Moving bonobos off the scientifically endangered list

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


This Special Issue of Behaviour includes twelve novel empirical papers focusing on the behaviour and cognition of both captive and wild bonobos (Pan paniscus). As our species less known closest relative, the bonobo has gone from being little studied to increasingly popular as a species of focus over the past decade. We suggest that bonobos are ready to come off the scientific endangered list as a result. This Special Issue is exhibit A in showing that a renaissance in bonobo research is well underway. In this Editorial we review a number of traits in which bonobos and chimpanzees are more similar to humans than they are each other. We show how this means that bonobos provide an extremely powerful test of ideas about human uniqueness as well as being crucial to determining the evolutionary processes by which cognitive traits evolve in apes. This introduction places the twelve empirical contributions within the Special Issue in the larger evolutionary context to which they contribute. Overall this Special Issue demonstrates how anyone interested in understanding humans or chimpanzees must also know bonobos.

Moving bonobos off the scientifically endangered list

in Behaviour



BeauneD.BretagnolleF.BollacheL.HohmannG.FruthB. (2015). Can fruiting plants control animal behavior and seed dispersal distance?Behaviour 152: 359-374.

BehringerV.DeschnerT.DeimelC.StevensJ.HohmannG. (2014a). Age related changes in urinary testosterone levels suggest differences in puberty onset and divergent life history strategies in bonobos and chimpanzees. — Horm. Behav. 66: 525-533.

BehringerV.DeschnerT.MurtaghR.StevensJ.HohmannG. (2014b). Age-related changes in Thyroid hormone levels of bonobos and chimpanzees indicate heterochrony in development. — J. Hum. Evol. 66: 83-88. WaalF.B.M. (2015). Sex and strife: post conflict sexual contacts in bonobos. — Behaviour 152: 313-334.

de LathouwersM.Van ElsackerL. (2006). Comparing infant and juvenile behavior in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): a preliminary study. — Primates 47: 287-293.

de WaalF.B.M. (1987). Tension regulation and non-reproductive functions of sex in captive bonobos. — Nat. Geogr. Res. 3: 318-335.

de WaalF.B.M.LantingF. (1997). Bonobo: the forgotten ape. — California University PressBerkeley, CA.

FuruichiT. (2011). Female contributions to the peaceful nature of bonobo society. — Evol. Anthropol. 20: 131-142.

FuruichiT.SanzC.KoopsK.SakamakiT.RyuH.TokuyamaN.MorganD. (2015). Why do wild bonobos not use tools like chimpanzees do?Behaviour 152: 425-460.

GruberT.ClayZ.ZuberbühlerK. (2010). A comparison of bonobo and chimpanzee tool use: evidence for a female bias in the Pan lineage. — Anim. Behav. 80: 1023-1033.

HareB. (2007). From nonhuman to human mind: what changed and why. — Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16: 60-64.

HareB. (2009). What is the effect of affect on bonobo and chimpanzee problem solving? — In: The neurobiology of the umwelt: how living beings perceive the world ( BerthozA.ChristenY. eds). SpringerBerlin p.  89-102.

HareB. (2011). From hominoid to hominid mind: what changed and why?Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 40: 293-309.

HareB.WoodsV. (2011). Bonobo but not chimpanzee infants use socio-sexual contact with peers. — Primates 52: 111-116.

HareB.MelisA.WoodsV.HastingsS.WranghamR. (2007). Tolerance allows bonobos to outperform chimpanzees in a cooperative task. — Curr. Biol. 17: 619-623.

HareB.WobberT.WranghamR. (2012). The self-domestication hypothesis: bonobo psychology evolved due to selection against male aggression. — Anim. Behav. 83: 573-585.

HashimotoC.FuruichiT. (2006). Comparison of behavioral sequence of copulation between chimpanzees and bonobos. — Primates 47: 51-55.

HerrmannE.HareB.CallJ.TomaselloM. (2010). Differences in the cognitive skills of bonobos and chimpanzees. — PLoS One 5: e12438.

HerrmannE.HareB.CisseskiJ.TomaselloM. (2011). The origins of human temperament: children avoid novelty more than other apes. — Dev. Sci. 14: 1393-1405.

