Mate Choice On Multiple Cues, Decision Rules and Sampling Strategies in Female Pied Flycatchers

In: Behaviour
Svein Dale(Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1050 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway

Search for other papers by Svein Dale in
Current site
Google Scholar
Tore Slagsvold(Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1050 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway

Search for other papers by Tore Slagsvold in
Current site
Google Scholar
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


The mate sampling behaviour and mate choice of 125 individually marked female pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca, was recorded with video cameras. Females visited on average 3.1 males within a period of less than 1 day. Females had independent preferences for unmated males, brightly coloured males and males with nestboxes that had small entrance holes; 77-86% of the females chose a male that was the best one among the males sampled in relation to at least one of these factors. When having a choice only on mating status 91 % of the females made a correct choice; corresponding values for plumage colour and nest site quality were 64% and 73%, respectively. Females made 'mistakes' more often when differences between males were small, at least regarding plumage colour. When given simultaneous choices on two cues, females gave priority to the cue with the largest differences between males. Females returned to some males before rejecting them and these males tended to have brighter plumage or better nestboxes than males that were visited only once. The final choice of mate was not related to the order in the sequence of males visited, suggesting that many females used a pool-comparison strategy. However, about one third of the females visited only one male, and one third sampled males in a way conforming to threshold or sequential comparison strategies as well as a pool-comparison strategy. The temporal pattern of female visits suggested that they either sampled males at once and then settled, or that they visited one male repeatedly and made occasional visits to other males, often after a long period of residency. Twenty-eight females (22%) made visits to other males after they had settled


started nest building) with one male, and this resulted in mate switching in seven cases (6% of all females). These results show that females compare and choose mates on the basis of at least three different cues, and that most females are able to pick out the best or one of the best males among those sampled. However, females sample few males, probably because of competition between females for a mate, so that they must sometimes accept dull or mated males, or males with poor-quality nest sites. Limited choice reduces the strength of sexual selection even when female preferences are strong. This may help explain why plumage colour variation and polygyny exist in the pied flycatcher.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 322 60 5
Full Text Views 186 13 0
PDF Views & Downloads 71 13 0