One of the most conspicuous behavioural differences among great apes is the paucity of tool use among wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) in comparison to chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) who are one of the most prolific and skilled tool users in the animal kingdom. This is in spite of the fact that bonobo tool use repertories are as large and diverse as chimpanzees’ in captive settings. In this study, we compared tool using behaviours and potential drivers of these behaviours in the Wamba bonobo population located in central Democratic Republic of Congo with the Goualougo chimpanzee population of northern Republic of Congo. The tool use repertoire of wild bonobos was comprised of only 13 behaviours, compared to 42 for chimpanzees. However, the number of tool behaviours observed in each study site was similar between bonobos and chimpanzees, and many types of tool use for social, self-grooming/stimulation, and comfort/protection functions were commonly used by both species. A marked difference is that 25 of 42 tool behaviours exhibited by chimpanzees are performed for feeding, in contrast to a single report of bonobos using a leaf sponge to drink water. We examined whether the differences in tool use repertoires can be explained by the necessity, opportunity, relative profitability, or invention hypotheses. We found that habitat composition and fluctuation of fruit production at these two sites were similar, particularly when compared with variation observed between sites within each species. Thus it was unlikely that the necessity hypothesis explains the lack of tool use for feeding in bonobos. Though further study at Wamba is needed, we did not identify any obvious differences in prey availability that would indicate differences in tool using opportunities between the sites. This study could not test the relative profitability hypothesis, and further research is needed on whether tool use is the most efficient means of calorie or protein intake for wild apes. Bonobos at Wamba formed much larger and stable parties than chimpanzees at Goualougo, which was contrary to the prediction by the invention hypothesis. Another explanation is that differences in tool use behaviour between bonobos and chimpanzees might not be explained by the current ecological or social conditions, but rather by circumstances during the Pleistocene Epoch. The observed species differences might also reflect divergent behavioural predispositions, rather than actual differences in cognitive abilities.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Beaune D., Bollache L., Fruth B., Bretagnolle F. (2012). Bush pig (Potamochoerus porcus) seed predation of bush mango (Irvingia gabonensis) and other plant species in Democratic Republic of Congo. — Afr. J. Ecol. 50: 509-512.
Beaune D., Bretagnolle F., Bollache L., Hohmann G., Surbeck M., Bourson C., Fruth B. (2013). The bonobo–Dialium positive interactions: seed dispersal mutualism. — Am. J. Primatol. 75: 394-403.
Boesch C., Boesch-Achermann H. (2000). The chimpanzees of the Tai forest: behavioral ecology and evolution. — Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Bogart S.L., Pruetz J.D. (2011). Insectivory of savanna chimpanzees (Pantroglodytes verus) at Fongoli, Senegal. — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 145: 11-20.
Boose K.J., White F.J., Meinelt A. (2013). Sex differences in tool use acquisition in bonobos (Panpaniscus). — Am. J. Primatol. 75: 917-926.
Boysen S., Kuhlmeier V.A., Halliday P., Halliday Y.M. (1999). Tool use in captive gorillas. — In: The mentalities of gorillas and orangutans: comparative perspectives ( Parker S.T., Mitchell R.W., Miles H.L., eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 179-187.
Chapman C.A., Wrangham R., Chapman L. (1994). Indices of habitat-wide fruit abundance in tropical forests. — Biotropica 26: 160-171.
Deblauwe I. (2009). Temporal variation in insect-eating by chimpanzees and gorillas in Southeast Cameroon: extension of niche differentiation. — Int. J. Primatol. 30: 229-252.
Devos C., Sanz C., Morgan D., Onononga J.R., Laporte N., Huynen M.C. (2008). Comparing ape densities and habitats in northern congo: surveys of sympatric gorillas and chimpanzees in the odzala and ndoki regions. — Am. J. Primatol. 70: 439-451.
Enomoto T. (1990). Social play and sexual-behavior of the bonobo (Panpaniscus) with special reference to flexibility. — Primates 31: 469-480.
Fox E.A., Sitompul A.F., van Schaik C.P. (1999). Intelligent tool use in wild Sumatran orangutans. — In: The mentalities of gorillas and orangutans ( Parker S.T., Mitchell R.W., Miles H.L., eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 99-116.
Fox E.A., van Schaik C.P., Sitompul A., Wright D.N. (2004). Intra- and interpopulational differences in orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) activity and diet: implications for the invention of tool use. — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 125: 162-174.
