Colonization and Forestry in French Indochina: the Control, Use, and Exploitation of Forests
In: Asian Review of World HistoriesSearch for other papers by Chizuru Namba in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This paper aims to illustrate how forests, which play an important role in the economy, the environment, the military, and culture, were managed and used in French Indochina through the colonial period. The Forest Service’s plan involved rational, systematic logging with the participation of companies that generally excluded local inhabitants from the reserved forests and restricted forest use for their livelihoods. Also, the “communal reserves” established in some areas to prioritize locals’ forest use led to regional strife. Despite the colonial authorities’ view that maintenance of the abundant forests was a manifestation of their civilizing mission, the actual implementation of such policies was frequently accompanied by strict policies and repressive control. Friction existed between the various parties using the forest and the Forest Service concerning forest management. The views and behavior of the colonial authorities were also inconsistent, due to the multifaceted nature of the forests, which were at once natural treasures that supported people’s lives as well as a stage for conflicts between varied actors and interests, including local inhabitants, villages, outsiders, the Forest Service, and administrative agencies.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Badré, Louis. 1983. Histoire de la forêt française [History of the French forest]. Paris: Arthaud.
-
Barton, Gregory. 2002. Empire Forestry and the Origins of Environmentalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bergeret, Anne. 1993. “Discours et politiques forestières coloniales en Afrique et à Madagascar” [Views and colonial forestry policies in Africa and Madagascar]. Revue française d’histoire d’outre-mer 298: 23–47.
-
Bernal, Martin. 1981. “The Nghe-Tinh Soviet Movement 1930–1931.” Past & Present 92: 148–168.
-
Bernard, Claire. 1993. “Les débuts de la politique de reboisement dans la vallée du fleuve Sénégal” [The beginnings of reforestation policy in the Senegal river valley]. Revue française d’histoire d’outre-mer 298: 49–82.
-
Buchy, Marlène. 1993. “Histoire forestière de l’Indochine (1850–1954): Perspectives de recherche” [Forest history in Indochina: Research perspectives]. Revue française d’histoire d’outre-mer 299: 219–249.
-
Cadière, Léopold. 1992. Croyances et pratiques religieuses de Vietnamiens [Religious beliefs and practices of the Vietnamese], vol. 2. Paris: EFEO.
-
Chalvet, Martine. 2011. Une histoire de la forêt [A history of the forest]. Paris: Seuil.
-
Cleary, Mark. 2005. “Managing the Forest in Colonial Indochina, 1900–1940.” Modern Asian Studies 39 (2): 257–283.
-
Condominas, Georges. 1974. Nous avons mangé la forêt: Chronique d’un village mnong gar, hauts plateaux du Viet Nam [We have eaten the forest: The story of a Montagnard village in the central highlands of Vietnam]. Paris: Mercure de France.
-
Corvol, Andrée. 1987. L’Homme aux bois: Histoire des relations de l’homme et de la forêt XVIIe–XXe siècle [Man in the woods: History of the relationship between man and the forest, 17th–20th century]. Paris: Fayard.
-
Davis, Diana K. 2012. Les mythes environnementaux de la colonisation française au Magreb [The environmental myths of French colonization in the Maghreb]. Seyssel: Champ Vallon.
-
Devèse, Michèl. 1965. Histoire de Forêts [History of forests]. Paris: PUF.
-
Jonas, Guéhi. 1993. “La politique coloniale de protection de la nature en Côte d’Ivoire (1900–1958)” [Colonial policy of nature protection in Côte d’Ivoire]. Revue française d’histoire d’outre-mer 298: 83–104.
-
McElwee, Pamela D. 2016. Forests Are Gold: Trees, People, and Environmental Rule in Vietnam. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
-
Rajan, Ravi. 2006. Modernizing Nature: Forestry and Imperial Eco-Development, 1800–1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Sivaramakrishnan, K. 1999. Modern Forests: Statemaking and Environmental Change in Colonial Eastern India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
-
Thomas, Frédéric. 1998. “Écologie et gestion forestière dans l’Indochine françaises” [Ecology and forest management in French Indochina]. Revue française d’histoire d’outre-mer 319: 59–86.
-
Thomas, Frédéric. 1999. Histoire du régime et des services forestiers français en Indochine de 1862 à 1945 [History of the French forest regime and services in Indochina from 1862 to 1945]. Hanoi: Éditions Thế Giới.
-
Thomas, Frédéric. 2000. “Forêts de Cochinchine et ‘bois coloniaux’ 1862–1900” [Forests in Cochinchina and “colonial woods”]. Autrepart 15: 49–72.
-
Thomas, Frédéric. 2009. “Protection des forêts et environnementalisme: Indochine 1860–1945” [Forest protection and environmentalism: Indochina 1860–1945]. Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine 56: 104–136.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 888 | 255 | 41 |
| Full Text Views | 187 | 28 | 11 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 433 | 40 | 7 |
Colonization and Forestry in French Indochina: the Control, Use, and Exploitation of Forests
In: Asian Review of World HistoriesSearch for other papers by Chizuru Namba in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This paper aims to illustrate how forests, which play an important role in the economy, the environment, the military, and culture, were managed and used in French Indochina through the colonial period. The Forest Service’s plan involved rational, systematic logging with the participation of companies that generally excluded local inhabitants from the reserved forests and restricted forest use for their livelihoods. Also, the “communal reserves” established in some areas to prioritize locals’ forest use led to regional strife. Despite the colonial authorities’ view that maintenance of the abundant forests was a manifestation of their civilizing mission, the actual implementation of such policies was frequently accompanied by strict policies and repressive control. Friction existed between the various parties using the forest and the Forest Service concerning forest management. The views and behavior of the colonial authorities were also inconsistent, due to the multifaceted nature of the forests, which were at once natural treasures that supported people’s lives as well as a stage for conflicts between varied actors and interests, including local inhabitants, villages, outsiders, the Forest Service, and administrative agencies.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 888 | 255 | 41 |
| Full Text Views | 187 | 28 | 11 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 433 | 40 | 7 |