Prolonged maximal sexual swelling in wild bonobos facilitates affiliative interactions between females

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Perineal sexual skin swelling in relation to menstrual cycle occurs in a variety of primate taxa. However, sexual swelling with exaggerated size and colour is found only in some Old World monkeys and the two Pan species. Although several hypotheses have been proposed (e.g., reliable indicator hypothesis and graded signal hypothesis), it seems unlikely that a single explanation can account for the significance of the sexual swelling in all of these species. Bonobos (Pan paniscus) provide an excellent opportunity for studying sexual swelling since they have the most prolonged maximal swelling periods among primates. In this study we propose a new hypothesis that sexual swelling in female bonobos increases their attractiveness to other females and thereby facilitates affiliative social interaction with them. We found that free-ranging female bonobos with maximal sexual swelling engaged in affiliative social interactions with other females, including genito-genital rubbing, staying in close proximity and grooming, more frequently than females without maximal swelling. These tendencies suggest that females with maximal swelling were attractive to other females. The results also suggest that the benefits of maximal swelling might vary among females depending on their life-history stage. In particular, young females may get more benefits from prolonged maximal swelling through increased grooming reciprocity and staying in close proximity to other females. Thus our study supported the hypothesis that one function of prolonged maximal swelling in bonobos is to increase attractiveness to other females, thereby enhancing affiliative relationships between females in a male-philopatric social system.

Prolonged maximal sexual swelling in wild bonobos facilitates affiliative interactions between females

in Behaviour

Sections

References

AlbertsS.C.FitzpatrickC.L. (2012). Paternal care and the evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates. — Behav. Ecol. 23: 699-706.

AltmannJ. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. — Behaviour 49: 227-267.

AndersonC.M.BielertC.F. (1994). Adolescent exaggeration in female catarrhine primates. — Primates 35: 283-300.

AureliF.SchaffnerC.M.BoeschC.BearderS.K.CallJ.ChapmanC.A.ConnorR.FioreA.D.DunbarR.I.M.HenziS.P.HolekampK.KorstjensA.H.LaytonR.LeeP.LehmannJ.MansonJ.H.Ramos-FernandezG.StrierK.B.van SchaikC.P. (2008). Fission–fusion dynamics: new research frameworks. — Curr. Anthropol. 49: 627-654.

BercovitchF.B. (1988). Coalitions, cooperation and reproductive tactics among adult male baboons. — Anim. Behav. 36: 1198-1209.

BielertC.BusseC. (1983). Influences of ovarian hormones on the food intake and feeding of captive and wild female chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). — Physiol. Behav. 30: 103-111.

BoeschC.Boesch-AchermannH. (2000). The chimpanzees of the Taï Forest: behavioural ecology and evolution. — Oxford University PressNew York, NY.

Clutton-BrockT.H.HarveyP.H. (1976). Evolutionary rules and primate societies. — In: Growing points in ethology ( BatesonP.P.G.HindeR.A. eds). Cambridge University PressCambridge p.  195-237.

DahlJ.F.NadlerR.D.CollinsD.C. (1991). Monitoring the ovarian cycles of Pan troglodytes and P. paniscus: a comparative approach. — Am. J. Primatol. 24: 195-209.

de WaalF.B.M. (1995). Bonobo sex and society. — Sci. Am. 272: 82-88.

Delignette-MullerM.L.PouillotR.DenisJ.-B.DutangC. (2012). fitdistrplus: help to fit of a parametric distribution to non-censored or censored data. — R package version 1.0-0.

DeschnerT.BoeschC. (2007). Can the patterns of sexual swelling cycles in female Taï chimpanzees be explained by the cost-of-sexual-attraction hypothesis?Int. J. Primatol. 28: 389-406.

DeschnerT.HeistermannM.HodgesK.BoeschC. (2003). Timing and probability of ovulation in relation to sex skin swelling in wild West African chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus. — Anim. Behav. 66: 551-560.

DixsonA.F. (1977). Observations on the displays, menstrual cycles and sexual behaviour of the “Black ape” of Celebes (Macaca nigra). — J. Zool. 182: 63-84.

DixsonA.F. (1983). Observations on the evolution and behavioral significance of “sexual skin” in female primates. — Adv. Stud. Behav. 13: 63-106.

DouglasB.MartinM.BenB. (2012). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. — RStudioBoston, MA.

EmeryM.A.WhittenP.L. (2003). Size of sexual swellings reflects ovarian function in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54: 340-351.

