No evidence of selection by predators on tadpole boldness

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Animals typically exhibit adaptive behaviors that reduce their risk of predation. The term ‘boldness’ describes individual variation in the propensity to exhibit risk-reducing behavior and is the subject of much research attention. Predators should select against boldness, and this has been supported by empirical studies and behavioral ecology theory. We tested whether a standardized assay of three boldness-associated behaviors in wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) tadpoles predicted survival when faced with a predator. Tadpole behavior was assayed in an open field and then tadpoles were placed, in pairs, in an enclosure with a predator (newt or larval dragonfly). Survival did not depend on differences in measured boldness, and this result held when we accounted for interactions between different boldness behaviors and between behavior and size or predator identity. The absence of selection by predators against bolder tadpoles is counterintuitive and inconsistent with our understanding of the behavioral ecology of these animals. Two possible explanations are offered for this result. First, selection against boldness may be minimized by other phenotypic traits, such as escape ability. Alternatively, the potential lack of consistency between standardized boldness assays and natural encounters with predators may limit our capacity to study the evolution of boldness, cautioning against this approach. These results highlight the complexities of the relationships between behavioral traits and fitness and the challenges associated with their study.

No evidence of selection by predators on tadpole boldness

in Behaviour

Sections

References

ÅbjörnssonK.HanssonL.-A.BrönmarkC. (2004). Responses of prey from habitats with different predator regimes: local adaptation and heritability. — Ecology 85: 1859-1866.

AltweggR. (2003). Hungry predators render predator-avoidance behavior in tadpoles ineffective. — Oikos 100: 311-316.

AnholtB.R.WernerE.E. (1998). Predictable changes in predation mortality as a consequence of changes in food availability and predation risk. — Evol. Ecol. 12: 729-738.

BallS.L.BakerR.L. (1996). Predator-induced life history changes: antipredator behavior costs or facultative life history shifts?Ecology 77: 1116.

BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB. (2011). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R Package Version 0.999375-42. — Available online at: http://www.R-project.org (accessed 3 August 2012).

BeatyL. (2012). The effect of body size and personality on anuran fitness. — Masters thesis Texas Tech University Lubbock TX.

BellA.M. (2005). Behavioural differences between individuals and two populations of stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). — J. Evol. Biol. 18: 464-473.

BellA.M.SihA. (2007). Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). — Ecol. Lett. 15: 278-289.

BellA.M.HankisonS.J.LaskowskiK.L. (2009). The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. — Anim. Behav. 77: 771-783.

BolkerB.M.BrooksM.E.ClarkC.J.GeangeS.W.PoulsenJ.R.StevensM.H.H.WhiteJ.-S.S. (2009). Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 127-135.

BrodieE.D.III (1992). Correlational selection for color pattern and antipredator behavior in the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides. — Evolution 46: 1284-1298.

BrodinT.JohanssonF. (2008). Conflicting selection pressures on the growth/predation-risk trade-off in a damselfly. — Ecology 85: 2927-2932.

BrodinT.LindM.I.WibergM.K.JohanssonF. (2012). Personality trait differences between mainland and island populations in the common frog (Rana temporaria). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67: 135-143.

BrownC.JonesF.BraithwaiteV. (2005). In situ examination of boldness–shyness traits in the tropical poeciliid, Brachyraphis episcopi. — Anim. Behav. 70: 1003-1009.

BrydgesN.M.ColegraveN.HeathcoteR.J.P.BraithwaiteV.A. (2008). Habitat stability and predation pressure affect temperament behaviours in populations of three-spined sticklebacks. — J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 229-235.

BurnsJ.G. (2008). The validity of three tests of temperament in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). — J. Comp. Psychol. 122: 344-356.

CalsbeekR.CoxR.M. (2010). Experimentally assessing the relative importance of predation and competition as agents of selection. — Nature 465: 613-616.

CarlsonB.E.LangkildeT. (2013a). A common marking technique affects tadpole behavior and risk of predation. — Ethology 119: 167-177.

CarlsonB.E.LangkildeT. (2013b). Personality traits are expressed in Bullfrog tadpoles during open-field trials. — J. Herpetol. 47: 378-383.

CarterA.J.GoldizenA.W.TrompS.A. (2010). Agamas exhibit behavioral syndromes: bolder males bask and feed more but may suffer higher predation. — Behav. Ecol. 21: 655-661.

