Shelter availability influences social behavior and habitat choice in crayfish, Orconectes virilis
In: BehaviourbUniversity of Michigan Biological Station, 9133 East State Street, Pellston, MI 49679, USA
Search for other papers by Kandice C. Fero in
Current site
Google Scholar
bUniversity of Michigan Biological Station, 9133 East State Street, Pellston, MI 49679, USA
Search for other papers by Paul A. Moore in
Current site
Google Scholar
Conspecific distribution across differing microhabitats may arise due to individual differences in resource requirements, vulnerability to predation, environmental tolerances, and as a direct result of social interaction. The aim of this study was to examine crayfish distributions across habitats with varying resource availability and to examine whether such distributions are correlated with dominance relationships among individuals. Agonistic interactions, habitat use, and shelter use were observed in mixed-sex populations of eight crayfish, Orconectes virilis. Populations were placed in a semi-natural, 4 × 4 m arena for 20 h that was split into shelter-poor (low), shelter-rich (high) and shelter-free (free) areas. The presence of shelter was associated with a significant increase in crayfish habitat use. Overall agonism also increased in habitats where shelter was present. Status specific differences in shelter and habitat use were observed and were dependent upon environmental context (e.g., day versus night). Lower ranking crayfish were found to occupy and defend shelter less frequently than dominant crayfish and low ranking crayfish were also found more often in shelter-poor habitat. These status-specific differences in behavior were only observed during the day when shelter-related behaviors were increased overall. Distinct shelter use strategies were also apparent between top-ranked (alpha) and bottom-ranked (omega) crayfish. Taken together, these results suggest that shelter use and habitat use are, in part, mediated by social status. Additionally, these results indicate that habitat selection may arise as a consequence of status-specific differences in resource use.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Bay L., Jones G., McCormick M. (2001). Habitat selection and aggression as determinants of spatial segregation among damselfish on a coral reef. — Coral Reefs 20: 289-298.
-
Bergman D.A., Moore P.A. (2003). Field observations of intraspecific agonistic behavior of two crayfish species, Orconectes rusticus and Orconectes virilis, in different habitats. — Biol. Bull. 205: 26-35.
-
Bon R., Rideau C., Villaret J.-C., Joachim J. (2001). Segregation is not only a matter of sex in Alpine ibex, Capra ibex ibex. — Anim. Behav. 62: 495-504.
-
Bovbjerg R.V. (1970). Ecological isolation and competitive exclusion in two crayfish (Orconectes virilis and Orconectes immunis). — Ecology 51: 225-236.
-
Breithaupt T. (2011). Chemical communication in crayfish. — In: Chemical communication in crustaceans ( Breithaupt T., Thiel M., eds). Springer, New York, NY, p. 257-276.
-
Brotons L., Orell M., Lahti K., Koivula K. (2000). Age-related microhabitat segregation in willow tit Parus montanus winter flocks. — Ethology 106: 993-1005.
-
Bruinzeel L.W., de Pol M.V., Trierweiler C. (2006). Competitive abilities of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) occupying territories of different quality. — J. Ornithol. 147: 457-463.
-
Cohen J., Pimm S., Yodiz P., Saldana J. (1993). Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. — J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 67-78.
-
Conradt L., Clutton-Brock T.H., Thomson T.H. (1999). Habitat segregation in ungulates: are males forced into suboptimal foraging habitats through indirect competition by females? — Oecologia 119: 336-377.
-
Dalosto M.M., Palaoro A.V., Costa J.R., Santos S. (2013). Aggressiveness and life underground: the case of burrowing crayfish. — Behaviour 150: 3-22.
-
David B.O., Closs G.P., Crow S.K., Hansen E.A. (2007). Is diel activity determined by social rank in a drift-feeding stream fish dominance hierarchy? — Anim. Behav. 74: 259-263.
-
Debuse V.J., Addison J.T., Reynolds J.D. (2003). Effects of breeding site density in competition and sexual selection in the European lobster. — Behav. Ecol. 14: 396-402.
-
Dennenmoser S., Thiel M. (2008). Effects of social structure on the behaviour and performance of alternative mating tactics in male rock shrimp, Rhynchocinetes typus. — Ethology 114: 327-339.
-
Dennenmoser S., Thiel M. (2007). Competition for food and mates by dominant and subordinate male rock shrimp, Rhyncocinetes typus. — Behaviour 144: 33-59.
-
Englund G., Krupa J.J. (2000). Habitat use by crayfish in stream pools: influence of predators, depth and body size. — Freshw. Biol. 43: 75-83.
-
Fero K., Moore P.A. (2008). Social spacing of crayfish in natural habitats: what role does dominance play? — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 1119-1125.
