Does religion make people moral?
In: BehaviourI address three common empirical questions about the connection between religion and morality: (1) Do religious beliefs and practices shape moral behavior? (2) Do all religions universally concern themselves with moral behavior? (3) Is religion necessary for morality? I draw on recent empirical research on religious prosociality to reach several conclusions. First, awareness of supernatural monitoring and other mechanisms found in religions encourage prosociality towards strangers, and in that regard, religions have come to influence moral behavior. Second, religion’s connection with morality is culturally variable; this link is weak or absent in small-scale groups, and solidifies as group size and societal complexity increase over time and across societies. Third, moral sentiments that encourage prosociality evolved independently of religion, and secular institutions can serve social monitoring functions; therefore religion is not necessary for morality. Supernatural monitoring and related cultural practices build social solidarity and extend moral concern to strangers as a result of a cultural evolutionary process.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Atran S., Henrich J. (2010). The evolution of religion: how cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. — Biol. Theor. 5: 18-30.
-
Atran S., Norenzayan A. (2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. — Behav. Brain Sci. 27: 713-770.
-
Barrett J.L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? — AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
-
Bateson M., Nettle D., Roberts G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. — Biol. Lett. 2: 412-414.
-
Batson C.D., Schoenrade P., Ventis W.L. (1993). Religion and the individual: a social-psychological perspective. — Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
-
Baumard N., Boyer P. (2013). Explaining moral religions. — Trends Cogn. Sci. 17: 272-280.
-
Bering J. (2011). The belief instinct: the psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. — W.W. Norton, New York, NY.
-
Bloom P. (2012). Religion, morality, evolution. — Ann. Rev. Psychol. 63: 179-199.
-
Blumner R.E. (2011). Goodness without God. — St. Petersburg Times, 8 July 2011.
-
Boyer P. (2001). Religion explained. — Basic Books, New York, NY.
-
Brooks A.C. (2006). Who really cares: the surprising truth about compassionate conservatism. — Basic Books, New York, NY.
-
Bulbulia J., Sosis R. (2011). Signalling theory and the evolutionary study of religions. — Religion 41: 363-388.
-
Cauvin J. (1999). The birth of the gods and the origins of agriculture. Trans. T. Watkins. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
-
Churchland P.S. (2012). Braintrust: what neuroscience tells us about morality. — Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Clark K.J., Winslett J.T. (2011). The evolutionary psychology of Chinese religion: Pre-Qin high gods as punishers and rewarders. — J. Am. Acad. Relig. 79: 928-960.
-
Clarke P., Byrne P. (1993). Religion defined and explained. — Macmillan Press, London.
-
Cohen E., Mundry R. & Kirschner S. (in press). Religion, synchrony, and cooperation. — Relig. Brain Behav.
-
Darwin C. (1859/1860). On the origins of species by means of natural selection. — John Murray, London.
-
Dawkins R. (2006). The God delusion. — Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
-
Dennett D.C. (2006). Breaking the spell. — Viking, New York, NY.
-
de Waal F. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altrusim: the evolution of empathy. — Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59: 279-300.
-
de Waal F. (2013). The bonobo and the atheist: in search of humanism among the primates. — W.W. Norton, New York, NY.
-
Doris J., Harman G., Nichols S., Prinz J., Sinnott-Armstrong W., Stich S. (2012). The moral psychology handbook. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
-
Durkheim E. (1915/1995). The elementary forms of the religious life. — Free Press, New York, NY.
-
Edgell P., Gerteis J., Hartmann D. (2006). Atheists as “other”: moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. — Am. Sociol. Rev. 71: 211-234.
-
Fehr E., Fischbacher U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. — Nature 425: 785-791.
-
Gervais W.M., Norenzayan A. (2012a). Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about God increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding. — J. Exp. Soc. Pychol. 48: 298-302.
-
Gervais W.M., Norenzayan A. (2012b). Reminders of secular authority reduce believers’ distrust of atheists. — Psychol. Sci. 23: 483-491.
