibility enhancing displays do. PLoS ONE12(8) e0182764.

MarkramH.RinaldiT. & MarkramK. (2007). The intense world syndrome: An alternative hypothesis for autism. Frontiers in Neuroscience1(1) 77-96.

McCauleyR. N. (2011). Why religion is natural and science is not. New York: Oxford University Press.

McGrathJ. (2016April). Autism, systemizing and empathy: Some inside-out comments. Retrieved from

MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research. A guide to design and implementation. San Fransisco: Josey Bass.

NorenzayanA.GervaisW. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2012). Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in a personal god. PLoS ONE7(5) e36880.

PavlidesM. (2008). Animal-assisted interventions for individuals with autism. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

PetersonC.GarnettM.KellyA. & AttwoodT. (2009). Everyday social and conversation applications of theory-of-mind understanding by children with autism-spectrum disorders or typical development. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry18(2) 105-115.

ReddishP.TokP. & KundtR. (2016). Religious cognition and behaviour in autism: The role of mentalizing. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion26(2) 1-36.

RicœurP. (1995). Figuring the sacred: Religion narrative and imagination. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

RogersK.DziobekI.HassenstabJ.WolfO. T. & ConvitA. (2007). Who cares? Revisiting empathy in Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders37709-715.

ScottF. J. (2013). The development of imagination in children in autism. In M. Taylor (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of the development of imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

SeligmanA.WellerR. P.PuettM. J. & BennettS. (2008). Ritual and its consequences. An essay on the limits of sincerity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

SmartN. (1989). The world’s religions: Old traditions and modern transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SmithA. (2009). The empathy imbalance hypothesis of autism: A theoretical approach to cognitive and emotional empathy in autistic development. Psychological Record59(3) 489-510.

SmithJ. A.JarmanM. & OsbornM. (1999). Doing interpretational phenomenological analysis. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.) Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods (pp. 218-240). London: Sage.

SmithR. S. & SharpJ. (2013). Fascination and isolation: A grounded theory exploration of unusual sensory experiences in adults with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders43(4) 891-910.

SolomonO. (2010). Sense and the senses: Anthropology and the study of autism. Annual Review of Anthropology39(1) 241-259.

SperberD. (1997). Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind and Language12(1) 67-83.

Tager-FlusbergH. (2007). Evaluating the Theory-of-Mind Hypothesis of autism. Current Directions on Psychological Science16(6) 311-315.

Tager-FlusbergH. & JosephR. M. (2005). How language facilitates the acquisition of false-belief understanding in children with autism. In J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.) Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 298-318). New York, NY: Oxford Press.

TavesA. (2013). Building blocks of sacralities: A new basis for comparison across cultures and religions. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.) Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 138-164). New York: The Guildford Press.

The Swedish Research Council. (2011). Good research practice. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.

ThurfjellD. (2015). Det gudlösa folket: De postkristna svenskarna och religionen [The godless people: The post-Christian Swedes and religion]. Stockholm: Molin & Sorgenfrei.

TorranceE. P. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical manual research edition-Verbal tests forms A and B-Figural tests forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.

TremlinT. (2006). Minds and gods. The cognitive foundations of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

VisuriI. (2012). Could everyone talk to God? A case study on Asperger’s syndrome, religion & spirituality. Journal of Religion Health and Disability. 16(4) 352-378.

VisuriI. (2018). Dis-order: Cognition explored through a different lens. In L. MartinA. K. PedersenI. Sælid GilhusJ. Sinding Jensen & J. Sørensen (Eds.) A new synthesis for the study of religion. Cognition evolution and history in the study of religion. Brill Supplements to Method and Theory in the Study of Religion.

VonkJ. & PitzenJ. (2017). Accurate mentalizing does not predict religiosity. Personality and Individual Differences11570-76.

WallaceM. T. (2012). The impact of multisensory alterations in human developmental disabilities and disease: The tip of an iceberg? In B. E. Stein (Ed.) The new handbook of multisensory processing (pp. 645-655). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

WillardA. K. & NorenzayanA. (2013). Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose. Cognition129(2) 379-391.

WilsonS. C. & BarberT. X. (1981). Behavior therapy as a short-term therapeutic approach. In S. H. Budman (Ed.) Forms of brief therapy (pp. 131-166). New York: Guilford Press.

WilsonS. C. &. BarberT. X. (1983). The fantasy-prone personality: Implications for understanding imagery, hypnosis, and parapsychological phenomena. In A. A. Sheikh (Ed.) Imagery: Current theory research and application (pp. 340-390). New York: Wiley.

WingL. & GouldJ. (1979). Severe impairments of social interaction and associated abnormalities in children: Epidemiology and classification. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders9(1) 11-29.



Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 122 122 47
Full Text Views 96 96 74
PDF Downloads 6 6 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0