Artists’ Innocent Eye as Extended Proximal Mode of Vision

in Art & Perception
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


The innocent eye, or seeing ‘what the eye sees’ is a meaningful expression many artists use to capture their experience in observational drawing and painting. However, a literal interpretation of the innocent eye does not comport with a science of vison focused on object perception. Nor is a two-step model involving a ‘bottom-up strategy’ a plausible account of the notion. Consistent with an emerging body of neuroscientific and psychophysical evidence for the pivotal role of attention in conscious vision, artists’ innocent eye is best construed as an extended proximal mode of vision involving focused attention on pictorial relationships in an identified object or scene. The innocent eye is open to creative expansion, made possible by a competency developed most likely in the early through middle childhood that underpins the visuocognitive skills for flexible deployment of attention, flexible representation, mental imagery and visual memory. The potential challenge from the rare cases of savant-talented artists, who seem to be able to access retinal images directly, is discussed and considered inconclusive. The proposed theoretical framework raises new questions for empirical investigations on the nature and development of the artists’ perceptual expertise, and has implications for science-based pedagogical approaches to drawing, painting, and creativity.

Artists’ Innocent Eye as Extended Proximal Mode of Vision

in Art & Perception



Alberti L. (1966). On PaintingYale University PressNew Haven, CT, USA (Originally published 1435–1436).

Amso D. and Scerif G. (2015). The attentive brain: Insights from developmental cognitive neuroscienceNat. Rev. Neurosci. 16606619.

Anstis S. (2002). Was El Greco astigmatic? Leonardo 35208.

Arend L. Reeves A. Schirillo J. and Goldstein R. (1991). Simultaneous color constancy: Paper with diverse Munsell valuesJ. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8661672.

Arnheim R. (1974). Art and Visual Perception: The New EditionUniversity of CaliforniaLondon, UK.

Arnheim R. (1980). The puzzle of Nadia’s drawingsArts Psychother. 77985.

Atherton M. (2002). The origins of the sensation/perception distinction in: Perception and the Physical World: Psychological and Philosophical Issues in Perception Heyer D. and Mausfeld R. (Eds) pp. 319John Wiley & SonsNew York, NY, USA.

Awh E. Vogel E. K. and Oh S. H. (2006). Interactions between attention and working memoryNeuroscience 139201208.

Bertamini M. and Parks T. E. (2005). On what people know about images on mirrorsCognition 9885104.

Biederman I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understandingPsychol. Rev. 94115117.

Biederman I. and Kim J. G. (2008). 17000 years of depicting the junction of two smooth shapesPerception 37161164.

Brunswik E. (1944). Distal focusing of perception: Size-constancy in a representative sample of situationsPsychol. Monogr. 56149.

Bühler K. (1930). The Mental Development of the ChildKegan PaulLondon, UK.

Cantlon J. F. Pinel P. Dehaene S. and Pelphrey K. A. (2011). Cortical representations of symbols, objects, and faces are pruned back during early childhoodCereb. Cortex 21191199.

Caplovitz G. P. Fendrich R. and Hughes H. C. (2008). Failures to see: Attentive blank stares revealed by change blindnessConsc. Cogn. 17877886.

Carson L. Millard M. Quehl N. and Danckert J. (2014). Polygon-based drawing accuracy analysis and positive/negative spaceArt Percept. 2213236.

Cavanagh P. (2005). The artist as neuroscientistNature 434301307.

Chamberlain R. and Wagemans J. (2015). Visual arts training is linked to flexible attention to local and global levels of visual stimuliActa Psychol. 161185197.

Chamberlain R. and Wagemans J. (2016). The genesis of errors in drawingNeurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 65195207.

Chamberlain R. McManus I. C. Riley H. Rankin Q. and Brunswick N. (2013). Local processing enhancements associated with superior observational drawing are due to enhanced perceptual functioning, not weak central coherenceQ. J. Exp. Psychol. 6614481466.

Chamberlain R. Swinnen L. Heeren S. and Wagemans J. (in press). Perceptual flexibility is coupled with reduced executive inhibition in students of the visual artsBr. J. Psychol. doi:10.1111/bjop.12253.

