Acoustic cues to individual identity in the rattle calls of common blackbirds: a potential for individual recognition through multi-syllabic vocalisations emitted in both territorial and alarm contexts

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Vocal signals convey many types of information, and individually recognizable cues can benefit signallers and receivers, as shown in birdsongs that are used in the contexts of mating and territoriality. Bird calls are typically less complex than songs and thus are likely to convey less information. However, the rattle calls of some species serve a dual function, being emitted as an anti-predator and deterrence signal, and thus may encode information on individual identity. We investigated these questions in the common blackbird (Turdus merula), which emits complex rattle calls in both territorial and alarm contexts. The vocalisations of free-living males were elicited and recorded by playing back songs of unknown males in birds’ territories (territorial context) and also while approaching individuals (predator context). These song-like highly-structured multi-syllabic calls typically had three types of elements. Acoustic and statistical analyses revealed, through elevated repeatability indexes, that most of the acoustic measurements used to describe the complexity of the calls (structural, temporal and frequency parameters) were highly variable, due to inter-individual differences. The size of the call and the characteristics of the starting element only were able to discriminate a high portion of the individual calls. Beyond the very well studied songs of oscines, calls therefore deserve more attention as they also carry a potential for conveying information on individual identity.

Acoustic cues to individual identity in the rattle calls of common blackbirds: a potential for individual recognition through multi-syllabic vocalisations emitted in both territorial and alarm contexts

in Behaviour



AdamsD.M.BalsbyT.J.S.BradburyJ.W. (2009). The function of double chees in orange-fronted conures (Aratinga canicularis; Psittacidae). — Behaviour 146: 171-188.

AndrewR.J. (1961). The motivational organisation controlling the mobbing calls of the blackbird (Turdus merula). I. Effects of flight on mobbing calls. — Behaviour 17: 224-246.

BeeM.A.GerhardtH.C. (2001). Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis. — Anim. Behav. 62: 1129-1140.

BeeM.A.KozichC.E.BlackwellK.J.GerhardtH.C. (2001). Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans: implications for individual discrimination. — Ethology 107: 65-84.

BeletskyL.D. (1989). Alert calls of male red-winged blackbirds: do female listen?Behaviour 111: 1-12.

BellA.M.HankisonS.J.LaskowskiK.L. (2009). The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. — Anim. Behav. 77: 771-783.

BlumenrathS.H.DabelsteenT.PedersenS.B. (2007). Vocal neighbor-mate discrimination in female great tits despite high song similarity. — Anim. Behav. 73: 789-796.

BlumsteinD.T.DanielJ.C. (2004). Yellow-bellied marmots discriminate between the alarm calls of individuals and are more responsive to calls from juveniles. — Anim. Behav. 68: 1257-1265.

BlumsteinD.T.VerneyreL.DanielJ.C. (2004). Reliability and the adaptive utility of discrimination among alarm callers. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 271: 1851-1857.

BradburyJ.W.VehrencampS.L. (1998). Principles of animal communication. — Sinauer AssociatesSunderland, MA.

BrooksR.J.FallsJ.B. (1975). Individual recognition by song in white-throated sparrows. I. Discrimination of songs of neighbors and strangers. — Can. J. Zool. 53: 879-888.

CharrierI.JouventinP.MathevonN.AubinT. (2001). Potentiality of individual identity coding depends on call type in the South Polar Skua. — Pol. Biol. 24: 378-382.

CheneyD.L.SeyfarthR.M. (1988). Assessment of meaning and the detection of unreliable signals by vervet monkeys. — Anim. Behav. 36: 477-486.

CouchouxC.CresswellW. (2012). Personality constraints versus flexible antipredation behaviors: how important is boldness in risk management of redshanks (Tringa totanus) foraging in a natural system?Behav. Ecol. 23: 290-301.

DabelsteenT. (1982). Variation in the response of free-living blackbirds Turdus merula to playback of song: I. Effect of continuous stimulation and predictability of the response. — Z. Tierpsychol. 58: 311-328.

DabelsteenT. (1984). An analysis of the full song of the blackbird (Turdus merula) with respect to message coding and adaptations for acoustic communication. — Ornis Scand. 15: 227-239.

DabelsteenT.PedersenS.B. (1985). Correspondence between messages in the full song of the blackbird Turdus merula and meanings to territorial males, as inferred from responses to computerized modifications of natural song. — Z. Tierpsychol. 69: 149-165.

DabelsteenT.PedersenS.B. (1990). Song and information about aggressive responses of blackbirds, Turdus merula: evidence from interactive playback experiments with territory owners. — Anim. Behav. 40: 1158-1168.

DigweedS.M.RendallD. (2009). Predator-Associated vocalizations in North American red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus): to whom are alarm calls addressed and how do they function?Ethology 115: 1190-1199.

DigweedS.M.RendallD.ImbeauT. (2012). Who’s your neighbor? Acoustic cues to individual identity in red squirrel Tamiasciurus hudsonicus rattle calls. — Curr. Zool. 58: 758-764.

