Competition and cuckoldry: estimating fitness of alternative reproductive tactics in plainfin midshipman

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

There has been much debate about how male alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs) evolve. In particular, researchers question whether ARTs have evolved as a conditional, ‘best of a bad job’ strategy where one tactic has higher fitness than the other, or whether they have evolved as a result of a genetic polymorphism where both tactics have equal fitness. Despite the large number of species known to have ARTs, tests of equal fitness between tactics have only been conducted in a handful of species. We tested the prediction of equal fitness using the plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus), a species with two well characterized male ARTs: guarding type I males and cuckolding type II males. We collected data across three years and three sampling locations to determine the proportion of each reproductive tactic, as well as the proportion of offspring sired by each male type using microsatellite markers. Our analysis suggests that males adopting the conventional guarding tactic likely have higher fitness compared to males adopting the cuckolder type II tactic. Also, we show that the guarding male tactic is able to gain paternity through cuckoldry, and that these males, who sometimes guard and sometimes cuckold, are responsible for the majority of paternity lost within nests. Indeed, the classic cuckolding type II males were responsible for only a small fraction of the paternity lost. These results highlight the degree of flexibility in male behaviour even among individuals adopting the same male tactic. Taken together, our results provide the first exploration of the evolution of male ARTs in plainfin midshipman and, given the tractability of midshipman system, a valuable next step will be to look for gene-by-environment interactions on tactic development and expression.

Sections

References

AroraH.L. (1948). Observations on the habits and early life history of the Batrachoid fish, Porichthys notatus Girard. — Copeia: 89-93.

BassA.H. (1990). Sounds from the intertidal zone: vocalizing fish. — BioScience 40: 247-258.

BassA.H. (1992). Dimorphic male brains and alternative reproductive tactics in a vocalizing fish. — Trends Neurosci. 15: 139-145.

BassA.H. (1993). From brains to behaviour: hormonal cascades and alternative mating tactics in teleost fishes. — Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 3: 181-186.

BassA.H. (1996). Shaping brain sexuality. — Am. Sci. 84: 352-363.

BassA.H.AndersonK. (1991). Intra- and inter-sexual dimorphisms in the sound generating motor system in a vocalizing fish: motor axon number and size. — Brain Behav. Evol. 37: 204-214.

BassA.H.HorvathB.J.BrothersE.B. (1996). Nonsequential developmental trajectories lead to dimorphic vocal circuitry for males with alternative reproductive tactics. — J. Neurobiol. 30: 493-504.

BassA.H.MarchaterreM.A. (1989). Sound-generating (sonic) motor system in a teleost fish (Porichthys notatus): sexual polymorphisms and general synaptology of sonic motor nucleus. — J. Comp. Neurol. 86: 154-169.

BrantleyR.K.BassA.H. (1994). Alternative male spawning tactics and acoustic signals in the plainfin midshipman fish Porichthy notatus Girard (Teleostei, Batrachoididae). — Ethology 96: 213-232.

BrantleyR.K.MarchaterreM.A.BassA.H. (1993). Androgen effects on vocal muscle structure in a teleost fish with inter- and intra-sexual dimorphism. — J. Morph. 216: 305-318.

CogliatiK.M.NeffB.D.BalshineS. (2013). High degree of paternity loss in a species with alternative reproductive tactics. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67: 399-408.

DawkinsR. (1980). Good strategy or evolutionarily stable strategy? — In: Sociobiology: beyond nature/nurture? ( SilverbergJ., ed.). Westview Press, CO, p.  331-367.

DeMartiniE.E. (1988). Spawning success of the male plainfin midshipman. I. Influences of male body size and area of spawning site. — J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 121: 177-192.

DeMartiniE.E. (1990). Annual variations in fecundity, egg size and condition of the plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus). — Copeia: 850-855.

EberhardW.G. (1994). Beetle horn dimorphism: making the best of a bad lot. — Am. Nat. 119: 420-426.

EmlenD.J. (1994). Environmental control of horn length dimorphism in the beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 256: 131-136.

EmlenD.J. (2008). The roles of genes and the environment in the expression and evolution of alternative tactics. — In: Alternative reproductive tactics ( OliveiraR.F.TaborskyM.BrockmanH.J., eds). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, p.  85-108.

ForanC.M. (1998). Phenotypic plasticity in the neuroendocrine axis of a teleost fish with alternative reproductive tactics (Porichthys notatus). — PhD Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

GrossM.R. (1982). Sneakers, satellites and parentals: polymorphic mating strategies in North American sunfishes. — Z. Tierpsychol. 60: 1-26.

GrossM.R. (1996). Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 92-98.

GrossM.R.CharnovE.L. (1980). Alternative male life histories in bluegill sunfish. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77: 6937-6940.

HubbsC.L. (1920). The bionomics of Porichthy notatus Girard. — Am. Nat. 54: 380-384.