Chien S. H. L. Bronson-Castain K. Palmer J. and Teller D. Y. (2006). Lightness constancy in 4-month-old infantsVis. Res. 4621392148.

Cohen D. J. (2005). Look little, look often: The influence of gaze frequency on drawing accuracyPercept. Psychophys . 679971009.

Cohen D. J. and Bennett S. (1997). Why can’t most people draw what they see? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23609621.

Cohen D. J. and Earls H. (2010). Inverting an image does not improve drawing accuracyPsychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 4168172.

Cohen D. J. and Jones H. E. (2008). How shape constancy relates to drawing accuracyPsychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 2819.

Coren S. (1970). Lateral inhibition and geometric illusionsQ. J. Exp. Psychol. 22274278.

Costall A. (1995). The myth of the sensory core: The traditional versus the ecological approach to children’s drawings. in Drawing and Looking: Theoretical Approaches to Pictorial Representation in Children Lange-Küttner C. and Thomas G. V. (Eds) (pp. 1626) Harvester WheatsheafHemel Hempstead, UK.

Dannemiller J. L. (1989). A test of color constancy in 9- and 20-weeks-old human infants following simulated illuminant changesDev. Psychol. 25171.

Del Giudice E. Grossi D. Angelini R. Crisantia A. F. Lattea F. Fragassia N. A. and Trojano L. (2000). Spatial cognition in children. I. Development of drawing-related (visuospatial and constructional) abilities in preschool and early school yearsBrain Dev . 22362367.

Dennett D. (1991). Consciousness ExplainedLittle BrownBoston, MA, USA.

De Renzi E. (1982). Disorders of Space Exploration and CognitionJohn Wiley & SonsChichester. UK.

Di Lollo V. Enns J. T. and Rensink R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processJ. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 129481507.

Drake J. E. (2013). Is superior local processing in the visuospatial domain a function of drawing talent rather than autism spectrum disorder? Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 7203209.

Drake J. E. and Winner E. (2011). Realistic drawing talent in typical adults is associated with the same kind of local processing bias found in individuals with ASDJ. Autism and Dev. Disord. 4111921201.

Durgin F. H. Ruff A. J. and Russell R. C. (2012). Constant enough: On the kinds of perceptual constancy worth having in: Visual Experience: Sensation Cognition and Constancy Hatfield G. and Allred S. (Eds) pp. 87102Oxford University PressOxford, UK.

Ebersbach M. Stiehler S. and Asmus P. (2011). On the relationship between children’s perspective taking in complex scenes and their spatial drawing abilityBr. J. Dev. Psychol. 29455474.

Edwards B. (1979). Drawing on the Right Side of the BrainJ. P. TarcherLos Angeles, CA, USA.

Epstein W. and Hatfield G. (1978). Functional equivalence of masking and cue reduction in perception of shape at a slantPercept. Psychophys. 23137144.

Epstein W. Hatfield G. and Muise G. (1977). Perceived shape at a slant as a function of processing time and processing loadJ. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform . 3473483.

Firestone C. (2013). On the origin and status of the “El Greco fallacy”Perception 42672674.

Forisha B. D. (1975). Mental imagery verbal processes: A developmental studyDev. Psychol. 11259267.

Fry R. (1960). Vision and DesignMeridian Books, New YorkNY, USA (originally published 1919).

Gainotti G. and Tiacci C. (1970). Patterns of drawing disability in right and left hemispheric patientsNeuropsychologia 8379384.

Gallate J. Chi R. Ellwood S. and Snyder A. (2009). Reducing false memories by magnetic pulse stimulationNeurosci. Lett. 44911511154.

Ganis G. Thompson W. L. and Kosslyn S. M. (2004). Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: An fMRI studyCogn. Brain Res. 20226241.

Geer T. (2012). What we illustrate when we draw: Normative visual processing in beginning drawings, and the capacity to observe detail in: Thinking through Drawing: Practice into Knowledge Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Symposium on Drawing Cognition and Education Kantrowitz A. Brew A. and Fava M. (Eds) pp. 4550Teachers College, Columbia UniversityNew York, NY, USA.

