Visual Image Statistics in the History of Western Art
In: Art & PerceptionSearch for other papers by George Mather in
Current site
Google Scholar
The history of Western visual art is traditionally divided into a succession of stylistic movements on the basis of the art-historical provenance and visual qualities of artworks. Little is known about how the visual statistics of Western artworks have changed over time, though this data could inform debate about the transitions between art movements. This longitudinal statistical study shows that two measures of the statistics of Western paintings remained relatively stable for 500 years, and similar to the values found in photographic images depicting the same subjects. Dramatic changes began in the late nineteenth century between the years 1878 and 1891, when the statistics of artworks became steadily more variable, and more frequently departed from values that are typical of representational images. This period can be considered as a major turning point that marks the beginning of the Modern Art movement. Statistically, abstract Modern art is more diverse than the representational art of any period. There is only limited evidence that aesthetic responses to paintings bear any relation to their visual statistics.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Aks D. J. and Sprott J. C. (1996). Quantifying aesthetic preference for chaotic patterns, Empir. Stud. Arts 14, 1–16.
-
Amirshahi S. A. , Denzler J. and Redies C. (2013). JenAesthetics — A public dataset of paintings for aesthetic research.Tech. rep., Computer Vision Group, University of Jena, Germany, pp. 1–12.
-
Amirshahi S. A. , Hayn-Leichsenring G. U. , Denzler J. and Redies C. (2015). JenAesthetics subjective dataset: Analyzing paintings by subjective scores, in: Agapito L. , Bronstein M. and Rother C. (Eds), Computer Vision — ECCV 2014 Workshops. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science , Vol. 8925, pp. 3–19. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16178-5_1.
-
Brettell R. R. (1999). Modern Art 1851–1929. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
-
Burton G. J. and Moorhead I. R. (1987). Color and spatial structure in natural scenes, Appl. Opt. 26, 157–170.
-
Denis M. (1890, August). Définition du néo-traditionnisme, Art Critique 65, 540–542.
-
Elger D. (2017). Abstract Art. Taschen, Koln, Germany.
-
Field D. J. (1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 2379–2394.
-
Gombrich E. (1972). The Story of Art, 13th ed. Phaedon, Oxford, UK.Graham, D. J. and Field, D. J. (2007). Statistical regularities of art images and natural scenes: Spectra, sparseness and nonlinearities, Spat. Vis.21, 149–164.
-
Graham D. J. and Field D. J. (2008). Variations in intensity statistics for representational and abstract art, and for art from the Eastern and Western hemispheres, Perception 37, 1341–1352.
-
Graham-Dixon A. (2008). Art: The Definitive Visual Guide. Dorling Kindersley, London, UK.
-
Güçlütürk Y. , Jacobs R. H. A. H. and Lier R. van (2016). Liking versus complexity: Decomposing the inverted U-curve, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 112. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00112.
-
Hayn-Leichsenring G. U. , Lehmann T. and Redies C. (2017). Subjective ratings of beauty and aesthetics: correlations with statistical image properties in Western oil paintings, iPerception 8, 2041669517715474. http://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517715474.
-
Jin X. C. and Ong S. H. (1995). A practical method for estimating fractal dimension, Pattern Recognit. Lett. 16, 457–464.
-
Kersten D. (1987). Predictability and redundancy of natural images, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 2395–2400.
-
Knill D. C. , Field D. J. and Kersten D. (1990). Human discrimination of fractal images, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 1113–1123.
-
Li J. , Du Q. and Sun C. (2009). An improved box-counting method for image fractal dimension estimation, Pattern Recognit. 42, 2460–2469.
-
Little S. (2004). -isms: Understanding Art. Bloomsbury, London, UK.
-
Liu Y. , Chen L. , Wang H. , Jiang L. , Zhang Y. , Zhao J. , Wang D. , Zhao Y. and Song Y. (2014). An improved differential box-counting method to estimate fractal dimensions of gray-level images, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 25, 1102–1111.
-
Mather G. (2014). Artistic adjustment of image spectral slope. Art Percept. 2, 11–22.
-
Olmos A. and Kingdom F. A. A. (2004). A biologically inspired algorithm for the recovery of shading and reflectance images, Perception 33, 1463–1473.
-
Peitgen D. and Saupe H. (1988). The Science of Fractal Images. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.
-
Phillips S. (2012). …isms. Understanding Modern Art. Bloomsbury, London, UK.
-
Redies C. (2007). A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli, Spat. Vis. 21, 97–117.
-
Redies C. and Brachmann A. (2017). Statistical image properties in large subsets of traditional art, bad art, and abstract art, Front. Neurosci. 11, 593. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00593.
-
Redies C. , Hänisch J. , Blickhan M. and Denzler J. (2007a). Artists portray human faces with the Fourier statistics of complex natural scenes, Network 18, 235–248.
-
Redies C. , Hasenstein J. and Denzler J. (2007b). Fractal-like image statistics in visual art: similarity to natural scenes, Spat. Vis. 21, 137–148.
-
Ruderman D. L. (1994). The statistics of natural images, Network 5, 517–548.
-
Ruderman D. L. (1997). Origins of scaling in natural images, Vis. Res. 37, 3385–3398.
-
Sartori A. (2014). Affective analysis of abstract paintings using statistical analysis and art theory, in: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction - ICMI ’14, V(212), Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 384–388. http://doi.org/10.1145/2663204.2666289.
-
Saupe D. (1988). Algorithms for random fractals, in: The Science of Fractal Images, Peitgen D. and Saupe H. (Eds), pp. 71–136. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.
-
Schweinhart A. M. , and Essock E. A. (2013). Structural content in paintings: Artists overregularize oriented content of paintings relative to the typical natural scene bias, Perception 42, 1311–1332.
-
Shannon C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423, 623–656.
-
Spehar B. , Clifford C. W. G. , Newell B. R. and Taylor R. P. (2003). Universal aesthetic of fractals, Comput. Graph. 27, 813–820.
-
Spehar B. , Walker N. and Taylor R. P. (2016). Taxonomy of individual variations in aesthetic responses to fractal patterns, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 350. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00350.
-
Yanulevskaya V. , Uijlings J. , Bruni E. , Sartori A. , Zamboni E. , Bacci F. , Melcher D. and Sebe N. (2012). In the eye of the beholder: Employing statistical analysis and eye tracking for analyzing abstract paintings categories and subject descriptors, in: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Nara, Japan, pp. 349–358. http://doi.org/10.1145/2393347.2393399.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 901 | 446 | 36 |
| Full Text Views | 1494 | 16 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 1641 | 340 | 0 |
Visual Image Statistics in the History of Western Art
In: Art & PerceptionSearch for other papers by George Mather in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The history of Western visual art is traditionally divided into a succession of stylistic movements on the basis of the art-historical provenance and visual qualities of artworks. Little is known about how the visual statistics of Western artworks have changed over time, though this data could inform debate about the transitions between art movements. This longitudinal statistical study shows that two measures of the statistics of Western paintings remained relatively stable for 500 years, and similar to the values found in photographic images depicting the same subjects. Dramatic changes began in the late nineteenth century between the years 1878 and 1891, when the statistics of artworks became steadily more variable, and more frequently departed from values that are typical of representational images. This period can be considered as a major turning point that marks the beginning of the Modern Art movement. Statistically, abstract Modern art is more diverse than the representational art of any period. There is only limited evidence that aesthetic responses to paintings bear any relation to their visual statistics.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 901 | 446 | 36 |
| Full Text Views | 1494 | 16 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 1641 | 340 | 0 |