Artists’ Innocent Eye as Extended Proximal Mode of Vision

In: Art & Perception

The innocent eye, or seeing ‘what the eye sees’ is a meaningful expression many artists use to capture their experience in observational drawing and painting. However, a literal interpretation of the innocent eye does not comport with a science of vison focused on object perception. Nor is a two-step model involving a ‘bottom-up strategy’ a plausible account of the notion. Consistent with an emerging body of neuroscientific and psychophysical evidence for the pivotal role of attention in conscious vision, artists’ innocent eye is best construed as an extended proximal mode of vision involving focused attention on pictorial relationships in an identified object or scene. The innocent eye is open to creative expansion, made possible by a competency developed most likely in the early through middle childhood that underpins the visuocognitive skills for flexible deployment of attention, flexible representation, mental imagery and visual memory. The potential challenge from the rare cases of savant-talented artists, who seem to be able to access retinal images directly, is discussed and considered inconclusive. The proposed theoretical framework raises new questions for empirical investigations on the nature and development of the artists’ perceptual expertise, and has implications for science-based pedagogical approaches to drawing, painting, and creativity.

  • Alberti L. (1966). On Painting, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA (Originally published 1435–1436).

  • Amso D. and Scerif G. (2015). The attentive brain: Insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 606–619.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anstis S. (2002). Was El Greco astigmatic? Leonardo 35, 208.

  • Arend L. , Reeves A. , Schirillo J. and Goldstein R. (1991). Simultaneous color constancy: Paper with diverse Munsell values, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 661–672.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arnheim R. (1974). Art and Visual Perception: The New Edition, University of California, London, UK.

  • Arnheim R. (1980). The puzzle of Nadia’s drawings, Arts Psychother. 7, 79–85.

  • Atherton M. (2002). The origins of the sensation/perception distinction, in: Perception and the Physical World: Psychological and Philosophical Issues in Perception , Heyer D. and Mausfeld R. (Eds), pp. 3–19, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Awh E. , Vogel E. K. and Oh S. H. (2006). Interactions between attention and working memory, Neuroscience 139, 201–208.

  • Bertamini M. and Parks T. E. (2005). On what people know about images on mirrors, Cognition 98, 85–104.

  • Biederman I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding, Psychol. Rev. 94, 115–117.

  • Biederman I. and Kim J. G. (2008). 17000 years of depicting the junction of two smooth shapes, Perception 37, 161–164.

  • Brunswik E. (1944). Distal focusing of perception: Size-constancy in a representative sample of situations, Psychol. Monogr. 56 , 1–49.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bühler K. (1930). The Mental Development of the Child, Kegan Paul, London, UK.

  • Cantlon J. F. , Pinel P. , Dehaene S. and Pelphrey K. A. (2011). Cortical representations of symbols, objects, and faces are pruned back during early childhood, Cereb. Cortex 21, 191–199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caplovitz G. P. , Fendrich R. and Hughes H. C. (2008). Failures to see: Attentive blank stares revealed by change blindness, Consc. Cogn. 17, 877–886.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carson L. , Millard M., Quehl N. and Danckert J. (2014). Polygon-based drawing accuracy analysis and positive/negative space, Art Percept. 2, 213–236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cavanagh P. (2005). The artist as neuroscientist, Nature 434, 301–307.

  • Chamberlain R. and Wagemans J. (2015). Visual arts training is linked to flexible attention to local and global levels of visual stimuli, Acta Psychol. 161, 185–197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chamberlain R. and Wagemans J. (2016). The genesis of errors in drawing, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 65, 195–207.

