Puma communication behaviours: understanding functional use and variation among sex and age classes

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Intraspecific communication for mate selection sometimes varies between sexes based on different evolutionary life history patterns. Solitary felids use communication for territorial defence and location of mates, for which they use scent-marking behaviours including scraping, urine spraying, body rubbing, caterwauling, cheek rubbing, and the flehmen response, but these behaviours are not well understood in pumas (Puma concolor). We used motion-triggered video cameras to document the use of communication behaviours by male and female pumas, and used a series of experimental treatments to determine the mechanisms and importance of visual and olfactory cues in puma scrapes. We found that pumas use the physical scrape to locate communications, and then use urine to convey and interpret the communication itself. We also found significant differences among puma age and sex classes in the proportion of use and duration of time behaviours were displayed. Mature males spent significantly longer durations (x¯=22.1 s) on producing behaviours (scraping, body rubbing, and caterwauling behaviours) than mature females (x¯=3.3 s), and males used scraping (78.5%) and body rubbing (12.4%) behaviours at a higher proportion of visits than females (13.6 and 2.7%, respectively). Mature females spent significantly longer durations (x¯=30.4 s) on consuming behaviours (investigating and flehmen response behaviours) than mature males (x¯=13.7 s), and females used flehmen response (30.6%) and caterwauling (9.3%) behaviours at a higher proportion of visits than mature males (6.5% flehmen and 0.4% caterwauling). Male reproductive strategy appears based on advertisement for possible mates, while female reproductive strategy appears based on assessment of possible mates. The use of communication behaviours also appears to develop with age, as immature pumas rarely visited and acted as non-participants in communication behaviours.

Puma communication behaviours: understanding functional use and variation among sex and age classes

in Behaviour

Sections

References

AshmanD.ChristensenG.C.HessM.L.TsukamotoG.K.WickershamM.S. (1983). The mountain lion in Nevada final report for project W-48-15. — Nevada Game and Fish Department Reno NV.

BaileyT.N. (1993). The African leopard: ecology and behavior of a solitary felid. — Blackburn PressCaldwell, NJ.

BreedM.D.MooreJ. (2011). Animal behavior. — Academic PressSan Diego, CA.

ChoateD.M.WolfeM.L.StonerD.C. (2006). Evaluation of cougar population estimators in Utah. — Wild. Soc. Bull. 34: 782-799.

CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. — Psych. Bull. 112: 155-159.

Cougar Management Working Group (2005). Cougar management guidelines. — Wild FuturesBainbridge Island, WA.

CurrierM.J.P. (1983). Felis concolor. — Mamm. Spec. 200: 1-7.

DaviesN.B.KrebsJ.R.WestS.A. (2012). An introduction to behavioural ecology. — Wiley-BlackwellNew York, NY.

de BoerJ.N. (1977). The age of olfactory cues functioning in chemocommunication among male domestic cats. — Behav. Proc. 2: 209-225.

ElbrochL.M. (2003). Mammal tracks and sign: a guide to North American species. — Stackpole BooksMechanicsburg, PA.

GundersonH.L. (1976). Mammalogy. — McGraw-HillNew York, NY.

HarmsenB.J.FosterR.J.GutierrezS.M.MarinS.Y.DoncasterC.P. (2010). Scrape-marking behavior of jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor). — J. Mamm. 91: 1225-1234.

HurstJ.L.BenyonR.J. (2004). Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice. — BioEssays 26: 1288-1298.

KellyM.J.NossA.J.DiBitettiM.S.MaffeiL.ArispeR.L.PavioloA.DeAngeloC.D.DiBlancoY.E. (2008). Estimating puma densities from camera trapping across three study sites: Bolivia, Argentina, and Belize. — J. Mamm. 89: 408-418.

LaundréJ.W.HernandezL.StreubelD.AltendorfK.GonzalezC.L. (2000). Aging mountain lions using gum-line recession. — Wild. Soc. Bull. 28: 963-966.

