The Life Sciences, 1900–2000: Analysis and Social Welfare from Mendel and Koch to Biotech and Conservation

in Asian Review of World Histories
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

The life sciences underwent a dramatic transformation during the twentieth century, with an expansion in fundamental knowledge of the process of evolution and its molecular basis, through advances in health care that greatly extended human life, and by the combination of these advances to address the problem of conserving the many forms of life threatened by expanding human society. The essay highlights the worldwide emphasis on social welfare in the years 1945–1980 and the expanding role of international collaboration, especially in the International Biological Program and its advances in ecology and the notion of the biosphere, and in the emergence of molecular biology. This was also the era of the Cold War, yet military confrontation had fewer implications for life sciences than for the natural sciences in that era. After 1980, deregulation and neoliberalism weakened programs for social welfare, yet links among the varying strands of life sciences continued to grow, bringing the development of genomics and its many implications, expanding epidemiology to include reliance on social sciences, and deepening ecological studies as the Anthropocene became more and more prevalent. In sum, the experience of the life sciences should make it clear to world historians that scientific advance goes beyond the achievements of brilliant but isolated researchers: those same advances rely substantially on social movements, migration, and the exchange of knowledge across intellectual and physical boundaries.

The Life Sciences, 1900–2000: Analysis and Social Welfare from Mendel and Koch to Biotech and Conservation

in Asian Review of World Histories

Sections

References

Abir-amPnina. 1997. “The Molecular Transformation of Twentieth-Century Biology.” In Science in the Twentieth Century edited by John Krige and Dominique Pestre495524. Amsterdam: Harwood.

Abir-amPnina. 2010. “The Rockefeller Foundation and the Post WW2 Transnational Ecology of Science Policy: From Solitary Splendor in the Inter-war Era to a ‘Me Too’ Agenda in the 1950s.” Centaurus 52: 323337.

Arehart-TreichelJoan. 1973. “IBP: The Last Lap.” Science News 104 (10): 157.

AronovaElenaKaren S. Baker and Naomi Oreskes. 2010. “Big Science and Big Data in Biology: From the International Geophysical Year through the International Biological Program to the Long Term Ecological Research (lter) Network, 1957–Present.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 40 (2): 183224.

BashfordAlison and Philippa Levine. 2010. “Introduction: Eugenics and the Modern World.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics edited by Alison Bashford and Philippa Levine324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

BorowyIris. 2013. Defining Sustainable Development for our Common Future: A History of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission). London: Routledge.

BorowyIris. 2016. “Science and Technology for a Postcolonial World: Science and Technology for Development at the United Nations, 1960–1980.” Unpublished paper.

BrainStephen. 2010. “The Great Stalin Plan for the Transformation of Nature.” Environmental History 15 (4): 670700.

BudRobert. 1998. “Penicillin and the New Elizabethans.” British Journal for the History of Science 31: 305333.

BushVannevar. 1997. Endless Horizons. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.

CannRebecca L.Mark Stoneking and Allan C. Wilson. 1987. “MitochondrialDNA and Human Evolution.” Nature 325: 3136.

CapshewJames H. and Karen A. Rader. 1992. “Big Science: Price to the Present.” Osiris 7: 325.

CarsonRachel. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

ChadarevianSoraya de. 2002. Designs for Life: Molecular Biology after World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ChadarevianSoraya de and Harmke Kamminga. 1998. Molecularizing Biology and Medicine: New Practices and Alliances. Amsteldijk, Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers.

ColemanD.C. 2010. Big Ecology: The Emergence of Ecosystem Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.

CooperFrederick and Randall M. Packard eds. 1998. International Development and the Social Sciences: Essays on the History and Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.

CrawfordElisabeth. 1988. “Internationalism in Science as a Casualty of the First World War: Relations between German and Allied Scientists as reflected in nominations for the Nobel prizes in physics and chemistry.” Social Science Information 27 (2): 163201.

DehnerGeorge. 2012. Influenza: A Century of Science and Public Health Response. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

DeJong-LambertWilliam and Nikolai Krementsov eds. 2012. “The Lysenko Controversy and the Cold War.” Special issue. Journal of the History of Biology 45 (3).

DobzhanskyTheodosius. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.

FisherR.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

GalisonPeter and Bruce W. Hevly eds. 1992. Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

GerovitchSlava. 2015. Soviet Space Mythologies: Public Images Private Memories and the Making of a Cultural Identity. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

GhaswalaS.K. 1968. “India’s Role in theIBP.” Science News 93 (6): 144145.

GilletteAaron. 2007. Eugenics and the Nature-Nurture Debate in the Twentieth Century. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

GreenawayFrank. 1992. Science International: A History of the International Council of Scientific Unions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

HuAiqun. 2015. China’s Social Insurance in the Twentieth Century: A Global Historical Perspective. Leiden: Brill.

HuAiqun and Patrick Manning. 2010. “The Global Social Insurance Movement since the 1880s.” Journal of Global History 5: 125148.

HudsonPat and Keith Tribe. 2016. The Contradictions of Capital in the Twenty-First Century: The Piketty Opportunity. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda.