  • Chamberlain R. , McManus I. C. , Riley H. , Rankin Q. and Brunswick N. (2013). Local processing enhancements associated with superior observational drawing are due to enhanced perceptual functioning, not weak central coherence, Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 66, 1448–1466.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chamberlain R. , Swinnen L. , Heeren S. and Wagemans J. (in press). Perceptual flexibility is coupled with reduced executive inhibition in students of the visual arts, Br. J. Psychol. doi:10.1111/bjop.12253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chien S. H. L. , Bronson-Castain K. , Palmer J. and Teller D. Y. (2006). Lightness constancy in 4-month-old infants, Vis. Res. 46, 2139–2148.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cohen D. J. (2005). Look little, look often: The influence of gaze frequency on drawing accuracy, Percept. Psychophys . 67, 997–1009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cohen D. J. and Bennett S. (1997). Why can’t most people draw what they see? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23, 609–621.

  • Cohen D. J. and Earls H. (2010). Inverting an image does not improve drawing accuracy, Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 4, 168–172.

  • Cohen D. J. and Jones H. E. (2008). How shape constancy relates to drawing accuracy, Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 2, 8–19.

  • Coren S. (1970). Lateral inhibition and geometric illusions, Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 22, 274–278.

  • Costall A. (1995). The myth of the sensory core: The traditional versus the ecological approach to children’s drawings. in Drawing and Looking: Theoretical Approaches to Pictorial Representation in Children, Lange-Küttner C. and Thomas G. V. (Eds), (pp. 16–26), Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, UK.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dannemiller J. L. (1989). A test of color constancy in 9- and 20-weeks-old human infants following simulated illuminant changes, Dev. Psychol. 25, 171.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Del Giudice E. , Grossi D. , Angelini R. , Crisantia A. F. , Lattea F. , Fragassia N. A. and Trojano L. (2000). Spatial cognition in children. I. Development of drawing-related (visuospatial and constructional) abilities in preschool and early school years, Brain Dev . 22, 362–367.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dennett D. (1991). Consciousness Explained, Little Brown, Boston, MA, USA.

  • De Renzi E. (1982). Disorders of Space Exploration and Cognition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. UK.

  • Di Lollo V. , Enns J. T. and Rensink R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual process, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 129, 481–507.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drake J. E. (2013). Is superior local processing in the visuospatial domain a function of drawing talent rather than autism spectrum disorder? Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 7, 203–209.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drake J. E. and Winner E. (2011). Realistic drawing talent in typical adults is associated with the same kind of local processing bias found in individuals with ASD, J. Autism and Dev. Disord. 41, 1192–1201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durgin F. H. , Ruff A. J. and Russell R. C. (2012). Constant enough: On the kinds of perceptual constancy worth having, in: Visual Experience: Sensation, Cognition and Constancy , Hatfield G. and Allred S. (Eds), pp. 87–102, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ebersbach M. , Stiehler S. and Asmus P. (2011). On the relationship between children’s perspective taking in complex scenes and their spatial drawing ability, Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 29, 455–474.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Edwards B. (1979). Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain, J. P. Tarcher, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

  • Epstein W. and Hatfield G. (1978). Functional equivalence of masking and cue reduction in perception of shape at a slant, Percept. Psychophys. 23, 137–144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Epstein W. , Hatfield G. and Muise G. (1977). Perceived shape at a slant as a function of processing time and processing load, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform . 3, 473–483.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Firestone C. (2013). On the origin and status of the “El Greco fallacy”, Perception 42, 672–674.

  • Forisha B. D. (1975). Mental imagery verbal processes: A developmental study, Dev. Psychol. 11 , 259–267.

  • Fry R. (1960). Vision and Design, Meridian Books, New York, NY, USA (originally published 1919).

  • Gainotti G. and Tiacci C. (1970). Patterns of drawing disability in right and left hemispheric patients, Neuropsychologia 8, 379–384.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gallate J. , Chi R. , Ellwood S. and Snyder A. (2009). Reducing false memories by magnetic pulse stimulation, Neurosci. Lett. 449, 1151–1154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ganis G. , Thompson W. L. and Kosslyn S. M. (2004). Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: An fMRI study, Cogn. Brain Res. 20, 226–241.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geer T. (2012). What we illustrate when we draw: Normative visual processing in beginning drawings, and the capacity to observe detail, in: Thinking through Drawing: Practice into Knowledge, Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Symposium on Drawing, Cognition and Education , Kantrowitz A. , Brew A. and Fava M. (Eds), pp. 45–50, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gibson J. J. (1950). Perception of the Visual World, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA.