-
Fero K., Simon J.L., Jourdie V., Moore P.A. (2007). Consequences of social dominance on crayfish resource use. — Behaviour 144: 61-82.
-
Figler M.H., Blank G.S., Peeke H.V.S. (2005). Shelter competition between resident male red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard) and conspecific intruders varying by sex and reproductive status. — Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 38: 237-248.
-
Flaxman S.M., de Roos C.A. (2007). Different modes of resource variation provide a critical test of ideal free distribution models. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 877-886.
-
Fretwell S.D., Lucas H.L. (1970). On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. — Acta Biotheor. 19: 17-36.
-
Gherardi F., Cioni A. (2004). Agonism and interference competition in freshwater decapods. — Behaviour 141: 1297-1324.
-
Grabowski T.B., Isely J.J. (2007). Spatial and temporal segregation of spawning habitat by catostomids in the Savannah River, Georgia and South Carolina, USA. — J. Fish Biol. 70: 782-798.
-
Grant J.W.A. (1993). Whether or not to defend? The influence of resource distribution. — Mar. Behav. Physiol. 23: 137-153.
-
Grant J.W.A., Gaboury C.L., Levitt H.L. (2000). Competitor-to-resource ratio, a general formulation of operational sex ratio, as a predictor of competitive aggression in Japanese medaka (Pisces: Oryziidea). — Behav. Ecol. 11: 670-675.
-
Hemelrijk C.K. (2000). Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure. — Anim. Behav. 59: 1035-1048.
-
Hemelrijk C.K., Kunz H. (2005). Density distribution and size sorting in fish schools: an individual-based model. — Behav. Ecol. 16: 178-187.
-
Herberholz J., Sen M.M., Edwards D.H. (2003). Parallel changes in agonistic and non-agonistic behaviors during dominance hierarchy formation in crayfish. — J. Comp. Physiol. A 189: 321-325.
-
Hill A.M., Lodge D.M. (1994). Diel changes in resource demand: competition and predation in species replacement among crayfishes. — Ecology 75: 2118-2126.
-
Hinojosa I., Thiel M. (2003). Somatic and gametic resources in male rock shrimp, Rhynchocinetes typus — effect of mating potential and ontogenetic male stage. — Anim. Behav. 66: 449-458.
-
Jensen S.P., Gray S.J., Hurst J.L. (2003). How does habitat structure affect activity and use of space among house mice? — Anim. Behav. 66: 239-250.
-
Karnofsky E.B., Atema J., Elgin R.H. (1989). Field observations of social behavior, shelter use, and foraging in the lobster, Homarus americanus. — Biol. Bull. 176: 239-246.
-
Keeley E., Grant J. (2001). Prey size of salmonid fishes in streams, lakes, and oceans. — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 1122-1132.
-
Koczaja C., McCall L., Fitch E., Gloriosos B., Hanna C., Kyzar J., Niemiller M., Spiess J., Tolley A., Wyckoff R., Mullen D. (2005). Size-specific habitat segregation and intraspecific interactions in banded sculpin (Cottus carolinae). — Southeast. Nat. 4: 207-218.
-
Lawton P. (1987). Diel activity and foraging behavior of juvenile american lobsters, Homarus americanus. — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44: 1195-1205.
-
Levenbach S., Hazlett B.A. (1996). Habitat displacement and the mechanical and display functions of chelae in crayfish. — J. Freshw. Ecol. 11: 485-492.
-
MacPherson E. (1998). Ontogenetic shifts in habitat use and aggregation in juvenile sparid fishes. — J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 220: 127-150.
-
Marra P.P. (2000). The role of behavioral dominance in structuring habitat occupancy of a migrant bird during the nonbreeding season. — Behav. Ecol. 11: 299-308.
-
Marra P.P., Holmes R.T. (2001). Consequences of dominance-mediated habitat segregation in American redstarts during the non-breeding season. — Auk 188: 92-104.
-
Martin A.L. III, Moore P.A. (2007). Field observations of agonism in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: shelter use in a natural environment. — Ethology 113: 1192-1201.
-
Martin A.L. III, Moore P.A. (2008). The influence of dominance on shelter preference and eviction rates in the crayfish, Orconectes rustics. — Ethology 114: 175-188.
-
Martin A.L. III, Moore P.A. (2010). The influence of reproductive state on the agonistic interactions between male and female crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. — Behaviour 147: 1309-1325.
-
Martin T.E. (2001). Abiotic vs. biotic influences on habitat selection of coexisting species: climate change impacts? — Ecology 82: 175-188.
-
Mullen D.M., Burton T. (1998). Experimental tests of intraspecific competition in stream riffles between juvenile and adult longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae). — Can. J. Zool. 76: 855-862.
