Canned Emotions. Effects of Genre and Audience Reaction on Emotions
In: Art & PerceptionSearch for other papers by Andreas M. Baranowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Rebecca Teichmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Heiko Hecht in
Current site
Google Scholar
Laughter is said to be contagious. Maybe this is why TV stations often choose to add so-called canned laughter to their shows. Questionable as this practice may be, observers seem to like it. If such a simple manipulation, assumingly by inducing positive emotion, can change our attitudes toward the film, does the opposite manipulation work as well? Does a negative sound-track, such as screaming voices, have comparable effects in the opposite direction? We designed three experiments with a total of 110 participants to test whether scream-tracks have comparable effects on the evaluation of film sequences as do laugh-tracks. Experiment 1 showed segments of comedies, scary, and neutral films and crossed them with three sound tracks of canned laughter, canned screams, and no audience sound. Observers had to rate the degree of their subjective amusement and fear as well as general liking and immersion. The sound-tracks had independent effects on amusement and fear, and increased immersion when the sound was appropriate. Experiment 2 was identical, but instead of canned sounds, confederates of the experimenter enacted the sound-track. Here, the effects were even stronger. Experiment 3 manipulated social pressure by explicit evaluations of the film clips, which were particularly influential in comedies. Scream tracks worked as well as laugh tracks, in particular when the film was only mildly funny or scary. The information conveyed by a sound track is able to change the evaluation of films regardless of their emotional nature.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Asch S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments, in: Groups, Leadership and Men, Guetzkow H. (Ed.), pp. 177–190. Carnegie Press, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
-
Backhaus N. and Brandenburg S. (2014). Emotions in the movies – Is there a need for a new film set for emotion elicitation? in: TeaP 2014: Abstracts of the 56th Conference of Experimental Psychologists, Schütz A. C. , Drewing K. and Gegenfurtner K. R. (Eds), p. 18, Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, Germany.
-
Chapman A. J. (1973). Funniness of jokes, canned laughter and recall performance, Sociometry 36, 569–578.
-
Chapman A. J. and Chapman W. A. (1974). Responsiveness to humor: Its dependency upon a companion’s humorous smiling and laughter, J. Psychol. 88 , 245–252.
-
Donoghue E. E. , McCarrey M. W. and Clément R. (1983). Humour appreciation as a function of canned laughter, a mirthful companion, and field dependence: Facilitation and inhibitory effects, Can. J. Behav. Sci. 15 , 150–162.
-
Ekman P. , Friesen W. V. and Ancoli S. (1980). Facial signs of emotional experience, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39 , 1125–1134.
-
Fuller R. G. C. and Sheehy-Skeffington A. (1974). Effects of group laughter on responses to humorous material, a replication and extension, Psychol. Rep. 35 , 531–534.
-
Gross J. J. and Levenson R. W. (1995). Eliciting emotions using films, Cogn. Emot. 9, 87–108.
-
Lawson T. J. , Downing B. and Cetola H. (1998). An attributional explanation for the effect of audience laughter on perceived funniness, Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 20 , 243–249.
-
Leventhal H. and Mace W. (1970). The effect of laughter on evaluation of a slapstick movie, J. Pers. 31 , 16–30.
-
Lieberman E. A. , Neuendorf K. A. , Denny J. Skalski P. D. and Wang J. (2009). The language of laughter: A quantitative/qualitative fusion examining television narrative and humor, J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 53, 497–514.
-
Nonsanchuk T. A. and Lightstone J. (1974). Canned laughter and public and private conformity, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 29, 153–156.
-
Pistole D. D. and Shor R. E. (1979). A multivariate study of the effect of repetition on humor appreciation as qualified by two social influence factors, J. Gen. Psychol. 100 , 43–51.
-
Platow M. J. , Haslam S. A. , Both A. , Chew I , Cuddon M. , Goharpey N. , Maurera J. , Rosinia S. , Tsekourasa A. and Gracec D. M. (2005). “It’s not funny if they’re laughing”: Self-categorization, social influence, and responses to canned laughter, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 41 , 542–550.
-
Provine R. R. (1992). Contagious laughter: Laughter is a sufficient stimulus for laughs and smiles, Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 30 , 1–4.
-
Provine R. R. (2000). Laughter: A Scientific Investigation . Penguin Books, New York, NY, USA.
-
Shariff A. F. and Tracy J. L. (2011). What are emotion expressions for? Curr Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20 , 395–399.
-
Smyth M. M. and Fuller R. G. C. (1972). Effects of group laughter on responses to humorous material, Psychol. Rep. 30 , 132–134.
-
Vraga E. K. , Johnson C. N. , Carr D. J. , Bode J. and Bard M. T. (2014). Filmed in front of a live studio audience: Laughter and aggression in political entertainment programming. J. Broadcast Electron. Media 58 , 131–150.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1297 | 240 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 277 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 81 | 8 | 0 |
Canned Emotions. Effects of Genre and Audience Reaction on Emotions
In: Art & PerceptionSearch for other papers by Andreas M. Baranowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rebecca Teichmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Heiko Hecht in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Laughter is said to be contagious. Maybe this is why TV stations often choose to add so-called canned laughter to their shows. Questionable as this practice may be, observers seem to like it. If such a simple manipulation, assumingly by inducing positive emotion, can change our attitudes toward the film, does the opposite manipulation work as well? Does a negative sound-track, such as screaming voices, have comparable effects in the opposite direction? We designed three experiments with a total of 110 participants to test whether scream-tracks have comparable effects on the evaluation of film sequences as do laugh-tracks. Experiment 1 showed segments of comedies, scary, and neutral films and crossed them with three sound tracks of canned laughter, canned screams, and no audience sound. Observers had to rate the degree of their subjective amusement and fear as well as general liking and immersion. The sound-tracks had independent effects on amusement and fear, and increased immersion when the sound was appropriate. Experiment 2 was identical, but instead of canned sounds, confederates of the experimenter enacted the sound-track. Here, the effects were even stronger. Experiment 3 manipulated social pressure by explicit evaluations of the film clips, which were particularly influential in comedies. Scream tracks worked as well as laugh tracks, in particular when the film was only mildly funny or scary. The information conveyed by a sound track is able to change the evaluation of films regardless of their emotional nature.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1297 | 240 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 277 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 81 | 8 | 0 |