IbaraR.M.PennyL.T.EbelingA.W.van DykhuizenG.CailletG. (1983). The mating call of the plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus. — In: Predators and prey in fishes ( WardJ.A., ed.). Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, p.  205-212.

JonesO.R.WangJ. (2010). Colony: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. — Mol. Ecol. Resources 10: 551-555.

LankD.B.SmithC.M.HanotteO.BurkeT.CookeF. (1995). Genetic polymorphism for alternative mating behavior in lekking male ruff Philomachus pugnax. — Nature 378: 59-62.

LeeJ.S.F.BassA.H. (2004). Does exaggerated morphology preclude plasticity to cuckoldry in the midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus). — Naturwissenschaften 91: 338-341.

MagurranA.E.SeghersB.H. (1991). Variation in schooling and aggression behaviour amongst guppy (Poecilia reticulata) populations in Trinidad. — Behaviour 118: 215-234.

MagurranA.E.SeghersB.H. (1994). Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology: evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 255: 31-36.

Maynard SmithJ. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

MillerD.J.LeaR.N. (1972). In: Fish Bulletin 157: guide to the coastal marine fishes of California. — Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, p. 72-73.

NeffB.D. (2001). Genetic paternity analysis and breeding success in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). — J. Hered. 92: 111-119.

NeffB.D.ClareE.L. (2008). Temporal variation in cuckoldry and paternity in two sunfish species (Lepomis spp.) with alternative reproductive tactics. — Can. J. Zool. 86: 92-99.

NeffB.D.ListerJ.S. (2007). Genetic life history effects on juvenile survival in bluegill. — J. Evol. Biol. 20: 517-525.

NeffB.D.SvenssonE.I. (2013). Polyandry and alternative mating tactics. — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 368: 20120045.

NeffB.D.RepkaJ.GrossM.R. (2000a). Parentage analysis with incomplete sampling of candidate parents and offspring. — Mol. Ecol. 9: 515-528.

NeffB.D.RepkaJ.GrossM.R. (2000b). Statistical confidence in parentage analyses with incomplete sampling: how many loci and offspring are needed?Mol. Ecol. 9: 529-539.

OliveiraR.F.TaborskyM.BrockmannH.J. (eds) (2008). Alternative reproductive tactics: an integrative approach. — Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

PicheJ.HutchingsJ.A.BlanchardW. (2008). Genetic variation in threshold reaction norms for alternative reproductive tactics in male Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 275: 1571-1575.

Rios-CardenasO.WebsterM.S. (2008). A molecular genetic examination of the mating system of pumpkinseed sunfish reveals high pay-offs for specialized sneakers. — Mol. Ecol. 17: 2310-2320.

RoffD.A. (2011). Alternative strategies: the evolution of switch points. — Curr. Biol. 21: R285-R287.

RyanM.J.PeaseC.M.MorrisM.R. (1992). A genetic polymorphism in the swordtail Xiphophorus nigrensis: testing the prediction of equal fitnesses. — Am. Nat. 139: 21-31.

ShusterS.M. (1989). Male alternative reproductive strategies in a marine isopod crustacean (Paracerceis sculpta): the use of genetic markers to measure differences in fertilization success among α-, β-, and γ-males. — Evolution 43: 1683-1698.

ShusterS.M.WadeM.J. (1991). Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. — Nature 350: 608-610.

SinervoB.LivelyC.M. (1996). The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. — Nature 380: 240-243.

SukH.Y.NeffB.D.FitzpatrickJ.L.BalshineS. (2009). Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the plain midshipman fish. — Hereditas 146: 001-004.

TaborskyM.OliveiraR.F.BrockmanH.J. (2008). The evolution of alternative reproductive tactics: concepts and questions. — In: Alternative reproductive tactics ( OliveiraR.F.TaborskyM.BrockmanH.J., eds). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, p.  1-21.

ThornhillR. (1981). Panorpa (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) scorpionflies: systems for understanding resource-defense polygyny and alternative male reproductive efforts. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 355-386.

TomkinsJ.L.MoczekA.P. (2009). Patterns of threshold evolution in polyphonic insects under different developmental models. — Evolution 63: 459-468.

WangJ. (2004). Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. — Genetics 166: 1963-1979.

Figures

  • Estimates of the relative fitness of alternative reproductive tactics in plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus). Shown are the mean relative fitness (±1SD, dot and vertical line) for type I males given high (all unknown sires as type I), proportional (85% of unknown sires as type I), and low (all unknown sires as type II) scenarios (see text for details). The violin plots show the frequency histograms of the distribution of data from the Monte Carlo analyses. The width of the violin plots are an outcome of re-sampling the data and applying equation (1). Data are bounded between zero and one when type I males have lower fitness, while there is no upper bound in the equation when type I males have higher fitness. The solid horizontal line depicts equal fitness (=1) between type I and type II males. The y-axis is a log scale to better depict the ratio data.

    View in gallery

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 5 5 2
Full Text Views 1 1 1
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0