  • Gibson J. J. (1952). The visual field and the visual world: A reply to professor Boring, Psychol. Rev. 59, 149–51.

  • Gibson J. J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems , Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA.

  • Gibson J. J. (1972). A theory of direct visual perception, in: The Psychology of Knowing , Royce J. and Rozenboom W. (Eds), pp. 215–227, Gordon and Breach, New York, NY, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gibson J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA.

  • Gilchrist A. (2012). Objective and subjective sides of perception, in: Visual Experience: Sensation, Cognition and Constancy, Hatfield G. and Allred S. (Eds), pp. 105–121, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gilchrist A. (2015). Theoretical approaches to lightness and perception, Perception 44, 339–358.

  • Girgus J. J. , Rock I. and Egatz R. (1977). The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures, Percept. Psychophys. 22, 550–556.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldenberg G. , Wirnmer A. , Holzner E. and Wessely P. (1985). Apraxia of the left limbs in a case of callosal disconnection: The contribution of medial frontal lobe damage, Cortex 21, 135–151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gombrich E. (1960). Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gopnik A. and Astington J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance–reality distinction, Child Dev. 59, 26–37.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gopnik A. and Rosati A. (2001). Duck or rabbit? Reversing ambiguous figures and understanding ambiguous representations, Dev.Sci. 4, 175–183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gregory R. (1997). Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA (originally published 1966).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grossberg S. and Zajac L. (2017). How humans consciously see paintings and paintings illuminate how humans see. Art Percept. 5, 1–95.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haber R. N. (1980). Perceiving space from pictures: A theoretical analysis, in: The Perception of Pictures , Vol. I, Hagen M. A. (Ed.), pp. 3–32, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamm J. (1963). Drawing the Head & Figure , Perigee Books, New York, NY, USA.

  • Hammad S. , Kennedy J. M. , Juricevic I. and Rajani S. (2008). Ellipses on the surface of a picture, Perception 37, 504–510.

  • Hawthorne C. W. (1960). Hawthorne on Painting, Dover, Mineola, NY, USA.

  • Hazlett H. C. et al. (2017). Early brain development in infants at high risk for autism spectrum disorder, Nature 542, 348–351.

  • He Z. J. and Nakayama K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search, Nature 359, 231–233.

  • Hegarty M. (2010). Components of spatial intelligence, in: The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 52, Ross B. H. (Ed.), pp. 265–297, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Helmholtz H. W. (1910). Treatise on Physiological Optics, English translation by Optical Society of America (1924/1925), Dover, Mineola, NY, USA (originally published 1869).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Helmholtz H. W. (1971). The facts of perception, in: Selected Writings of Hermann Helmholtz, Kahl R. (Ed.), Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CN, USA (originally published 1887) Available online at: https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/helmholt.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hermelin B. (2001). Bright Splinters of the Mind, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, UK.

  • Hochberg J. (2007). The psychophysics of pictorial perception, in: The mind’s eye: Julian Hochberg on the Perception of Pictures, Films, and the World , Peterson M. A. , Gillam B. and Sedgwick H. A. (Eds), pp. 30–59, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hochstein S. and Ahissar M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system, Neuron 36, 791–804.

  • Hurlbert A. (1999). Colour vision: Is colour constancy real? Curr. Biol. 9, R558–R561.

  • Ihde D. (1977). Experimental Phenomenology: An Introduction, Paragon Books, New York, NY, USA.

  • Karmiloff-Smith A. (1993). Self-organization and cognitive change, in: Brain Development and Cognition: A Reader , Johnson M. H. (Ed.), pp. 592–618, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirk A. and Kertesz A. (1989). Hemispheric contributions to drawing, Neuropsychologia 27, 881–886.