FuruichiT. (1987). Sexual swelling, receptivity, and grouping of wild pygmy chimpanzee females at Wamba, Zaire. — Primates 28: 309-318.

FuruichiT. (1989). Social interactions and the life history of female Pan paniscus in Wamba, Zaire. — Int. J. Primatol. 10: 173-197.

FuruichiT. (1992). The prolonged estrus of females and factors influencing mating in a wild group of bonobos (Pan paniscus) in Wamba, Zaire. — In: Topics in primatology 2. Behavior ecology and conservation ( ItoigawaN.SugiyamaY.SackettG.P.ThompsonR.K.R. eds). University of Tokyo PressTokyo p.  179-190.

FuruichiT. (1997). Agonistic interactions and matrifocal dominance rank of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba. — Int. J. Primatol. 18: 855-875.

FuruichiT. (2011). Female contributions to the peaceful nature of bonobo society. — Evol. Anthropol. Issues News Rev. 20: 131-142.

FuruichiT.HashimotoC. (2002). Why female bonobos have a lower copulation rate during oestrus than chimpanzees. — In: Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos ( BoeschC.HohmannG.MarchantL.F. eds). Cambridge University PressCambridge p.  156-167.

FuruichiT.HashimotoC. (2004). Sex differences in copulation attempts in wild bonobos at Wamba. — Primates 45: 59-62.

FuruichiT.IdaniG.IhobeH.HashimotoC.TashiroY.SakamakiT.MulavwaM.N.YangozeneK.KurodaS. (2012). Long-term studies on wild bonobos at Wamba, Luo Scientific Reserve, D. R. Congo: towards the understanding of female life history in a male-philopatric species. — In: Long-term field studies of primates ( KappelerP.M.WattsD.P. eds). SpringerBerlin p.  413-433.

HallE.T. (1966). The hidden dimension. — DoubledayNew York, NY.

HallK.R.L.de VoreI. (1965). Baboon social behavior. — In: Primate behavior: field studies of monkeys and apes ( De VoreI. ed.). Holt, Rinehart and WinstonNew York, NY p.  55-110.

HamiltonW.J.I. (1984). Significance of paternal investment by primates to the evolution of adult male–female associations. — In: Primate paternalism ( TaubD.M. ed.). Van Nostrand ReinholdNew York, NY p.  309-335.

HashimotoC. (1997). Context and development of sexual behavior of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba, Zaire. — Int. J. Primatol. 18: 1-21.

HashimotoC.FuruichiT.TashiroY. (2001). What factors affect the size of chimpanzee parties in the Kalinzu Forest, Uganda? Examination of fruit abundance and number of estrous females. — Int. J. Primatol. 22: 947-959.

HashimotoC.TashiroY.HibinoE.MulavwaM.YangozeneK.FuruichiT.IdaniG.TakenakaO. (2008). Longitudinal structure of a unit-group of bonobos: male philopatry and possible fusion of unit-groups. — In: The bonobos: behavior ecology and conservation ( FuruichiT.ThompsonJ. eds). SpringerNew York, NY p.  107-119.

HausfaterG. (1975). Dominance and reproduction in baboons (Papio cynocephalus): a quantitative analysis. — In: Contributions to primatology. KargerBasel p.  1-150.

HeistermannM.MöhleU.VervaeckeH.Van ElsackerL.HodgesJ.K. (1996). Application of urinary and fecal steroid measurements for monitoring ovarian function and pregnancy in the bonobo (Pan paniscus) and evaluation of perineal swelling patterns in relation to endocrine events. — Biol. Reprod. 55: 844-853.

HendrickxA.G.KraemerD.C. (1969). Observations on the menstrual cycle, optimal mating time and pre-implantation embryos of the baboon, Papio anubis and Papio cynocephalus. — J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 6: 119-128.

HenziS.P.BarrettL. (1999). The value of grooming to female primates. — Primates 40: 47-59.

HillD.A. (1987). Social relationships between adult male and female rhesus macaques: 1. Sexual consortships. — Primates 28: 439-456.

HohmannG.FruthB. (2000). Use and function of genital contacts among female bonobos. — Anim. Behav. 60: 107-120.

HohmannG.GerloffU.TautzD.FruthB. (1999). Social bonds and genetic ties: kinship, association and affiliation in a community of bonobos (Pan paniscus). — Behaviour 136: 1219-1235.

HrdyS.B.WhittenP.L. (1987). Patterning of sexual activity. — In: Primate societies ( SmutsB.B.CheneyD.L.SeyfarthR.M.WranghamR.W.StruhsakerT.T. eds). University of Chicago PressChicago, IL p.  370-384.

