Frank Stella’s early works tend to be characterised as displaying the flatness of painted surfaces and an ambition to negate pictorial illusionism. However, beyond their emphasis on flatness, these early series of paintings generate new forms of illusions and, in some cases, initiate another type of pictorial space — one that bodies forth, coming toward the viewer, appearing as if in front of the canvas. We consider the materials of the painting format in Stella’s early work (1959 to 1986) that create or facilitate the emergence of such a protruding or ‘projective’ space: mainly canvas, types and colours of paint. After introducing notions of flatness and illusionism and our respective approaches, we focus on Stella’s use of unprimed, raw, canvas, on the one hand, and his use of reflective and fluorescent paint skins, on the other, and how paint and canvas relate to each other. We focus on the material conditions that Stella sets up to manifest his intentions regarding the perception of space in painting and where he believes painting ‘should’ go. Indeed, in a book published in 1986, Stella describes projective effects from painters who use different tactics than his, but he does not reveal how he achieves his own. We analyse precisely which elements in Stella’s early paintings trick the eye of the viewer into seeing a painting, as it were, in front of itself, and we demonstrate the aesthetic impact of Stella’s chosen materials. Or how colour, paint and canvas, working together in a sort of symbiosis, generate a protruding effect in a new, previously unseen manner, and challenge Stella’s assertions against illusionism.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Aach, H. (1970) On the use and phenomena of fluorescent pigments in paintings, Leonardo 3, 135–138.
Agoston, G. A. (1987). Color Theory and its Application in Art and Design. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Auping, M. and Stella, F. (2015). The un-secret world of Frank Stella, VoCA Journal, 12 November. http://journal.voca.network/the-un-secret-world-of-frank-stella/ (accessed January 2024).
Bourdon, D. (1968). A simple quality – like Mantle hitting a homer, LIFE 64, 3, 49.
Broeker, H. (2012). From the birth of the shaped canvas to the Protractor series (1960–1971), in: Frank Stella: The Retrospective Works 1958–2012, exhibition catalog, pp. 155–160. Kunstmuseum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Creeley, R. (1989). Frank Stella: A Way to Go [1965], in: The Collected Essays of Robert Creeley, pp. 393–398. University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA, USA. doi: 10.1515/9783112658024-112.
Day-Glo Corp. (n.d.). How do you measure the DAY-GLO difference? Day-Glo commercial, Day-Glo Corp., Cleveland, OH, USA. http://www.dayglo.com/fileshare/pdf/TelcomStudy-Summary.pdf, accessed January 2024.
De Corte, H. (2019). Uses of Unprimed Canvas - Looking at the Absorptive Qualities of the Painting Support and Its Material Nature. Doctoral thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
De Corte, H. (2020). Selective preparation of canvas as an ‘artistic device’ in David Hockney’s early paintings (1964–1972): Impact of this hybrid priming technique on perception by the viewer, with a particular focus on Portrait of an Artist (Pool with Two Figures) and Mt. Fuji and Flowers. Art Percept. 8, 311–336, doi: 10.1163/22134913-bja10015.
De Winter, S. (2019). Frank Stella en DayGlo, De Witte Raaf, 199, May–June: 2–3.
De Winter, S. (2020). Flattened Intensities: an Empirically Informed Assessment of Frank Stella’s Fluorescent Paintings from the Sixties. PhD thesis, K.U. Leuven, Belgium.
De Winter, S. (2022). Woven picturality, for Self-Play exhibition by Hannah De Corte, 1 April–28 May 2022. Galerie La Patinoire Royale Bach, Brussels, Belgium.
De Winter, S. and Wagemans, J. (2022). Tracking Frank Stella: An empirical evaluation of art-historical issues in an eye-movement and questionnaire study. Art Percept, 10, 201-243. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-bja10038.
De Winter, S., Moors, P., Van Gelder, H. and Wagemans, J. (2018). Illusory depth based on interactions between fluorescent and conventional colours: A case study on Frank Stella’s Irregular Polygons paintings, Art Percept. 6, 116–150. doi: 10.1163/22134913-20181093.
De Winter, S., Vissers, N., Bossens, C. and Wagemans, J. (2020). Instantaneous art? Investigating Frank Stella’s Moroccan Paintings with a short-exposure experiment. Art Percept. 8, 121–157. doi: 10.1163/22134913-bja10001.
Fried, M. (1965). Three American Painters, in: Art and Objecthood, pp. 213–268. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
Fried, M. (1966). Shape as form: Frank Stella’s new paintings, in: Art and Objecthood, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
Glaser, B. (1966). Questions to Stella and Judd, Art News, 65, 55–61, reprinted in: Minimal Art: A Critical Anthology, G. Battcock (Ed.), pp. 148–164. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Graw, I. (2018). The Love of Painting: Genealogy of a Success Medium. Sternberg Press, London, United Kingdom.