DalesmanS.RundleS.D.CottonP.A. (2007). Predator regime influences innate anti-predator behaviour in the freshwater gastropod Lymnaea stagnalis. — Freshwater Biol. 52: 2134-2140.

DownesS. (2002). Does responsiveness to predator scents affect lizard survivorship?Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52: 38-42.

EklovP.WernerE.E. (2000). Multiple predator effects on size-dependent behavior and mortality of two species of anuran larvae. — Oikos 88: 250-258.

FerrariM.C.O.MessierF.ChiversD.P. (2007). Degradation of chemical alarm cues under natural conditions: risk assessment by larval woodfrogs. — Chemoecology 17: 263-266.

FrakerM.E.HuF.CuddapahV.McCollumS.A.RelyeaR.A.HempelJ.DenverR.J. (2009). Characterization of an alarm pheromone secreted by amphibian tadpoles that induces behavioral inhibition and suppression of the neuroendocrine stress axis. — Horm. Behav. 55: 520-529.

GodinJ.-G.J.DavisS.A. (1995). Who dares, benefits: predator approach behaviour in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) deters predator pursuit. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 259: 193-200.

GoslingS.D. (2001). From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research?Psychol. Bull. 127: 45-86.

GosnerK.L. (1960). A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. — Herpetologica 16: 183-190.

HarrisS.RamnarineI.W.SmithH.G.PetterssonL.B. (2010). Picking personalities apart: estimating the influence of predation, sex and body size on boldness in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. — Oikos 119: 1711-1718.

HouleD. (1992). Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. — Genetics 130: 195-204.

KingsolverJ.G.HoekstraH.E.HoekstraJ.M.BerriganD.VignieriS.N.HillC.E.HoangA.GibertP.BeerliP. (2001). The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. — Am. Nat. 157: 245-261.

KoprivnikarJ.GibsonC.H.RedfernJ.C. (2012). Infectious personalities: behavioural syndromes and disease risk in larval amphibians. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 279: 1544-1550.

LaurilaA. (2000). Behavioural responses to predator chemical cues and local variation in antipredator performance in Rana temporaria tadpoles. — Oikos 88: 159-168.

LawlerS.P. (1989). Behavioural responses to predators and predation risk in four species of larval anurans. — Anim. Behav. 38: 1039-1047.

LimaS.L.DillL.M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. — Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.

LindJ.CresswellW. (2005). Determining the fitness consequences of anti-predation behaviour. — Behav. Ecol. 16: 945-956.

MesslerA.WundM.A.BakerJ.A.FosterS.A. (2007). The effects of relaxed and reversed selection by predators on the antipredator behavior of the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. — Ethology 113: 953-963.

MichelM.J. (2011). Spatial dependence of phenotype-environment associations for tadpoles in natural ponds. — Evol. Ecol. 25: 915-932.

PetrankaJ.HayesL. (1998). Chemically mediated avoidance of a predatory odonate (Anax junius) by American toad (Bufo americanus) and wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 263-271.

PruittJ.N.StachowiczJ.J.SihA. (2012). Behavioral types of predator and prey jointly determine prey survival: potential implications for the maintenance of within-species behavioral variation. — Am. Nat. 179: 217-227.

R Development Core Team (2012). R: a language and environment for statistical computing2.15.0 edn.R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna available online at: http://www.R-project.org (accessed 3 August 2012).

RéaleD.Festa-BianchetM. (2003). Predator-induced natural selection on temperament in bighorn ewes. — Anim. Behav. 65: 463-470.

RéaleD.ReaderS.M.SolD.McDougallP.T.DingemanseN.J. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. — Biol. Rev. 82: 291-318.

RedmerM.TrauthS. (2005). Rana sylvatica LeConte, 1825: wood frog. — In: Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species ( LannooM. ed.). University of California PressBerkeley, CA p.  590-593.

RelyeaR.A. (2001). Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. — Ecology 82: 523-540.

RelyeaR.A. (2002). Competitor-induced plasticity in tadpoles: consequences, cues, and connections to predator-induced plasticity. — Ecol. Monogr. 72: 523-540.

RelyeaR.A.WernerE.E. (1999). Quantifying the relation between predator-induced behavior and growth performance in larval anurans. — Ecology 80: 2117-2124.

RieschR.DuweV.HerrmannN.PadurL.RammA.ScharnweberK.SchulteM.Schulz-MirbachT.ZiegeM.PlathM. (2009). Variation along the shy–bold continuum in extremophile fishes (Poecilia mexicana, Poecilia sulphuraria). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63: 1515-1526.