  • Kleiner F. S. (2009). Gardner’s Art through the Ages: The Western Perspective, Vol. II, 13th ed., Wadswoth Cengage Learning, Boston, MA, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koenig O. , Reiss L. P. and Kosslyn M. S. (1990). The development of spatial relation representations: Evidence from studies of cerebral lateralization, J. Exp. Child Psychol. 50, 119–130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koffka K. (1935). Principle of Gestalt Psychology, Lund Humphries, London, UK.

  • Köhler W. (1947). Gestalt psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology , Liveright, New York, NY, USA.

  • Kosslyn S. M. (1987). Seeing and imaginingin the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach, Psychol. Rev. 94, 148–175.

  • Kosslyn S. M. , Holtzman J. D. , Farah M. J. and Gazzaniga M. S. (1985). A computational analysis of mental image generation: Evidence from functional dissociations in split-brain patients , J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 114, 311–341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kozbelt A. (2001). Artists as experts in visual cognition, Vis. Cogn. 8, 705–723.

  • Kozbelt A. and Seeley W. P. (2007). Integrating art historical, psychological, and neuroscientific explanations of artists’ advantages in drawing and perception, Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 1, 80–90.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kozbelt A. , Seidel A. , ElBassiouny A. , Mark Y. and Owen D. R. (2010). Visual selection contributes to artists’ advantages in realistic drawing, Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 4, 93–102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lamme V. A. (2000). Neural mechanisms of visual awareness: A linking proposition. Brain and Mind, 1, 385–406.

  • Lange-Küttner C. (2014). Do drawing stages really exist? Children’s early mapping of perspective, Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 8, 168–182.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lange-Küttner C. and Reith E. (1995). The transformation of figurative thought: Implications of Piaget and Inhelder’s developmental theory for children’s drawings. in: Drawing and Looking: Theoretical Approaches to Pictorial Representation in Children , Lange-Küttner C. and Thomas G. V. (Eds), pp. 75–92, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hertfordshire, UK.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee H. and Vecera S. P. (2005). Visual cognition influences early vision: The role of visual short-term memory in amodal completion , Psychol. Sci. 16, 763–768.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leibowitz H. and Sacca E. J. (1971). Comparison of matching and drawing in the perception of shape at various intelligence levels , Percept. Psychophys. 9, 407–409.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leibowitz H. , Waskow I. , Loeffler N. and Glaser F. (1959). Intelligence level as a variable in the perception of shape , Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 11, 108–112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lichte W. H. and Borresen C. R. (1967). Influence of instructions on degree of shape constancy, J. Exp. Psychol. 74, 538–542.

  • Livingstone M. (2002). Vision and Art: The Biology of Seeing, Abrams, New York, NY, USA.

  • Logothetis N. K. , Leopold D. A. and Sheinberg D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380, 621–624.

  • Longobardi C. , Quaglia R. and Iotti N. O. (2015). Reconsidering the scribbling stage of drawing: A new perspective on toddlers’ representational processes Front. Psychol. 6:1227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01227.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lotto B. and Purve D. (2000). An empirical explanation of color contrast , Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 97, 12834–12839.

  • Lou H. C , Luber B. , Crupain M. , Keenan J. P. , Nowak M. , Kjaer T. W. , Sackeim H. A. and Lisanby S. H. (2004). Parietal cortex and representation of the mental self , Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6827–32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Luquet G.-H. (2001). Children’s Drawings (Le Dessin Enfantin), Costall A. (transl.), Free Association Books, London, UK (originally published 1927).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mack A. (1978). Three modes of visual perception, in: Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information , Pick H. L. Jr. and Saltzman E. (Eds), pp. 171–186, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mack A. and Rock I. (1998). Inattentional Blindness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