Fruth B., Hohmann G., McGrew W.C. (1999). The Pan species. — In: The nonhuman primates ( Dolhinow P., Fuentes A., eds). Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View, CA, p. 64-72.
Furuichi T. (1997). Agonistic interactions and matrifocal dominance rank of wild bonobos (Panpaniscus) at Wamba. — Int. J. Primatol. 18: 855-875.
Furuichi T. (2009). Factors underlying party size differences between chimpanzees and bonobos: a review and hypotheses for future study. — Primates 50: 197-209.
Furuichi T., Hashimoto C., Tashiro Y. (2001). Fruit availability and habitat use by chimpanzees in the Kalinzu forest, Uganda: examination of fallback foods. — Int. J. Primatol. 22: 929-945.
Furuichi T., Idani G., Ihobe H., Hashimoto C., Tashiro Y., Sakamaki T., Mulavwa M.N., Yangozene K., Kuroda S. (2012). Long-term studies on wild bonobos at Wamba, Luo Scientific Reserve, D. R. Congo: towards the understanding of female life history in a male-philopatric species. — In: Long-term field studies of primates ( Kappeler P.M., Watts D.P., eds). Springer, Berlin, p. 413-433.
Gold K.C. (2002). Ladder use and clubbing by a bonobo (Panpaniscus) in Apenheul Primate Park. — Zoo Biology 21: 607-611.
Gruber T., Clay Z., Zuberbuhler K. (2010). A comparison of bonobo and chimpanzee tool use: evidence for a female bias in the Pan lineage. — Anim. Behav. 80: 1023-1033.
Gruber T., Potts K.B., Krupenye C., Byrne M.-R., Mackworth-Young C., McGrew W.C., Reynolds V., Zuberbuhler K. (2012). The influence of ecology on chimpanzee (Pantroglodytes) cultural behavior: a case study of five Ugandan chimpanzee communities. — J. Comp. Psychol. 126: 446-457.
Gunther M., Boesch C. (1993). Energetic costs of nut-cracking behavior in wild chimpanzees. — In: Evolution of hands ( Chivers D., Preuschoft H., eds). Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, p. 109-129.
Harrison M.E., Marshall A.J. (2011). Strategies for the use of fallback foods in apes. — Int. J. Primatol. 32: 531-565.
Hashimoto C., Furuichi T., Tashiro Y. (2001). What factors affect the size of chimpanzee parties in the Kalinzu Forest, Uganda? Examination of fruit abundance and number of estrous females. — Int. J. Primatol. 22: 947-959.
Hashimoto C., Furuichi T., Tashiro Y., Kimura D. (1999). Vegetation of the Kalinzu Forest, Uganda: ordination of forest types using principal component analysis. — Afr. Stud. Monogr. 20: 229-239.
Hashimoto C., Tashiro Y., Kimura D., Enomoto T., Ingmanson J., Idani G., Furuichi T. (1998). Habitat use and ranging of wild bonobos (Panpaniscus) at Wamba. — Int. J. Primatol. 19: 1045-1060.
Hernandez-Aguilar R.A. (2009). Chimpanzee nest distribution and site reuse in a dry habitat: implications for early hominin ranging. — J. Hum. Evol. 57: 350-364.
Hernandez-Aguilar R.A., Moore J., Pickering T.R. (2007). Savanna chimpanzees use tools to harvest the underground storage organs of plants. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 19210-19213.
Herrmann E., Hare B., Call J., Tomasello M. (2010). Differences in the cognitive skills of bonobos and chimpanzees. — PLoS ONE 5: e12438.
Herrmann E., Wobber V., Call J. (2008). Great apes’ (Pantroglodytes, Panpaniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) understanding of tool functional properties after limited experience. — J. Comp. Psychol. 122: 220-230.
Hohmann G., Fruth B. (2003a). Culture in bonobos? Between-species and within-species variation in behavior. — Curr. Anthropol. 44: 563-571.
Hohmann G., Fruth B. (2003b). Lui Kotal — a new site for field research on bonobos in the Salonga National Park. — Pan Africa News 10: 25-27.
Howard P.C. (1991). Nature conservation in Uganda’s tropical forest reserves. — IUCN, Gland.
Humle T., Matsuzawa T. (2004). Oil palm use by adjacent communities of chimpanzees at Bossou and Nimba Mountains, West Africa. — Int. J. Primatol. 25: 551-581.
