Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Empirical Methodologies and the Value of Subjectivity in the Analysis of the Experience of Contemporary Experiential Art
In: Art & PerceptionAbstract
Current neuroscientific methods for the investigation of art experience are circumscribed by the researcher’s own cultural constructions of gender, art and beauty, and these present difficulties in the production of unassailable empirical data. Gathering biometric data of viewers or participants’ responses to artworks remains equally problematic as a consequence of the anticipation or arousal brought about by the act of preparing the subject for the collection of data. Much of the methodology that has been designed to study aesthetic psychological and affective states is based in classicism, a convention which contemporary experiential art defies. There is a group of contemporary experiential artworks, defined herein as ATRIA (Affective Transcendental Revelatory Immersive Artworks), which report a significantly higher rate for profound, life-changing, epiphanic, transcendent experiences, and the study of the experience of these artworks defies current methodologies. An understanding of these works and states requires a re-evaluation of the value of subjective reportage and the personal truths that are central to these experiences of art. Research artists understand that objective reality does not lie at the core of the experience of art, and that practice-based artist-led research (PBR) must as a consequence critically inform any neuroaesthetic or neuroscientific endeavour or study. The article is an opinion paper by a practising artist, academic and researcher.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ball, P. (2013). Neuroaesthetics is killing your soul: Can brain scans ever tell us why we like art? Nat. News. Retrieved from: https://www.nature.com/news/neuroaesthetics-is-killing-your-soul-1.12640 [Accessed 21 March 2020].
-
Buks, E., Schuster, R., Heiblum, M., Mahalu, D. an Umansky, V. (1998). Dephasing in electron interference by a ‘which-path’ detector, Nature, 391, 871–874. doi: 10.1038/36057.
-
Campbell-Dollaghan, K. and Hession, M. (2013). Explore the extraordinary, glittering infinity rooms of Yayoi Kusama, Gizmodo. Retrieved from: https://gizmodo.com/explore-the-extraordinary-glittering-infinity-rooms-of-1471382304 [Accessed 21 March 2020].
-
Carbon, C.-C. (2017). Art perception in the museum: How we spend time and space in art exhibitions, I-Perception, 8. doi: 10.1177/2041669517694184.
-
Carbon, C.-C. (2019). Empirical approaches to studying art experience, J. Percept. Imaging, 2, 10501-1–10501-7. doi: 10.2352/J.Percept.Imaging.2019.2.1.010501.
-
Cetina, K. K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
-
Conway, B. R. and Rehding, A. (2013). Neuroaesthetics and the Trouble with Beauty, PLoS Biology, 11, e1001504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001504.
-
Crivelli, C. and Fridlund, A. (2018). Facial displays are tools for social influence, Trends Cogn. Sci., 22, 388–399. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.006 \.
-
Devlin, H. (2020). AI systems claiming to ‘read’ emotions pose discrimination risks, The Guardian (UK). Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/feb/16/ai-systems-claiming-to-read-emotions-pose-discrimination-risks [Accessed 20 March 2020].
-
Eliasson, O. (2009). Your Atmospheric Colour Atlas. 21st Century Museum of Contemporary Art, Kanazawa, Japan.
-
Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion, Am. Psychol., 48, 384–392. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.4.384.
-
Elwes, C. (2015). Installation and the Moving Image. Wallflower Press, New York, NY, USA.
-
Feldman Barrett, L. (2017). How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, MA, USA.
-
Fenwick, P. (2001). The neurophysiology of religious experience, in: Psychosis and Spirituality: Exploring The New Frontier, I. Clarke (Ed.), pp. 15–26, Whurr Publishers, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
-
Fitch, W. T. and Westphal-Fitch, G. (2013). Fechner revisited: Towards an inclusive approach to aesthetics, Behav. Brain Sci., 36, 140–141. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001604.
