Exploring Primate Social Cognition: Some Critical Remarks1)

In: Behaviour
Hans Kummer Ethology & Wildlife Research, Institute of Zoology, University of Zurich-Irchel, Winter-thurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Hans Kummer in
Current site
Google Scholar
Verena Dasser Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, U.S.A.

Search for other papers by Verena Dasser in
Current site
Google Scholar
, and
Paul Hoyningen-Huene Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Department of Humanities, ETH Zentrum, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Paul Hoyningen-Huene in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



The paper expresses the authors' views on the growing interest in primate social cognition, particularly among descriptive primate ethologists. Its characteristics are the hope to extract cognitive interpretations from field anecdotes, the free use of intentional language, and the untested and so far untestable idea that primate intelligence was selected in social contexts. We believe that 1) To understand how the animal itself represents the structure of its group or its habitat is perhaps the most ethological ethology there is and well worth pursuing. The study of social cognition, in particular, has long been neglected. 2) However, it requires of ethologists that they learn from established cognitive science and integrate its categories with their own. This is an interdisciplinary enterprise. 3) A traditional inductive study begins with anecdotes, which then are translated into hypotheses, which in turn are subjected to empirical tests including experiments. Sociobiology began to publish hypotheses without tests; the social cognition move now goes on to publish anecdotes without hypotheses, with a strong penchant for anthropomorphic interpretations in terms of social manipulation. This is little more than applying human prejudice. Phylogenetic and cognitive insights will come from testing alternative levels of organization in an animal's social knowledge about the same behavioral interaction. The experiment is the largely unavoidable method. Examples are given. 4) The speculation of the social origin of primate intelligence is tentatively interpreted in two possible directions. A version based on ROZIN's (1976) view that generalized mammal intelligence evolved from context-specific "Adaptive Specializations" seems the more accessible to ethological thinking and method.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 937 59 0
Full Text Views 160 11 0
PDF Views & Downloads 52 8 1