Search for other papers by Maarten Bode in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Modern Ayurveda, a product of the colonial period, is marked by scientization, Sanskritization, and professionalization. In the last four decades of the twentieth century, Ayurvedic research by Indian government bodies mainly consisted of studies on the binomial botanical identity of Ayurvedic material medica, their physicochemical constituents, and the forced reconciliation of Ayurvedic notions with biomedical concepts. Research seldom found its way to international medical journals. India’s growing global importance, the proliferation of lifestyle diseases, and the rise of complementary and alternative medicine prompted Indian government bodies and universities to initiate laboratory studies under the banner of “Ayurveda Biology” to experimentally prove the validity of Ayurvedic notions, materials, and treatment procedures. Linking Ayurvedic notions to genomics and testing them through meticulously designed bioassays is intended to undercut the view that Ayurveda is outdated and that treatments only work because of their placebo effects. The objective is to develop Ayurvedic studies that will find their way to internationally acclaimed medical and biological journals. This paper critically examines two of these research projects and argues that the nascent Ayurveda Biology research community should also seek inspiration from the medical humanities and the philosophy of science. Otherwise, Ayurveda’s mindful and ecological body will be cut to size on the Procrustean bed of structural biology.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Adams, Jon, Daniel Hollenberg, Chi-Wai Lui, and Alex Broom. 2009. “Contextualizing Integration: A Critical Social Science Approach to Integrative Health Care.” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 32, no. 9: 792–798.
-
Alter, Joe S. 1999. “Heaps of Health, Metaphysical Fitness: Ayurveda and the Ontology of Good Health in Medical Anthropology.” Current Anthropology 40: s43–58.
-
Berger, Rachel. 2013. Ayurveda Made Modern: Political histories of Indigenous Medicine in North India, 1900–1955. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Bhalerao, Supriya and Patwardhan, Kishor. 2016. “Prakriti-based research: Good reporting practice” in Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, 2016 May 24; 7(1): 69–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2015.08.002
-
Bode, Maarten. 2008. Taking Traditional Knowledge to the Market: The Modern Image of the Ayurvedic and Unani Industry. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
-
Bode, Maarten. 2012. “Ayurveda in the 21st Century: Logic, Practice, and Ethics.” In Medical Pluralism in Contemporary India, edited by Leena Abraham and V. Sujatha, 59–76. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
-
Bode, Maarten, and Prasan Shankar. 2018. “Ayurvedic College Education, Reifying Biomedicine, and the Need for Reflexivity.” Anthropology & Medicine 25, no. 2: 162–175.
-
Brass, Paul. 1972. “Politics of Ayurvedic Education: A Case Study of Revivalism and Modernisation in India”. In Education and Politics in India: Studies in Organization, Society, and Politics, edited by Susanne Hoeber Rudolph and Lloyd I. Rudolph, 342–459. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Cerulli, Anthony. 2022. The Practice of Texts: Education and Healing in South India. Oakland: University of California Press.
-
Chandra, Shailaja. 2011. “Research.” In Status of Indian Medicine and Folk Healing, Part I, 25–58. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of AYUSH.
-
Chandra, Shailaja. 2019. “Ayurvedic Research for Direct Public Benefit.” Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine 10, no. 1: 1–3.
-
Chaudhury, Ranjit Roy, and Mandakini Roy Chaudhury. 2002. “Standardization, Pre- Clinical Toxicology and Clinical Evaluation of Medical Plants, Including Ethical Considerations.” In Traditional Medicine in Asia, SEARORegional Publications no. 39, edited by Ranjit Roy Chaudhury and Uton Muchtar Rafei, 209–226. New Delhi: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Southeast Asia.
-
Coetzee, John Michael. 2007. Diary of a Bad Year. London: Harvill Secker.
-
Comba, Antonella. 1987. “Carakasaṃhitā, Śārīrasthāna I and Vaiśeṣika Philosophy.” In Studies on Indian Medical History, edited by G. Jan Meulenbeld and Dominik Wujastyk, 43–62. Groningen: Egbert Forsten.