Hunt K.D., McGrew W.C. (2002). Chimpanzees in the dry habitats of Assirik, Senegal and Semliki Wildlife Reserve, Uganda. — In: Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos ( Boesch C., Hohmann G., Marchant L.F., eds). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, p. 35-51.
Idani G., Kuroda S., Kano T., Asato R. (1994). Flora and vegetation of Wamba forest, central Zaire with reference to bonobo (Panpaniscus) foods. — Tropics 3: 309-332.
Ingmanson E.J. (1996). Tool-using behaviors in wild Panpaniscus: social and ecological considerations. — In: Reaching into thought: the minds of the great apes ( Russon A.E., Bard K.A., Parker S.T., eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 190-210.
Inogwabini B.I., Bewa M., Longwango M., Abokome M., Vuvuet M. (2008). The bonobos of the Lake Tumba — Lake Maindombe Hinterland: threats and opportunities for population conservation. — In: The bonobos: behavior, ecology, and conservation ( Furuichi T., Thompson J., eds). Springer, New York, NY, p. 273-290.
Jordan C. (1982). Object manipulation and tool-use in captive pygmy chimpanzees (Panpaniscus). — J. Hum. Evol. 11: 35-39.
Kano T. (1982a). The social group of pygmy chimpanzees (Panpaniscus) of Wamba. — Primates 23: 171-188.
Kano T. (1982b). The use of leafy twigs for rain cover by the pygmy chimpanzees of Wamba. — Primates 23: 453-457.
Kano T. (1992). The last ape: pygmy chimpanzee behavior and ecology. — Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Kano T. (1997). Leaf-dropping sexual display exhibited by a male bonobo at Wamba. — Pan Africa News 4: 3-4.
Kano T., Mulavwa M. (1984). Feeding ecology of the pygmy chimpanzees (Panpaniscus) of Wamba. — In: The pygmy chimpanzee ( Susman R.L., ed.). Plenum, New York, NY, p. 233-274.
Kawamoto Y., Takemoto H., Higuchi S., Sakamaki T., Hart J.A., Hart T.B., Tokuyama N., Reinartz G.E., Guislain P., Dupain J., Cobden A.K., Mulavwa M.N., Yangozene K., Darroze S., Devos C., Furuichi T. (2013). Genetic structure of wild bonobo populations: diversity of mitochondrial DNA and geographical distribution. — PLoS ONE 8: e59660.
Koops K. (2011). Chimpanzees in the Seringbara region of the Nimba mountains. — In: The chimpanzees of Bossou and Nimba ( Matsuzawa T., Humle T., Sugiyama Y., eds). Springer, Tokyo, p. 277-287.
Koops K., McGrew W.C., de Vries H., Matsuzawa T. (2012). Nest-building by chimpanzees (Pantroglodytesverus) at Seringbara, Nimba mountains: antipredation, thermoregulation, and antivector hypotheses. — Int. J. Primatol. 33: 356-380.
Koops K., McGrew W.C., Matsuzawa T. (2013). Ecology of culture: do environmental factors influence foraging tool use in wild chimpanzees, Pantroglodytes verus? — Anim. Behav. 85: 175-185.
Laiolo P., Jovani R. (2007). The emergence of animal culture conservation. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 5.
Lonsdorf E.V. (2005). Sex differences in the development of termite-fishing skills in the wild chimpanzees, Pantroglodytes schweinfurthii, of Gombe National Park, Tanzania. — Anim. Behav. 70: 673-683.
Lonsdorf E.V. (2006). What is the role of mothers in the acquisition of termite-fishing behaviors in wild chimpanzees (Pantroglodytes schweinfurthii)? — Anim. Cogn. 9: 36-46.
Lonsdorf E.V., Ross S.R., Linick S.A., Milstein M.S., Melber T.N. (2009). An experimental, comparative investigation of tool use in chimpanzees and gorillas. — Anim. Behav. 77: 1119-1126.
Marshall A.J., Wrangham R.W. (2007). Evolutionary consequences of fallback foods. — Int. J. Primatol. 28: 1218-1235.
Mayr E., Ohara R.J. (1986). The biolgeographic evidence supporting the pleistocene forest refuge hypothesis. — Evolution 40: 55-67.
McGrew W.C. (1979). Evolutionary implication of sex differences in chimpanzee predation and tool use. — In: The great apes ( Hamburg DA., McCown E.R., eds). Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA, p. 41-463.
McGrew W.C. (1992). Chimpanzee material culture: implications for human evolution. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
McGrew W.C., Collins D.A. (1985). Tool use by wild chimpanzees (Pantroglodytes) to obtain termites (Macrotermes herus) in the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania. — Am. J. Primatol. 9: 47-62.
