The moral consequences of social selection
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Christopher Boehm in
Current site
Google Scholar
For half a century explaining human altruism has been a major research focus for scholars in a wide variety of disciplines, yet answers are still sought. Here, paradigms like reciprocal altruism, mutualism, and group selection are set aside, to examine the effects of social selection as an under-explored model. To complement Alexander’s reputational-selection model, I introduce group punishment as another type of social selection that could have impacted substantially on the development of today’s human nature, and on our potential for behaving altruistically. Capital punishment is a decisive type of social selection, which in our past hunter–gatherer environment was aimed primarily against intimidating, selfish bullies, so it is proposed that moral sanctioning has played a major part in genetically shaping our social and political behaviours. Aggressive suppression of free-riding deviants who bully or deceive has made a cooperatively generous, egalitarian band life efficient for humans, even as it has helped our species to evolve in directions that favour altruism.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Alexander R.D. (1974). The evolution of social behavior. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 325-384.
-
Alexander R.D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. — Aldine de Gruyter, New York, NY.
-
Bird R.B., Smith E.A., Bird D.W. (2001). The hunting handicap: costly signaling in human foraging strategies. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50: 9-19.
-
Boehm C. (1991). Lower-level teleology in biological evolution: decision behaviour and reproductive success in two species. — Cult. Dynam. 4: 115-134.
-
Boehm C. (1993). Egalitarian behaviour and reverse dominance hierarchy. — Curr. Anthropol. 34: 227-254.
-
Boehm C. (1997). Impact of the human egalitarian syndrome on Darwinian selection mechanics. — Am. Nat. 150: 100-121.
-
Boehm C. (1999). Hierarchy in the forest: the evolution of egalitarian behaviour. — Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Boehm C. (2004). What makes humans economically distinctive? A three-species evolutionary comparison and historical analysis. — J. Bioeconom. 6: 109-135.
-
Boehm C. (2008). Purposive social selection and the evolution of human altruism. — Cross-Cult. Res. 42: 319-352.
-
Boehm C. (2012a). Ancestral hierarchy and conflict. — Science 336: 844-847.
-
Boehm C. (2012b). Moral origins: the evolution of altruism, virtue, and shame. — Basic Books, New York, NY.
-
Byrne R.W., Byrne J.M. (1988). Leopard killers of Mahale. — Nat. Hist. 97: 22-26.
-
Cosmides L., Tooby J., Fiddick L., Bryant G.A. (2005). Detecting cheaters. — Trends Cogn. Sci. 9: 505-506.
-
Damasio A.R., Tranel D., Damasio H. (1990). Individuals with sociopathic behaviour caused by frontal damage fail to respond automatically to social stimuli. — Behav. Brain Res. 41: 81-94.
-
Darwin C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. — John Murray, London.
-
Dawkins R. (1976). The selfish gene. — Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
-
de Waal F.B.M. (1982). Chimpanzee politics: power and sex among apes. — Harper & Row, New York, NY.
-
de Waal F.B.M. (1990). Peacemaking among primates. — Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
de Waal F.B.M. (2013). The bonobo and the atheist: in search of humanism among the primates. — W.W. Norton, New York, NY.
-
Flack J.C., de Waal F.B.M. (2000). ‘Any animal whatever’: Darwinian building blocks of morality in monkeys and apes. — J. Consci. Stud. 7: 1-29.
-
Fried M.H. (1967). The evolution of political society. — Random House, New York, NY.
-
Goodall J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: patterns of behaviour. — Belknap Press, Cambridge.
-
Gurven M. (2004). To give and to give not: the behavioral ecology of human food transfers. — Behav. Brain Sci. 27: 543-583.
-
Hare R. (1993). Without conscience: the disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. — Guilford Press, New York, NY.
-
Hill K.R., Walker R., Bozicevic M., Eder J., Headland T., Hewlett B., Hurtado A.M., Marlowe F., Wiessner P., Wood B. (2011). Coresidence patterns in hunter–gatherer societies show unique human social structure. — Science 331: 1286-1289.
-
Hohmann G., Fruth B. (2011). Is blood thicker than water? — In: Among African apes: stories and photos from the field ( Robbins M.M., Boesch C., eds). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, p. 61-76.
