Tracking Frank Stella: An Empirical Evaluation of Art-Historical Issues in an Eye-Movement and Questionnaire Study
In: Art & PerceptionLaboratory of Experimental Psychology, Department of Brain and Cognition, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Tiensestraat 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Search for other papers by Stefanie De Winter in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Johan Wagemans in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
An eye-tracking and questionnaire study was set up in collaboration with the Van Abbemuseum (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) to investigate the perception and appreciation of three Frank Stella paintings from the 60s (Tuxedo Park and Effingham I from the collection of the museum and a hand-painted replica of Hiraqla Variation II). Effingham and Hiraqla were shown next to a printed copy without fluorescent colors, for a direct comparison between the two versions. The main purpose of the study was to assess whether the works were experienced according to Stella’s prescriptions as defined in his Modernist ‘logic’: all-overness, flatness, instantaneousness and self-referentiality. We found that the perception of Tuxedo resulted in a well-structured, coherent heatmap, while a more or less even distribution of fixations over the surface was found in the case of Effingham and Hiraqla (and their copies), which indicates that Stella’s target of all-overness was achieved better in the last two works. Although Stella claimed to have created “flat and frontal” paintings, depth was experienced, especially in Tuxedo and the Hiraqla replica. In the latter, this was mainly caused by the protruding fluorescent colors. Also, in this work more fixations were found in fluorescent-colored areas when corrected for area size. No such effect was found in the original Effingham painting. Most participants found only Effingham to be instantaneously capturable. In the case of Tuxedo, the specific material qualities, like alkyd and open canvas, were rarely recognized, which undermines Stella’s aim for self-referentiality. Participants noticed the fluorescent effect in the Hiraqla replica, but they did not mention other material qualities. A reverse effect was found for Effingham.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Day-Glo Corp. (n.d.). “How Do You Measure the Day-Glo Difference?” Day-Glo commercial. Day-Glo Corp., Cleveland, OH, USA. http://www.dayglo.com/fileshare/pdf/TelcomStudy-Summary.pdf. Accessed April 2022.
-
De Duve, T. (1996) Kant after Duchamp. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
-
De Winter, S. (2010). Conservation problems with paintings containing fluorescent layers of paint. CeROArt EGG 1. doi: 10.4000/ceroart.1659.
-
De Winter, S. (2020). Flattened Intensities: an Empirically Informed Assessment of Frank Stella’s Fluorescent Paintings from the Sixties. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, K.U. Leuven, Belgium.
-
De Winter, S., Moors, P., Van Gelder, H. and Wagemans, J. (2018). Illusory depth based on interactions between fluorescent and conventional colours: a case study on Frank Stella’s Irregular Polygons paintings. Art Percept. 6, 116–150. doi: 10.1163/22134913-20181093.
-
De Winter, S., Vissers, N., Bossens, C. and Wagemans, J. (2020). Instantaneous art? Investigating Frank Stella’s Moroccan Paintings with a short-exposure experiment. Art Percept. 8, 121–157. doi: 10.1163/22134913-bja10001.
-
Elkins, J. and Fiorentini. E. (2020). Visual Worlds: Looking, Images, Visual Disciplines. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.
-
Fried, M. (1998). Shape as form: Frank Stella’s new paintings (1966), in: M. Fried (Ed.), Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews, pp. 77–99. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
-
Glaser, B. (1995). Questions to Stella and Judd: Interview by Bruce Glaser [1964], in: L. Lippard (Ed.), Minimal Art: A Critical Anthology, pp. 148–164. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.
-
Greenberg, C. (1986). Towards a newer Laocoön [1940], in: Clement Greenberg: The Collected Essays and Criticism. Vol. 1, Perceptions and Judgments 1939–1944, J. O’Brien (Ed.), pp. 23–38. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
-
Greenberg, C. (1995). Modernist Painting. [1960], in: O’Brian, J. (Ed.), The Collected Essays and Criticism. Vol. 4: Modernism with a Vengeance, 1957–1969, pp. 85–93. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
-
Judd, D. (1965). Specific objects. Contemporary Sculpture: Arts Yearbook 8, 74–82.