  • Marr D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , Freeman, San Francisco, CA, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mausfeld R. (2003). Conjoint representation and the mental capacity for multiple simultaneous perspectives, in: Looking into Picture: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Pictorial Space , Hecht H. , Schwartz R. and Atherton M. (Eds), pp. 17–60, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McManus I. C. , Loo P. , Chamberlain R. , Riley H. and Brunswick N. (2011). Does shape constancy relate to drawing ability? Two failures to replicate , Empir. Stud. Arts 29, 191–208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McManus C. , Ying B. T. Z. , Fleming E. , Lee P. and Chamberlain R. (2014). Testing Ruskin: Seeing, drawing and remembering complex curves. Presented at the Visual Science of Art Conference, Belgrade, Serbia.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller B. L. , Ponton M. , Benson D. F. , Cummings J. L. and Mena I. (1996). Enhanced artistic creativity with temporal lobe degeneration, Lancet 348, 1744–1745.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller B. L. , Cummings J. , Mishkin F. , Boone K. , Prince F. , Ponton M. and Cotman C. (1998). Emergence of artistic talent in frontotemporal dementia, Neurology 51, 978–982.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell P. and Taylor L. M. (1999). Shape constancy and theory of mind: Is there a link? Cognition 70, 167–190.

  • Mitchell P. , Ropar D. , Ackroyd K. and Rajendran G. (2005). How perception impacts on drawings , J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 996–1003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitroff S. R. , Sobel D. M. and Gopnik A. (2006). Reversing how to think about ambiguous figure reversals: Spontaneous alternating by uninformed observers, Perception 35, 709–715.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moore E. G. (1913/1914). Status of sense-data, Proc. Aristotelian Soc. 14, 355–380.

  • Noë A. (2008). Précis of Action in Perception: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , Philos. Phenomenol. Res. 76, 660–665.

  • O’Regan J. K. , Heiner D. , Clark J. J. and Rensink R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking, Vis. Cogn. 7, 191–211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Osborne L. (2003). Savant for a day, N Y Times Mag., 22 June 2003.

  • Ostrofsky J. , Kozbelt A. and Seidel A. (2012). Perceptual constancies and visual selection as predictors of realistic drawing skill, Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 6, 124–136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ostrofsky J. , Cohen D. J. and Kozbelt A. (2014). Objective versus subjective measures of face-drawing accuracy and their relations with perceptual constancies, Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 8, 486–497.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ostrofsky J. , Kozbelt A. and Cohen D. J. (2015). Observational drawing biases are predicted by biases in perception: Empirical support of the misperception hypothesis of drawing accuracy with respect to two angle illusions . Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 68, 1007–1025.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Palmer S. E. (1999). Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

  • Perdreau F. (2014). What can drawing expertise tell us about visual and memory mechanisms? PhD thesis, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perdreau F. and Cavanagh P. (2011). Do artists see their retinas? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5, 171. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00171.

  • Perdreau F. and Cavanagh P. (2013a). Is artists’ perception more veridical? Front. Neurosci. 7, 6. doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00006.

  • Perdreau F. and Cavanagh P. (2013b). The artist’s advantage: Better integration of object information across eye movements, I-Perception, 4, 380–395.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perdreau F. and Cavanagh P. (2014). Drawing skill is related to the efficiency of encoding object structure, I-Perception, 5, 101–119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perdreau F. and Cavanagh P. (2015). Drawing experts have better visual memory while drawing., J. Vis. 15, 5. doi: 10.1167/15.5.5.

  • Pérez-Fabello M. and Campos A. (2007). Influence of training in artistic skills on mental imaging capacity, Creat. Res. J 19, 227–232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Persuh M. , Gomez M. , Bauer L. and Melara R. D. (2014). Feature-based inattentional blindness: Loss of awareness to featural information in fully attended objects , Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 76, 2229–2239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Piaget J. and Inhelder B. (1956). The Child’s Conception of Space, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, UK.

  • Piaget J. and Inhelder B. (1971). Mental Imagery in the Child, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA (originally published 1966).