SchluterD.PriceT.D.RoweL. (1991). Conflicting selection pressures and life history trade-offs. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 246: 11-17.

SchmitzO.J.BeckermanA.P.O’BrienK.M. (1997). Behaviorally mediated trophic cascades: effects of predation risk on food web interactions. — Ecology 78: 1388-1399.

SergioF.MarchesiL.PedriniP. (2003). Spatial refugia and the coexistence of a diurnal raptor with its intraguild owl predator. — J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 232-245.

SihA. (1982). Foraging strategies and the avoidance of predation by an aquatic insect, Notonecta hoffmanni. — Ecology 63: 786-796.

SihA.BellA.JohnsonJ.C. (2004). Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 372-378.

SihA.CoteJ.EvansM.FogartyS.PruittJ. (2012). Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes. — Ecol. Lett. 19: 372-378.

SihA.EnglundG.WoosterD. (1997). Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 350-355.

SkellyD.K. (1994). Activity level and the susceptibility of anuran larvae to predation. — Anim. Behav. 47: 465-468.

SkellyD.K.WernerE.E. (1990). Behavioral and life-historical responses of larval American toads to an odonate predator. — Ecology 71: 2313-2322.

SmeeD.L.WeissburgM.J. (2008). Heightened prey responses in risky habitats: predation pressure increases prey sensitivity to predation risk. — Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 363: 39-50.

SmithB.R.BlumsteinD.T. (2007). Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. — Behav. Ecol. 19: 448-455.

SmithB.R.BlumsteinD.T. (2010). Behavioral types as predictors of survival in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). — Behav. Ecol. 21: 919-926.

UrbanM.C. (2007). Risky prey behavior evolves in risky habitats. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 14377-14382.

Van BuskirkJ.ArioliM. (2005). Habitat specialization and adaptive phenotypic divergence of anuran populations. — J. Evol. Biol. 18: 596-608.

Van BuskirkJ.McCollumS.A. (2000). Functional mechanisms of an inducible defence in tadpoles: morphology and behaviour influence mortality risk from predation. — J. Evol. Biol. 13: 336-347.

Van BuskirkJ.McCollumS.A.WernerE.E. (1997). Natural selection for environmentally induced phenotypes in tadpoles. — Evolution 51: 1983-1992.

WaldmanB. (1982). Sibling association among schooling toad tadpoles: field evidence and implications. — Anim. Behav. 30: 700-713.

WalshR.CumminsR. (1976). The open-field test: a critical review. — Psychol. Bull. 83: 482-504.

WatkinsT.B. (1996). Predator-mediated selection on burst seimming performance in tadpoles of the Pacific tree frog Pseudacris regilla. — Physiol. Zool. 69: 154-167.

WernerE.E.AnholtB.R. (1993). Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. — Am. Nat. 142: 242-272.

WilsonA.D.M.KrauseJ. (2012). Personality and metamorphosis: is behavioral variation consistent across ontogenetic niche shifts?Behav. Ecol. 23: 1316-1323.

WilsonD.S.ClarkA.B.ColemanK.DearstyneT. (1994). Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 442-446.

WilsonD.S.ColemanK.ClarkA.B.BiedermanL. (1993). Shy–bold continuum in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus): an ecological study of a psychological trait. — J. Comp. Psychol. 107: 250-260.

WolfM.WeissingF.J. (2012). Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 27: 452-461.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Diagram of experimental setups for (a) assaying behavior in an open-field and (b) predator selection trials. Not to scale.

  • View in gallery

    Distributions of behavioral scores for activity level in the (a) absence and (b) presence of predator cues, and (c) avoidance of predator cues. Activity levels represent the number of observations (out of 30) in which tadpoles were observed moving, while low numbers indicate avoidance of the predator cues.

  • View in gallery

    Distribution of durations of predator selection trials used in the analyses. Trials were terminated when one tadpole was captured or eaten.

  • View in gallery

    Relationships between survival of focal tadpoles in predation trials and relative differences in boldness-related behavior between the focal tadpole and the conspecific with which it was paired during a trial. Behaviors are (a) activity level in the presence of predator cues, (b) responsiveness (change in activity after adding predator cues) and (c) spatial avoidance of predator cues. Lines indicate 95% confidence intervals of predicted survival probability using logistic regressions with a single independent variable.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 21 21 15
Full Text Views 94 94 84
PDF Downloads 3 3 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0