Religion’s historical mistrust of sexuality shapes people’s behavior by inhibiting liberal sexuality. Still, it is unclear whether this inhibitive role also includes common, normative sexual behavior, particularly in secularized contexts. Moreover, the possible mediating effects emotions, affects, and thoughts have on the association between religiosity and restricted sexuality have never been integrated into a single model. Finally, cross-religious differences in common sexual behavior have still yet to be documented. We addressed these three issues in two studies, with samples of Catholic and Muslim tradition (total N = 446). Consistently across samples, religiosity predicted, either directly or indirectly, less frequent common heterosexual behaviors and masturbation, partly through sexual guilt and inhibition, and/or decreased sexual fantasy and the search for sexual pleasure. However, married Muslims’ religiosity, unlike Catholics’, did not directly undermine fertility-oriented sexuality and the search for pleasure. Religion’s role in restricting sexuality seems to be rooted in deep psychological rationale.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Aalsma, M. C., Woodrome, S. E., Downs, S. M., Hensel, D. J., Zimet, G. D., Orr, D. P., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2013). Developmental trajectories of religiosity, sexual conservatism and sexual behavior among female adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 1193-1204.
Adamczyk, A., & Hayes, B. E. (2012). Religion and sexual behaviors: Islamic cultures, religious affiliation, and sex outside of marriage. American Sociological Review, 77, 723-746.
Ahrold, T. K., Farmer, M. A., Trapnell, P. D., & Meston, C. M. (2011). The relationship among sexual attitudes, sexual fantasy, and religiosity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 619-630.
Baćak, V., & Štulhofer, A. (2011). Masturbation among sexually active young women in Croatia: Associations with religiosity and pornography use. International Journal of Sexual Health, 23, 248-257.
Baumeister, R. F., & Exline, J. J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality 67, 1165-1194.
Brelsford, G. M., Luquis, R., & Murray-Swank, N. A. (2011). College students’ permissive sexual attitudes: Links to religiousness and spirituality. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21, 127-136.
Byrne, B. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Cohen, A. B., & Rozin, P. (2001). Religion and the morality of mentality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 697-710.
Deak, C., & Saroglou, V. (2015). Opposing abortion, gay adoption, euthanasia, and suicide: Compassionate openness or self-centered moral rigorism? Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 37, 267-294.
de Visser, R. O., Smith, A. M., Richters, J., & Rissel, C. E. (2007). Associations between religiosity and sexuality in a representative sample of Australian adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 33-46.
Dialmy, A. (2010). Sexuality and Islam. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 15, 160-168.
Doebler, S. (2015). Relationships between religion and two forms of homonegativity in Europe—A multilevel analysis of effects of believing, belonging and religious practice. PLoS ONE, 10, Article e0133538.
Dogan, S. J., Stockdale, G. D., Widaman, K. F., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Developmental relations and patterns of change between alcohol use and number of sexual partners from adolescence through adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1747-1759.
Epstein, M., Bailey, J. A., Manhart, L. E., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., Haggerty, K. P., & Catalano, R. F. (2014). Understanding the link between early sexual initiation and later sexually transmitted infection: Test and replication in two longitudinal studies. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54, 435-441.
Farmer, M. A., Trapnell, P. D., & Meston, C. M. (2009). The relation between sexual behavior and religiosity subtypes: A test of the secularization hypothesis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 852-865.
Freud, S. (1961). Obsessive actions and religious practices. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 115-128). London, UK: Hogarth Press.
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385.
Grubbs, J. B., Exline, J. J., Pargament, K. I., Hook, J. N., & Carlisle, R. D. (2015). Transgression as addiction: Religiosity and moral disapproval as predictors of perceived addiction to pornography. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 125-136.
Grubbs, J. B., Exline, J. J., Pargament, K. I., Volk, F., & Lindberg, M. J. (2017). Internet pornography use, perceived addiction, and religious/spiritual struggles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1733-1745.
