The determinants of dominance relationships among subordinate females in the cooperatively breeding meerkat

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

In cooperatively breeding species with high reproductive skew, a single breeding female is dominant to all other group members, but it is not yet known if there are consistent dominance relationships among subordinates. In this study on meerkats (Suricata suricatta), we used naturally observed dominance assertions and submissive interactions within dyads of subordinate females to investigate: (i) whether or not a dominance structure exists among them and what factors influence dominance relationships; and (ii) how dominance may influence the future reproductive success of subordinate females. Our study indicates that superiority in age and weight provide a competitive advantage during conflicts among subordinate females and that females who consistently dominate in these contests are subsequently more likely to attain a dominant breeding position. This provides a starting point for further investigations into dominance structure among subordinates in meerkat societies and other cooperative breeders.

The determinants of dominance relationships among subordinate females in the cooperatively breeding meerkat

in Behaviour

Sections

References

AppsP. (1992). Wild ways4th edn.Southern Book PublishersHalfway House.

ArchieE.A.MorrisonT.A.FoleyC.A.H.MossC.J.AlbertsS.C. (2006). Dominance rank relationships among wild female African elephants, Loxodonta africana. — Anim. Behav. 71: 117-127.

BeachamJ.L. (2003). Models of dominance hierarchy formation: effects of prior experience and intrinsic traits. — Behaviour 140: 1275-1303.

BeaugrandJ.P.GouletC.PayetteD. (1991). Outcome of dyadic conflict in male green swordtail fish, Xiphophorus helleri: effects of body size and prior dominance. — Anim. Behav. 41: 417-424.

BergstromM.L.FediganL.M. (2013). Dominance style of female white-faced capuchins. — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 150: 591-601.

BurlandT.M.BennettN.C.JarvisJ.U.M.FaulkesC.G. (2004). Colony structure and parentage in wild colonies of co-operatively breeding Damaraland mole-rats suggest incest avoidance alone may not maintain reproductive skew. — Mol. Ecol. 13: 2371-2379.

CantM.A.LlopJ.B.FieldJ. (2006). Individual variation in social aggression and the probability of inheritance: theory and field test. — Am. Nat. 167: 837-852.

CarlsonA.A.YoungA.J.RussellA.F.BennettN.C.McNeillyA.S.Clutton-BrockT.H. (2004). Hormonal correlates of dominance in meerkats (Suricata suricatta). — Horm. Behav. 46: 141-150.

ChaseI.D. (1974). Models of hierarchy formation in animal societies. — Behav. Sci. 19: 374-382.

ChaseI.D.ToveyC.Spangler-MartinD.ManfredonlaM. (2002). Individual differences versus social dynamics in the formation of animal dominance hierarchies. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 5744-5749.

Clutton-BrockT.H. (2009). Structure and function in mammalian societies. — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B. 364: 3229-3242.

Clutton-BrockT.H.AlbonS.D.GuinnessF.E. (1986). Great expectations: dominance, breeding success and offspring ratios in red deer. — Anim. Behav. 34: 460-471.

Clutton-BrockT.H.BrothertonP.N.M.SmithR.McIlrathG.M.KanskyR.GaynorD.O’RiainM.J.SkinnerJ.D. (1998a). Infanticide and expulsion of females in a cooperative mammal. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 265: 2291-2295.

Clutton-BrockT.H.GaynorD.KanskyR.MacCollA.D.C.McIlrathG.ChadwickP.BrothertonP.N.M.O’RiainJ.M.ManserM.SkinnerJ.D. (1998b). Costs of cooperative behaviour in suricates (Suricata suricatta). — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 265: 185-190.

Clutton-BrockT.H.BrothertonP.N.M.RussellA.F.O’RiainM.J.GaynorD.KanskyR.GriffenA.ManserM.SharpeL.McIlrathG.M.SmallT.MossA.MonfortS. (2001). Cooperation, control and concession in meerkat groups. — Science 291: 478-480.

Clutton-BrockT.H.RussellA.F.SharpeL.L.YoungA.J.BalmforthZ.McIlrathG.M. (2002). Evolution and development of sex differences in cooperative behaviour in meerkats. — Science 297: 253-256.

Clutton-BrockT.H.RussellA.F.SharpeL.L.JordanN.R. (2005). ‘False feeding’ and aggression in meerkat societies. — Anim. Behav. 69: 1273-1284.

Clutton-BrockT.H.HodgeS.J.SpongG.RussellA.F.JordanN.R.BennettN.C.SharpeL.L.ManserM.B. (2006). Intrasexual competition and sexual selection in cooperative mammals. — Nature 444: 1065-1068.

CooneyR.BennettN.C. (2000). Inbreeding avoidance and reproductive skew in a cooperative mammal. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 267: 801-806.

CôtéS.D. (2000). Dominance hierarchies in female mountain goats: stability, aggressiveness and determinants of rank. — Behaviour 37: 1541-1566.

CreelS. (2001). Social dominance and stress hormones. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 491-497.

CreelS. (2005). Dominance, aggression, and glucocorticoid levels in social carnivores. — J. Mammal. 86: 255-264.