-
Krauss, R. E. (1990). The story of the eye. N. Lit. Hist. 21, 283–298. doi: 10.2307/469253.
-
Lyssenko, N., Redies, C. and Hayn-Leichsenring, G. U. (2016). Evaluating abstract art: relation between term usage, subjective ratings, image properties and personality traits. Front. Psychol., 7, 973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00973.
-
Rose, B. (1967). Abstract Illusionism. Artforum (1967, October), 33–37.
-
Rosenberg, R., and Klein, C. (2015). The moving eye of the beholder: eye tracking and the perception of paintings, in: Art, Aesthetics and the Brain, J. P. Huston, M. Nadal, F. Mora, L. F. Agnati, and C. J. Cela-Conde (Eds), pp. 79–108. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670000.003.0005.
-
Rubin, W.S. (1970). Frank Stella (Exhibition catalog). Museum of Modern Art, New York, NY, USA.
-
Schieber, F., Willan, N. and Schlorholtz, B. (2006). Fluorescent colored stimuli automatically attract visual attention: an eye movement study, in: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 50 (16), pp. 1634–1637. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, CA, USA. doi: 10.1177/154193120605001625.
-
Slate, L. (1966). USA Artists Episode 05 — The New Abstraction — Frank Stella + Larry Poons. Aired March 20.
-
Stella, F. and Solomon, A. (1970). Frank Stella: Portions of an Interview. Members Newsletter (Museum of Modern Art), 8, 1–4.
-
Stevanov, J., Zanker, J. M. and Holmes, T. (2018). Mobile eye tracking in the Royal Academy of Arts — Analysing scanpath sequences in Jackson Pollock’s paintings. Poster presented at the European Conference on Visual Perception, Trieste, Italy.
-
Tobii Pro (2020). Tobii Pro Glasses 2 Wearable Eye Tracker. https://www.tobiipro.com/learn-and-support/learn/steps-in-an-eye-tracking-study/setup/tobii-pro-glasses-2-usage-overview/. Accessed September 2020.
-
Tobii Pro (2021). Pro Lab User Manual. https://www.tobiipro.com/siteassets/tobii-pro/user-manuals/Tobii-Pro-Lab-User-Manual/. Accessed April 2022.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 677 | 158 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 31 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 68 | 18 | 0 |
Tracking Frank Stella: An Empirical Evaluation of Art-Historical Issues in an Eye-Movement and Questionnaire Study
In: Art & PerceptionLaboratory of Experimental Psychology, Department of Brain and Cognition, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Tiensestraat 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Search for other papers by Stefanie De Winter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johan Wagemans in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
An eye-tracking and questionnaire study was set up in collaboration with the Van Abbemuseum (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) to investigate the perception and appreciation of three Frank Stella paintings from the 60s (Tuxedo Park and Effingham I from the collection of the museum and a hand-painted replica of Hiraqla Variation II). Effingham and Hiraqla were shown next to a printed copy without fluorescent colors, for a direct comparison between the two versions. The main purpose of the study was to assess whether the works were experienced according to Stella’s prescriptions as defined in his Modernist ‘logic’: all-overness, flatness, instantaneousness and self-referentiality. We found that the perception of Tuxedo resulted in a well-structured, coherent heatmap, while a more or less even distribution of fixations over the surface was found in the case of Effingham and Hiraqla (and their copies), which indicates that Stella’s target of all-overness was achieved better in the last two works. Although Stella claimed to have created “flat and frontal” paintings, depth was experienced, especially in Tuxedo and the Hiraqla replica. In the latter, this was mainly caused by the protruding fluorescent colors. Also, in this work more fixations were found in fluorescent-colored areas when corrected for area size. No such effect was found in the original Effingham painting. Most participants found only Effingham to be instantaneously capturable. In the case of Tuxedo, the specific material qualities, like alkyd and open canvas, were rarely recognized, which undermines Stella’s aim for self-referentiality. Participants noticed the fluorescent effect in the Hiraqla replica, but they did not mention other material qualities. A reverse effect was found for Effingham.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 677 | 158 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 31 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 68 | 18 | 0 |