In songbirds, male song is an acoustic signal used to attract mates and defend territories. Typically, song is an acoustically complex signal; however, the fee-bee song of the black-capped chickadee is relatively simple. Despite this relative simplicity, two previous studies (Christie et al., 2004b; Hoeschele et al., ) found acoustic features within the fee-bee song that contain information regarding an individual’s dominance rank; however each of these studies reported a different dominance-related acoustic cue. Specifically, the relative amplitude of the two notes differed between the songs of dominant and subordinate males from northern British Columbia, while the interval pitch ratio differed between the songs of dominant and subordinate males from eastern Ontario. In the current study, we examined six acoustic features within songs from both of the chickadee populations (northern British Columbia and eastern Ontario) examined in these previous studies and used bioacoustic analyses and discriminant function analyses to determine whether there is a consistent dominance-related acoustic cue across both, or in each of these populations. Consistent with the previous findings, the current results indicate that relative amplitude differs based on dominance status in the songs from British Columbia; however, our results failed to reach significance with songs from Ontario. These results suggest that acoustic cues that signal a male’s dominance in this species vary with geographic location. Furthermore, examining songs from these two locations and one additional location in northern British Columbia, we found that discriminant function analyses could correctly classify songs based on geographic location. Considering the broad extent of the species’ range, black-capped chickadee song is considered relatively invariant; however, our results suggest that there is geographic variation in songs, although the differences are subtle compared to geographic song variation in other species.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Baker M.C., Thompson D.B. (1985). Song dialects of white-crowned sparrows: historical processes inferred from patterns of geographic variation. — Condor 87: 127-141.
Ballentine B., Hyman J., Nowicki S. (2004). Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. — Behav. Ecol. 15: 163-168.
Bloomfield L.L., Farrell T.M., Sturdy C.B. (2008). All “chick-a-dee” calls are not created equally. Part II. Mechanisms for discrimination by sympatric and allopatric chickadees. — Behav. Process. 77: 87-99.
Bloomfield L.L., Sturdy C.B. (2008). All “chick-a-dee” calls are not created equally. Part I. Open-ended categorization of chick-a-dee calls by sympatric and allopatric chickadees. — Behav. Process. 77: 73-86.
Betz N.E. (1987). Use of discriminant analysis in counseling psychology research. — J. Couns. Psychol. 34: 393-403.
Catchpole C.K., Slater P.J.B. (2008). Bird song: biological themes and variations. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Christie P.J., Mennill D.J., Ratcliffe L.M. (2004a). Chickadee song structure is individually distinctive over long broadcast distances. — Behaviour 141: 101-124.
Christie P.J., Mennill D.J., Ratcliffe L.M. (2004b). Pitch shifts and song structure indicate male quality in the dawn chorus of black-capped chickadees. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55: 341-348.
Desrochers A., Hannon S.J., Nordin K.E. (1988). Winter survival and territory acquisition in a northern population of black-capped chickadees. — Auk 105: 727-736.
Dixon K.L., Stefanski R.A. (1970). An appraisal of the song of the black-capped chickadee. — Wilson Bull. 82: 53-62.
Dooling R.J., Haskell R.J. (1978). Auditory duration discrimination in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus). — J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63: 1640-1643.
Drăgănoiu T.I., Nagle L., Kreutzer M. (2002). Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. 269: 2525-2531.
Drews C. (1993). The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour. — Behaviour 125: 283-313.
Ficken M.S., Ficken R.W., Witkin S.R. (1978). Vocal repertoire of the black-capped chickadee. — Auk 95: 34-48.
Forstmeier W., Kempenaers B., Meyer A., Leisler B. (2002). A novel song parameter correlates with extra-pair paternity and reflects male longevity. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. 269: 1479-1485.
Gammon D.E., Baker M.C. (2004). Song repertoire evolution and acoustic divergence in a population of black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus. — Anim. Behav. 68: 903-913.
Grava T., Grava A., Otter K.A. (2012). Vocal performance varies with habitat quality in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus). — Behaviour 149: 35-50.
Guillette L.M., Farrell T.M., Hoeschele M., Sturdy C.B. (2010). Acoustic mechanisms of a species-based discrimination of the chick-a-dee call in sympatric black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and mountain chickadees (P. gambeli). — Front. Psychol. 1: 229, DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00229
Hailman J.P. (1989). The organization of major vocalizations in the Paridae. — Wilson Bull. 101: 305-343.