HerrmannE.KeuppS.HareB.VaishA.TomaselloM. (2013). Direct and indirect reputation formation in great apes and human children. — J. Comp. Psychol. 127: 63-75.

HohmannG.FruthB. (2000). Use and function of genital contacts among female bonobos. — Anim. Behav. 60: 107-120.

HohmannG.FruthB. (2002). Dynamics in social organization of bonobos (Pan paniscus). — In: Behavioural diversity in chimpanzee ( BoeschC.MarchantL.HohmannG. eds). Cambridge University PressCambridge p.  138-150.

HohmannG.FruthB. (2003a). Culture in bonobos? Between-species and within-species variation in behavior. — Curr. Anthropol. 44: 563-609.

HohmannG.FruthB. (2003b). Lui Kotal — a new site for field research on bonobos in Salonga National Park. — Pan African News 10: 25-27 available online at

HopkinsW.SchaefferJ.RussellJ.BogartS.MeguerditchianA.CoulonO. (2015). A comparative assessment of handedeness and its potential neuroanatomical correlates in chimpanzees and bonobos. — Behaviour 152: 461-492.

IhobeH. (1992). Male–male relationships among wild bonobos at Wamba, Republic of Zaire. — Primates 33: 163-179.

JaeggiA.StevensJ.van SchaikC. (2010). Tolerant food sharing and reciprocity is precluded by despotism among bonobos but not chimpanzees. — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 143: 41-51.

KanoT. (1992). The last ape: pygmy chimpanzee behavior and ecology. — Stanford University PressStanford, CA.

KurodaS. (1989). Developmental retardation and behavioral characteristics of pygmy chimpanzees. — In: Understanding chimpanzees ( HeltneP.MarquardtL. eds). Harvard University PressCambridge, MA p.  184-193.

MacleanE.HareB. (2012). Bonobos and chimpanzees infer the target of an actor’s attention. — Anim. Behav. 83: 345-353.

MacleanE.HareB. (2013). Spontaneous triadic play in bonobos and chimpanzees. — J. Comp. Psychol. 127: 245-255.

MacleanE.HareB. (2015). Bonobos and chimpanzees read helpful gestures better than prohibitive gestures. — Behaviour 152: 493-520.

PalagiE.PaoliT. (2007). Play in adult bonobos (Pan paniscus): modality and potential meaning. — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 134: 219-225.

PruferK.MunchK.HellmannI.AkagiK.MillerJ.R.WalenzB.KorenS.SuttonG.KodiraC.WinerR.KnightJ.R.MullikinJ.C.MeaderS.J.PontingC.P.LunterG.HigashinoS.HobolthA.DutheilJ.KarakoçE.AlkanC.SajjadianS.CatacchioC.R.VenturaM.Marques-BonetT.EichlerE.E.AndréC.AtenciaR.MugishaL.JunholdJ.PattersonN.SiebauerM.GoodJ.M.FischerA.PtakS.E.LachmannM.SymerD.E.MailundT.SchierupM.H.AndrésA.M.KelsoJ.PääboS. (2012). The bonobo genome compared to the chimpanzee and human genome. — Nature 486: 527-531.

RosatiA. (2015). Context influences spatial frames of reference in bonobos (Pan paniscus). — Behaviour 152: 375-406.

RosatiA.G.HareB. (2012). Decision making across social contexts: competition increases preferences for risk in chimpanzees and bonobos. — Anim. Behav. 84: 869-879.

RosatiA.HareB. (2013). Chimpanzees and bonobos exhibit emotional responses to decision outcomes. — PLoS One 8: e63058.

RyuH.HillD.FuruichiT. (2015). Prolonged maximal sexual swelling in wild bonobos facilitates affiliative interactions between females. — Behaviour 152: 285-311.

Schroepfer-WalkerK.WobberT.HareB. (2015). Experimental evidence that grooming and play are social currency in bonobos and chimpanzees. — Behaviour 152: 545-562.