Gibson J. J. (1950). Perception of the Visual WorldHoughton MifflinBoston, MA, USA.

Gibson J. J. (1952). The visual field and the visual world: A reply to professor BoringPsychol. Rev. 5914951.

Gibson J. J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual SystemsHoughton MifflinBoston, MA, USA.

Gibson J. J. (1972). A theory of direct visual perception in: The Psychology of Knowing Royce J. and Rozenboom W. (Eds) pp. 215227Gordon and BreachNew York, NY, USA.

Gibson J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual PerceptionHoughton MifflinBoston, MA, USA.

Gilchrist A. (2012). Objective and subjective sides of perception in: Visual Experience: Sensation Cognition and Constancy Hatfield G. and Allred S. (Eds) pp. 105121Oxford University PressOxford, UK.

Gilchrist A. (2015). Theoretical approaches to lightness and perceptionPerception 44339358.

Girgus J. J. Rock I. and Egatz R. (1977). The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figuresPercept. Psychophys. 22550556.

Goldenberg G. Wirnmer A. Holzner E. and Wessely P. (1985). Apraxia of the left limbs in a case of callosal disconnection: The contribution of medial frontal lobe damageCortex 21135151.

Gombrich E. (1960). Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial RepresentationPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJ, USA.

Gopnik A. and Astington J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance–reality distinctionChild Dev. 592637.

Gopnik A. and Rosati A. (2001). Duck or rabbit? Reversing ambiguous figures and understanding ambiguous representationsDev.Sci. 4175183.

Gregory R. (1997). Eye and Brain: The Psychology of SeeingPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJ, USA (originally published 1966).

Grossberg S. and Zajac L. (2017). How humans consciously see paintings and paintings illuminate how humans see. Art Percept. 5195.

Haber R. N. (1980). Perceiving space from pictures: A theoretical analysis in: The Perception of Pictures Vol. I Hagen M. A. (Ed.) pp. 332Academic PressNew York, NY, USA.

Hamm J. (1963). Drawing the Head & FigurePerigee BooksNew York, NY, USA.

Hammad S. Kennedy J. M. Juricevic I. and Rajani S. (2008). Ellipses on the surface of a picturePerception 37504510.

Hawthorne C. W. (1960). Hawthorne on PaintingDoverMineola, NY, USA.

Hazlett H. C. et al. (2017). Early brain development in infants at high risk for autism spectrum disorderNature 542348351.

He Z. J. and Nakayama K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual searchNature 359231233.

Hegarty M. (2010). Components of spatial intelligence in: The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory Vol. 52 Ross B. H. (Ed.) pp. 265297Elsevier Academic PressSan Diego, CA, USA.

Helmholtz H. W. (1910). Treatise on Physiological Optics English translation by Optical Society of America (1924/1925) DoverMineola, NY, USA (originally published 1869).

Helmholtz H. W. (1971). The facts of perception in: Selected Writings of Hermann Helmholtz Kahl R. (Ed.) Wesleyan University PressMiddletown, CN, USA (originally published 1887) Available online at:

Hermelin B. (2001). Bright Splinters of the MindJessica Kingsley PublishersLondon, UK.

Hochberg J. (2007). The psychophysics of pictorial perception in: The mind’s eye: Julian Hochberg on the Perception of Pictures Films and the World Peterson M. A. Gillam B. and Sedgwick H. A. (Eds) pp. 3059Oxford University PressNew York, NY, USA.

Hochstein S. and Ahissar M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual systemNeuron 36791804.

Hurlbert A. (1999). Colour vision: Is colour constancy real? Curr. Biol. 9R558R561.

Ihde D. (1977). Experimental Phenomenology: An IntroductionParagon BooksNew York, NY, USA.

Karmiloff-Smith A. (1993). Self-organization and cognitive change in: Brain Development and Cognition: A Reader Johnson M. H. (Ed.) pp. 592618Blackwell PublishingMalden, MA, USA.

Kirk A. and Kertesz A. (1989). Hemispheric contributions to drawingNeuropsychologia 27881886.