EllisJ.M.S. (2008). Decay of apparent individual distinctiveness in the begging calls of adult female white-throated magpie jays. — Condor 110: 648-657.

FallsJ.B. (1982). Individual recognition by sounds in birds. — In: Acoustic communication in birdsVol. 2. Song learning and its consequences ( KroodsmaD.E.MillerE.H. eds). Academic PressNew York, NY p.  237-278.

FarquharC.C. (1993). Individual and intersexual variation in alarm calls of the white-tailed hawk. — Condor 95: 234-239.

FickenM.S.FickenR.W.WitkinS.R. (1978). Vocal repertoire of the black-capped chickadee. — Auk 95: 34-48.

FischerJ.HammerschmidtK.CheneyD.L.SeyfarthR.M. (2001). Acoustic features of female chacma baboon barks. — Ethology 107: 33-54.

FisherJ.B. (1954). Evolution and bird sociality. — In: Evolution as process ( HuxleyJ.HardyA.C.FordE.B. eds). Allen & UnwinLondon p.  71-83.

FitchW.T.HauserM.D. (2003). Unpacking “honesty”: vertebrate vocal production and the evolution of acoustic signals. — In: Acoustic communication ( SimmonsA.M.FayR.PopperA.N. eds). SpringerNew York, NY p.  65-137.

FrommoltK.H.GoltsmanM.E.MacdonaldD.W. (2003). Barking foxes, Alopex lagopus: field experiments in individual recognition in a territorial mammal. — Anim. Behav. 65: 509-518.

HareJ.F. (1998). Juvenile Richardson’s ground squirrels, Spermophilus richardsonii, discriminate among individual alarm callers. — Anim. Behav. 55: 451-460.

HareJ.F.AtkinsB.A. (2001). The squirrel that cried wolf: reliability detection by juvenile Richardson’s ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51: 108-112.

HeslerN.MundryR.DabelsteenT. (2011). Does song repertoire size in common blackbirds play a role in an intra-sexual context?J. Ornithol. 152: 591-601.

HussonF.JosseJ.S.MazetJ. (2010). FactoMineR: multivariate exploratory data analysis and data mining with R R package version 1.14. — R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna available online at

HymanJ. (2005). Seasonal variation in response to neighbors and strangers by a territorial songbird. — Ethology 111: 951-961.

JouventinP.AubinT.LengagneT. (1999). Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition. — Anim. Behav. 57: 1175-1183.

KennedyR.A.W.EvansC.S.McDonaldP.G. (2009). Individual distinctiveness in the mobbing call of a cooperative bird, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala. — J. Avian Biol. 40: 481-490.

KleckaW.R. (1980). Discriminant analysis: quantitative applications in the social sciences. — Sage PublicationsLondon.

KondoN.WatanabeS. (2009). Contact calls: information and social function. — Jpn. Psychol. Res. 51: 197-208.

KroodsmaD.E. (1977). A re-evaluation of song development in the song sparrow. — Anim. Behav. 25: 390-399.

KroodsmaD.E.MillerE.H. (1982a). Acoustic communication in birdsVol. 1. — Academic PressNew York, NY.

KroodsmaD.E.MillerE.H. (1982b). Acoustic communication in birdsVol. 2. — Academic PressNew York, NY.

LachenbruchP.A. (1967). An almost unbiased method of obtaining confidence intervals for the probability of misclassification in discriminant analysis. — Biometrics 23: 639-645.

LessellsC.M.BoagP.T. (1987). Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. — Auk 104: 116-121.

MacedoniaJ.M. (1986). Individuality in a contact call of the ringtailed lemur (Lemur catta). — Am. J. Primatol. 11: 163-179.

MammenD.L.NowickiS. (1981). Individual differences and within-flock convergence in chickadee calls. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9: 179-186.

MarlerP. (1955). Characteristics of some animal calls. — Nature 176: 6-8.

MarlerP. (2004a). Bird calls: a cornucopia for communication. — In: Nature’s music: the science of birdsong ( MarlerP.SlabbekoornH. eds). Elsevier/Academic PressAmsterdam p.  132-177.

MarlerP. (2004b). Bird calls: their potential for behavioural neurobiology. — Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1016: 31-44.

MatrosovaV.A.VolodinI.A.VolodinaE.V. (2008). Does kinship affect the alarm call structure in the yellow ground squirrel Spermophilus fulvus. — Lynx (Praha) ns 39: 295-303.

NakagawaS.SchielzethH. (2010). Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. — Biol. Rev. 85: 935-956.

NelsonD.A.MarlerP. (1990). The perception of birdsong and an ecological concept of signal space. — In: Comparative perceptionVol. 2. Complex signals ( StebbinsW.C.BerkleyM.A. eds). WileyNew York, NY p.  443-478.

PinheiroJ.BatesD. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. — SpringerNew York, NY.

PinheiroJ.BatesD.DebRoyS.SarkarD. & R Development Core Team (2010). Nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models R package version 3.1-97. — R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna.

