Bondedness and sociality
In: BehaviourReview Bondedness and sociality Robin I.M. Dunbar 1) & Susanne Shultz (British Academy Centenary Research Project, Institute of Cognitive & Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, 64 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6PN, UK) (Accepted: 31 March 2010) Summary Approaches to sociality have, in the past, focused either on group typologies or on the functional aspects of relationships (mate choice, parental investment decisions). In contrast, the nature of the social relationships that scale from the individual-level behavioural decisions to the emergent properties represented by group typology has received almost no attention at all. We argue that that there is now a need
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1180 | 325 | 22 |
| Full Text Views | 309 | 55 | 19 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 233 | 82 | 11 |
Review Bondedness and sociality Robin I.M. Dunbar 1) & Susanne Shultz (British Academy Centenary Research Project, Institute of Cognitive & Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, 64 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6PN, UK) (Accepted: 31 March 2010) Summary Approaches to sociality have, in the past, focused either on group typologies or on the functional aspects of relationships (mate choice, parental investment decisions). In contrast, the nature of the social relationships that scale from the individual-level behavioural decisions to the emergent properties represented by group typology has received almost no attention at all. We argue that that there is now a need
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1180 | 325 | 22 |
| Full Text Views | 309 | 55 | 19 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 233 | 82 | 11 |