SchubertG.VigilantL.BoeschC.KlenkeR.LangergraberK.MundryR.SurbeckM.HohmannG. (2013). Co-residence between males and their mothers and grandmothers is more frequent in bonobos than chimpanzees. — PLoS One 8: e83870. VriesH.Van ElsackerL. (2007). Sex differences in the steepness of dominance hierarchies in captive bonobo groups. — Int. J. Primatol. 28: 1417-1430.

StevensJ.De GrootE.StaesN. (2015). Relationship quality in captive bonobo groups. — Behaviour 152: 259-283.

SurbeckM.HohmannG. (2008). Primate hunting by bonobos at LuiKotale, Salonga National Park. — Curr. Biol. 18: R906-R907.

SurbeckM.MundryR.HohmannG. (2011). Mothers matter! Maternal support, dominance status and mating success in male bonobos (Pan paniscus). — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 278: 590-598.

TanJ.HareB. (2013). Bonobos share with strangers. — PLoS One 8: e51922.

TanJ.KwetuendaS.HareB. (2015). Preference or Paradigm? Bonobos do not share in “the” prosocial choice task. — Behaviour 152: 521-544.

WattsD.MitaniJ. (2002). Hunting behaviour of chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. — In: Behavioral diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos ( BoeschC.HohmannG.MarchantL. eds). Cambridge University PressCambridge p.  244-257.

WilsonM.BoeschC.FruthB.FuruichiT.GilbyI.C.HashimotoC.HobaiterC.L.HohmannG.ItohN.KoopsK.LloydJ.N.MatsuzawaT.MitaniJ.C.MjunguD.C.MorganD.MullerM.N.MundryR.NakamuraM.PruetzJ.PuseyA.E.RiedelJ.SanzC.SchelA.M.SimmonsN.WallerM.WattsD.P.WhiteF.WittigR.M.ZuberbühlerK.WranghamR.W. (2014). Lethal aggression better explained by adaptive strategies than by human impact. — Nature 513: 414-417.

WobberT.HareB. (2011). Psychological health of orphan bonobos and chimpanzees in African sanctuaries. — PLoS One 6: e17147.

WobberV.HerrmannE. (2015). The influence of testosterone of cognitive performance in bonobos and chimpanzees. — Behaviour 152: 407-423.

WobberV.WranghamR.HareB. (2010a). Evidence for delayed development of social behavior and cognition in bonobos relative to chimpanzees. — Curr. Biol. 20: 226-230.

WobberV.HareB.MabotoJ.LipsonS.WranghamR.EllisonP. (2010b). Differential reactivity of steroid hormones in chimpanzees and bonobos when anticipating food competition. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107: 12457-12462.

WobberT.HerrmannE.HareB.WranghamR.TomaselloM. (2014). The evolution of cognitive development in Pan and Homo. — Dev. Psychobiol. 5: 547-573.

WranghamR. (1999). Evolution of coalitionary killing. — Yb. Phys. Anthropol. 42: 1-30.

YamamotoS. (2015). Non-reciprocal but peaceful fruit sharing in the wild bonobos of Wamba. — Behaviour 152: 335-357.


  • View in gallery

    Bonobos are endangered and are only endemic to tropical forest South of the Congo River in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Their suspected historical range (approx. 500 000 km2) is nearly the size of France and bigger than California (see The map shows the Congo River and the location of the most productive research sites over the last decade for bonobo behaviour and cognition. Wamba in the Luo Reserve represents the first and oldest study of wild bonobos established in 1973 by Takayoshi Kano (Kano, 1992), Lui Katole in Salonga National Park has likely been the most productive study site on wild bonobos after over a decade of support from the Max Planck Society (Hohmann & Fruth, 2003b), and Lola ya Bonobo Sanctuary outside the capital of Kinshasa has allowed for dozens of cognitive and developmental studies focusing on the sanctuaries’ rehabilitated orphan bonobos rescued from the bushmeat trade (Wobber & Hare, 2011). Map from wikicommons: File:CongoLualaba_watershed_topo.png. This figure is published in colour in the online edition of this journal, which can be accessed via

  • View in gallery

    Bonobo (Pan paniscus). Photo taken by Shinya Yamamoto at Wamba, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 14 14 11
Full Text Views 8 8 8
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0