Feeding-Vigilance Trade-Off in the Teal (Anas Crecca): Effects of Feeding Method and Predation Risk

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Feeding and vigilance are conflicting demands in teals (Anas crecca) that use feeding methods where the eyes are beneath the water surface. This trade-off was compared across different beneath-surface feeding methods (head submerged, neck submerged, upending) and between the absence and presence of live predators, ospreys (Pandion haliaetus). A comparison across feeding methods indicated that the proportion of time spent scanning for predators and scanning rate decreased from head submerged to upending. Similarly, within a particular feeding method the level of vigilance decreased as average feeding bout length increased. Teals thus sacrificed vigilance as foraging demands increased. When a predator was present, however, teals increased the proportion of time spent scanning at the expense of feeding time in all feeding methods. This was achieved by lengthening scanning bouts, not by increasing scanning rate. As a consequence, feeding efficiency decreased. Feeding methods differed in terms of predator detection probability. An examination of the role of grouping in increasing predator detection probability indicated, however, that grouping would provide only a marginal benefit to foraging teals in this respect, whatever the feeding method.



Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 7 7 4
Full Text Views 4 4 4
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0