CroninA.L.FieldJ.P. (2007). Rank and colony defence against conspecifics in a facultatively eusocial hover wasp. — Behav. Ecol. 18: 331-336.

de LucaD.W.GinsbergJ.R. (2001). Dominance, reproduction and survival in banded mongooses: towards an egalitarian social system?Anim. Behav. 61: 17-30.

DrewsC. (1993). The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour. — Behaviour 125: 283-313.

DrummondH.Garcia ChavalesC. (1989). Food shortage influences sibling aggression in the blue-footed booby. — Anim. Behav. 37: 806-819.

FrankL.G. (1986). Social organization of the spotted hyaena Crocuta crocuta. II. Dominance and reproduction. — Anim. Behav. 34: 1510-1527.

HodgeS.J.ManicaA.FlowerT.P.Clutton-BrockT.H. (2008). Determinants of reproductive success in dominant female meerkats. — J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 92-102.

KeaneB.WaserP.M.CreelS.R.CreelN.M.ElliottL.F.MinchellaD.J. (1994). Subordinate reproduction in dwarf mongooses. — Anim. Behav. 47: 65-75.

KutsukakeN.Clutton-BrockT.H. (2006). Social functions of allogrooming in cooperatively breeding meerkats. — Anim. Behav. 72: 1059-1068.

KutsukakeN.Clutton-BrockT.H. (2008). Do meerkats engage in conflict management following aggression? Reconciliation, submission and avoidance. — Anim. Behav. 75: 1441-1453.

MartinP.BatesonP. (2007). Measuring behaviour3rd edn.Cambridge University PressCambridge.

Maynard SmithJ.ParkerG.H. (1976). The logic of asymmetric contests. — Anim. Behav. 24: 159-175.

MonninT.PeetersC. (1999). Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant. — Behav. Ecol. 10: 323-332.

ParkerG.A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of animal conflicts. — J. Theor. Biol. 47: 223-243.

PrenterJ.TaylorP.W.ElwoodR.W. (2008). Large body size for winning and large swords for winning quickly in swordtail males, Iphophorus helleri. — Anim. Behav. 75: 1981-1987.

PuseyA.E.PackerC. (1997). The ecology of relationships. — In: Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach4th edn. ( KrebsJ.R.DaviesN.B. eds). BlackwellOxford p.  254-287.

RussellA.F.CarlsonA.A.McIlrathG.M.JordanN.R.Clutton-BrockT.H. (2004). Adaptive size modification by dominant female meerkats. — Evolution 58: 1600-1607.

RussellA.F.Clutton-BrockT.H.BrothertonP.N.SharpeL.L.McIlrathG.M.DalerumF.D.CameronE.Z.BarnardJ.A. (2002). Factors affecting pup growth and survival in cooperatively breeding meerkats Suricata suricatta. — J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 700-709.

SaltzmanW.Schultz-DarkenN.J.AbbottD.H. (1996). Behavioural and endocrine predictors of dominance and tolerance in female marmosets, Callithrix jacchus. — Anim. Behav. 51: 657-674.

Savin-WilliamsR.C. (1976). An ethological study of dominance formation and maintenance in a group of human adolescents. — Child Dev. 47: 972-979.

SharpS.P.Clutton-BrockT.H. (2010). Reproductive senescence in a cooperatively breeding mammal. — J. Anim. Ecol. 79: 176-183.

SharpeL.L. (2005). Frequency of social play does not affect dispersal partnerships in wild meerkats. — Anim. Behav. 70: 559-569.

SpieringP.A.SomersM.J.MaldonadoJ.E.WildtW.E.GuntherM.S. (2010). Reproductive sharing and proximate factors mediating cooperative breeding in the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 583-592.

StahlJ.TolsmaP.H.LoonenM.J.DrentR.H. (2001). Subordinates explore but dominants profit: resource competition in high Arctic barnacle goose flocks. — Anim. Behav. 61: 257-264.

StanbackM.T. (1994). Dominance within broods of the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker. — Anim. Behav. 47: 1121-1126.

VinuelaJ. (1999). Sibling aggression, hatching asynchrony, and nestling mortality in the black kite (Milvus migrans). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45: 33-45.

WileyR.H.RabenaldK.N. (1984). The evolution of cooperative breeding by delayed reciprocity and queuing for favourable social positions. — Evolution 38: 609-621.

WittigR.M.BoeschC. (2003). Food competition and linear dominance hierarchy among female chimpanzees of the Taï National Park. — Int. J. Primatol. 24: 847-867.

YoungA.J.CarlsonA.A.MonfortS.L.RussellA.F.BennettN.C.Clutton-BrockT.H. (2006). Stress and suppression of subordinate reproduction in cooperatively breeding meerkats. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 12005-12010.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Percentage of dyads within which dominance relationships were formed, as categorised by (a) the age difference and (b) weight difference between dyadic partners. Dominance relationships were defined as relationships where one partner significantly more often dominated her dyadic partner, as assessed through binomial tests.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 44 44 30
Full Text Views 96 96 84
PDF Downloads 7 7 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0