Bin Yang correctly states that cowrie shells (250 species) and cowrie monies (two species mostly) deserve far more attention in global histories than they have received. He provides the most comprehensive view of the global history of cowries and cowrie monies to date. Multiple shell monies proliferated worldwide, but they did not concentrate within China (except Yunnan) nor within Europe. Why did specific cowries accumulate only in certain specific geographical locations? Yang establishes a general answer: cultural preferences for holding specific objects, including specific monies, determined where the shells were concentrated. He offers global evidence that, I argue, contradicts mainstream economic theory, which is based upon conceptual aggregation of diverse monies into amorphous stocks of (national or regional) money (singular). Yang demonstrates repeatedly that distinct market locations and distinct market prices existed for specific cowrie and other shell monies (plural) throughout global history. His evidence starkly demonstrates inadequacies of mainstream monetary theory (although he does not say as much). The relentless evidence of the existence of monetary disaggregation, evidence highlighted throughout Yang’s volume, demonstrates an urgent need for alternative monetary theories that portray prices and stocks of individual monies in conformity with empirical evidence provided by archival historians.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Cao, Jin, and Dennis O. Flynn. 2020. “Global Quantification and Inventory Demand for Silver in China.” Revista de Historia Económica – Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History 38 (3): 421–447.
De Zwart, Pim, and Dennis O. Flynn. 2021. “The Significance of Early Globalization: Arguments and Evidence.” In The Fruits of the Early Globalization, edited by R. Dobado-González and A. García: 35–67. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Flynn, Dennis O. 2018. “Six Monetary Functions over Five Millennia: A Price Theory of Monies.” In Money, Currency and Crisis: In Search of Trust, 2000 BC to AD 2000, edited by R. J. van der Spek and Bas van Leeuwen: 13–36. London: Routledge.
Flynn, Dennis O. 2019. “Big History, Geological Accumulations, Physical Economics, and Wealth.” Asian Review of World Histories 7: 80–106.
Flynn, Dennis O., and Arturo Giráldez. 2008. “Born Again: Globalization’s Sixteenth- Century Origins.” Pacific Economic Review 13 (3): 359–387.
Hogendorn, Jan, and Marion Johnson. 1986. The Shell Money of the Slave Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, Marion. 1970. “The Cowrie Currencies of West Africa.” Journal of African History 11 (1): 17–49.
Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro, and Randall Wright. 1989. “On Money as a Medium of Exchange.” Journal of Political Economy 97 (4): 927–954.
Kuroda, Akinobu. 2020. A Global History of Money. London and New York: Routledge.
Manning, Patrick. 1982. Slavery, Colonialism and Economic Growth in Dahomey, 1640–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peng, Xinwei. 1988. Zhongguo huobishi [A monetary history of China]. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe.
von Glahn, Richard. 1996. Fountain of Fortune: Money and Monetary Policy in China, 1000–1700. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Webster’s New Twentieth Century Dictionary, 2nd ed. 1978. Collins World.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1468 | 104 | 15 |
Full Text Views | 34 | 13 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 74 | 27 | 1 |
Bin Yang correctly states that cowrie shells (250 species) and cowrie monies (two species mostly) deserve far more attention in global histories than they have received. He provides the most comprehensive view of the global history of cowries and cowrie monies to date. Multiple shell monies proliferated worldwide, but they did not concentrate within China (except Yunnan) nor within Europe. Why did specific cowries accumulate only in certain specific geographical locations? Yang establishes a general answer: cultural preferences for holding specific objects, including specific monies, determined where the shells were concentrated. He offers global evidence that, I argue, contradicts mainstream economic theory, which is based upon conceptual aggregation of diverse monies into amorphous stocks of (national or regional) money (singular). Yang demonstrates repeatedly that distinct market locations and distinct market prices existed for specific cowrie and other shell monies (plural) throughout global history. His evidence starkly demonstrates inadequacies of mainstream monetary theory (although he does not say as much). The relentless evidence of the existence of monetary disaggregation, evidence highlighted throughout Yang’s volume, demonstrates an urgent need for alternative monetary theories that portray prices and stocks of individual monies in conformity with empirical evidence provided by archival historians.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1468 | 104 | 15 |
Full Text Views | 34 | 13 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 74 | 27 | 1 |