-
Hrdy S.B. (2009). Mothers and others: the evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. — Belknap Press, Cambridge.
-
Kano T. (1992). The last ape: pygmy chimpanzee behaviour and ecology. — Stanford University Press, Stanford.
-
Kelly R.L. (1995). The foraging spectrum: diversity in hunter–gatherer lifeways. — Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
-
Kiehl K.A. (2008). Without morals: the cognitive neuroscience of criminal psychopaths. — In: Moral psychology, Vol. 1: the evolution of morality: adaptations and innateness ( Sinnott-Armstrong W., ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p. 119-154.
-
Klein R.G. (1999). The human career: human biological and cultural origins. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
-
Knauft B.M. (1991). Violence and sociality in human evolution. — Curr. Anthropol. 32: 391-428.
-
Lee R.B. (1979). The !Kung San: men, women, and work in a foraging society. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
-
McBrearty S., Brooks A. (2000). The revolution that wasn’t: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behaviour. — J. Human Evol. 39: 453-563.
-
Nesse R.M. (2007). Runaway social selection for displays of partner value and altruism. — Biol. Theor. 2: 143-155.
-
Parker S.T. (1998). A social selection model for the evolution and adaptive significance of self-conscious emotions. — In: Self-awareness: its nature and development ( Ferrari M.D., Sternberg R.J., eds). Guildford Press, New York, NY, p. 108-136.
-
Ridley M. (1996). The origins of virtue: human instincts and the evolution of cooperation. — Penguin Books, New York, NY.
-
Simon H.A. (1990). A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. — Science 250: 1665-1668.
-
Stiner M.C. (2002). Carnivory, coevolution, and the geographic spread of the genus Homo. — J. Archaeol. Res. 10: 1-63.
-
Thieme H. (1997). Lower Paleolithic hunting spears from Germany. — Nature 385: 807-810.
-
Trivers R.L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. — Q. Rev. Biol. 46: 35-57.
-
West-Eberhard M.J. (1975). The evolution of social behavior by kin selection. — Q. Rev. Biol. 50: 1-33.
-
West-Eberhard M.J. (1983). Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. — Q. Rev. Biol. 58: 155-183.
-
Wiessner P. (1996). Leveling the hunter: constraints on the status quest in foraging societies. — In: Food and the status quest: an interdisciplinary perspective ( Wiessner P., Schiefenhovel W., eds). Berghahn Books, Oxford, p. 171-191.
-
Wiessner P. (2005). Norm enforcement among the Ju/’hoansi bushmen: a case of strong reciprocity? — Hum. Nat. 16: 115-145.
-
Wilson D.S., Dugatkin L.A. (1997). Group selection and assortative interactions. — Am. Nat. 149: 336-351.
-
Wilson D.S., Wilson E.O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. — Q. Rev. Biol. 82: 327-348.
-
Wrangham R.W. (1987). African apes: the significance of African apes for reconstructing social evolution. — In: The evolution of human behaviour: primate models ( Kinzey W.G., ed.). State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, p. 51-71.
-
Wrangram R.W., Peterson N. (1996). Demonic males: apes and the origins of human violence. — Houghton Mifflin, New York, NY.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 3546 | 538 | 58 |
| Full Text Views | 353 | 17 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 215 | 30 | 0 |
The moral consequences of social selection
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Christopher Boehm in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
For half a century explaining human altruism has been a major research focus for scholars in a wide variety of disciplines, yet answers are still sought. Here, paradigms like reciprocal altruism, mutualism, and group selection are set aside, to examine the effects of social selection as an under-explored model. To complement Alexander’s reputational-selection model, I introduce group punishment as another type of social selection that could have impacted substantially on the development of today’s human nature, and on our potential for behaving altruistically. Capital punishment is a decisive type of social selection, which in our past hunter–gatherer environment was aimed primarily against intimidating, selfish bullies, so it is proposed that moral sanctioning has played a major part in genetically shaping our social and political behaviours. Aggressive suppression of free-riding deviants who bully or deceive has made a cooperatively generous, egalitarian band life efficient for humans, even as it has helped our species to evolve in directions that favour altruism.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 3546 | 538 | 58 |
| Full Text Views | 353 | 17 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 215 | 30 | 0 |