Instantaneous Art? Investigating Frank Stella’s Moroccan Paintings with a Short-Exposure Experiment
In: Art & PerceptionSearch for other papers by Stefanie De Winter in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Nathalie Vissers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Christophe Bossens in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Johan Wagemans in
Current site
Google Scholar
In his search to create ‘instantaneously capturable’ paintings, Frank Stella started to use Day-Glo alkyd paints as a vehicle to communicate his simple, striped designs. Up till now, art criticism has neglected the visual impact of these fluorescent colours on this concept of ‘instantaneous art’. By presenting participants with Stella’s designs (fluorescent and conventional variants) for short presentation times (8 to 12 ms), we aimed to find out whether fluorescent colour combinations are seen faster (i.e., yield better performance in identifying the specific design) than their conventional counterparts. In general, participants were very good in identifying the correct design among distractors, which means that the pattern and colour combinations based on Stella’s work do seem to be ‘instantaneously capturable’. However, Stella’s formula for ‘instantaneous’ paintings is not identical for the different combinations. When exploring fluorescence in combination with other aspects of the design (colour and pattern), we found two effects that seemed to predict performance. First, performance seemed to depend on specific design patterns. Second, fluorescence seemed to interact with specific colour combinations in predicting performance. The red/yellow designs yielded better performance for the fluorescent variants, while the opposite was found for the green/orange designs. Contrast differences in luminance between the two colours of each colour combination might explain part of the results. On the other hand, the effect of fluorescent colours might have been watered down by the confusion between the hand-printed fluorescent colours and the computer display used for the identification task, which only showed conventional colours.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Augustin, M. D. , Leder, H. , Hutzler, F. , and Carbon, C.-C. (2008). Style follows content: On the microgenesis of art perception. Acta Psychol. 128, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.11.006
-
Bachmann, T. (2000). Microgenetic Approach to the Conscious Mind. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
-
Bachmann, T. Y. and Vipper, K. (1983). Perceptual rating of paintings from different artistic styles as a function of semantic differential scales and exposure time. Arch. Psychol. 135, 149–161.
-
Battcock, G. (1968). Questions to Stella and Judd. Interview by Bruce Glaser, in: Minimal Art: A Critical Anthology, G. Battcock (Ed.), pp 148–164, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.
-
Breuer, C. and Rumpf, C. (2015). The impact of color and animation on sports viewers’ attention to televised sponsorship signage, J. Sport Manag. 29, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1123/JSM.2013-0280.
-
Castelhano, M. S. and Henderson, J. M. (2008). The influence of color on the perception of scene gist, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 34, 660–675. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.660.
-
Clearwater, B. (2018). Frank Stella: Experiment and Change. Gallery guide. NSU Art Museum, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
-
Cupchik, G. C. , and Berlyne, D. E. (1979). The perception of collative properties in visual stimuli. Scand. J. Psychol. 20, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1979.tb00688.x
-
Day-Glo Corp . (n.d.). How Do You Measure the Day-Glo Difference? Day-Glo commercial. Day-Glo Corp., Cleveland, OH, USA. Retrieved from http://www.dayglo.com/fileshare/pdf/TelcomStudy-Summary.pdf.
-
De Winter, S. (2018). DayGloification: Frank Stella’s fluorescent turn, an art-scientific approach, Int. J. Image 9, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8560/CGP/v09i04/29-44.
-
De Winter, S. , Moors, P. , Van Gelder, H. and Wagemans, J. (2018). Illusory depth based on interactions between fluorescent and conventional colours: a case study on Frank Stella’s irregular polygons paintings. Art Percept. 6, 116–150. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-20181093.
-
Fei-Fei, L. , Iyer, A. , Koch, C. and Perona, P. (2007). What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? J. Vis. 7, 10. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.1.10.
-
Flavell, J. H. and Draguns, J. (1957). A microgenetic approach to perception and thought. Psychol. Bull. 54, 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041350.
-
Fried, M. (1966). Shape as form: Frank Stella’s new paintings. Artforum 5, 18–27.
-
Greenberg, C. (1975). Seminar Four, Art Int. 19, 16.
-
Greenberg, C. (1993). The case for abstract art (1959), in: The Collected Essays and Criticism, Vol. 4, Modernism with a Vengeance 1957–1969, John O’Brian (Ed.), pp. 75–84. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
-
Grill-Spector, K. and Kanwisher, N. (2005). Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is, Psychol. Sci. 16, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00796.x.
-
Judd, D. (1965). Specific objects. Arts Yearbook, 8, 74–82.