IdaniG. (1991). Social relationships between immigrant and resident bonobo (Pan paniscus) females at Wamba. — Folia Primatol. 57: 83-95.

JollyA. (1966). Lemur behavior: a Madagascar field study. — University of Chicago PressChicago, IL.

KanoT. (1982). The social group of pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) of Wamba. — Primates 23: 171-188.

KanoT. (1992). The last ape: pygmy chimpanzee behavior and ecology. — Stanford University PressStanford, CA.

KurodaS. (1979). Grouping of the pygmy chimpanzees. — Primates 20: 161-183.

KurodaS. (1980). Social behavior of the pygmy chimpanzees. — Primates 21: 181-197.

McKennaJ.J. (1978). Biosocial functions of grooming behavior among the common Indian langur monkey (Presbytis entellus). — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 48: 503-509.

MulavwaM.N.FuruichiT.YangozeneK.Yamba-YambaM.Motema-SaloB.IdaniG.IhobeH.HashimotoC.TashiroY.MwanzaN. (2008). Seasonal changes in fruit production and party size of bonobos at Wamba. — In: The bonobos ( FuruichiT.ThompsonJ. eds). SpringerNew York, NY p.  121-134.

MulavwaM.N.YangozeneK.Yamba-YambaM.Motema-SaloB.MwanzaN.N.FuruichiT. (2010). Nest groups of wild bonobos at Wamba: selection of vegetation and tree species and relationships between nest group size and party size. — Am. J. Primatol. 72: 575-586.

MullerM.N.KahlenbergS.M.Emery ThompsonM.WranghamR.W. (2007). Male coercion and the costs of promiscuous mating for female chimpanzees. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 274: 1009-1014.

NunnC.L. (1999). The evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates and the graded-signal hypothesis. — Anim. Behav. 58: 229-246.

PagelM. (1994). The evolution of conspicuous oestrous advertisement in Old World monkeys. — Anim. Behav. 47: 1333-1341.

PaoliT. (2009). The absence of sexual coercion in bonobos. — In: Sexual coercion in primates and humans: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females ( MullerM.N.WranghamR.W. eds). Harvard University PressCambridge, MA p.  410-423.

PaoliT.PalagiE.TacconiG.TarliS.B. (2006). Perineal swelling, intermenstrual cycle, and female sexual behavior in bonobos (Pan paniscus). — Am. J. Primatol. 68: 333-347.

ParishA.R. (1994). Sex and food control in the “uncommon chimpanzee”: how bonobo females overcome a phylogenetic legacy of male dominance. — Ethol. Sociobiol. 15: 157-179.

ParishA.R. (1996). Female relationships in bonobos (Pan paniscus): evidence for bonding, cooperation, and female dominance in a male-philopatric species. — Hum. Nat. 7: 61-96.

ParishA.R.de WaalF.B.M.HaigD. (2000). The other “closest living relative”: how bonobos (Pan paniscus) challenge traditional assumptions about females, dominance, intra- and intersexual interactions, and hominid evolution. — Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 907: 97-113.

PinheiroJ.BatesD.DebRoyS.SarkarD. & R Core Team (2012). nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. — R Core TeamVienna.

PocockR.I. (1906). Notes upon menstruation, gestation, and parturition of some monkeys that have lived in the Society’s Gardens. — Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond.: 558-570.

R Core Team (2012). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical ComputingVienna.

ReichertK.E.HeistermannM.HodgesJ.K.BoeschC.HohmannG. (2002). What females tell males about their reproductive status: are morphological and behavioural cues reliable signals of ovulation in bonobos (Pan paniscus)?Ethology 108: 583-600.

RStudio (2012). RStudio: integrated development environment for R. — RStudioBoston, MA.

SaaymanG.S. (1970). The menstrual cycle and sexual behaviour in a troop of free ranging chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). — Folia Primatol. 12: 81-110.

SakamakiT. (2013). Social grooming among wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba in the Luo Scientific Reserve, DR Congo, with special reference to the formation of grooming gatherings. — Primates 54: 349-359.

SakugH.FournierD.NielsenA.MagnussonA.BolkerB. (2012). Generalized linear mixed models using AD Model Builder.

Savage-RumbaughE.S.WilkersonB.J. (1978). Socio-sexual behavior in Pan paniscus and Pan troglodytes: a comparative study. — J. Hum. Evol. 7: 327-344.

SbegliaG.C.Tang-MartinezZ.SussmanR.W. (2010). Effects of food, proximity, and kinship on social behavior in ringtailed lemurs. — Am. J. Primatol. 72: 981-991.