  • Pinna G. (2013). Why are paintings painted as they are? The place of children’s drawings in vision and art, Art Percept . 1, 75–104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Premack D. G. and Woodruff G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav. Brain Sci. 1, 515–526.

  • Pring L. , Hermelin B. and Heavey L. (1995). Savants, segments, art, and autism, J. Child Psychol. Psychiat. 36, 1065–1076.

  • Pring L. , Hermelin B. , Buhler M. and Walker I. (1997). Native savant talent and acquired skill, Autism 1, 199–214.

  • Prinz J. (2000). A neurofunctional theory of visual consciousness , Consc. Cogn. 9, 243–259.

  • Prinz J. (2014). The Conscious Brain: How Attention Engenders Experience, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

  • Rensink R. A. and Enns J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects, Vis. Res. 38, 2489–2505.

  • Robichaux J. W. (1997). Hensche on Painting, Dover, Mineola, NY, USA.

  • Rock I. (1983). The Logic of Perception, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

  • Rock I. , Gopnik A. and Hall S. (1994). Do young children reverse ambiguous figures? Perception , 23, 635–644.

  • Ropar D. and Mitchell P. (2002). Shape constancy in autism: The role of prior knowledge and perspective cues , J. Child Psychol. Psychiat. 43, 647–653.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roth H. L. , Bauer R. M. , G. P. Crucian and Heilman K. M. (2014). Frontal-executive constructional apraxia: When delayed recall is better than copying, Neurocase 20, 283–95.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ruskin J. (1971). The Elements of Drawing, Dover, Mineola, NY, USA (originally published 1857).

  • Sacks O. (1995). Anthropologist on Mars , Alfred A. Knopgf, New York, NY, USA.

  • Schaer K. , Jahn G and Lotze M. (2012). fMRI-activation during drawing a naturalistic or sketchy portrait, Behav. Brain Res. 233, 209–216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schlegel A. , Fogelson S. , Li X. , Lu Z. , Alexander P. , Meng M. and Tse P. (2012). Visual art training in young adults changes neural circuitry in visual and motor areas , J. Vis. 12, 1129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schlegel A. , Prescott A. , Fogelson S. , Li X. , Lu Z. , Kohler P. J. , Riley E. , Tse P. and Meng M. (2015). The artist emerges: Visual art learning alters neural structure and function, NeuroImage 105, 440–451.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schurz M. , Aichhorn M. , Martin A. and Perner J. (2013). Common brain areas engaged in false belief reasoning and visual perspective taking: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 712. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00712.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Selfe L. (1977). Nadia — A Case of Extraordinary Drawing Ability in an Autistic Child , Academic Press, London, UK.

  • Selfe L. (1983). Normal and Anomalous Representational Drawing Ability in Children , Academic Press, London, UK.

  • Selfe L. (1985). Anomalous drawing development, in: Visual Order: The Nature and Development of Pictorial Representation , Freeman N. H. & Cox M. V. (Eds), pp. 135–154, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simons D. J. and Levin D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1, 261–267.

  • Slater A. and Morison V. (1985). Shape constancy and slant perception at birth, Perception 14, 337–344.

  • Slater A. , Mattock A. and Brown E. (1990). Size constancy at birth: Newborn infants’ responses to retinal and real size , J. Exp. Child Psychol. 49, 314–322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Slotnick S. D. , Thompson W. L. and Kosslyn S. M. (2012). Visual memory and visual mental imagery recruit common control and sensory regions of the brain, Cogn. Neurosci. 3, 14–20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Snyder A. W. (2004). Autistic genius, Nature 428, 470–471.