-
Dissanayake, Wimal. 1993. “The Body in Indian Theory and Practice.” In Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice, edited by Thomas P. Kasulis, 39–44. Albany: State University of New York Press.
-
Dupré, Sven. 2018. “Introduction: Science and Practices of Translation.” Isis 109, no. 2: 302–307.
-
Dwarakanath, Chandragiri. (1967) 1997. Digestion and Metabolism in Ayurveda. Varanasi: Krishnadas Academy.
-
Filliozat, J. (1949) 1964. The Classical Doctrine of Indian Medicine. Its Origins and its Greek Parallels. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
-
FRLHT (Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions). 2012. “Vision & Roadmap of the Institute of Trans-Disciplinary Health Sciences and Technology.” Unpublished manuscript, June 2012.
-
FRLHT. 2015. “National R&D Facility for Rasayana Products of Indian Systems of Medicine, April 2010–March 2015: Summary of Achievements.” Unpublished manuscript, March 2015.
-
Ganeri, Jonardon. 2018. “Epistemology from a Sanskritic Point of View.” In Epistemology for the Rest of the World, edited by Stephen Stich and Masaharu Mizomoto, 12–21. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Ganguly, Ritika. 2014. “Sense and Evidence: Ayurvedic Experiments and the Politics of an ‘Open-Minded’ Science.” Asian Medicine 9: 102–140.
-
Govindaraj Periyasamy, Sheikh Nizamuddin, Anugula Sharath, et al. 2015. “Genome- Wide Analysis Correlates Ayurveda Prakriti.” Scientific Reports 5, no. 1: 15786.
-
Hankey, Alex. 2010. “Establishing the Scientific Validity of Tridosha, Part 1: Doshas, Subdoshas and Dosha Prakritis.” Ancient Science of Life 29, no. 3: 6–18.
-
Jeffery, Roger. 1988. “Indigenous Medicine and the State Before 1947.” In The Politics of Health in India, 42–58. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Kaptchuk, Ted. 1998. “Powerful Placebo: The Dark Side of the Randomized Controlled Trial.” Lancet 351: 1722–1725.
-
Kasulis, Thomas P. 1993. Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
-
Kirmayer, Laurence. 2004. “The Cultural Diversity of Healing: Meaning, Metaphor, and Mechanism.” British Medical Bulletin 69: 33–48.
-
Langford, Jean M. 2002. “Healing National Culture.” In Fluent Bodies: Ayurvedic Remedies for Postcolonial Imbalance, 63–96. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
-
Larson, Gerald. 1969. Classical Samkhya: An Interpretation of its History and Meaning. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
-
Larson, Gerald James. 1993. “Ayurveda and the Hindu Philosophical Systems.” In Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice, edited by Thomas P. Kasulis, 103–121. Albany: State University of New York Press.
-
Leslie, Charles. 1976. “The Ambiguities of Medical Revivalism in Modern India.” In Asian Medical Systems, edited by Charles Leslie, 356–367. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Leslie, Charles. 1992. “Interpretations of Illness: Syncretism in Modern Ayurveda.” In Paths to Asian Medical Knowledge, edited by Charles Leslie and Allan Young, 177–208. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Lock, Margaret, and Vinh-Kim Nguyen. 2010. An Anthropology of Biomedicine. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
-
Maas, Philipp A. 2017. “Rasāyana in Classical Yoga and Ayurveda.” In “Transmutations: Rejuvenation, Longevity, and Immortality Practices in South and Inner Asia,” edited by Dagmar Wujastyk, Suzanne Newcombe, and Christèle Barois. Special issue, History of Science in South Asia 5, no. 2: 66–84.
-
Mashelkar, Raghunath Anant. 2008. “Ayurveda for the Future: Inaugural Address World Ayurveda Congress.” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 5, no. 2: 129–131.
-
Meulenbeld, G. Jan. 1992. “The Characteristics of a Doṣa.” Journal of the European Ayurvedic Society 2: 1–5.
