This anthropologically informed study explores descriptions of communication with invisible, superhuman agents in high functioning young adults on the autism spectrum. Based on material from interviews, two hypotheses are formulated. First, autistic individuals may experience communication with bodiless agents (e.g., gods, angels, and spirits) as less complex than interaction with peers, since it is unrestricted by multisensory input, such as body language, facial expressions, and intonation. Second, descriptions of how participants absorb into “imaginary realities” suggest that such mental states are desirable due to qualities that facilitate social cognition: While the empirical world comes through as fragmented and incoherent, imaginary worlds offer predictability, emotional coherence, and benevolent minds. These results do not conform to popular expectations that autistic minds are less adapted to experience supernatural agents, and it is instead argued that imaginative, autistic individuals may embrace religious and fictive agents in search for socially and emotionally comprehensible interaction.
BoucherJ. (2011). Redefining the concept of autism as a unitary disorder: Multiple causal deficits of a single kind? In D. A.Fein (Ed.) The neuropsychology of autism (pp. 469-483). New York: Oxford University Press.
Caldwell-HarrisC.MurphyC.VelazquezT. & McNamaraP. (2012). Religious belief systems of persons with high functioning autism. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society3362-3366.
DavidsonJ. & OrsiniM. (2013). The shifting horizons of autism online. In J.Davidson & M.Orsini (Eds.) Worlds of autism: Across the spectrum of neurological difference (pp. 285-303). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
EpleyN.ConverseB. A.DelboscA.MonteleoneG. A. & CacioppoJ. T. (2009). Believers’ estimates of God’s beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people’s beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106(51) 21533-21538.
Looking. (2016March10). Re: Anyone with autism have a good imagination? [Blog comment]. Retrieved from https://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=307754&start=15.
Lorraine. (2016December8). Re: Autism and imagination?? [Blog comment]. Retrieved from https://www.netmums.com/coffeehouse/advice-support-40/special-needs-disabilities-support-502/237916–autism-imagination-all.html.
MaijD. L. R.van HarreveldF.GervaisW.SchragY.MohrC. & van ElkM. (2017). Mentalizing skills do not differentiate believers from non-believers but credibility enhancing displays do. PLoS ONE12(8) e0182764.
McGrathJ. (2016April). Autism, systemizing and empathy: Some inside-out comments. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/24026438/Autism_Systemizing_and_Empathy_Some_Inside-Out_Comments_Autism_Awareness_Week_April_2016_.
PetersonC.GarnettM.KellyA. & AttwoodT. (2009). Everyday social and conversation applications of theory-of-mind understanding by children with autism-spectrum disorders or typical development. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry18(2) 105-115.
SmithR. S. & SharpJ. (2013). Fascination and isolation: A grounded theory exploration of unusual sensory experiences in adults with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders43(4) 891-910.
Tager-FlusbergH. & JosephR. M. (2005). How language facilitates the acquisition of false-belief understanding in children with autism. In J. W.Astington & J. A.Baird (Eds.) Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 298-318). New York, NY: Oxford Press.
TavesA. (2013). Building blocks of sacralities: A new basis for comparison across cultures and religions. In R. F.Paloutzian & C. L.Park (Eds.) Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 138-164). New York: The Guildford Press.
VisuriI. (2018). Dis-order: Cognition explored through a different lens. In L.MartinA. K.PedersenI.Sælid GilhusJ.Sinding Jensen & J.Sørensen (Eds.) A new synthesis for the study of religion. Cognition evolution and history in the study of religion. Brill Supplements to Method and Theory in the Study of Religion.
WallaceM. T. (2012). The impact of multisensory alterations in human developmental disabilities and disease: The tip of an iceberg? In B. E.Stein (Ed.) The new handbook of multisensory processing (pp. 645-655). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
WilsonS. C. &. BarberT. X. (1983). The fantasy-prone personality: Implications for understanding imagery, hypnosis, and parapsychological phenomena. In A. A.Sheikh (Ed.) Imagery: Current theory research and application (pp. 340-390). New York: Wiley.