Primates must solve complex spatial problems when foraging, such as finding patchy resources and navigating between different locations. However, the nature of the cognitive representations supporting these types of behaviors is currently unclear. In humans, there has been great debate concerning the relative importance of egocentric representations (which are viewer-dependent) versus allocentric representations (which are based on aspects of the external environment). Comparative studies of nonhuman apes can illuminate which aspects of human spatial cognition are shared with other primates, versus which aspects are unique to our lineage. The current studies therefore examined spatial cognitive development in one of our closest living relatives, bonobos (Pan paniscus) across contexts. The first study assessed how younger bonobos encode locations in a place-response task in which apes first learn that one of two locations is consistently baited with a reward, and then must approach the two locations from a flipped perspective. The second study examined how a larger age sample of bonobos responded to a spatial relations task in which they first experience that one location is baited, and then can generalize this learning to a new set of targets. Results indicated that while bonobos exhibited a predominantly allocentric strategy in the first study, they consistently exhibited an egocentric strategy in the second. Together, these results show that bonobos can use both strategies to encode spatial information, and illuminate the complementary contributions to cognition made by egocentric and allocentric representations.
Frames of spatial reference and their acquisition in Tenejapan Tzeltal. — In:
Culture thought and development (
NucciL.SaxeG.TurielE. eds). Lawrence ErlbaumMahwah, NJ p.
Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: cross-linguistic evidence. — In:
Language and space. Language speech and communication (
BloomP.PetersonM.A.NadelL.GarrettM.F. eds). MIT PressCambridge, MA p.
A quantitative comparison of terrestrial herbaceous food consumption by Pan paniscus in the Lomako Forest, Zaire, and Pan troglodytes in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. —
Am. J. Primatol.32:
Development of spatial cognition. — In:
Handbook of child psychologyVol. II: cognition perception and language (
DamonW.LernerR.M.KuhnD.SieglerR.S. eds). WileyNew York, NY p.
Explaining the development of spatial reorientation: modularity-plus-language versus the emergence of adaptive combination. — In:
Emerging landscapes of mind: mapping the nature of change in spatial cognitive development (
PlumertJ.SpencerJ. eds). Oxford University PressNew York, NY p.