Elevation related variation in aggressive response to mirror image in mountain chickadees

in Behaviour
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Behavioural syndrome literature suggests that behavioural traits may be coupled to form behavioural strategies that are consistent and repeatable across contexts. Typically these behavioural types are composed of bold, aggressive, dominant individuals and shy, less aggressive, subordinate individuals. Mountain chickadees living in varying climatic conditions across a montane environment appear to exhibit consistent behavioural types, such that high elevation birds, which experience harsher winter conditions and rely more heavily on spatial memory to retrieve food caches to survive winter, explore a novel environment at a slower rate (i.e., shy) and are socially subordinate to low elevation birds. Dominance is typically expressed in individual pairwise interactions, but it is not always clear which traits predispose an individual to become a dominant in such interactions. Aggression is frequently suggested to be associated with higher dominance status, yet the data are equivocal. Here we aimed to test whether previously described elevation related differences in social dominance might be associated with elevation related differences in aggression levels in mountain chickadees by using the mirror test. The mirror test can address potential differences in reactive and proactive aggression, although caution should be taken when using the mirror test as some species are able to self-recognize. Low elevation birds responded more aggressively to their mirror image than high elevation birds, suggesting that elevation related differences in aggression may be partially responsible for previously found differences in social dominance status.

Elevation related variation in aggressive response to mirror image in mountain chickadees

in Behaviour

Sections

References

ArceseP.SmithJ.N.M. (1985). Phenotypic correlates and ecological consequences of dominance in song sparrows. — J. Anim. Ecol. 54: 817-830.

BlanchardR.J.HoriK.TomP.BlanchardD.C. (1988). Social dominance and individual aggressiveness. — Aggressive Behav. 14: 195-203.

BrommerJ.E.KluenE. (2012). Exploring the genetics of nestling personality traits in a wild passerine bird: testing the phenotypic gambit. — Ecol. Evol. 2: 3032-3044.

BronsteinP.M. (1984). Agonistic and reproductive interactions in Betta splendens. — J. Comp. Psychol. 98: 421-431.

CreelS. (2005). Dominance, aggression, and glucocorticoid levels in social carnivores. — J. Mammal. 86: 255-264.

DesjardinsJ.K.FernaldR.D. (2010). What do fish make of mirror images?Biol. Lett. 6: 744-747.

DochtermannN.A.RoffD.A. (2010). Applying a quantitative genetics framework to behavioural syndrome research. — Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 365: 4013-4020.

EkmanJ. (1989). Ecology of non-breeding social systems of parus. — Wilson Bull. 101: 263-288.

ElwoodR.W.StoilovaV.McDonnellA.EarleyR.L.ArnottG. (2014). Do mirrors reflect reality in agonistic encounters? A test of mutual cooperation in displays. — Anim. Behav. 97: 63-67.

FoxR.A.LaDageL.D.RothT.C.IIPravosudovV.V. (2009). Behavioral profile predicts dominance status in mountain chickadees. — Anim. Behav. 77: 1441-1448.

FreasC.A.LaDageL.D.RothT.C.IIPravosudovV.V. (2012). Elevation-related differences in memory and the hippocampus in mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli). — Anim. Behav. 84: 121-127.

FreasC.A.RothT.C.IILaDageL.D.PravosudovV.V. (2013a). Hippocampal neuron soma size is associated with population differences in winter climate severity in food caching chickadees. — Funct. Ecol. 27: 1341-1349.

FreasC.A.BingmanK.LaDageL.D.PravosudovV.V. (2013b). Untangling elevation related differences in the hippocampus in food-caching mountain chickadees: the effect of a uniform captive environment. — Brain Behav. Evol. 82: 199-209.

GerlaiR. (2003). Zebra fish: an uncharted behavior genetic model. — Behav. Genet. 33: 461-468.

GerlaiR.LahavM.GuoS.RosenthalA. (2000). Drinks like a fish: zebra fish (Danio rerio) as a behavior genetic model to study alcohol effects. — Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 67: 773-782.

HoltbyL.B.SwainD.P.AllanG.M. (1993). Mirror-elicited antagonistic behavior and body morphology as predictors of dominance status in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 676-684.

KozlovskyD.Y.BranchC.L.FreasC.A.PravosudovV.V. (2014). Elevation related differences in novel environment exploration and social dominance in food-caching mountain chickadees. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68: 1871-1881.

McCallumD.A.GrundelR.DahlstenD.L. (1999). Mountain chickadee (Poecile gambeli). — In: The birds of North America online ( PooleA. ed.). Cornell Lab of OrnithologyIthaca, NY. Available online at http://0-bna.birds.cornell.edu.innopac.library.unr.edu/bna/species/453/articles/introduction DOI:10.2173/bna.453.

MunroA.D. (1986). Effects of melatonin, serotonin, and naloxone on aggression in isolated cichlid fish (Aequidens pulcher). — J. Pineal Res. 3: 257-262.

PravosudovV.V.ClaytonN.S. (2002). A test of the adaptive specialization hypothesis: population differences in caching, memory and the hippocampus in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapilla). — Behav. Neurosci. 116: 515-522.

PravosudovV.V.RothT.C.II (2013). Cognitive ecology of food hoarding: the evolution of spatial memory and the hippocampus. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44: 173-193.

PravosudovV.V.MendozaS.P.ClaytonN.S. (2003). The relationship between dominance, corticosterone, memory and food caching in mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli). — Horm. Behav. 44: 93-102.

RatcliffeL.MennillD.J.SchubertK.A. (2007). Social dominance and fitness in black capped chickadees. — In: Ecology and behaviour of chickadees and titmice: an integrated approach ( OtterK. ed.). Oxford University PressOxford p.  131-146.

RealeD.ReaderS.M.SolD.McDougallP.DingemanseN.J. (2007). Integrating temperament in ecology and evolutionary biology. — Biol. Rev. 82: 291-318.

ReissD.MarinoL. (2001). Mirror self-recognition in the bottlenose dolphin: A case of cognitive convergence. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 5937-5942.

SandsJ.CreelS. (2004). Social dominance, aggression and faecal glucocorticoid levels in a wild population of wolves, Canis lupus. — Anim. Behav. 67: 387-396.

SihA.BellA.JohnsonJ.C. (2004). Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 372-378.

TinbergenN. (1951). The study of instinct. — Clarendon PressOxford.

van OersK.DrentP.J.de JongG.van NoordwijkA.J. (2004). Additive and nonadditive genetic variation in avian personality traits. — Heredity 93: 496-503.

VerbeekM.E.M.BoonA.DrentP.J. (1996). Exploration, aggressive behaviour and dominance in pair-wise confrontations of juvenile male great tits. — Behaviour 133: 945-963.

VrontouE.NilsenS.P.DemirE.KravitzE.A.DicksonB.J. (2006). fruitless regulates aggression and dominance in Drosophila. — Nature Neurosci. 9: 1469-1471.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Mean latency (s) of high and low elevation males to fly at the mirror (statistics were computed with log transformed data). High, N=6; low, N=6. The box around the mean value represents SEM, and the whiskers represent SDM.

  • View in gallery

    Mean latency (s) of high and low elevation birds that did wing quiver during an aggression trial (statistics were computed with log transformed data). High, N=4; low, N=5. The box around the mean value represents SEM, and the whiskers represent SDM.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 7
Full Text Views 5 5 5
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0