PollardK.A. (2010). Making the most of alarm signals: the adaptive value of individual discrimination in an alarm context. — Behav. Ecol. 22: 93-100.

PriceT.ArnoldK.ZuberbühlerK.SempleS. (2009). Pyow but not hack calls of the male putty-nosed monkey (Cercopithcus nictitans) convey information about caller identity. — Behaviour 146: 871-888.

PriceT.NdiayeO.HammerschmidtK.FischerJ. (2014). Limited geographic variation in the acoustic structure of and responses to adult male alarm barks of African green monkeys. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68: 815-825.

R Development Core Team (2010). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna available online at

RasmussenR.DabelsteenT. (2002). Song repertoires and repertoire sharing in a local group of blackbirds. — Bioacoustics 13: 63-76.

RéaleD.ReaderS.M.SolD.McDougallP.T.DingemanseN.J. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. — Biol. Rev. 82: 291-318.

SchneiderováI.PolichtR. (2011). S. taurensis encode information about caller identity. — Bioacoustics 20: 29-43.

SharpS.P.HatchwellB.J. (2005). Individuality in the contact calls of cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits (Aegithalos caudatus). — Behaviour 142: 1559-1575.

SlagsvoldT. (1984). The mobbing behaviour of the hooded crow Corvus corone cornix: anti-predator defence or self-advertisement?Fauna Norv. C Cinc. 7: 127-131.

SnowD.W. (1958). A study of blackbirds. — Allen & UnwinLondon.

StoddardP.K. (1996). Vocal recognition of neighbors by territorial passerines. — In: Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds ( KroodsmaD.E.MillerE.H. eds). Cornell University PressIthaca, NY p.  356-374.

StoddardP.K.BeecherM.D.HorningC.L.WillisM.S. (1990). Strong neighbor-stranger discrimination in song sparrows. — Condor 92: 1051-1056.

TemelesE.J. (1994). The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they ‘dear enemies’?Anim. Behav. 47: 339-350.

VenablesW.N.RipleyB.D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S4th edn.SpringerNew York, NY.

WankerR.FischerJ. (2001). Intra- and interindividual variation in the contact calls of spectacled parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus). — Behaviour 138: 709-726.

WilsonD.R.EvansC.S. (2010). Female fowl (Gallus gallus) do not prefer alarm-calling males. — Behaviour 147: 525-552.

WilsonD.R.MennillD.J. (2010). Black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus, can use individually distinctive songs to discriminate among conspecifics. — Anim. Behav. 79: 1267-1275.

WilsonD.R.BaylyK.L.NelsonX.J.GillingsM.EvansC.S. (2008). Alarm calling best predicts mating and reproductive success in ornamented male fowl, Gallus gallus. — Anim. Behav. 76: 543-554.

YorzinskiJ.L.VehrencampS.McGowanK.ClarkA. (2006). The inflected alarm caw of the American crow: differences in acoustic structure among individuals and sexes. — Condor 108: 518-529.

YorzinskiJ.L. (2014). Peafowl antipredator calls encode information about signalers. — J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135: 942-952.


  • View in gallery

    Examples of the different types of the rattle call’s global structure (A, B and C) and illustration of some acoustic measurements. C indicates the chook element, S indicates the starting element, I indicates the internal element and E indicates the ending element. Numbers following these letters indicate the number of each of these elements found in the exemplar call. The acoustic parameters that reflect the global structure of the calls are illustrated on the first spectrogram (A). On the second spectrogram (B), some of the frequency parameters that we measured on each element are presented. The temporal parameters, which were measured on each of the elements, are illustrated on the third spectrogram (C).

  • View in gallery

    Sound spectrograms of the rattle calls from five male common blackbirds (B5, B17, B23, B27 and B37). Above each spectrogram is the ID number of the caller, with the number of the call recorded. In this example the two vocalisations presented for B17 were composed of two rattles, illustrating how we counted the number of rattle calls in a bout. These examples illustrate large inter-individual variation, compared to a low intra-individual variation, allowing a high potential for individuality coding. Beyond the differences in the global structure of these calls the shape of the same types of elements differ between individuals: B17, B23 and B27 all have a global structure SRI (see Figure 1) but the starting and the internal elements of B27’s calls differ from those of the two other individuals. B5’s calls show a SRIE structure, whereas the calls of B37 have an SAIE structure (Figure 1). A third call from B37 is shown in Figure 1C for further comparison of the low intra-individual variation.

  • View in gallery

    Boxplot illustrating high variation in the size of the rattle call (represented by the variable ‘PC1 structure’, which includes the duration and the number of elements in the rattle) of the different individuals.

  • View in gallery

    Scatterplot illustrating the first two discriminant functions of the rattle calls of eleven male common blackbirds. The calls that were assigned to the same individual are represented with the same symbol (see legend for ID). Calls that were not assigned to the individual they belong to are identified with the ID of the real caller next to the symbol.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 21 21 19
Full Text Views 8 8 8
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0