Bonobos are the only ape species, other than humans, that have demonstrated prosocial behaviors toward groupmates and strangers. However, bonobos have not been tested in the most frequently used test of prosociality in animals. The current study tested the other-regarding preferences of bonobos in two experiments using the prosocial choice task. In the first experiment subjects preferred a food option that would benefit both themselves and another bonobo. This preference was likely the result of a location bias developed in the pretest since they showed the same preference in the non-social control condition within test sessions. A second experiment was designed to help subjects overcome this bias that might interfere with their social choices. Bonobos again did not prefer to choose the prosocial option. However, results suggest constraints of this paradigm in revealing social preferences. In discussing our results we consider why bonobos show robust prosocial preferences in other paradigms but not here. While others have suggested that such contradictory results might suggest interesting motivational or cognitive differences between humans and non-humans, we propose that the current ‘standard’ paradigm has failed validation due to three methodological constraints. Across the dozens of studies completed few have demonstrated that non-human subjects understand the causal properties of the apparatus, non-social biases quickly develop in inadequately counterbalanced pretests that typically explain subjects’ choices in the test, and even human children found this choice task too cognitively demanding to consistently show prosocial preferences. We suggest it is time to consider switching to a variety of more powerful and valid measures.
Cooperatively breeding cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) do not donate rewards to their long-term mates. —
J. Comp. Psychol.123:
GoldK. (2001). Group formation in captive bonobos: sex as a bonding strategy. — In: Proceedings of The Apes: Challenges for the 21st Century, Brookfield Zoo, Brookfield, IL. Chicago Zoological Society, Chicago, IL, p. 90-93.
Chimpanzee helping in collaborative and noncollaborative contexts. —
How much of our cooperative behavior is human? — In:
The primate mind: built to connect with other minds (
de WaalF.B.M.FerrariP.F., eds). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p.
JaeggiA.V.BurkartJ.M.van SchaikC.P. (2010b).
On the psychology of cooperation in humans and other primates: combining the natural history and experimental evidence of prosociality. —
Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B365:
Social regard: evolving a psychology of cooperation. — In:
The evolution of primate societies (
MitaniJ.C.CallJ.KappelerP.M.PalombitR.A.SilkJ.B., eds). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p.
Collaboration and helping in chimpanzees. — In:
The mind of the chimpanzee (
LonsdorfE.V.RossS.MatsuzawaT., eds). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p.
The phylogeny and ontogeny of prosocial behavior. — In:
The Oxford handbook of comparative evolutionary psychology (
VonkJ.ShackelfordT.K., eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, p.
Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members. —