Kleiner F. S. (2009). Gardner’s Art through the Ages: The Western Perspective Vol. II13th ed.Wadswoth Cengage LearningBoston, MA, USA.

Koenig O. Reiss L. P. and Kosslyn M. S. (1990). The development of spatial relation representations: Evidence from studies of cerebral lateralizationJ. Exp. Child Psychol. 50119130.

Koffka K. (1935). Principle of Gestalt PsychologyLund HumphriesLondon, UK.

Köhler W. (1947). Gestalt psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern PsychologyLiverightNew York, NY, USA.

Kosslyn S. M. (1987). Seeing and imaginingin the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approachPsychol. Rev. 94148175.

Kosslyn S. M. Holtzman J. D. Farah M. J. and Gazzaniga M. S. (1985). A computational analysis of mental image generation: Evidence from functional dissociations in split-brain patientsJ. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 114311341.

Kozbelt A. (2001). Artists as experts in visual cognitionVis. Cogn. 8705723.

Kozbelt A. and Seeley W. P. (2007). Integrating art historical, psychological, and neuroscientific explanations of artists’ advantages in drawing and perceptionPsychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 18090.

Kozbelt A. Seidel A. ElBassiouny A. Mark Y. and Owen D. R. (2010). Visual selection contributes to artists’ advantages in realistic drawingPsychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 493102.

Lamme V. A. (2000). Neural mechanisms of visual awareness: A linking proposition. Brain and Mind1385406.

Lange-Küttner C. (2014). Do drawing stages really exist? Children’s early mapping of perspectivePsychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 8168182.

Lange-Küttner C. and Reith E. (1995). The transformation of figurative thought: Implications of Piaget and Inhelder’s developmental theory for children’s drawings. in: Drawing and Looking: Theoretical Approaches to Pictorial Representation in Children Lange-Küttner C. and Thomas G. V. (Eds) pp. 7592Harvester WheatsheafHertfordshire, UK.

Lee H. and Vecera S. P. (2005). Visual cognition influences early vision: The role of visual short-term memory in amodal completionPsychol. Sci. 16763768.

Leibowitz H. and Sacca E. J. (1971). Comparison of matching and drawing in the perception of shape at various intelligence levelsPercept. Psychophys. 9407409.

Leibowitz H. Waskow I. Loeffler N. and Glaser F. (1959). Intelligence level as a variable in the perception of shapeQ. J. Exp. Psychol. 11108112.

Lichte W. H. and Borresen C. R. (1967). Influence of instructions on degree of shape constancyJ. Exp. Psychol. 74538542.

Livingstone M. (2002). Vision and Art: The Biology of SeeingAbramsNew York, NY, USA.

Logothetis N. K. Leopold D. A. and Sheinberg D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380621624.

Longobardi C. Quaglia R. and Iotti N. O. (2015). Reconsidering the scribbling stage of drawing: A new perspective on toddlers’ representational processes Front. Psychol. 6:1227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01227.

Lotto B. and Purve D. (2000). An empirical explanation of color contrastProc. Natl Acad. Sci. 971283412839.

Lou H. C Luber B. Crupain M. Keenan J. P. Nowak M. Kjaer T. W. Sackeim H. A. and Lisanby S. H. (2004). Parietal cortex and representation of the mental selfProc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101682732.

Luquet G.-H. (2001). Children’s Drawings (Le Dessin Enfantin) Costall A. (transl.) Free Association BooksLondon, UK (originally published 1927).

Mack A. (1978). Three modes of visual perception in: Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information Pick H. L. Jr. and Saltzman E. (Eds) pp. 171186Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJ, USA.

Mack A. and Rock I. (1998). Inattentional BlindnessMIT PressCambridge, MA, USA.

Marr D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual InformationFreemanSan Francisco, CA, USA.

Mausfeld R. (2003). Conjoint representation and the mental capacity for multiple simultaneous perspectives in: Looking into Picture: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Pictorial Space Hecht H. Schwartz R. and Atherton M. (Eds) pp. 1760MIT PressCambridge, MA, USA.

McManus I. C. Loo P. Chamberlain R. Riley H. and Brunswick N. (2011). Does shape constancy relate to drawing ability? Two failures to replicateEmpir. Stud. Arts 29191208.