Gunderson, M. P., & McCary, J. L. (1979). Sexual guilt and religion. The Family Coordinator, 28, 353-357.
Hernandez, K. M., Mahoney, A., & Pargament, K. I. (2013). Sexuality and religion. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA Handbook of sexuality and psychology. Vol. 2: Contextual approaches (pp. 425-447). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hoffarth, M. R., Hodson, G., & Molnar, D. S. (2018). When and why is religious attendance associated with antigay bias and gay rights opposition? A justification-suppression model approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 526-563.
Hook, J. N., Farrell, J. E., Ramos, M. J., Davis, D. E., Karaga, S., Van Tongeren, D. R., & Grubbs, J. (2015). Religiousness and congruence between sexual values and behavior. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 34, 179-188.
Hull, S. J., Hennessy, M., Bleakley, A., Fishbein, M., & Jordan, A. (2011). Identifying the causal pathways from religiosity to delayed adolescent sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 543-553.
Hunt, S. J., & Yip, A. K.-T. (Eds.). (2012). The Ashgate research companion to contemporary religion and sexuality. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
Hurlbert, D. F., & Apt, C. (1993). Female sexuality: A comparative study between women in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 19, 315-327.
Janda, L. H., & Bazemore, S. D. (2011). The Revised Mosher Sex-Guilt Scale: Its psychometric properties and a proposed ten-item version. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 392-396.
Jung, J. H. (2016). A cross-national analysis of religion and attitudes toward premarital sex: Do economic contexts matter? Sociological Perspectives, 59, 798-817.
Khurana, A., Romer, D., Betancourt, L. M., Brodsky, N. L., Giannetta, J. M., & Hurt, H. (2012). Early adolescent sexual debut: The mediating role of working memory ability, sensation seeking, and impulsivity. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1416-1428.
Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469-496.
Li, Y. J., & Cohen, A. B. (2014). Religion, sexuality, and family. In. V. Saroglou (Ed.), Religion, personality, and social behavior (pp. 213-229). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Malka, A. (2014). Religion and domestic political attitudes around the world. In V. Saroglou (Ed.), Religion, personality, and social behavior (pp. 230-254). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
McCullough, M. E., & Carter, E. C. (2013). Religion, self-control, and self-regulation: How and why are they related? In K. I. Pargament, J. J. Exline, & J. W. James (Eds.), APA Handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1, pp. 123-138). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Meston, C. D., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 477-507.
Mosher, D. L., & Cross, H. J. (1971). Sex guilt and premarital sexual experiences of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 27-32.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Olatunji, B. O. (2008). Disgust, scrupulosity and conservative attitudes about sex: Evidence for a mediational model of homophobia. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1364-1369.
Olatunji, B. O., Williams, N. L., Tolin, D. F., Abramowitz, J. S., Sawchuk, C. N., Lohr, J. M., & Elwood, L. S. (2007). The Disgust Scale: Item analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement. Psychological Assessment, 19, 281-297.
Pedersen, W. (2014). Forbidden fruit? A longitudinal study of Christianity, sex, and marriage. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 542-550.
Pew Research Center (2017). The changing global religious landscape. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2017/04/05/the-changing-global-religious-landscape/.
Preston, J. L., & Ritter, R. S. (2012). Cleanliness and godliness: Mutual association between two kinds of personal purity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1365-1368.
Regnerus, M. D. (2007). Forbidden fruit: Sex and religion in the lives of American teenagers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Riggs, N. R., Tate, E. B., Ridenour, T. A., Reynolds, M. D., Zhai, Z. W., Vanyukov, M. M., & Tarter, R. E. (2013). Longitudinal associations from neurobehavioral disinhibition to adolescent risky sexual behavior in boys: Direct and mediated effects through moderate alcohol consumption. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 465-470.