-
Gervais W.M., Norenzayan A. (2013). Religion and the origins of anti-atheist prejudice. — In: Intolerance and conflict: a scientific and conceptual investigation ( Clarke S., Powell R., Savulescu J., eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 126-145.
-
Gervais W.M., Shariff A.F., Norenzayan A. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. — J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 101: 1189-1206.
-
Haidt J. (2012). The righteous mind: why good people are divided by politics and religion. — Pantheon Books, New York, NY.
-
Hamlin J.K., Wynn K., Bloom P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. — Nature 450: 557-559.
-
Hamlin J.K., Wynn K., Bloom P., Mahajan N. (2011). How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. — Proc. Natl. Acad, Sci. USA 108: 19931-19936.
-
Henrich J., Ensimger J., McElreath R., Barr A., Barrett C., Bolyanatz A., Cardenas J.C., Gurven M., Gwako E., Henrich N., Lesorogol C., Marlowe F., Tracer D., Ziker J. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. — Science 327: 1480-1484.
-
Henrich N.S., Henrich J. (2007). Why humans cooperate: a cultural and evolutionary explanation. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
-
Herrmann B., Thöni C., Gächter S. (2008). Antisocial punishment across societies. — Science 319: 1362-1367.
-
Johnson D.D. (2005). God’s punishment and public goods. — Human Nature 16: 410-446.
-
Kauffman D.A., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. (2003). Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996–2002. — World Bank Econ. Rev. 18: 253-287.
-
Kelly R.L. (1995). The foraging spectrum: diversity in hunter-gatherer lifeways. — Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
-
Kitcher P. (2011). The ethical project. — Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Laurin K., Shariff A.F., Henrich J., Kay A.C. (2012). Outsourcing punishment to god: beliefs in divine control reduce earthly punishment. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 279: 3272-3281.
-
Locke J. (1983). A letter concerning toleration. — Hackett, Indianapolis, IN.
-
Malhotra D. (2008). (When) Are religious people nicer? Religious salience and the “Sunday Effect” on prosocial behavior. — Judgm. Decis. Making 5: 138-143.
-
Marcus J., Flannery K.V. (2004). The coevolution of ritual and society: new 14C dates from ancient Mexico. — Proc. Natl. Acad, Sci. USA 101: 18257-18261.
-
Marlowe F.W. (2010). The Hadza: hunter–gatherers of Tanzania. — University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
-
McKay R., Efferson C., Whitehouse H., Fehr E. (2011). Wrath of God: religious primes and punishment. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 278: 1858-1863.
-
Norenzayan A. (2013). Big Gods: how religion transformed cooperation and conflict. — Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Norenzayan A., Gervais W.M. (2013). The origins of religious disbelief. — Trends Cogn. Sci. 17: 20-25.
-
Norenzayan A., Shariff A.F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. — Science 322: 58-62.
-
Norenzayan A., Henrich J. & Slingerland E. (in press). Religious prosociality: a synthesis. — In: Cultural evolution ( Richerson P., Christiansen M., eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Norris P., Inglehart R. (2004). Sacred and secular: religion and politics worldwide. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
-
Paper J. (2012). Response to Kelly James Clark & Justin T. Winslett, “The evolutionary psychology of Chinese religion: Pre-Qin high gods as punishers and rewarders”. — J. Am. Acad. Relig. 80: 518-521.
-
Piazza J., Bering J.M., Ingram G. (2011). “Princess Alice is watching you”: children’s belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating. — J. Exp. Child Psychol. 109: 311-320.
-
Powell A., Shennan S., Thomas M.G. (2009). Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. — Science 324: 1298-1301.
-
Purzycki B.G. (2011). Tyvan cher eezi and the sociological constraints of supernatural agents’ minds. — Relig. Brain Behav. 1: 31-45.
-
Randolph-Seng B., Nielsen M.E. (2007). Honesty: one effect of primed religious representations. — Int. J. Psychol. Relig. 17: 303-315.