McManus C. Ying B. T. Z. Fleming E. Lee P. and Chamberlain R. (2014). Testing Ruskin: Seeing drawing and remembering complex curves. Presented at the Visual Science of Art ConferenceBelgradeSerbia.

Miller B. L. Ponton M. Benson D. F. Cummings J. L. and Mena I. (1996). Enhanced artistic creativity with temporal lobe degenerationLancet 34817441745.

Miller B. L. Cummings J. Mishkin F. Boone K. Prince F. Ponton M. and Cotman C. (1998). Emergence of artistic talent in frontotemporal dementiaNeurology 51978982.

Mitchell P. and Taylor L. M. (1999). Shape constancy and theory of mind: Is there a link? Cognition 70167190.

Mitchell P. Ropar D. Ackroyd K. and Rajendran G. (2005). How perception impacts on drawingsJ. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 319961003.

Mitroff S. R. Sobel D. M. and Gopnik A. (2006). Reversing how to think about ambiguous figure reversals: Spontaneous alternating by uninformed observersPerception 35709715.

Moore E. G. (1913/1914). Status of sense-dataProc. Aristotelian Soc. 14355380.

Noë A. (2008). Précis of Action in Perception: Philosophy and Phenomenological ResearchPhilos. Phenomenol. Res. 76660665.

O’Regan J. K. Heiner D. Clark J. J. and Rensink R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without lookingVis. Cogn. 7191211.

Osborne L. (2003). Savant for a dayN Y Times Mag. 22 June 2003.

Ostrofsky J. Kozbelt A. and Seidel A. (2012). Perceptual constancies and visual selection as predictors of realistic drawing skillPsychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 6124136.

Ostrofsky J. Cohen D. J. and Kozbelt A. (2014). Objective versus subjective measures of face-drawing accuracy and their relations with perceptual constanciesPsychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 8486497.

Ostrofsky J. Kozbelt A. and Cohen D. J. (2015). Observational drawing biases are predicted by biases in perception: Empirical support of the misperception hypothesis of drawing accuracy with respect to two angle illusions . Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 6810071025.

Palmer S. E. (1999). Vision Science: Photons to PhenomenologyMIT PressCambridge, MA, USA.

Perdreau F. (2014). What can drawing expertise tell us about visual and memory mechanisms? PhD thesis Université Paris Descartes Paris, France.

Perdreau F. and Cavanagh P. (2011). Do artists see their retinas? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5171. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00171.

Perdreau F. and Cavanagh P. (2013a). Is artists’ perception more veridical? Front. Neurosci. 76. doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00006.

Perdreau F. and Cavanagh P. (2013b). The artist’s advantage: Better integration of object information across eye movementsI-Perception4380395.

Perdreau F. and Cavanagh P. (2014). Drawing skill is related to the efficiency of encoding object structureI-Perception5101119.

Perdreau F. and Cavanagh P. (2015). Drawing experts have better visual memory while drawing. J. Vis. 155. doi: 10.1167/15.5.5.

Pérez-Fabello M. and Campos A. (2007). Influence of training in artistic skills on mental imaging capacityCreat. Res. J 19227232.

Persuh M. Gomez M. Bauer L. and Melara R. D. (2014). Feature-based inattentional blindness: Loss of awareness to featural information in fully attended objectsAtten. Percept. Psychophys. 7622292239.

Piaget J. and Inhelder B. (1956). The Child’s Conception of SpaceRoutledge & Kegan PaulLondon, UK.

Piaget J. and Inhelder B. (1971). Mental Imagery in the ChildBasic BooksNew York, NY, USA (originally published 1966).

Pinna G. (2013). Why are paintings painted as they are? The place of children’s drawings in vision and artArt Percept . 175104.

Premack D. G. and Woodruff G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav. Brain Sci. 1515526.

Pring L. Hermelin B. and Heavey L. (1995). Savants, segments, art, and autismJ. Child Psychol. Psychiat. 3610651076.

Pring L. Hermelin B. Buhler M. and Walker I. (1997). Native savant talent and acquired skillAutism 1199214.