-
Gander, J. M. (2015). Situating creative production: Recording studios and the making of a pop song, Manag. Decis., 53, 843–856. doi: 10.1108/MD-03-2014-0165.
-
Gordon, S. (2015). Alan Watts and neurophenomenology, Self Soc., 43, 311321. doi: 10.1080/03060497.2016.1142263.
-
Grimes, W. (2013) Lights, Mirrors, Instagram! #Artsensation”. NYTimes, December 1 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/02/arts/design/yayoi-kusamas-mirrored-room-at-david-zwirner-gallery.html [Accessed 21 March 2020].
-
Holborn, M. and Turrell, J. (1993). Air Mass, James Turrell. South Bank Centre, London, UK.
-
Horst, S. (2005). Phenomenology and psychophysics, Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci., 4, 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s11097-005-5852-6.
-
Ishizu, T. and Zeki, S. (2011). Toward a brain-based theory of beauty, PloS ONE, 6, e21852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021852.
-
James, W. (1909). A Pluralistic Universe. The Project Gutenberg EBook #11984. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/11984/11984-8.txt [Accessed 21 March 2020].
-
Jones, C. (2006). Sensorium: Embodied Experience, Technology, and Contemporary Art. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
-
Kastner, J. (2004). 1000 Words: Anthony McCall, Artforum, 42. Retrieved from: https://www.artforum.com/print/200406/1000-words-anthony-mccall-6959 [Accessed 21 March 2020].
-
Keltner, D. and Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion, Cogn. Emot., 17, 297–314. doi: 10.1080/02699930302297.
-
Lefford, M. N. and Thompson, N. (2018). Naturalistic artistic decision-making and metacognition in the music studio. Cogn. Technol. Work, 20, 543–554. doi: 10.1007/s10111-018-0497-8.
-
Löcher, P. J. (2014). Contemporary experimental aesthetics: procedures and findings, in: V.A. Ginsburgh and D. Throsby (Eds), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Vol. 2, pp. 49–80, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53776-8.00003-9.
-
Magritte, R. (1929). The Treachery of Images (oil on canvas). Los Angeles County Museum, Los Angeles.
-
Maslow, A. (1970). Religions, Values and Peak Experiences. Viking, New York, NY, USA.
-
McDonald, M. G. (2008). The nature of epiphanic experience, J. Humanist. Psychol., 48, 89–115. doi: 10.1177/0022167807311878.
-
McNiff, S. (2010). Art-Based Research. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, UK.
-
Neuendorf, H., 2018. A Mind-Boggling 75,000 People Saw Yayoi Kusama’s Blockbuster Show At David Zwirner | Artnet News. [online] Artnet News. Available at: <https://news.artnet.com/exhibitions/kusama-david-zwirner-attendance-1191881> [Accessed 31 March 2020].
-
Pelowski, M. and Akiba, F. (2011). A model of art perception, evaluation and emotion in transformative aesthetic experience, New Ideas Psychol., 29, 80–97. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.04.001.
-
Pelowski, M., Leder, H., Mitschke, V., Specker, E., Gerger, G., Tinio, P. P. L., Vaporova, E., Bieg T. and Husslein-Arco, A. (2018). Capturing aesthetic experiences with installation art: an empirical assessment of emotion, evaluations, and mobile eye tracking in Olafur Eliasson’s “Baroque, Baroque!” Front. Psychol., 9, 1255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01255.
-
Peshkin, A. (1994). The presence of self: subjectivity in the conduct of qualitative research, Bull. Council Res. Music Educ., 122, 45–56.
-
Prinz, J. (2015). Beyond Human Nature. Allen Lane, London, UK.
-
Russell, J. A., Bachorowski, J-A. and Fernández-Dols, J.-M. (2003). Facial and vocal expressions of emotion, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 54, 329–349. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145102.
-
Sadia, S. (2014). All Time and Space Fold into The Infinite Present (Cataract Gorge) (three channel moving image installation with eight channel soundfield). Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery (QVMAG) Permanent Collection, Launceston, TAS, Australia.