  • Snyder A. W. (2009). Explaining and inducing savant skills: Privileged access to lower level, less-processed information, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 1399–1405.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Snyder A. W. and Mitchell D. J. (1999). Is integer arithmetic fundamental to mental processing? The mind’s secret arithmetic, Proc. R. Soc. B 266, 587–592.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Snyder A. W. , Mulcahy E. , Taylor J. L. , Mitchell D. J. , Sachdev P. and Gandevia S. C. (2003). Savant-like skills exposed in normal people by suppressing the left fronto- temporal lobe, J. Integr. Neurosci. 2, 149–158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strüber D. and Stadler M. (1999). Differences in top–down influences on the reversal rate of different categories of reversible figures, Perception 28, 1185–1196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Subirana-Vilanova J. B. and Richards W. (1996). Attentional frames, frame curves and figural boundaries: The inside/outside dilemma, Vis. Res. 36, 1493–1501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor L. M. and Mitchell P. (1997). Judgments of apparent shape contaminated by knowledge of reality: Viewing circles obliquely, Br. J. Psychol. 88, 653–670.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tchalenko J. (2009). Segmentation and accuracy in copying and drawing: Experts and beginners, Vis. Re. 49, 791–800.

  • Tchalenko J. , Dempere-Marco L. , Hu X. P. and Yang G. Z. (2003). Eye movement and voluntary control in portrait drawing. in The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research , Hyona J. , Radach R. and Deubel H. (Eds), pp. 705–727, North Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tchalenko J. , Nam S.-H. , Ladanga M. , Miall R. C. (2014). The gaze-shift strategy in drawing, Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 8, 330–339.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thouless R. H. (1931). Phenomenal regression to the real object. I, Br. J. Psychol. 21 , 339–359.

  • Thouless R. H. (1932). Individual differences in phenomenal regression, Br. J. Psychol. 22, 216–241.

  • Todorovic D. (2002). Comparative overview of perception of distal and proximal visual attributes, in: Perception and the Physical World , Heyer D. and Mausfeld R. (Eds), pp. 37–74, Wiley, New York, NY, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Topper D. R. (1983). Art in the realist ontology of J.J. Gibson, Synthese 54, 71–83.

  • Treffert D. (2011). Islands of Genius: The Beautiful Mind of the Autistic, Acquired, and Sudden Savant, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, UK/Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tsal Y. and Kolbet L. (1985). Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention . Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 37A, 25–37.

  • Tse P. (1999). Volume completion, Cogn. Psychol. 39, 37–68.

  • Van Sommers P. (1984). Drawing and Cognition , Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.

  • Van Sommers P. (1989). A system for drawing and drawing-related neuropsychology, Cogn. Neuropsychol. 6, 117–164.

  • Van Veluw S. J. and Chance S. A. (2014). Differentiating between self and others: An ALE meta-analysis of fMRI studies of self-recognition and theory of mind, Brain Imaging Behav. 8, 24–38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wapner W. , Judd T. and Gardner J. (1978). Visual agnosia in an artist, Cortex 14, 343–364.

  • Willats J. (1977). How children learn to draw realistic pictures , Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 29, 367–382.

  • Willats J. (1997). Art and Representation: New Principles in the Analysis of Pictures , Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Willats J. (2005). Making Sense of Children’s Drawings. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA.

  • Wimmer M. and Doherty M. (2011a). The development of ambiguous figure perception: Abstract, Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev., 76 , vii.

  • Wimmer M. and Doherty M. (2011b). The development of ambiguous figure perception. V. Study 4—Reversing ambiguous figures and mental imagery, Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. , 76 , 69–86.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wolfe J. M. and Horowitz T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 495–501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yang J. , Kanazawa S. , Masami Yamaguchi K. and Motoyoshi I. (2015). Pre-constancy vision in infants. Curr. Biol. 25, 1–4.

  • Yirmiya N. , Solomonica-Levi D. , Shulman C. and Pilowsky T. (1996). Theory of mind abilities in individuals with autism, down syndrome, and mental retardation of unknown etiology: The role of age and intelligence, J. Child Psychol. 37, 1003–1014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Young R. , Ridding M. and Morrell T. (2004). Switching skills on by turning off part of the brain, Neurocase 10, 215–222.

  • Zeki S. (1999). Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 344 190 14
Full Text Views 281 96 0
PDF Downloads 24 6 0