Prinz J. (2000). A neurofunctional theory of visual consciousnessConsc. Cogn. 9243259.

Prinz J. (2014). The Conscious Brain: How Attention Engenders ExperienceOxford University PressOxford, UK.

Rensink R. A. and Enns J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objectsVis. Res. 3824892505.

Robichaux J. W. (1997). Hensche on PaintingDoverMineola, NY, USA.

Rock I. (1983). The Logic of PerceptionMIT PressCambridge, MA, USA.

Rock I. Gopnik A. and Hall S. (1994). Do young children reverse ambiguous figures? Perception23635644.

Ropar D. and Mitchell P. (2002). Shape constancy in autism: The role of prior knowledge and perspective cuesJ. Child Psychol. Psychiat. 43647653.

Roth H. L. Bauer R. M. G. P. Crucian and Heilman K. M. (2014). Frontal-executive constructional apraxia: When delayed recall is better than copyingNeurocase 2028395.

Ruskin J. (1971). The Elements of DrawingDoverMineola, NY, USA (originally published 1857).

Sacks O. (1995). Anthropologist on MarsAlfred A. KnopgfNew York, NY, USA.

Schaer K. Jahn G and Lotze M. (2012). fMRI-activation during drawing a naturalistic or sketchy portraitBehav. Brain Res. 233209216.

Schlegel A. Fogelson S. Li X. Lu Z. Alexander P. Meng M. and Tse P. (2012). Visual art training in young adults changes neural circuitry in visual and motor areasJ. Vis. 121129.

Schlegel A. Prescott A. Fogelson S. Li X. Lu Z. Kohler P. J. Riley E. Tse P. and Meng M. (2015). The artist emerges: Visual art learning alters neural structure and functionNeuroImage 105440451.

Schurz M. Aichhorn M. Martin A. and Perner J. (2013). Common brain areas engaged in false belief reasoning and visual perspective taking: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7712. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00712.

Selfe L. (1977). Nadia — A Case of Extraordinary Drawing Ability in an Autistic ChildAcademic PressLondon, UK.

Selfe L. (1983). Normal and Anomalous Representational Drawing Ability in ChildrenAcademic PressLondon, UK.

Selfe L. (1985). Anomalous drawing development in: Visual Order: The Nature and Development of Pictorial Representation Freeman N. H. & Cox M. V. (Eds) pp. 135154Cambridge University PressCambridge, UK.

Simons D. J. and Levin D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1261267.

Slater A. and Morison V. (1985). Shape constancy and slant perception at birthPerception 14337344.

Slater A. Mattock A. and Brown E. (1990). Size constancy at birth: Newborn infants’ responses to retinal and real sizeJ. Exp. Child Psychol. 49314322.

Slotnick S. D. Thompson W. L. and Kosslyn S. M. (2012). Visual memory and visual mental imagery recruit common control and sensory regions of the brainCogn. Neurosci. 31420.

Snyder A. W. (2004). Autistic geniusNature 428470471.

Snyder A. W. (2009). Explaining and inducing savant skills: Privileged access to lower level, less-processed informationPhilos. Trans. R. Soc. B 36413991405.

Snyder A. W. and Mitchell D. J. (1999). Is integer arithmetic fundamental to mental processing? The mind’s secret arithmeticProc. R. Soc. B 266587592.

Snyder A. W. Mulcahy E. Taylor J. L. Mitchell D. J. Sachdev P. and Gandevia S. C. (2003). Savant-like skills exposed in normal people by suppressing the left fronto- temporal lobeJ. Integr. Neurosci. 2149158.

Strüber D. and Stadler M. (1999). Differences in top–down influences on the reversal rate of different categories of reversible figuresPerception 2811851196.

Subirana-Vilanova J. B. and Richards W. (1996). Attentional frames, frame curves and figural boundaries: The inside/outside dilemmaVis. Res. 3614931501.

Taylor L. M. and Mitchell P. (1997). Judgments of apparent shape contaminated by knowledge of reality: Viewing circles obliquelyBr. J. Psychol. 88653670.