-
Nakano S. (1995). Individual differences in resource use, growth and emigration under the influence of a dominance hierarchy in fluvial red-spotted masu salmon in a natural habitat. — J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 75-84.
-
Noel M.V., Grant J.W.A., Carrigan J.G. (2005). Effects of competitor-to-resource ratio on aggression and size variation within group of convict cichlids. — Anim. Behav. 69: 1157-1163.
-
Palaoro A.V., Ayres-Peres L., Santos S. (2013). Modulation of male aggressiveness through different communication pathways. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67: 283-292.
-
Parker G.A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. — J. Theor. Biol. 47: 223-243.
-
Peeke H.V.S., Sippel J., Figler M.H. (1995). Prior residence effects in shelter defense in adult signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana)): results in same and mixed-sex dyads. — Crustaceana 68: 873-881.
-
Poisbleau M., Jenouvrier S., Fritz H. (2006). Assessing the reliability of dominance scores for assigning individual ranks in a hierarchy. — Anim. Behav. 72: 835-842.
-
Ranta E., Lindstrom K. (1992). Power to hold sheltering burrows by juveniles of signal crayfish, Pasifasticus leniusculus. — Ethology 92: 217-226.
-
Spina A.P. (2000). Habitat partitioning in a patchy environment: considering the role of intraspecific competition. — Environ. Biol. Fish. 57: 393-400.
-
Statzner B., Fievet E., Champagne J.Y., Morel R., Herouin E. (2000). Crayfish as geomorphic agents and ecosystem engineers: biological behavior affects sand and gravel erosion in experimental streams. — Limnol. Oceanogr. 45: 1030-1040.
-
Taylor S., Bennett M. (2008). Cephalopod dietary specialization and ontogenetic partitioning of the Australian weasel shark Hemigaleus australiensis White, Last and Compagno. — J. Fish Biol. 72: 917-936.
-
van Oort H., Otter K.A., Fort K.T. (2007). Habitat, dominance, and the phenotypic quality of male Black-capped Chikadees. — Condor 109: 88-96.
-
Van Son T.C., Thiel M. (2006). Mating behavior of male rock shrimp, Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea): the effect of recent mating history and predation risk. — Anim. Behav. 71: 61-70.
-
Wasserberg G., Kotler B.P., Abramsky Z. (2006). The role of site, habitat, seasonality and competition in determining the nightly activity patterns of psammophilic gerbils in a centrifugally organized community. — Oikos 112: 573-579.
-
Weir L.K., Grant J.W.A. (2004). The causes of resource monopolization: interaction between resource dispersion and mode of competition. — Ethology 110: 63-74.
-
Zulandt-Schneider R.A., Huber R., Moore P.A. (2001). Individual and status recognition in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: the effects of urine release on fight dynamics. — Behaviour 138: 137-154.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 817 | 217 | 13 |
| Full Text Views | 288 | 32 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 230 | 66 | 0 |
Shelter availability influences social behavior and habitat choice in crayfish, Orconectes virilis
In: BehaviourbUniversity of Michigan Biological Station, 9133 East State Street, Pellston, MI 49679, USA
Search for other papers by Kandice C. Fero in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
bUniversity of Michigan Biological Station, 9133 East State Street, Pellston, MI 49679, USA
Search for other papers by Paul A. Moore in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Conspecific distribution across differing microhabitats may arise due to individual differences in resource requirements, vulnerability to predation, environmental tolerances, and as a direct result of social interaction. The aim of this study was to examine crayfish distributions across habitats with varying resource availability and to examine whether such distributions are correlated with dominance relationships among individuals. Agonistic interactions, habitat use, and shelter use were observed in mixed-sex populations of eight crayfish, Orconectes virilis. Populations were placed in a semi-natural, 4 × 4 m arena for 20 h that was split into shelter-poor (low), shelter-rich (high) and shelter-free (free) areas. The presence of shelter was associated with a significant increase in crayfish habitat use. Overall agonism also increased in habitats where shelter was present. Status specific differences in shelter and habitat use were observed and were dependent upon environmental context (e.g., day versus night). Lower ranking crayfish were found to occupy and defend shelter less frequently than dominant crayfish and low ranking crayfish were also found more often in shelter-poor habitat. These status-specific differences in behavior were only observed during the day when shelter-related behaviors were increased overall. Distinct shelter use strategies were also apparent between top-ranked (alpha) and bottom-ranked (omega) crayfish. Taken together, these results suggest that shelter use and habitat use are, in part, mediated by social status. Additionally, these results indicate that habitat selection may arise as a consequence of status-specific differences in resource use.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 817 | 217 | 13 |
| Full Text Views | 288 | 32 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 230 | 66 | 0 |