The history of art attribution in painting demonstrates that connoisseurs compare faces and facial features in their efforts to ascribe paintings to regions, schools, workshops and specific artists. Connoisseurs do not generally reflect on their application of face recognition or its importance. Since connoisseurs apply both specialist perception skills (recognising a brushstroke technique, for instance) and generic perception skills, an experiment was performed aiming to eliminate a connoisseur’s specialist skills. The experiment was performed using laymen observing faces, derived from paintings, that were stripped from all contextual information (i.e., cut-out faces). Thus, only generic skills could be applied in order to categorise these pictures. The results show how laymen arrive at the same categorisation of paintings as connoisseurs do, without prior training in matters of artistic connoisseurship.
BouchotH. (1904). Les Primitifs Français. 1292–1500. Complément Documentaire au Catalogue Official de l’Exposition2nd ed. Librairie de l’Art Ancien et Moderne Paris France unpaginated (sections Table des Planches and Planches LXXX LXXXI and XXXVI).
DuchaineB. and NakayamaK. (2006). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participantsNeuropsychologia44576–585.
GombrichE.H. (1986b). The mask and the face. The perception of physiognomic likeness in life and in art in: The Image and the Eye. Further Studies in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation2nd ed.GombrichE. H. pp. 107–108Phaidon PressOxford, UK.
ScottL. S. (2011). Face perception and perceptual expertise in adult and developmental populations in: The Oxford Handbook of Face PerceptionCalderA. J.RhodesG.JohnsonsM. H. and HaxbyJ. V. (Eds) pp. 195–213Oxford University PressOxford, UK.
TanakaJ. W. and GordonI. (2011). Features, configuration, and holistic face processing in: The Oxford Handbook of Face PerceptionCalderA. J.RhodesG.JohnsonsM. H. and HaxbyJ. V. (Eds) pp. 177–194Oxford University PressOxford, UK.