Parts and Wholes in Pictorial Art

in Art & Perception
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The part–whole relation is fundamental to the Gestalt description of visual awareness; therefore one expects it to play an equally important role in the visual arts. The formal science of parthood relations is mereology. Thus, it is natural to attempt to construct a mereological account of the structure of works of the visual arts. However, I argue in this paper that such a program is headed for failure. There are various reasons for this, perhaps the more interesting being that one deals with parallel pictorial worlds.

Parts and Wholes in Pictorial Art

in Art & Perception

Sections

References

AlbertazziL. (2012). Experimental phenomenology. An introduction in: The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Experimental Phenomenology. Visual Perception of Shape Space and AppearanceAlbertazziL. (Ed.). WileyNew York, USA.

BrentanoF. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Verlag von Duncker and HumblotLeipzig, Germany.

BrownJ. (1999). Microgenesis and Buddhism: the concept of momentarinessPhilos. East West 49261277.

DenisM. (1890). Definition du neo-traditionnismeArt et critique 6523 and 30 August 1890.

FreudG. (1910). Leonardo — Eine Kindheitserinnerung des Leonardo da Vinci In the series: Schriften zur angewandten Seelenkunde Heft VII Leipzig Vienna Austria.

GoodmanN. (1958). On relations that generatePhilos. Stud. 96566.

HogarthB. (1958). Dynamic Anatomy. Watson-GuptillNew York, USA.

HusserlE. (1901). Third logical investigation in: Logische Untersuchingen2nd edn. Max Niemayer VerlagTübingen, Germany.

KanizsaG. (1955). Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogeneaRivista di Psicologia 49730.

KoenderinkJ. J. (2001). Multiple visual worldsPerception 3017.

KoenderinkJ. J. (2011). Gestalts and pictorial worldsGestalt Theory 33289324.

KoenderinkJ. J.van DoornA. J.WagemansJ. (2011). Depthi-Perception (special issue on Art and Perception) 2541564.

LehndorffV.TrülzschH. (1986). ‘Veruschka’. Transfigurations. Introduction by Susan Sontag. Thames and HudsonLondon, UK.

LeonardH. S.GoodmanN. (1940). The calculus of individuals and its usesJ. Symbolic Logic 54555.

LésniewskiS. (1992). Collected WorksSurmaS. J.SrzednickiJ. T.BarnettD. I.RickeyV. F. (Eds and Transl.). KluwerNorwell, MA, USA.

LorandR. (1999). Bergson’s concept of artBrit. J. Aesthetics 39400415.

MaxwellJ. C. (1870). On hills and dalesPhilos. Mag. 40421427.

MetzgerW. (1975). Gesetze des Sehens. Verlag Waldemar KramerFrankfurt AM, Germany.

MinskyM.PapertR. (1969). Perceptrons. MIT PressCambridge, MA, USA.

NeckerL. A. (1832). Observations on some remarkable optical phaenomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phaenomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solidLondon Edinburgh Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1329337.

RemaneA. (1952). Die Grundlagen des naturlichen Systems der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Geest and Portig K.-G.Leipzig, Germany.

RidgwayB. S. (1984). Roman Copies of Greek Sculpture: The Problem of the Originals. University of Michigan PressAnn Arbor, MA, USA.

RiedlR. (1975). Die Ordnung des Lebendigen: Systembedingungen der Evolution Parey Hamburg/Berlin Germany.

RoschE.MervisC. (1975). Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categoriesCognit. Psychol. 7573605.

von GoetheJ. W. (1790). Versuch die Metamorphose der Pflanzen zu erklären. Ettingersche BuchhandlungGotha, Germany.

WertheimerM. (1923/1938). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt IIPsychologische Forschung 4301350.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 19 19 12
Full Text Views 21 21 21
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0