Illusory Depth Based on Interactions Between Fluorescent and Conventional Colours: A Case Study on Frank Stella’s Irregular Polygons Paintings
In: Art & PerceptionSearch for other papers by Stefanie De Winter in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Pieter Moors in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Hilde Van Gelder in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Johan Wagemans in
Current site
Google Scholar
Although Frank Stella intended to create flat, illusion-less Irregular Polygons paintings, it is not uncommon to experience the illusion of colour depth, based on the interaction between their fluorescent and conventional colours. Some critics praised these artworks’ flatness, while others described odd depth experiences that they categorised as a new kind of illusion. In order to provide a correct reading of these works and to reassess their art historical significance, a scientific case study regarding this colour-depth effect imposes itself. This article discusses an experiment in which we determined whether twenty artists, twenty art historians and twenty laypeople experienced fluorescent colours as protruding, receding or flat in combination with conventional colours. We additionally looked at whether they still perceived colour depth when all fluorescent colours were replaced with their conventional variants. All participants observed fifteen designs, which they had to rate according to the perceived depth of each coloured region with a number between −3 (strongly receding) and +3 (strongly protruding). The results revealed that most participants experience fluorescent regions as strongly protruding, unlike all conventional colours, which were rated as much less protruding. When a fluorescent colour was swapped with a conventional variant, all participants experienced significantly less depth. The differences between the subject groups were statistically negligible when looking at the mean depth ratings for both colour types. However, we discovered that artists experienced more contrast effects, as they gave different ratings to different panels (of identical colour and shape) in the same design, depending on their position.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Aach H. (1970). On the use and phenomena of fluorescent pigments in painting, Leonardo 3, 135–138.
-
De Winter S. (2014 ). Interview with Frank Stella, unpublished interview, transcribed. Peter Freeman Gallery, New York, NY, USA (January 20th, 2014).
-
Edwards A. S. (1955). Effect of color on visual depth perception. J. Gen. Psychol. 52, 331–333.
-
Fried M. (1965). Three American Painters, exhibition catalog. Fogg Art Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
-
Fried M. (1966). Shape as form: Frank Stella’s new paintings. Artforum 5, 18–27.
-
Gregory R. L. (1980). Perceptions as hypotheses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 290, 181–197.
-
Gregory R. L. (1990). Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing, 4th ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
-
Itten J. (1970). The Elements of Color. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
-
Johnston-Feller R. (2001). Color Science in the Examination of Museum Objects: Nondestructive Procedures. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
-
Judd D. (1965). Specific Objects, Arts Yearbook, 8, 74–82.
-
Kennedy B. P. (2010). Frank Stella: Irregular Polygons, 1965–66, exhibition catalogue. Hood Museum of Art, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
-
Krauss R. (1968). On Frontality. Artforum 5, 40–46.
-
Krauss R. (1971). Stella’s new work and the problem of series, Artforum 10, 40–44.
-
Lejeune A. (2015). Perspective et Géométral — Problématisation de la Sculpture aux États-Unis (1966–1973) , Les Presses du Réel, Dijon, France.
-
Litt S . (2011). Frank Stella’s luminous “Irregular Polygon” series is reunited at the Toledo Museum of Art. https://www.cleveland.com/arts/index.ssf/2011/04/frank_stellas_luminous_irregul.html. [accessed May 2018].
-
Little A. (1965). Shades of meaning, Color Eng. 3, 4.
-
Little A. (1966). Shades of meaning, Color Eng. 4, 3, 5.
-
Livingstone M. (2002). Vision and Art: The Biology of Seeing . Harry N. Abrams, New York, NY, USA.
-
McGlinchey C. and Pratt E. (2000). Exploring boundaries in painting technique. MoMA 3, 6–9.
-
Rose B. (1967). American Art since 1900 ; A Critical History. Praeger Publishers, New York, NY, USA.
-
Rose B. (1967). Abstract illusionism. Artforum (October 1967), 33–37.
-
Rubin W. S. (1970). Frank Stella, The Museum of Modern Art, New York, NY, USA.
-
Stella F. (1986). Working Space, Vol. 40. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
-
Streitel S. G. (2009). Fluorescent pigments (daylight). Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
-
Toledo Museum of Art (2011). Masters Series: An Evening with Frank Stella, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9qL6XVtPZM [accessed May 2018].
-
Van Gelder H. (2003). The instantaneous grace of a split-second glance: A modernist myth of timelessness revisited, in: The Enduring Instant: Time and the Spectator in the Visual Arts, Roesler-Friedenthal A. and Nathan J. (Eds), pp. 127–133. Mann Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
-
Van Gelder H. (2004). The fall from grace. late minimalism’s conception of the intrinsic time of the artwork-as-matter, Interval(les) 1, 83–97.
-
Vos J. J. (2008). Depth in colour, a history of a chapter in physiologie optique amusante. Clin. Exp. Optom. 91, 139–147.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 206 | 42 | 5 |
| Full Text Views | 647 | 36 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 596 | 48 | 0 |
Illusory Depth Based on Interactions Between Fluorescent and Conventional Colours: A Case Study on Frank Stella’s Irregular Polygons Paintings
In: Art & PerceptionSearch for other papers by Stefanie De Winter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pieter Moors in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hilde Van Gelder in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johan Wagemans in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Although Frank Stella intended to create flat, illusion-less Irregular Polygons paintings, it is not uncommon to experience the illusion of colour depth, based on the interaction between their fluorescent and conventional colours. Some critics praised these artworks’ flatness, while others described odd depth experiences that they categorised as a new kind of illusion. In order to provide a correct reading of these works and to reassess their art historical significance, a scientific case study regarding this colour-depth effect imposes itself. This article discusses an experiment in which we determined whether twenty artists, twenty art historians and twenty laypeople experienced fluorescent colours as protruding, receding or flat in combination with conventional colours. We additionally looked at whether they still perceived colour depth when all fluorescent colours were replaced with their conventional variants. All participants observed fifteen designs, which they had to rate according to the perceived depth of each coloured region with a number between −3 (strongly receding) and +3 (strongly protruding). The results revealed that most participants experience fluorescent regions as strongly protruding, unlike all conventional colours, which were rated as much less protruding. When a fluorescent colour was swapped with a conventional variant, all participants experienced significantly less depth. The differences between the subject groups were statistically negligible when looking at the mean depth ratings for both colour types. However, we discovered that artists experienced more contrast effects, as they gave different ratings to different panels (of identical colour and shape) in the same design, depending on their position.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 206 | 42 | 5 |
| Full Text Views | 647 | 36 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 596 | 48 | 0 |