-
Meulenbeld, G. Jan. 2008. “The Woes of Ojas in the Modern World.” In Modern and Global Ayurveda: Pluralism and Paradigms, edited by Dagmar Wujastyk and Frederick M. Smith, 157–176. Albany: State University of New York Press.
-
Moerman, Daniel. 2002. Meaning, Medicine and the “Placebo Effect.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Mukharji, Projit B. 2016. Doctoring Traditions: Ayurveda, Small Technologies, and Braided Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Narahari, Saravu R., Madhur Guruprasad Aggithaya, and Kumbla R. Suraj. 2010. “Conducting Literature Searches on Ayurveda in PubMed, Indian, and Other Databases.” Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 16, no 11: 1225–1237.
-
Patwardhan, Bhushan. 2012. “The Quest for Evidence-Based Ayurveda: Lessons Learned – Research Account.” Current Science 102, no. 10: 1406–1417.
-
Patwardhan, Bhushan. 2014a. “Bridging Ayurveda with Evidence-Based Scientific Approaches in Medicine.” EPMA Journal 5: 1–7.
-
Patwardhan, Bhushan. 2014b. “Five years of J-AIM: Editorial.” Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine 5, no. 4: 1–2.
-
Patwardhan, Bhushan. 2020. “Ten years of J-AIM: Editorial.” Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine 11, no. 1: 1–2.
-
Patwardhan, Bhushan, and Gerry Bodeker. 2008. “Ayurvedic Genomics: Establishing a Genetic Basis for Mind–Body Typologies.” Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 14, no. 5: 571–576.
-
Patwardhan, Bhushan, Sharad Deshpande, Girish Tillu, and Gururaj Mutalik. 2015. “In Search of Roots: Tracing the History and Philosophy of Indian Medicine.” Indian Journal of the History of Science 50, no. 4: 629–641.
-
Patwardhan, Bhushan, Vishnu Joglekar, Namyata Pathak, and Ashok Vaidya. 2011. “Vaidya- Scientists: Catalysing Ayurveda Renaissance.” Current Science 100, no. 4: 476–483.
-
Patwardhan, Bhushan, and Gururaj Mutalik. 2014. “Search of Novel Model for Integrative Medicine.” Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 20, no. 3: 170–178.
-
Patwardhan, Bhushan, Gururaj Mutalik, and Girish Tillu. 2015. Integrative Approaches for Health: Biomedical Research, Ayurveda and Yoga. London: Academic Press.
-
Patwardhan, Bhushan, and Ashok Vaidya. 2009. “Ayurveda: Scientific Research and Publications.” Current Science 97, no. 8: 1117–1121.
-
Payyappallimana, Unnikrishnan, and Padma Venkatasubramanian. 2016. “Exploring Ayurvedic Knowledge on Food and Health for Providing Innovative Solutions to Contemporary Healthcare.” Frontiers in Public Health 4: 169191.
-
Phillips, Stephen, and Anand Vaidya. 2024. “Epistemology in Classical Indian Philosophy.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [online], edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/ENTRIES/epistemology-india/#pagetoprigh.
-
Prakash, Gyan. 1999. Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Prasher, Bhavana, Sapna Negi, Shilpi Aggarwal, et al. 2008. “Whole Genome Expression and Biochemical Correlates of Extreme Constitutional Types Defined in Ayurveda.” Journal of Translational Medicine 6: 1–12.
-
Prasher, Bhavana, Chetana Sachidanandan, Mitali Mukerji, and Anurag Agrawal. No date. “Ayurgenomics: Bringing Age-Old Wisdom to the Healthcare of the Future.” Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. https://www.csir.res.in/csir-success-stories/ayurgenomics-bringing-age-old-wisdom-healthcare-future.
-
Rastogi, Sanjeev, ed. 2014. Ayurvedic Science of Food and Nutrition. New York: Springer.
-
Rastogi, Sanjeev, ed. 2019. Translational Ayurveda. New York: Springer.