HughesSally Smith. 2011. Genentech: The Beginnings of Biotech. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

HuxleyJulian. 1946. UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. N.p.: Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation.

ibp (International Biological Programme). 1964. “International Biological Programme: Report of the Planning Committee, November 15th, 1963.” Bioscience 14 (4): 4349.

IliffeJohn. 2006. The African AIDS Epidemic: A History. Oxford: J. Currey.

JoravskyD. 1970. The Lysenko Affair. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

KayLily E. 1993. The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech the Rockefeller Foundation and the Rise of the New Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

KevlesDaniel J. 1971. “‘Into Hostile Political Camps’: The Reorganization of International Science in World War I.” Isis 62: 4760.

KevlesDaniel J. 1997. “Big Science and Big Politics in the United States: Reflections on the Death of theSSC and the Life of the Human Genome Project.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 27 (2): 269297.

KrementsovNikolai. 2002. The Cure: A Story of Cancer and Politics from the Annals of the Cold War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

KuhnThomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

LewinRoger. 1975. “Ten Years of International Biology.” New ScientistJune 5558559.

LindbergDavid C. and Ronald L. Numbers gen. eds. 2002–. The Cambridge History of Science. 8 vols. (6 vols. to date). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

LynnRichard. 2001. Eugenics: A Reassessment. Westport, CT: Praeger.

MacKenbachJohan P. 2012. “The persistence of health inequalities in modern welfare states: the explanation of a paradox.” Social Science & Medicine 75 (4): 761769.

MacKenbachJohan P. and Martin McKee. 2013. “Social-Democratic Government and Health Policy in Europe: A Quantitative Analysis.” International Journal of Health Services 43 (3): 389413.

MaldantBoris and Maxime Haubert. 1973. Croissance et conjuncture dans l’Ouest africain. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

McClellanJames E.III and Harold Dorn. 2015. Science and Technology in World History. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

MilanovicBranko. 2016. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

MorangeMichel. 1998. History of Molecular Biology. Translated by Matthew Cobb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

NarayanamurtiVenkatesh and Toluwalogo Odumosu. 2016. Cycles of Invention and Discovery: Rethinking the Endless Frontier. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

NeushulPeter. 1993. “Science, Government, and the Mass Production of Penicillin.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 48: 371395.

OlbyRobert. 2004. “The Rockefeller University and the Molecular Revolution in Biology.” In Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research? Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University edited by Darwin H. Stapleton271282. New York: Rockefeller University Press.

ParkerJohn N.Niki Vermeulen and Bart Penders eds. 2010. Collaboration in the New Life Sciences. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

PetersBenjamin. 2016. How Not to Network a Nation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

PikettyThomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

PirieN.W. 1967. “Introduction: The Purpose and Function of the International Biological Programme.” Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 26 (1): 125128.

RasmussenNicolas. 1997. Picture Control: The Electron Microscope and the Transformation of Biology in America 1940–1960. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

RasmussenNicolas. 2002. “Of ‘Small Men,’ Big Science and Bigger Business: The Second World War and Biomedical Research in the United States.” Minerva 40 (2): 115146.

RevelleRoger. 1967. “Introduction.” In U.S. Participation in the International Biological Warfare Programu.s. National Committee for the International Biological Program Report no. 2 pp. 12. January. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Division of Biology and Agriculture.

RileyJames C. 2005. “Estimates of Regional and Global Life Expectancy, 1800–2001.” Population and Development Review 31 (3): 537543.

Roll-HansenNils. “A New Perspective on Lysenko?” Annals of Science 42 (3): 261278.

SmithF.E. 1968. “The International Biological Program and the Science of Ecology.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 60 (1): 511.

Solla PriceDerek J. de. 1963. Little Science Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.

SomsenGeert J. 2008. “A History of Universalism: Conceptions of the Internationality of Science from the Enlightenment to the Cold War.” Minerva 46: 361379.

SoyferValery N. 1994. Lysenko and the Tragedy of Soviet Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

TostJörg ed. Epigenetics. Norfolk, UK: Caister Academic Press2008.

TrefilJames. 2012. Science in World History. New York: Routledge.

VermeulenNiki. 2013. “From Darwin to the Census of Marine Life: Marine Biology as Big Science.” PloS one 8 (1). doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054284.

VermeulenNikiJohn Parker and Bart Penders. 2010. “Big, Small, or Mezzo: Lessons from Science Studies for the Ongoing Debate about ‘Big’ versus ‘Little’ Research Projects.” EMBO Reports 11 (6): 420423.

VermeulenNikiJohn Parker and Bart Penders. 2013. “Understanding Life Together: A Brief History of Collaboration in Biology.” Endeavour 37 (3): 162171.

WatersC. Kenneth and Albert Van Helden. 1992. Julian Huxley: Biologist and Statesman of Science. Houston: Rice University Press.

WatsonJ.D. and F.H.C. Crick. 1953. “A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid.” Nature 171: 737738.

WestfallCatherine. 2003. “Rethinking Big Science: Modest, Mezzo, Grand Science, and the Development of the Bevalac, 1971–1993.” Isis 94 (1): 3056.

Wiesner-HanksMerry E. gen ed. 2015. The Cambridge World History. 7 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ZacharyG. Pascal. 1997. Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush Engineer of the American Century. New York: The Free Press.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 69 69 11
Full Text Views 5 5 5
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0