-
Sadia, S. (2019a). The sacred ground: enhancing and constructing the transcendent state in the immersive installation environment, Doctoral thesis, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
-
Sadia, S. (2019b). The illuminated self: transcendent and epiphanic states in the encompassing aesthetic environment, in J. Park, J. Nam and J. W. Park (Eds), ISEA 2019 — Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Electronic Art, Gwangju, South Korea, pp. 527–530. Retrieved from: http://isea2019.isea-international.org/fullPro.asp.
-
Salkind, N. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of Research Design. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
-
Sandelowski, M. and Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer, New York, NY, USA.
-
Shusterman, R. (2008). Body Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
-
Smith, H. and Dean, R. T. (2009). Practice-Led Research, Research-Led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
-
Teamlab (n.d.). Borderless Tokyo Official Site. Retrieved from: https://borderless.teamlab.art [Accessed 21 March 2020].
-
Tröndle, M. and Tschacher, W. (2012). The physiology of phenomenology: the effects of artworks, Empir. Stud. Arts, 30, 75–113. doi: 10.2190/EM.30.1.g.
-
Tröndle, M., Greenwood, S., Ramakrishnan, C., Tschacher, W., Kirchberg, V., Wintzerith, S., van den Berg, K., Omlin, S., Kartadinata, S., Vaillant, C., Reed, P., Seeger, M., Viola, E., Schmidt, V., Rammelt, R., Alavi, B., Karl, N. and Wäspe, R. (2011). The entanglement of arts and sciences: On the transaction costs of transdisciplinary research settings, J. Artist. Res., 1. Retrieved from http://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/12219/12220 [Accessed 21 March 2020].
-
Tröndle, M., Greenwood, S., Kirchberg, V. and Tschacher, W. (2014). An integrative and comprehensive methodology for studying aesthetic experience in the field: merging movement tracking, physiology, and psychological data. Environ. Behav., 46, 102–135. doi: 10.1177/0013916512453839.
-
Tschacher, W., Bergomi, C. and Tröndle, M. (2015). The Art Affinity Index (AAI): an instrument to assess art relation and art knowledge. Empir. Stud. Arts, 33, 161–174. doi: 10.1177/0276237415594709.
-
Turrell, J. (2017). Beside Myself (coloured light, architectural walkway). MONA Museum of Old and New Art Permanent Collection, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
-
Turrell, J (2017). Unseen Seen (Perceptual Cell, light). MONA Museum of Old and New Art Permanent Collection, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 733 | 285 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 31 | 14 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 57 | 30 | 3 |
Empirical Methodologies and the Value of Subjectivity in the Analysis of the Experience of Contemporary Experiential Art
In: Art & PerceptionAbstract
Current neuroscientific methods for the investigation of art experience are circumscribed by the researcher’s own cultural constructions of gender, art and beauty, and these present difficulties in the production of unassailable empirical data. Gathering biometric data of viewers or participants’ responses to artworks remains equally problematic as a consequence of the anticipation or arousal brought about by the act of preparing the subject for the collection of data. Much of the methodology that has been designed to study aesthetic psychological and affective states is based in classicism, a convention which contemporary experiential art defies. There is a group of contemporary experiential artworks, defined herein as ATRIA (Affective Transcendental Revelatory Immersive Artworks), which report a significantly higher rate for profound, life-changing, epiphanic, transcendent experiences, and the study of the experience of these artworks defies current methodologies. An understanding of these works and states requires a re-evaluation of the value of subjective reportage and the personal truths that are central to these experiences of art. Research artists understand that objective reality does not lie at the core of the experience of art, and that practice-based artist-led research (PBR) must as a consequence critically inform any neuroaesthetic or neuroscientific endeavour or study. The article is an opinion paper by a practising artist, academic and researcher.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 733 | 285 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 31 | 14 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 57 | 30 | 3 |