McGrew W.C., Tutin C.E.G., Baldwin P.J. (1979). Chimpanzees, tools and termites: cross-cultural comparisons of Senegal, Tanzania, and Rio Muni. — Man 14: 185-214.
McGrew W.C., Baldwin P.J., Tutin C.E.G. (1981). Chimpanzees in a hot, dry and open habitat: Mt. Assirik, Senegal, West Africa. — J. Hum. Evol. 10: 237-244.
McGrew W.C., Marchant L.F., Beuerlein M.M., Vrancken D., Fruth B., Hohmann G. (2007). Prospects for bonobo insectivory: Lui kotal, democratic republic of congo. — Int. J. Primatol. 28: 1237-1252.
Moore J. (1992). “Savanna” chimpanzees. — In: Topics in Primatology, Vol. 1: human origins ( Nishida T., McGrew W.C., Marler P., Pickford M., de Waal F.B.M., eds). University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, p. 99-118.
Morgan D.B. (2007). Socio-ecology of Chimpanzees (Pantroglodytestroglodytes) in the Goualougo Triangle, Republic of Congo. — PhD thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
Morgan D., Sanz C. (2006). Chimpanzee feeding ecology and comparisons with sympatric gorillas in the Goualougo Triangle, Republic of Congo. — In: Primate feeding ecology in apes and other primates: ecological, physiological, and behavioural aspects ( Hohmann G., Robbins M., Boesch C., eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 97-122.
Morgan D., Sanz C., Onononga J.R., Strindberg S. (2006). Ape abundance and habitat use in the Goualougo Triangle, Republic of Congo. — Int. J. Primatol. 27: 147-179.
Mulavwa M., Furuichi T., Yangozene K., Yamba-Yamba M., Motema-Salo B., Idani G., Ihobe H., Hashimoto C., Tashiro Y., Mwanza N. (2008). Seasonal changes in fruit production and party size of bonobos at Wamba. — In: The bonobos: ecology, behavior, and conservation ( Furuichi T., Thompson J., eds). Springer, New York, NY, p. 121-134.
Mulavwa M.N., Yangozene K., Yamba-Yamba M., Motema-Salo B., Mwanza N.N., Furuichi T. (2010). Nest groups of wild bonobos at Wamba: selection of vegetation and tree species and relationships between nest group size and party size. — Am. J. Primatol. 72: 575-586.
Myers Thompson J.A. (2002). Bonobos of the Lukuru Wildlife Research Project. — In: Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos ( Boesch C., Hohmann G., Marchant L.F., eds). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, p. 61-70.
Nishida T. (1990). A quarter century of research in the Mahale Mountains: an overview. — In: The chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains: sexual and life history strategies ( Nishida T., ed.). University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, p. 3-35.
Nishie H. (2011). Natural history of Camponotus ant-fishing by the M group chimpanzees at the Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. — Primates 52: 329-342.
Nishihara T. (1995). Feeding ecology of western lowland gorillas in the Nouabale-Ndoki National Park, Congo. — Primates 36: 151-168.
Palagi E. (2006). Social play in bonobos (Panpaniscus) and chimpanzees (Pantroglodytes): implications for natural social systems and interindividual relationships. — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 129: 418-426.
Pandolfi S.S., van Schaik C.P., Pusey A.E. (2003). Sex differences in termite fishing among Gombe chimpanzees. — In: Animal social complexity: intelligence, culture, and individualized societies ( de Waal F.B.M., Tyack P.L., eds). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p. 414-418.
Plana V. (2004). Mechanisms and tempo of evolution in the African Guineo-Congolian rainforest. — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 359: 1585-1594.
Reynolds V. (2005). The chimpanzees of the Budongo Forest: ecology, behaviour, and conservation. — Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Rutz C., Bluff L.A., Reed N., Troscianko J., Newton J., Inger R., Kacelnik A., Bearhop S. (2010). The ecological significance of tool use in New Caledonian crows. — Science 329: 1523-1526.
Rutz C., St Clair J.J.H. (2012). The evolutionary origins and ecological context of tool use in New Caledonian crows. — Behav. Proc. 89: 153-165.
Sabater-Pi J. (1979). Feeding behaviour and diet of chimpanzees (Pantroglodytestroglodytes) in the Okorobiko Mountains of Rio Muni (West Africa). — Z. Tierpsychol. 50: 265-281.