Tchalenko J. (2009). Segmentation and accuracy in copying and drawing: Experts and beginnersVis. Re. 49791800.

Tchalenko J. Dempere-Marco L. Hu X. P. and Yang G. Z. (2003). Eye movement and voluntary control in portrait drawing. in The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research Hyona J. Radach R. and Deubel H. (Eds) pp. 705727North HollandAmsterdam, Netherlands.

Tchalenko J. Nam S.-H. Ladanga M. Miall R. C. (2014). The gaze-shift strategy in drawingPsychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 8330339.

Thouless R. H. (1931). Phenomenal regression to the real object. IBr. J. Psychol. 21339359.

Thouless R. H. (1932). Individual differences in phenomenal regressionBr. J. Psychol. 22216241.

Todorovic D. (2002). Comparative overview of perception of distal and proximal visual attributes in: Perception and the Physical World Heyer D. and Mausfeld R. (Eds) pp. 3774WileyNew York, NY, USA.

Topper D. R. (1983). Art in the realist ontology of J.J. GibsonSynthese 547183.

Treffert D. (2011). Islands of Genius: The Beautiful Mind of the Autistic Acquired and Sudden SavantJessica Kingsley PublishersLondon, UK/Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Tsal Y. and Kolbet L. (1985). Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention . Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 37A2537.

Tse P. (1999). Volume completionCogn. Psychol. 393768.

Van Sommers P. (1984). Drawing and CognitionCambridge University PressNew York, NY, USA.

Van Sommers P. (1989). A system for drawing and drawing-related neuropsychologyCogn. Neuropsychol. 6117164.

Van Veluw S. J. and Chance S. A. (2014). Differentiating between self and others: An ALE meta-analysis of fMRI studies of self-recognition and theory of mindBrain Imaging Behav. 82438.

Wapner W. Judd T. and Gardner J. (1978). Visual agnosia in an artistCortex 14343364.

Willats J. (1977). How children learn to draw realistic picturesQ. J. Exp. Psychol. 29367382.

Willats J. (1997). Art and Representation: New Principles in the Analysis of PicturesPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJ, USA.

Willats J. (2005). Making Sense of Children’s Drawings. Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, NJ, USA.

Wimmer M. and Doherty M. (2011a). The development of ambiguous figure perception: AbstractMonogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev.76vii.

Wimmer M. and Doherty M. (2011b). The development of ambiguous figure perception. V. Study 4—Reversing ambiguous figures and mental imageryMonogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev.766986.

Wolfe J. M. and Horowitz T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5495501.

Yang J. Kanazawa S. Masami Yamaguchi K. and Motoyoshi I. (2015). Pre-constancy vision in infants. Curr. Biol. 2514.

Yirmiya N. Solomonica-Levi D. Shulman C. and Pilowsky T. (1996). Theory of mind abilities in individuals with autism, down syndrome, and mental retardation of unknown etiology: The role of age and intelligenceJ. Child Psychol. 3710031014.

Young R. Ridding M. and Morrell T. (2004). Switching skills on by turning off part of the brainNeurocase 10215222.

Zeki S. (1999). Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the BrainOxford University PressNew York, NY, USA.


  • View in gallery

    Two conceptualizations of the P-mode vision: (a) The P-mode as a ‘bottom-up strategy’ as explicated by Rock (1983), and (b) The P-mode as post-identification attention, as proposed in this article. There are two main differences between (a) and (b). First, (a) assumes that view-variant percepts arise before object identification and constancy, whereas (b) assumes the opposite. Second, (a) assumes a top-down suppression (−) of the object identification and constancy perception, whereas (b) assumes a top-down attention (+) on pictorial relationships that go beyond the correlates of the retinal image. See text for details.

  • View in gallery

    Three examples from Hamm’s (1963) popular figure-drawing instruction book “Drawing the Head & Figure” showing auxiliary lines and triangles that artists frequently use for ensuring correct proportions among figural components. ‘Phantom images” of these lines and triangles can conceivably be formed for ensuring correct proportions among pictorial elements.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 94 94 22
Full Text Views 26 26 17
PDF Downloads 5 5 4
EPUB Downloads 5 5 2