-
Hegdé, J. (2008). Time course of visual perception: Coarse-to-fine processing and beyond, Prog. Neurobiol. 84, 405–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.09.001.
-
Kadar, I. and Ben-Shahar, O. (2012). A perceptual paradigm and psychophysical evidence for hierarchy in scene gist processing, J. Vis. 12, 16. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.13.16.
-
Krauss, R. E. (1990). The story of the eye, New Lit. Hist. 21, 283–298. https://doi.org/10.2307/469253.
-
Livingstone, M. (2002). Vision and art: the biology of seeing. Harry N. Abrams, New York, NY, USA.
-
Locher, P. , Krupinski, E. A. , Mello-Thoms, C. , & Nodine, C. F. (2007). Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience, Spat. Vis. 21, 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856807782753868.
-
Milosavljevic, M. , Navalpakkam, V. , Koch, C. and Rangel, A. ; (2012). Relative visual saliency differences induce sizable bias in consumer choice, J. Consum. Psychol. 22, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.002.
-
Morris, R. (1968) Anti form. Artforum 6, 41–47.
-
Oaklander, L. N. (2014). Debates in the Metaphysics of Time. Bloomsbury, London, UK.
-
Piéron, H. (1923). I. Les problèmes psycho-physiologiques de la perception du temps, Année Psychol. 24, 1–25.
-
Potter, M. C. , Wyble, B. , Hagmann, C. E. and McCourt, E. S. (2014). Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 76, 270–279. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0605-z.
-
R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
-
Rousselet, G. , Joubert, O. and Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2005). How long to get to the ‘gist’ of real-world natural scenes? Vis. Cogn. 12, 852–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280444000553.
-
Rubin, W. S. (1970). Frank Stella, The Museum of Modern Art, New York, NY, USA.
-
Thorpe, S. , Fize, D. , and Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system, Am. J. Ophthalmol. 122, 608–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)72148-8.
-
Van Gelder, H. (2003). The instantaneous grace of a split-second glance: A ‘modernist myth’ of timelessness revisited, in: The Enduring Instant: Time and the Spectator in the Visual Arts, A. Roesler-Friedenthal and J. Nathan (Eds), pp. 127–133. Mann Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
-
Verhavert, S. , Wagemans, J. and Augustin, M.D. (2018). Beauty in the blink of an eye: The time course of aesthetic experiences, Br. J. Psychol. 109, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12258.
-
Vicario, G. B. and Zambianchi. E. (1998). Some experimental observations on instantaneousness and durableness of events in the visual field, Teor. Model., 3, 39–57.
-
Winters, E . (2003). Pictures and Their Surfaces: Wollheim on “Twofoldness”. https://www.um.es/logica/Winters.htm.
-
Wollheim, R. (1987). Painting as an Art. Thames and Hudson, London, UK.
-
Wu, C-T .., Crouzet, S. M. , Thorpe, S. J. , and Fabre-Thorpe, M . (2015). At 120 msec you can spot the animal but you don’t yet know it’s a dog, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00701.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 867 | 138 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 33 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 53 | 6 | 0 |
Instantaneous Art? Investigating Frank Stella’s Moroccan Paintings with a Short-Exposure Experiment
In: Art & PerceptionSearch for other papers by Stefanie De Winter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nathalie Vissers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christophe Bossens in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johan Wagemans in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
In his search to create ‘instantaneously capturable’ paintings, Frank Stella started to use Day-Glo alkyd paints as a vehicle to communicate his simple, striped designs. Up till now, art criticism has neglected the visual impact of these fluorescent colours on this concept of ‘instantaneous art’. By presenting participants with Stella’s designs (fluorescent and conventional variants) for short presentation times (8 to 12 ms), we aimed to find out whether fluorescent colour combinations are seen faster (i.e., yield better performance in identifying the specific design) than their conventional counterparts. In general, participants were very good in identifying the correct design among distractors, which means that the pattern and colour combinations based on Stella’s work do seem to be ‘instantaneously capturable’. However, Stella’s formula for ‘instantaneous’ paintings is not identical for the different combinations. When exploring fluorescence in combination with other aspects of the design (colour and pattern), we found two effects that seemed to predict performance. First, performance seemed to depend on specific design patterns. Second, fluorescence seemed to interact with specific colour combinations in predicting performance. The red/yellow designs yielded better performance for the fluorescent variants, while the opposite was found for the green/orange designs. Contrast differences in luminance between the two colours of each colour combination might explain part of the results. On the other hand, the effect of fluorescent colours might have been watered down by the confusion between the hand-printed fluorescent colours and the computer display used for the identification task, which only showed conventional colours.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 867 | 138 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 33 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 53 | 6 | 0 |