Sabater Pi J. (1974). An elementary industry of the chimpanzees in the Okorobiko Mountains, Rio Muni (Republic of Equatorial Guinea), West Africa. — Primates 15: 351-364.
Samson D.R., Hunt K.D. (2012). A thermodynamic comparison of arboreal and terrestrial sleeping sites for dry-habitat chimpanzees (Pantroglodytes schweinfurthii) at the Toro-Semliki Wildlife Reserve, Uganda. — Am. J. Primatol. 74: 811-818.
Sanz C., Morgan D. (2007). Chimpanzee tool technology in the Goualougo Triangle, republic of Congo. — J. Hum. Evol. 52: 420-433.
Sanz C.M., Morgan D.B. (2009). Flexible and persistent tool-using strategies in honey-gathering by wild chimpanzees. — Int. J. Primatol. 30: 411-427.
Sanz C., Morgan D. (2010). Complexity of chimpanzee tool using behaviors. — In: The mind of the chimpanzee: ecological and experimental perspectives ( Lonsdorf E.V., Ross S.R., Matsuzawa T., eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p. 127-140.
Sanz C.M., Morgan D.B. (2013a). The social context of chimpanzee tool use. — In: Tool use in animals ( Sanz C.M., Call J., Boesch C., eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 161-175.
Sanz C.M., Morgan D.B. (2013b). Ecological and social correlates of chimpanzee tool use. — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 368: 20120416.
Sanz C., Morgan D., Gulick S. (2004). New insights into chimpanzees, tools, and termites from the Congo basin. — Am. Nat. 164: 567-581.
Sanz C.M., Schoning C., Morgan D.B. (2010). Chimpanzees Prey on army ants with specialized tool set. — Am. J. Primatol. 72: 17-24.
Serckx A., Huynen M.-C., Bastin J.-F., Hambuckers A., Beudels-Jamar R.C., Vimond M., Raynaud E., Kühl H.S. (2014). Nest grouping patterns of bonobos (Pan paniscus) in relation to fruit availability in a forest-savannah mosaic. — PLoS ONE 9: e93742.
Shumaker R.W., Walkup K.R., Beck B.B. (2011). Animal tool behavior: the use and manufacture of tools by animals. — Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Spagnoletti N., Visalberghi E., Ottoni E., Izar P., Fragaszy D. (2012). Stone tool use in wild bearded capuchin monkeys, Cebus libidinosus: is it a strategy to overcome food scarcity? — Anim. Behav. 83: 1285-1294.
Stanford C.B. (1998). The social behavior of chimpanzees and bonobos — empirical evidence and shifting assumptions. — Curr. Anthropol. 39: 399-420.
Surbeck M., Hohmann G. (2013). Intersexual dominance relationships and the influence of leverage on the outcome of conflicts in wild bonobos (Panpaniscus). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.: 1-14.
Suzuki S., Kuroda S., Nishihara T. (1995). Tool-set for termite-fishing by chimpanzees in the Ndoki forest, Congo. — Behaviour 132: 219-234.
Takasaki H., Nishida T., Uehara S., Norikoshi K., Kawanaka K., Takahata Y., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M., Hasegawa T., Hayaki H., Masui K., Huffman M.A. (1990). Summary of meteorological data at Mahale research camp, 1973–1988. — In: The chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains: sexual and life history strategies ( Nishida T., ed.). University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, p. 291-300.
Takemoto H. (2004). Seasonal change in terrestriality of chimpanzees in relation to microclimate in the tropical forest. — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 124: 81-92.
Tebbich S., Taborsky M., Fessl B., Dvorak M. (2002). The ecology of tool-use in the woodpecker finch (Cactospiza pallida). — Ecol. Lett. 5: 656-664.
van Schaik C.P. (2001). Fragility of traditions: the disturbance hypothesis for the loss of local traditions in orangutans. — Int. J. Primatol. 23: 527-538.
Wallis J. (2002). Seasonal aspects of reproduction and sexual behavior in two chimpanzee populations: a comparison of Gombe (Tanzania) and Budongo (Uganda). — In: Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos ( Boesch C., Hohmann G., Marchant L.F., eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 181-191.
Watts D.P. (2012). Long-term research on chimpanzee behavioral ecology in Kibale national park, Uganda. — In: Long-term field studies of primates ( Kappeler P.M., Watts D.P., eds). Springer, Heidelberg, p. 313-338.