-
Rege, Nirmala N., Urmila M. Thatte, and Sharadini A. Dahanukar. 1999. “Adaptogenic Properties of Six Rasayana Herbs Used in Ayurvedic Medicine.” Phytotherapy Research 13, no. 4: 275–291.
-
Rotti, Harish, Ritu Raval, Suchitra Anchan, et al. 2014. “Determinants of Prakriti, the Human Constitution Types of Indian Traditional Medicine and its Correlation with Contemporary Science.” Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine 5, no. 3: 167–175.
-
Sarukkai, Sundar. 2001. “Translation and Science.” Meta: Translators’ Journal 46, no. 4: 646–663.
-
Sarukkai, Sundar. 2002. “Inside/Outside: Merleau-Ponty/Yoga.” Philosophy East and West 52, no. 4: 459–478.
-
Sarukkai, Sundar. 2016. “Translation as Method: Implications for History of Science.” Indian Journal of History of Science 51, no. 1: 105–117.
-
Scheper‐Hughes, Nancy, and Margaret Lock. 1987. “The Mindful Body: A Prolegomenon to Future Work in Medical Anthropology.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 1, no. 1: 6–41.
-
Shankar, Darshan, and Ram Manohar. 1995. “Ayurvedic Medicine Today: Ayurveda at the Crossroads.” In Oriental Medicine: An Illustrated Guide to the Asian Arts of Healing, edited by Jan van Alphen and Anthony Aris, 99–105. London: Serindia Publications.
-
Shankar, Darshan, P. M. Unnikrishnan, and Padma Venkatasubramanian. 2007. “Need to Develop Inter-Cultural Standards for Quality, Safety and Efficacy of Traditional India Systems of Medicine.” Current Science 92, no. 11: 1499–1505.
-
Singh, Navjyoti. 2000. “What is the Scientific Method? And How is Shastra Related to It?” In Samskrita Vijñāna Vaibhavam, edited by D. Prahlada Char, 19–41. Tirupati: Rastriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha.
-
Singh, Ram Harsh. 2009. Body, Mind, Spirit: Integrative Medicine in Ayurveda, Yoga and Nature Cure. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan.
-
Singhal, G. D., and Thomas J. S. Patterson. 1993. Synopsis of Ayurveda: Based on a Translation of the Suśruta Saṃhitā. Ancient Indian Surgery Series, vol. 12, edited by G. D. Singhal et al. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
-
Sridharan Kannan, and Gowri Sivaramakrishnan. 2016. “Clinical Trials in Ayurveda: Analysis of the Clinical Trial Registry of India.” Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine 7, no. 2: 141–143.
-
Staal, Frits. 1993. “Indian Bodies.” In Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice, edited by Roger T. Ames, Wimal Dissanayake, and Thomas P. Kasulis, 59–101. Albany: State University of New York Press.
-
Sudha, V. B. Preethi, K. Ojik Singh, S. R. Prasad, and Padma Venkatasubramanian. 2009. “Killing of Enteric Bacteria in Drinking Water by a Copper Device for Use in the Home: Laboratory Evidence.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, no. 8: 819–822.
-
Sujatha, V. 2011. “Innovation Within and Between Traditions: Dilemma of Traditional Medicine in Contemporary India.” Science, Technology & Society 16, no. 2: 191–213.
-
Sumantran, Venil N., and Girish Tillu. 2013. “Insights on Personalized Medicine from Ayurveda.” Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine 4, no. 4: 370–375.
-
Thompson, Jennifer Jo, Cheryl Ritenbaugh, and Mark Nichter. 2009. “Reconsidering the Placebo Response from a Broad Anthropological Perspective.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 33: 112–152.
-
Thottapillil, Anjana, Sania Kouser, Subrahmanya Kumar Kukkupuni, and Chethala N. Vishnuprasad. 2021. “An ‘Ayurveda-Biology’ Platform for Integrative Diabetes Management.” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 268 (March 25): 113575.
-
Udupa, Kodethur Narasimha, ed. 1970. Advances in Research in Indian Medicine. Varanasi: Banaras Hindu University.