LoganK.SweanorL. (2001). Desert puma: evolutionary ecology and conservation of an enduring carnivore. — Island PressCovelo, CA.

LoganK.SweanorL. (2010). Behavior and social organization of a solitary carnivore. — In: Cougar: ecology and conservation ( HornockerM.NegriS. eds). University of Chicago PressChicago, IL p.  105-117.

LongE.S.FeckskeD.M.SweitzerR.A.JenksJ.A.PierceB.M.BleichV.C. (2003). Efficacy of photographic scent stations to detect mountain lions. — West. Nor. Am. Nat. 63: 529-532.

MayerK.E.LaundenslayerW.F. (eds) (1988). A guide to wildlife habitats in California. — State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Forestry and Fire ProtectionSacramento, CA.

McBrideR.McBrideC. (2010). Florida panther flehmen response recorded at baited trail camera site. — Southeast. Nat. 9: 629-631.

McBrideR.SensorR. (2012). Photographic evidence of wild Florida panthers scent-marking with facial glands. — Southeast. Nat. 11: 349-354.

MellenJ.D. (1993). A comparative analysis of scent-marking, social and reproductive behavior in, 20 species of small cats. — Am. Zool. 33: 151-166.

MeyerD.ZeileisA.HornikK. (2013). vcd: Visualizing Categorical Data. — R package version 1.3-1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna.

PinheiroJ.BatesD.DebRoyS.SarkarD. & R Core Team (2013). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-107.

R Core Team (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna.

RuthT.K.MurphyK. (2010). Competition with other carnivores for prey. — In: Cougar: ecology and conservation ( HornockerM.NegriS. eds). University of Chicago PressChicago, IL p.  163-172.

SeidenstickerJ.C.IVHornockerM.G.WilesW.V.MessickJ.P. (1973). Mountain lion social organization in the Idaho primitive area. — Wild Monogr. 35: 3-60.

SmithJ.L.D.McDougalC.MiquelleD. (1989). Scent marking in free-ranging tigers, Panthera tigris. — Anim. Behav. 37: 1-10.

SokalR.S.RohlfF.J. (1987). Introduction to biostatistics. — W.H. Freeman and CompanyNew York, NY.

SunquistM.SunquistF. (2002). Wild cats of the world. — University of Chicago PressChicago, IL.

ThonhauserK.E.RavehS.HettyeyA.BeissmannH.PennD.J. (2013). Scent marking increases male reproductive success in wild house mice. — Anim. Behav. 86: 1013-1021.

VerberneG.LeyhausenP. (1976). Marking behaviour of some viverridae and felidae: time-interval analysis of the marking pattern. — Behaviour 58: 192-253.

WalkerS.NovaroA. (2010). The world’s southernmost pumas in Patagonia and the southern Andes. — In: Cougar: ecology and conservation ( HornockerM.NegriS. eds). University of Chicago PressChicago, IL p.  91-99.

WilmersC.C.WangY.NickelB.HoughtalingP.ShakeriY.AllenM.L.Kermish-WellsJ.YovovichV.WilliamsT. (2013). Scale dependent behavioral responses to human development by a large predator, the puma. — PLoS One 8: e60590.

YuleG.U. (1912). On the methods of measuring the association between two attributes. — J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 75: 579-652.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    A map of the study area, which included areas in Santa Cruz, San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties in California. The study area is outlined by the thick black line, within the greater context of major highways and the cities of Santa Cruz and San Jose, and the location of each camera is noted.

  • View in gallery

    Proportion of visits where scraping and communication behaviours occurred for puma class. Behaviours include scraping, olfactory investigation, body rubbing, caterwauling and flehmen responses.

  • View in gallery

    Mean duration in seconds of producing and consuming behaviours during visits to community scrapes by each class of pumas. The error bars represent the standard error. Producing behaviours include scraping, body rubbing and caterwauling, while consuming behaviours include investigating and flehmen responses.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 21 21 13
Full Text Views 7 7 6
PDF Downloads 3 3 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0