Arch displays signal threat intentions in a fission–fusion flock of the red-crowned crane
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Kohei F. Takeda in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Mariko Hiraiwa-Hasegawa in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Nobuyuki Kutsukake in
Current site
Google Scholar
Ritualised displays are used by group-living animals in various contexts, such as when individuals join a group or flock. Only a few quantitative studies of the function of displays in species with fission–fusion social dynamics have been conducted to date. Here, we examined the arch display in red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis) immediately after joining a flock. Behavioural observations indicated that the arch functions as a signal of both threat motivation and individual strength. Singletons had disadvantages in terms of competition over resources and were, therefore, expected to have higher threat motivation than pairs or families. Indeed, singletons performed the arch more frequently than did pairs or families. Performance of the arch was related to dominance: males and adults were more likely to perform the arch than females and sub-adults. The likelihood of performing the arch was positively associated with local group density, indicating that joiners arched in more competitive situations. Contextual analyses indicated that subsequent behaviour by a joiner was more aggressive and that nearby individuals more frequently showed behavioural responses when a joiner arched than when it did not. Together, this study shows that cranes demonstrate functional displays to potential competitors, and represents a rare example of the functional analysis of ritualised signals in non-songbird species with fission–fusion social dynamics.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Aureli F., Schaffner C. (2007). Aggression and conflict management at fusion in spider monkeys. — Biol. Lett. 3: 147-149.
-
Aureli F., Shaffner C.M., Boesch C., Bearder S.K., Call J., Chapman C.A., Connor R., Di Fiore A., Dunbar R.I.M., Henzi S.P., Holekamp K., Korstjens A.H., Layton R., Lee P., Lehmann J., Manson J.H., Ramos-Fernandez G., Strier K.B., van Schaik C.P. (2008). Fission–fusion dynamics: new research frameworks. — Curr. Anthropol. 49: 627-654.
-
Bautista L.M., Alonso J.C., Alonso J.A. (1995). A field test of ideal free distribution in flock-feeding common cranes. — J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 747-757.
-
BirdLife International (2013). Grus japonensis. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2014.2. Available online at http://www.iucnredlist.org (downloaded on 7 October 2014).
-
Bradbury J.W., Vehrencamp S.L. (2011). Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn. — Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
-
Cortes-Avizanda A., Almaraz P., Carrete M., Sanchez-Zapata J.A., Delgado A., Hiraldo F., Donazar J.A. (2011). Spatial heterogeneity in resource distribution promotes facultative sociality in two trans-Saharan migratory birds. — PLoS One 6: e21016.
-
Ellis D.E., Swengel S.R., Archibald G.W., Kepler C.B. (1998). A sociogram for the cranes of the world. — Behav. Process. 43: 125-151.
-
Hurd P.L., Enquist M. (2001). Threat display in birds. — Can. J. Zool. 79: 931-942.
-
Huxley J. (1914). The courtship-habits of the great crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus); with an addition to the theory of sexual selection. — Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 35: 491-562.
-
Inoue M., Shimura R., Uebayashi A., Ikoma S., Iima H., Sumiyoshi T., Teraoka H., Makita K., Hiraga T., Momose K., Masatomi H. (2012). Physical body parameters of red-crowned cranes Grus japonensis by sex and life stage in eastern Hokkaido, Japan. — J. Vet. Med. Sci. Jpn. Soc. Vet. Sci. 75: 1055-1060.
-
Johnsgard P.A. (1983). Cranes of the world. — University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
-
Klenova A.N., Volodin I.N., Volodina E.V. (2008). Duet structure provides information about pair identity in the red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis). — J. Ethol. 26: 317-325.
-
Kraaijeveld K., Mulder R. (2001). The function of triumph ceremonies in the black swans. — Behaviour 139: 45-54.
-
Masatomi H. (1988). Arching behaviour of the tancho Grus japonensis landed on the feeding stations in 1998. — J. Senshu Univ. Hokkaido (Nat. Sci.) 21: 145-153. (In Japanese with an English abstract).