Hansen I.J.K., Otter K.A., van Oort H. (2005). Communication breakdown? Habitat influences on black-capped chickadee dawn choruses. — Acta Ethol. 8: 111-120.
Hansen P. (1979). Vocal learning: its role in adapting sound structures to long-distance propagation, and a hypothesis on its evolution. — Anim. Behav. 27: 1270-1271.
Hill B.G., Lein M.R. (1987). Function of frequency-shifted songs of black-capped chickadees. — Condor 89: 914-915.
Hoeschele M., Moscicki M.K., Otter K.A., van Oort H., Fort K.T., Farrell T.M., Lee H., Robson S.W.J., Sturdy C.B. (2010). Dominance signalled in an acoustic ornament. — Anim. Behav. 79: 657-664.
Horn A.G., Leonard M.L., Ratcliffe L., Shackleton S.A., Weisman R.G. (1992). Frequency variation in songs of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). — Auk 109: 847-852.
Kroodsma D.E., Albano D.J., Houlihan P.W., Wells J.A. (1995). Song development by black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus) and Carolina chickadees (P. carolinensis). — Auk 112: 29-43.
Kroodsma D.E., Byers B.E., Halin S.L., Hill C., Minis D., Bolsinger J.R., Dawson J., Donelan E., Farrington J., Gill F.B., Houlihan P., Innes D., Keller G., MacAulay L., Marantz C.A., Ortiz J., Stoddard P.K., Wilda K. (1999). Geographic variation in black-capped chickadee songs and singing behavior. — Auk 116: 387-402.
Lambrechts M., Dhondt A.A. (1988). The anti-exhaustion hypothesis: a new hypothesis to explain song performance and song switching in the great tit. — Anim. Behav. 36: 327-334.
Leonard M.L., Horn A.G. (1995). Crowing in relation to status in roosters. — Anim. Behav. 49: 1283-1290.
Lohr B., Dooling R.J., Bartone S. (2006). The discrimination of temporal fine structure in call-like harmonic sounds by birds. — J. Comp. Psychol. 120: 239-251.
Maier E.H., Klump G.M. (1990). Auditory duration discrimination in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). — J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88: 616-621.
Marler P., Pickert R. (1984). Species-universal microstructure in the learned song of the swamp sparrow (Melospiza georgiana). — Anim. Behav. 32: 673-689.
Marshall I. (1999). Ecosystems of Canada. — Ecosystem Stratification Working Group, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Mennill D.J., Doucet S.M., Montgomerie R., Ratcliffe L.M. (2003). Achromatic color variation in black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapilla: black and white signals of sex and rank. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53: 350-357.
Mennill D.J., Otter K.A. (2007). Status signaling and communication networks in chickadees: complex communication with a simple song. — In: The ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice: an integrated approach ( Otter K.A., ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, p. 215-233.
Mennill D.J., Ramsay S.M., Boag P.T., Ratcliffe L.M. (2004). Patterns of extrapair mating in relation to male dominance status and female nest placement in black-capped chickadees. — Behav. Ecol. 15: 757-765.
Møller A.P. (1987). Variation in badge size in male house sparrows Passer domesticus: evidence for status signalling. — Anim. Behav. 35: 1637-1644.
Morton E.S. (1975). Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. — Am. Nat. 109: 17-34.
Mundry R., Sommer C. (2007). Discriminant function analysis with nonindependent data: consequences and an alternative. — Anim. Behav. 74: 965-976.
Otter K.A., Chruszcz B., Ratcliffe L. (1997). Honest advertisement and song output during the dawn chorus of black-capped chickadees. — Behav. Ecol. 8: 167-178.
Podos J., Warren P.S. (2007). The evolution of geographic variation in birdsong. — Adv. Stud. Behav. 37: 403-458.
Ratcliffe L., Mennill D.J., Schubert K.A. (2007). Social dominance and fitness in black-capped chickadees. — In: The ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice: an integrated approach ( Otter K.A., ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, p. 131-150.
Ratcliffe L., Weisman R.G. (1985). Frequency shift in the fee bee song of the black-capped chickadee. — Condor 87: 555-556.