Greenberg, C. (1949). Our Period Style, Partis. Rev. 16, 1138.
Halley, P. (1988). Peter Halley: Collected Essays, 1981–87. Bruno Bischofberger, Zürich, Switzerland.
Hinde, E., Nel, P., Sloggett, R. and Roberts, A. (2013). Fluorimetric analysis of the constituent dyes within daylight fluorescent pigments: implications for display and preservation of daylight fluorescent artwork, J. Am. Inst. Conserv. 52, 97–106. doi: 10.1179/0197136013Z.0000000008.
Johnston-Feller, R. (2001). Color Science in the Examination of Museum Objects: Nondestructive Procedures. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kaprow, A. (1958). The legacy of Jackson Pollock, Art News 57, 24–26, 55–57.
Kennedy, B. P. and Stella, F. (2010). Irregular Polygons, 1965–66. Exhibition catalogue, Hood Museum of Art, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Komatsu, H. and Goda, N. (2018). Neural mechanisms of material perception: quest on Shitsukan, Neuroscience 392, 329–347, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.09.001.
Litt, S. (2011). Frank Stella’s luminous “Irregular Polygon” series is reunited at the Toledo Museum of Art, https://www.cleveland.com/arts/index.ssf/2011/04/frank_stellas_luminous_irregul.html. Accessed January 2024.
Muth, C., and Carbon, C.-C. (2016). SeIns: semantic instability in art, Art Percept. 4, 145–184. doi: 10.1163/22134913-00002049.
O’Connor, F. V. (1980). Jackson Pollock: The Black Pourings, 1951–53. Exhibition catalogue, Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston, MA, USA.
Oil and Colour Chemists’ Association (1993). Surface Coatings: Volume 1 – Raw Materials and Their Usage, third ed. Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Rose, B. (1967). Abstract Illusionism, Artforum 6, 33–37.
Rosenblum, R. (1971). Frank Stella. Penguin New Art, Harmondsworth, United Kingdom.
Rubin, W. S. (1970). Frank Stella. Exhibition catalogue, Museum of Modern Art, New York, NY, USA.
Slifkin, R. (2011). Now man’s bound to fail, more, in: Ango-Amercian Exchange in Postwar Sculpture, 1945-1975, R. Peabody (Ed.), pp. 59–75, J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stella, F. (1986). Working Space. Harvard University Prses, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tufnell, B., Hobbs, R., Hunt, T. and Wilken, K. (2011). Frank Stella: Connections. Hatje Cantz, Stuttgart, Germany.
Upright, D. (1985). The technique of Morris Louis, in: Morris Louis: The Complete Paintings, pp. 44–88. Harry N. Abrams, New York, NY, USA.
Van Tuijl, H. F. J. M. and Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1979). Neon color spreading and structural information measures, Percept. Psychophys. 25, 269–284.
Varnedoe, K. (2006). Pictures of Nothing: Abstract Art since Pollock. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 84 | 84 | 25 |
Full Text Views | 4 | 4 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 119 | 119 | 28 |
Frank Stella’s early works tend to be characterised as displaying the flatness of painted surfaces and an ambition to negate pictorial illusionism. However, beyond their emphasis on flatness, these early series of paintings generate new forms of illusions and, in some cases, initiate another type of pictorial space — one that bodies forth, coming toward the viewer, appearing as if in front of the canvas. We consider the materials of the painting format in Stella’s early work (1959 to 1986) that create or facilitate the emergence of such a protruding or ‘projective’ space: mainly canvas, types and colours of paint. After introducing notions of flatness and illusionism and our respective approaches, we focus on Stella’s use of unprimed, raw, canvas, on the one hand, and his use of reflective and fluorescent paint skins, on the other, and how paint and canvas relate to each other. We focus on the material conditions that Stella sets up to manifest his intentions regarding the perception of space in painting and where he believes painting ‘should’ go. Indeed, in a book published in 1986, Stella describes projective effects from painters who use different tactics than his, but he does not reveal how he achieves his own. We analyse precisely which elements in Stella’s early paintings trick the eye of the viewer into seeing a painting, as it were, in front of itself, and we demonstrate the aesthetic impact of Stella’s chosen materials. Or how colour, paint and canvas, working together in a sort of symbiosis, generate a protruding effect in a new, previously unseen manner, and challenge Stella’s assertions against illusionism.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 84 | 84 | 25 |
Full Text Views | 4 | 4 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 119 | 119 | 28 |