-
Masatomi H., Kitagawa T. (1974). Bionomics and sociology of tancho or the Japanese crane, Grus japonensis, I.: distribution, habitat and outline of annual cycle. — J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. Ser. VI. Zool. 19: 777-802.
-
Masatomi H., Kitagawa T. (1975). Bionomics and sociology of tancho or the Japanese crane, Grus japonensis, II. ethogram. — J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. Ser. VI. Zool. 19: 834-878.
-
Masatomi H., Masatomi Y. (2009). Promoting the coexistence of humans and tancho in Japan. — Jpn. J. Conserv. Ecol. 14: 223-242. (In Japanese with an English abstract).
-
Masatomi Y., Higashi S., Masatomi H. (2007). A simple population viability analysis of tancho (Grus japonensis) in southeastern Hokkaido, Japan. — Pop. Ecol. 49: 297-304.
-
Maynard Smith J., Harper D. (2003). Animal signals. — Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
-
Miura Y., Shiomi A., Shiraishi J., Makita K., Asakawa M., Kitazawa T., Hiraga T., Momose Y., Momose K., Masatomi H., Teraoka H. (2013). Large-scale survey of mitochondrial D-loop of the red-crowned crane Grus japonensis in Hokkaido, Japan by convenient genotyping method. — J. Vet. Med. Sci. Jap. Soc. Vet. Sci. 75: 43-47.
-
Morris D. (1958). The comparative ethology of grassfinches (Erythrurae) and mannikins (Amadinae). — Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 131: 389-439.
-
Muller M.N., Mitani J.C. (2005). Conflict and cooperation in wild chimpanzees. — Adv. Stud. Behav. 35: 275-331.
-
Senar J.C. (2006). Color displays as intrasexual signals of aggression and dominance. — In: Bird coloration ( Hill G.E., McGraw K.J., eds). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p. 87-136.
-
Silk M.J., Croft D.P., Tregenza T., Bearhop S. (2014). The importance of fission–fusion social group dynamics in birds. — Ibis 156: 701-715.
-
Smith J.E., Powning K.S., Dawes S.E., Estrada J.R., Hopper A.L., Piotrowski S.L., Holekamp K.E. (2011). Greetings promote cooperation and reinforce social bonds among spotted hyaenas. — Anim. Behav. 81: 401-415.
-
Takeda K. (2012). Individual dependence on a feeding station in the red-crowned crane. — China Crane News 16: 18-20.
-
van Tets G.F. (1965). A comparative study of some social communication patterns in the Pelecaniformes. — Ornithol. Monogr. 2: 1-88.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 368 | 65 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 190 | 13 | 6 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 57 | 25 | 14 |
Arch displays signal threat intentions in a fission–fusion flock of the red-crowned crane
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Kohei F. Takeda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mariko Hiraiwa-Hasegawa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nobuyuki Kutsukake in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Ritualised displays are used by group-living animals in various contexts, such as when individuals join a group or flock. Only a few quantitative studies of the function of displays in species with fission–fusion social dynamics have been conducted to date. Here, we examined the arch display in red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis) immediately after joining a flock. Behavioural observations indicated that the arch functions as a signal of both threat motivation and individual strength. Singletons had disadvantages in terms of competition over resources and were, therefore, expected to have higher threat motivation than pairs or families. Indeed, singletons performed the arch more frequently than did pairs or families. Performance of the arch was related to dominance: males and adults were more likely to perform the arch than females and sub-adults. The likelihood of performing the arch was positively associated with local group density, indicating that joiners arched in more competitive situations. Contextual analyses indicated that subsequent behaviour by a joiner was more aggressive and that nearby individuals more frequently showed behavioural responses when a joiner arched than when it did not. Together, this study shows that cranes demonstrate functional displays to potential competitors, and represents a rare example of the functional analysis of ritualised signals in non-songbird species with fission–fusion social dynamics.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 368 | 65 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 190 | 13 | 6 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 57 | 25 | 14 |