Rothstein S.I., Fleischer R.C. (1987). Vocal dialects and their possible relation to honest status signalling in the brown-headed cowbird. — Condor 89: 1-23.
Sakata J.T., Vehrencamp S.L. (2012). Integrating perspectives on vocal performance and consistency. — J. Exp. Biol. 215: 201-209.
Schubert K.A., Mennill D.J., Ramsay S.M., Otter K.A., Boag P.T., Ratcliffe L.M. (2007). Variation in social rank acquisition influences lifetime reproductive success in black-capped chickadees. — Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 90: 85-95.
Searcy W.A., Nowicki S., Peters S. (2003). Phonology and geographic song discrimination in song sparrows. — Ethology 109: 23-35.
Shackleton S.A., Ratcliffe L. (1993). Development of song in hand-reared black-capped chickadees. — Wilson Bull. 105: 637-644.
Smith S.M. (1991). The black-capped chickadee: behavioral ecology and natural history. — Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
van Oort H., Otter K.A., Fort K.T., Holschuh C.I. (2006). Habitat quality, social dominance and dawn chorus song output in black-capped chickadees. — Ethology 112: 772-778.
Venables W.N., Ripley B.D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. — Springer, New York, NY.
Weihs C., Ligges U., Luebke K., Raabe N. (2005). klaR analyzing German business cycles. — In: Data analysis and decision support ( Baier D., Decker R., Schmidt-Thieme L., eds). Springer, Berlin, p. 335-343.
Weisman R., Brownlie L., Olthof A., Njegovan M., Sturdy C., Mewhort D. (1999). Timing and classifying brief acoustic stimuli by songbirds and humans. — J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. B. 25: 139-152.
Weisman R., Ratcliffe L. (1989). Absolute and relative pitch processing in black-capped chickadees, Parus atricapillus. — Anim. Behav. 38: 685-692.
Weisman R., Ratcliffe L., Johnsrude I., Hurly T.A. (1990). Absolute and relative pitch production in the song of the black-capped chickadee. — Condor 92: 118-124.
Wilczynski W., Ryan M.J. (1999). Geographic variation in animal communication systems. — In: Geographic variation in behavior: perspectives on evolutionary mechanisms ( Foster S.A., Endler J.A., eds). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, p. 234-261.
Wiley R.H., Steadman L., Chadwick L., Wollerman L. (1999). Social inertia in white-crowned sparrows results from recognition of opponents. — Anim. Behav. 57: 453-463.
Zahavi A. (1975). Mate selection — a selection for a handicap. — J. Theor. Biol. 53: 205-214.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 445 | 117 | 22 |
Full Text Views | 180 | 39 | 9 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 132 | 61 | 15 |
In songbirds, male song is an acoustic signal used to attract mates and defend territories. Typically, song is an acoustically complex signal; however, the fee-bee song of the black-capped chickadee is relatively simple. Despite this relative simplicity, two previous studies (Christie et al., 2004b; Hoeschele et al., ) found acoustic features within the fee-bee song that contain information regarding an individual’s dominance rank; however each of these studies reported a different dominance-related acoustic cue. Specifically, the relative amplitude of the two notes differed between the songs of dominant and subordinate males from northern British Columbia, while the interval pitch ratio differed between the songs of dominant and subordinate males from eastern Ontario. In the current study, we examined six acoustic features within songs from both of the chickadee populations (northern British Columbia and eastern Ontario) examined in these previous studies and used bioacoustic analyses and discriminant function analyses to determine whether there is a consistent dominance-related acoustic cue across both, or in each of these populations. Consistent with the previous findings, the current results indicate that relative amplitude differs based on dominance status in the songs from British Columbia; however, our results failed to reach significance with songs from Ontario. These results suggest that acoustic cues that signal a male’s dominance in this species vary with geographic location. Furthermore, examining songs from these two locations and one additional location in northern British Columbia, we found that discriminant function analyses could correctly classify songs based on geographic location. Considering the broad extent of the species’ range, black-capped chickadee song is considered relatively invariant; however, our results suggest that there is geographic variation in songs, although the differences are subtle compared to geographic song variation in other species.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 445 | 117 | 22 |
Full Text Views | 180 | 39 | 9 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 132 | 61 | 15 |