SeyfarthR.M. (1977). A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. — J. Theor. Biol. 65: 671-698.

SilkJ.B.AlbertsS.C.AltmannJ. (2003). Social bonds of female baboons enhance infant survival. — Science 302: 1231-1234.

SmutsB.B.SmutsR.W. (1993). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. — Adv. Stud. Behav. 22: 1-63.

SpruijtB.M.van HooffJ.A.R.A.M.GispenW.H. (1992). Ethology and neurobiology of grooming behavior. — Physiol. Rev. 72: 825-852.

SurbeckM.MundryR.HohmannG. (2011). Mothers matter! Maternal support, dominance status and mating success in male bonobos (Pan paniscus). — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 278: 590-598.

TakahataY.IhobeH.IdaniG. (1996). Comparing copulations of chimpanzees and bonobos: do females exhibit proceptivity or receptivity? — In: Great ape societies ( McGrewW.C.MarchantL.F.NishidaT.GoodallJ.ItaniJ. eds). Cambridge University PressCambridge p.  146-155.

Thompson-HandlerN.MalenkyR.K.BadrianN. (1984). Sexual behavior of Pan paniscus under natural conditions in the Lomako Forest, Equateur, Zaire. — In: The pygmy chimpanzee ( SusmanR.L. ed.). SpringerNew York, NY p.  347-368.

TokudaK. (1961). A study on the sexual behavior in the Japanese monkey troop. — Primates 3: 1-40.

van SchaikC.P.HodgesJ.K.NunnC.L. (2000). Paternity confusion and the ovarian cycles of female primates. — In: Infanticide by males and its implications ( van SchaikC.P.JansonC.H. eds). Cambridge University PressCambridge p.  361-387.

WallisJ. (1992). Chimpanzee genital swelling and its role in the pattern of sociosexual behavior. — Am. J. Primatol. 28: 101-113.

WhiteF.J. (1988). Party composition and dynamics in Pan paniscus. — Int. J. Primatol. 9: 179-193.

WickhamH. (2002). The split-apply-combine strategy for data analysis. — J. Stat. Softw. 40: 1-29.

WickhamH. (2009). ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. — SpringerNew York, NY.

WildtD.E.DoyleL.L.StoneS.C.HarrisonR.M. (1977). Correlation of perineal swelling with serum ovarian hormone levels, vaginal cytology, and ovarian follicular development during the baboon reproductive cycle. — Primates 18: 261-270.

WrightP.C.IzardM.K.SimonsE.L. (1986). Reproductive cycles in Tarsius bancanus. — Am. J. Primatol. 11: 207-215.

YoungC.MajoloB.HeistermannM.SchülkeO.OstnerJ. (2013). Male mating behaviour in relation to female sexual swellings, socio-sexual behaviour and hormonal changes in wild Barbary macaques. — Horm. Behav. 63: 32-39.

ZeileisA.HothornT. (2002). Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. — R News 2: 7-10.

ZinnerD.P.NunnC.L.van SchaikC.P.KappelerP.M. (2004). Sexual selection and exaggerated sexual swellings of female primates. — In: Sexual selection in primates ( van SchaikC.P. ed.). Cambridge University PressNew York, NY p.  71-89.

ZuckermanS.FultonJ.F. (1934). The menstrual cycle of the primates: Part VII. The sexual skin of the chimpanzee. — J. Anat. 69: 38-47.

ZuurA.F.IenoE.N.WalkerN.J.SavelievA.A.SmithG.M. (2009). Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. — SpringerNew York, NY.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Mean number of copulations and g-g rubbing interactions per hour with standard error. (a) Copulations in relation to swelling status and age. (b) G-g rubbing interactions in relation to swelling status and age. This figure is published in colour in the online edition of this journal, which can be accessed via http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/1568539x.

  • View in gallery

    Mean number of females within 1 m, 5 m and party. (a) Number of females within 1 m in relation to swelling status and age. (b) Number of females within 5 m in relation to swelling status and age. (c) Number of females in 1-h party in relation to swelling status and age. This figure is published in colour in the online edition of this journal, which can be accessed via http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/1568539x.

  • View in gallery

    Grooming frequency and reciprocity. (a) Proportion of focal sessions in which grooming interaction was observed. (b) Grooming reciprocity index. Each box indicates upper quartile and lower quartile and dots indicate outliers. This figure is published in colour in the online edition of this journal, which can be accessed via http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/1568539x.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 12 12 11
Full Text Views 9 9 9
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0