Rigo, C., & Saroglou, V. (2013, August). Religious priming decreases appreciation and watching time of erotic pictures. Paper presented at the International Association for Psychology of Religion Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rigo, C., Uzarevic, F., & Saroglou, V. (2016). Make love and lose your religion and virtue: Recalling sexual experience undermines spiritual intentions and moral behavior. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 55, 23-39.
Ritter, R. S., & Preston, J. L. (2011). Gross gods and icky atheism: Disgust responses to rejected religious beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1225-1230.
Ritter, R. S., Preston, J. L., Salomon, E., & Relihan-Johnson, D. (2016). Imagine no religion: Heretical disgust, anger and the symbolic purity of mind. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 778-796.
Roccas, S., & Elster, A. (2014). Values and religiosity. In V. Saroglou (Ed.), Religion, personality, and social behavior (pp. 193-212). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Rostosky, S. S., Wilcox, B. L., Wright, M. L. C., & Randall, B. A. (2004). The impact of religiosity on adolescent sexual behavior: A review of the evidence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 677-697.
Rowatt, W. C., & Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Associations between religious orientation and varieties of sexual experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 455-465.
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (2016). Disgust. In L. F. Barrett, M. Lewis, & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (4th ed., pp. 815-834). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Saroglou, V. (2012). Adolescents’ social development and the role of religion: Coherence at the detriment of openness. In G. Trommsdorff & X. Chen (Eds.), Values, religion, and culture in adolescent development (pp. 391-423). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Saroglou, V. (2019). Religion and related morality across cultures. In D. Matsumoto & H. C. Hwang (Eds.), The handbook of culture and psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., & Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721-734.
Saroglou, V., & Mathijsen, F. (2007). Religion, multiple identities, and acculturation: A study of Muslim immigrants in Belgium. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 29, 177-198.
Schmitt, D. P., & Fuller, R. C. (2015). On the varieties of sexual experience: Cross-cultural links between religiosity and human mating strategies. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7, 314-326.
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). Values and religion in adolescent development: Cross-national and comparative evidence. In G. Trommsdorff & X. Chen (Eds.), Values, religion, and culture in adolescent development (pp. 97-122). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Thatcher, A. (Ed.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of theology, sexuality, and gender. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Vasilenko, S. A., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2014). Changes in religiosity after first intercourse in the transition to adulthood. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6, 310-315.
Woo, J. S. T., Morshedian, N., Brotto, L. A., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2012). Sex guilt mediates the relationship between religiosity and sexual desire in East Asian and Euro-Canadian college-aged women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1485-1495.
Wyatt, G. E., & Dunn, K. M. (1991). Examining predictors of sex guilt in a multiethnic sample of women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, 471-485.
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Helfand, M. (2008). Ten years of longitudinal research on U.S. adolescent sexual behavior: Developmental correlates of sexual intercourse, and the importance of age, gender and ethnic background. Developmental Review, 28, 153-224.
Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 139-149.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1210 | 153 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 64 | 7 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 76 | 18 | 0 |
Religion’s historical mistrust of sexuality shapes people’s behavior by inhibiting liberal sexuality. Still, it is unclear whether this inhibitive role also includes common, normative sexual behavior, particularly in secularized contexts. Moreover, the possible mediating effects emotions, affects, and thoughts have on the association between religiosity and restricted sexuality have never been integrated into a single model. Finally, cross-religious differences in common sexual behavior have still yet to be documented. We addressed these three issues in two studies, with samples of Catholic and Muslim tradition (total N = 446). Consistently across samples, religiosity predicted, either directly or indirectly, less frequent common heterosexual behaviors and masturbation, partly through sexual guilt and inhibition, and/or decreased sexual fantasy and the search for sexual pleasure. However, married Muslims’ religiosity, unlike Catholics’, did not directly undermine fertility-oriented sexuality and the search for pleasure. Religion’s role in restricting sexuality seems to be rooted in deep psychological rationale.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1210 | 153 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 64 | 7 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 76 | 18 | 0 |