-
Unschuld, Paul Ulrich. 1985. Medicine in China: A History of Ideas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Valiathan, Marthanda Sankaran. 2016a. “Ayurvedic Biology: The First Decade.” Procedures of the Indian National Science Academy 82, no. 1: 13–19.
-
Valiathan, Marthanda Sankaran. 2016b. “Caraka’s Approach to Knowledge.” Indian Journal of History of Science 51, no. 1: 33–39.
-
Venkatasubramanian, Padma, Subrahmanya K. Kumar, and S. N. Venugopalan Nair. 2010. “Cyperus rotundus, a Substitute for Aconitum heterophyllum: Studies on the Ayurvedic Concept of Abhava Pratinidhi Dravya (Drug Substitution).” Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine 1, no. 1: 33–39.
-
Venkatasubramanian, Padma, Ashwini Godbole, R. Vidyashankar, and Gina R. Kuruvilla. 2013. “Evaluation of Traditional Anthelmintic Herbs as Substitutes for the Endangered Embelia ribes, Using Caenorhabditis elegans Model.” Current Science 106, no. 11: 1593–1598.
-
Venkatasubramanian, Padma, Indu Bala Koul, Reeja Kochuthekil Varghese, Srividya Koyyala, and Arun Shivakumar. 2014. “Amla (Phyllanthus emblica L.) Enhances Iron Dialysability and Uptake in In vitro Models.” Current Science 107, no. 11: 1859–1866.
-
Venugopalan Nair, S. N., and Darshan Shankar. 2016. “Knowledge Generation in Āyurveda: Methodological Aspects.” Indian Journal of History of Science 51, no. 1: 48–55.
-
Vijay, Bhavya, Gurmeet Singh, and Chethala N. Vishnuprasad, et al. 2022. “Breaking Silos: Can the Emerging field of Ayurvedic Biology Contribute to the Advancement of Indian Health Science.” Current Science 122, no. 3: 251–257.
-
Wallace, Robert Keith. 2020. “Ayurgenomics and Modern Medicine.” Medicina 56, no. 12. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fmedicina56120661.
-
Wujastyk, Dominik. 1998. The Roots of Ayurveda: Selections of Sanskrit Medical Writings. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
-
Wujastyk, Dagmar, and Christèle Barois, eds. 2022. The Usman Report (1923): Translations of Regional Submissions, eJIM Supplements 4. Eelde: Barkhuis.
-
Zimmermann, Francis. 1987. The Jungle and the Aroma of Meats: An Ecological Theme in Hindu Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 315 | 315 | 112 |
| Full Text Views | 5 | 5 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 9 | 9 | 2 |
Search for other papers by Maarten Bode in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Modern Ayurveda, a product of the colonial period, is marked by scientization, Sanskritization, and professionalization. In the last four decades of the twentieth century, Ayurvedic research by Indian government bodies mainly consisted of studies on the binomial botanical identity of Ayurvedic material medica, their physicochemical constituents, and the forced reconciliation of Ayurvedic notions with biomedical concepts. Research seldom found its way to international medical journals. India’s growing global importance, the proliferation of lifestyle diseases, and the rise of complementary and alternative medicine prompted Indian government bodies and universities to initiate laboratory studies under the banner of “Ayurveda Biology” to experimentally prove the validity of Ayurvedic notions, materials, and treatment procedures. Linking Ayurvedic notions to genomics and testing them through meticulously designed bioassays is intended to undercut the view that Ayurveda is outdated and that treatments only work because of their placebo effects. The objective is to develop Ayurvedic studies that will find their way to internationally acclaimed medical and biological journals. This paper critically examines two of these research projects and argues that the nascent Ayurveda Biology research community should also seek inspiration from the medical humanities and the philosophy of science. Otherwise, Ayurveda’s mindful and ecological body will be cut to size on the Procrustean bed of structural biology.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 315 | 315 | 112 |
| Full Text Views | 5 | 5 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 9 | 9 | 2 |