-
Richerson P.J., Boyd R. (2005). Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
-
Roes F.L., Raymond M. (2003). Belief in moralizing gods. — Evol. Hum. Behav. 24: 126-135.
-
Saslow L.R., Willer R., Feinberg M., Piff P.K., Clark K., Keltner D., Saturn S.R. (2012). My brother’s keeper? Compassion predicts generosity more among less religious individuals. — Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 4: 31-38.
-
Schloss J.P., Murray M.J. (2011). Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: a critical review. — Relig. Brain Behav. 1: 46-99.
-
Schmidt K. (2010). Göbekli Tepe — the Stone Age Sanctuaries. New results of ongoing excavations with a special focus on sculptures and high reliefs. — Doc. Praehistor. XXXVII: 239-256.
-
Seabright P. (2004). In the company of strangers: a natural history of economic life. — Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Shariff A.F., Norenzayan A. (2007). God is watching you: priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. — Psychol. Sci. 18: 803-809.
-
Singer P. (2011). The expanding circle: ethics, evolution and moral progress. — Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Slingerland E., Henrich J. & Norenzayan A. (in press). The evolution of prosocial religions. — In: Cultural evolution ( Richerson P., Christiansen M., eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
-
Soler M. (2012). Costly signaling, ritual and cooperation: evidence from Candomblé, an Afro-Brazilian religion. — Evol. Hum. Behav. 33: 346-356.
-
Sosis R., Alcorta C. (2003). Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: the evolution of religious behavior. — Evol. Anthropol. 12: 264-274.
-
Sosis R., Ruffle B.J. (2003). Religious ritual and cooperation: testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular kibbutzim. — Curr. Anthropol. 44: 713-722.
-
Stark R. (2001). Gods, rituals, and the moral order. — J. Sci. Stud. Relig. 40: 619-636.
-
Stausberg M. (2010). Prospects in theories of religion. — Methods Theor. Stud. Relig. 22: 223-238.
-
Swanson G.E. (1964). The birth of the Gods. — University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
-
Whitehouse H., Hodder I. (2010). Modes of religiosity at Çatalhöyük. — In: Religion in the emergence of civilization ( Hodder I., ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 122-145.
-
Wilson D.S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
-
Wiltermuth S.S., Heath C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. — Psychol. Sci. 20: 1-5.
-
Wright R. (2009). The evolution of God. — Little Brown, New York, NY.
-
Xygalatas D. (2013). Effects of religious setting on cooperative behaviour. A case study from Mauritius. — Relig. Brain Behav. 3: 91-102.
-
Xygalatas D., Mitkidis P., Fischer R., Reddish P., Skewes J., Geertz A.W., Roepstorff A., Bulbulia J. (2013). Extreme rituals promote prosociality. — Psychol. Sci. 24: 1602-1605.
-
Zuckerman P. (2008). Society without God. — New York University Press, New York, NY.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2566 | 682 | 52 |
| Full Text Views | 441 | 113 | 6 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 320 | 204 | 13 |
I address three common empirical questions about the connection between religion and morality: (1) Do religious beliefs and practices shape moral behavior? (2) Do all religions universally concern themselves with moral behavior? (3) Is religion necessary for morality? I draw on recent empirical research on religious prosociality to reach several conclusions. First, awareness of supernatural monitoring and other mechanisms found in religions encourage prosociality towards strangers, and in that regard, religions have come to influence moral behavior. Second, religion’s connection with morality is culturally variable; this link is weak or absent in small-scale groups, and solidifies as group size and societal complexity increase over time and across societies. Third, moral sentiments that encourage prosociality evolved independently of religion, and secular institutions can serve social monitoring functions; therefore religion is not necessary for morality. Supernatural monitoring and related cultural practices build social solidarity and extend moral concern to strangers as a result of a cultural evolutionary process.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2566 | 682 | 52 |
| Full Text Views | 441 | 113 | 6 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 320 | 204 | 13 |