White F. (1986). The vegetation of Africa: a descriptive memoir to accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO vegetation map of Africa. — UNESCO, Paris.
White F.J. (1992). Activity budgets, feeding behavior, and habitat use of pygmy chimpanzees at Lomako, Zaire. — Am. J. Primatol. 26: 215-223.
Whitehead H. (2010). Conserving and managing animals that learn socially and share cultures. — Learn. Behav. 38: 329-336.
Whitehead H., Rendell L., Osborne R.W., Wursig B. (2004). Culture and conservation of non-humans with reference to whales and dolphins: review and new directions. — Biol. Conserv. 120: 427-437.
Whiten A., Goodall J., McGrew W.C., Nishida T., Reynolds V., Sugiyama Y., Tutin C.E.G., Wrangham R.W., Boesch C. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. — Nature 399: 682-685.
Whiten A., Goodall J., McGrew W.C., Nishida T., Reynolds V., Sugiyama Y., Tutin C.E.G., Wrangham R.W., Boesch C. (2001). Charting cultural variation in chimpanzees. — Behaviour 138: 1481-1516.
Whiten A., Spiteri A., Horner V., Bonnie K.E., Lambeth S.P., Schapiro S.J., de Waal F.B.M. (2007). Transmission of multiple traditions within and between chimpanzee groups. — Curr. Biol. 17: 1038-1043.
Wilson M.L., Hauser M.D., Wrangham R.W. (2001). Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees? — Anim. Behav. 61: 1203-1216.
Won Y.J., Hey J. (2005). Divergence population genetics of chimpanzees. — Mol. Biol. Evol. 22: 297-307.
Wrangham R.W., Clark A.P., Isabirye-Basuta G. (1992). Female social relationships and social organization of Kibale Forest chimpanzees. — In: Human origins ( Nishida T., McGrew W.C., Marler P., Pickford M., de Waal F.B.M., eds). University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, p. 81-98.
Yamagiwa J., Maruhashi T., Yumoto T., Mwanza N. (1996). Dietary and ranging overlap in sympatric gorillas and chimpanzees in Kahuzi-Biega National Park, Zaire. — In: Great ape societies ( McGrew W.C., Marchant L.F., Nishida T., eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 82-98.
Yamakoshi G. (1998). Dietary responses to fruit scarcity of wild chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea: possible implications for ecological importance of tool use. — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 106: 283-295.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1796 | 240 | 20 |
Full Text Views | 450 | 14 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 352 | 33 | 4 |
One of the most conspicuous behavioural differences among great apes is the paucity of tool use among wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) in comparison to chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) who are one of the most prolific and skilled tool users in the animal kingdom. This is in spite of the fact that bonobo tool use repertories are as large and diverse as chimpanzees’ in captive settings. In this study, we compared tool using behaviours and potential drivers of these behaviours in the Wamba bonobo population located in central Democratic Republic of Congo with the Goualougo chimpanzee population of northern Republic of Congo. The tool use repertoire of wild bonobos was comprised of only 13 behaviours, compared to 42 for chimpanzees. However, the number of tool behaviours observed in each study site was similar between bonobos and chimpanzees, and many types of tool use for social, self-grooming/stimulation, and comfort/protection functions were commonly used by both species. A marked difference is that 25 of 42 tool behaviours exhibited by chimpanzees are performed for feeding, in contrast to a single report of bonobos using a leaf sponge to drink water. We examined whether the differences in tool use repertoires can be explained by the necessity, opportunity, relative profitability, or invention hypotheses. We found that habitat composition and fluctuation of fruit production at these two sites were similar, particularly when compared with variation observed between sites within each species. Thus it was unlikely that the necessity hypothesis explains the lack of tool use for feeding in bonobos. Though further study at Wamba is needed, we did not identify any obvious differences in prey availability that would indicate differences in tool using opportunities between the sites. This study could not test the relative profitability hypothesis, and further research is needed on whether tool use is the most efficient means of calorie or protein intake for wild apes. Bonobos at Wamba formed much larger and stable parties than chimpanzees at Goualougo, which was contrary to the prediction by the invention hypothesis. Another explanation is that differences in tool use behaviour between bonobos and chimpanzees might not be explained by the current ecological or social conditions, but rather by circumstances during the Pleistocene Epoch. The observed species differences might also reflect divergent behavioural predispositions, rather than actual differences in cognitive abilities.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1796 | 240 | 20 |
Full Text Views | 450 | 14 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 352 | 33 | 4 |